24-07-2025
Will Frank White recall get delayed? What county legislators and lawsuits say
As the future of a planned recall election for County Executive Frank White Jr. heads to the courts, the Jackson County Legislature may be changing its tune to support pushing the vote to a later date.
Legislators had initially set the election date for Aug. 26. But in the face of multiple legal challenges and concerns from local election boards, they introduced an ordinance Monday supporting a Nov. 4 election to recall White, a Democrat and former Royals Hall of Famer who has served as county executive since 2016.
The ordinance suggests that Nov. 4 — when a county election is already scheduled — would be the next most appropriate date if a 'lawful election date' could not be found within 60 days of when voters submitted the petition prompting a recall vote, which is the timeline outlined in the county's charter.
Supporters of the recall effort submitted signatures to the Kansas City and Jackson County election boards, which certified 43,011 valid signatures on June 30, breaking the required signature threshold by 109 names. Along with vocal organizers in Eastern Jackson County, many of the signatures were collected over the course of two years by a dark money political action group.
White's opponents have cited disagreement with his handling of Jackson County's property tax assessments in recent years, as well as the 2024 tax question that would have funded a new Royals stadium in the Crossroads.
White's chief of staff Caleb Clifford said that he and White are concerned that the legislature introduced an ordinance around a Nov. 4 election while the older ordinance supporting an earlier date still stands.
'Moving forward with setting an election date without first rescinding the prior ordinance and ensuring full legal compliance could result in two unlawful, unbudgeted elections, costing taxpayers millions and requiring the County to once again draw from out dwindling emergency reserves,' Clifford said.
The scheduled Nov. 4 election is already set to include a ballot measure about amending the Jackson County Charter to make the role of county assessor an elected position starting in November 2028. Currently, Jackson County is the only county in Missouri where the county assessor is appointed rather than elected.
Third District At-Large Legislator Megan Smith (formerly Marshall) sponsored the ordinance supporting a Nov. 4 recall, which was assigned Monday to the legislature's Intergovernmental Affairs Committee. Smith was the only legislator to abstain from a July 18 vote overriding White's veto of an earlier ordinance recommending an August 26 special election.
The Jackson County and Kansas City election boards have been advocating for a Nov. 4 date for multiple weeks, arguing that state and federal law afforded them a longer timeline to administer an election.
During the July 18 vote, Smith echoed their concerns, noting that an August election date may disenfranchise voters overseas who will not receive ballots in time or voters who need to vote early or by absentee ballot. Forcing an election in violation of state law could open the door for other lawsuits or election results to be invalidated in the future, Smith said.
'I don't know if [the legislature] will get something done before the courts do,' said Tammy Brown, Republican Director of the Jackson County Election Board. 'We'll be happy either way whenever they get settled.'
The legislature and election boards have been involved in conflicting lawsuits, both of which ask the Jackson County court system to issue guidance on when a recall election should take place.
A lawsuit filed July 9 by four Jackson County residents, including former chairs of both the Democratic and Republican parties of Jackson County – Phil LeVota and Mark Anthony Jones, respectively – asked the court to mandate an Aug. 26 election regardless of any action from either White or the legislature.
The next day, the Jackson County and Kansas City election boards filed their own lawsuit, arguing that the proposed Aug. 26 date could not be legally enforced.
'We have certain federal and state laws we have to follow,' Brown said. 'We understand that they wanted a very speedy, quick election, but all of our elections start 10 weeks out, so we had to follow the law and that's what we've done. That's why we had to file the lawsuit.'
As of Tuesday, both lawsuits have been consolidated into one case. Jackson County judge Mary Wayne Seaton will hear the combined lawsuit on Aug. 1.
Meanwhile, some Jackson County residents and organizations are calling for White to resign before a special election proceeds. The Urban Council, a coalition of civil rights organizations in the Kansas City area affiliated with the Urban Summit, joined LeVota and Sixth District Legislator Sean Smith last week in demanding that White step down.
White has said that he would support a Nov. 4 election, while LeVota has called for a special election in September or October if the courts ruled against an Aug. 26 date. Both White and LeVota have said that running the recall question during a special election outside of Nov. 4 would cost taxpayers about $2 million.
If Smith's ordinance supporting a Nov. 4 election passes, White would have 10 days to veto it, at which point the legislature could overturn a veto with a supermajority of six votes — as occurred with the previous ordinance supporting an August 26 recall election.
However, the final decision on the timing of a recall election for now rests on a judge's decision.
'It's up to the courts at this point,' Brown said. 'We'll have to see what happens.'
Solve the daily Crossword
