logo
#

Latest news with #JeremyMcCrea

Why Canadian energy is a secret bargain, spurring a hostile takeover bid in the oil sands
Why Canadian energy is a secret bargain, spurring a hostile takeover bid in the oil sands

Globe and Mail

time23-05-2025

  • Business
  • Globe and Mail

Why Canadian energy is a secret bargain, spurring a hostile takeover bid in the oil sands

Panic over U.S. President Donald Trump's global trade war and unexpected production bumps from countries outside North America have sent oil prices plummeting, making investors fear a 2014-style crash all over again. Adjusting for inflation, the current price of West Texas Intermediate crude, the North American benchmark, is hovering around US$45. The last time it fell to this level, a decade ago, it spelled disaster for Canadian producers – and for the Canadian economy. But this is not 2014. After years of painful restructuring, the Canadian oil industry is much stronger today, and some producers are now so resilient that they've earned the right to brag. 'The discipline today is night-and-day different,' Jeremy McCrea, an energy analyst at BMO Nesbitt Burns, said in an interview. The new era is defined by cost constraint, an aversion to debt and a promise to return excess cash to shareholders instead of spending it on endless expansion. There is also a growing global appetite for natural gas, which is seen as a logical fuel source for AI data centres, and an increasing likelihood that Canada will build more export plants sourced by low-cost gas from the Montney formation in northeast British Columbia. In short, Canada's energy sector is sitting pretty. Yet with more than half of the S&P/TSX Capped Energy subindex trading below their September, 2014, prices, investors aren't ready to admit it yet. Producers, however, see opportunity, which explains why Strathcona Resources Ltd. SCR-T launched a hostile takeover bid for MEG Energy Corp. MEG-T, one of the few pure-play companies focused on the Canadian oil sands. MEG runs a low-cost oil sands operation at Christina Lake, earned $507-million in profit last year and recently paid down a good chunk of its debt early, yet its shares have been trading roughly 45 per cent below their September, 2014, level. It's an odd scenario because the industry looked quite different before the 2014 crash. Costs were bloated, everyone was taking on debt to expand and oil and gas companies were treated as growth stocks. Then Saudi Arabia shocked the market with plans to boost production and the growth bubble burst. 'No one wants to go back to that ever again,' said Mr. McCrea, the BMO analyst. It wasn't just negligence from the producers. As investment in the oil sands exploded, the U.S. energy industry went through a revolution and new technology – fracking – unlocked oil and gas reserves that previously weren't accessible. The U.S. quickly went from being Canada's largest export market to its top competitor. Around the same time, the ESG era that promoted environmental, societal and governance concerns took hold, putting a spotlight on oil sands emissions. Canada also struggled to get a pipeline or LNG plant built to export its energy beyond the U.S. What snapped Canadian energy out of its seven-year rut was Russia's attack on Ukraine in February, 2022, which put an international focus on energy security. For the next few years, Canadian producers were akin to malfunctioning ATMs, spitting out cash as oil and gas prices soared. Things have since settled down, but many companies are still quite profitable even as oil prices fall. Suncor SU-T, for instance, has pledged to cut production costs and in 2024 the company beat its US$4 target per barrel, lowering expenses by US$7 per barrel. The sector's debt load also continues to improve. Cenovus Energy Inc. CVE-T has been hampered by leverage concerns for years, but in March Moody's Investors Service upgraded its debt rating to 'Baa1′ – the same level as industry darling Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. CNQ-T – citing the company's 'commitment to a conservative financial policy,' among other things. Summarizing this new-look Canadian industry, Mark Oberstoetter, head of research for upstream companies at energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie, offered this comparison: Since 2014, 'everyone's been working out, but Canada has been training with a weighted vest.' Adding to the bull case: Canada has long-life oil reserves, meanwhile U.S. shale oil wells are starting to run dry, and the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion is now up and running. Because more oil can be moved to the West Coast for export, the price differential between Canadian heavy crude, known as Western Canadian Select and West Texas Intermediate oil, is now around only US$12, because more Canadian oil can be exported abroad from the West Coast. Previously, it would get trapped in Canada and the supply glut would hurt domestic prices. WTI oil could drop US$20 per barrel, and the Canadian differential could drop another US$20. Despite all that, investors aren't convinced. Cenovus got a debt rating upgrade, and its shares are down 31.7 per cent over the past year. Part of what's still missing, explained Benoit Gervais, head of the resource team at Mackenzie Investments, is policy certainty. Investors can't get too excited about Canadian energy if new export projects never get built. 'Mark Carney really needs to be careful with his first move,' he said. If the new Prime Minister isn't clear about his energy agenda, and the permanency of it, 'we won't attract a meaningful amount of capital. It's pretty simple.' To that end, the new federal Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, Tim Hodgson, who used to sit on MEG's board of directors, delivered a speech in Calgary on Friday and had a clear message: Canada will remain a reliable global supplier of oil and gas for decades to come. 'No more asking, 'Why build?'' he said. 'The real question is, 'How do we get it done?''

Fund managers buying these energy stocks as M&A activity heats up
Fund managers buying these energy stocks as M&A activity heats up

Globe and Mail

time21-05-2025

  • Business
  • Globe and Mail

Fund managers buying these energy stocks as M&A activity heats up

Daily roundup of research and analysis from The Globe and Mail's market strategist Scott Barlow BMO E&P analyst Jeremy McCrea identified the stocks institutional investors are buying in the sector, 'With the latest 13F and AMR ownership filings, we look at every fund that has reported a holding of at least one Canadian E&P since 2023 (approximately 5,800 funds). As global commodity prices and economic uncertainty continued, this group of funds sold $0.9 billion worth of CDN E&P companies; while still buying $0.1 billion of CDN mid-cap names … Bottom line, names that came up multiple times in our checklist criteria this quarter include Surge, Tamarack Valley, Topaz, Peyto and Headwater. 1. What 'energy-weighted' specialty funds are buying/selling. Typically, these funds are early movers and closer to company management including field-level operations (of the 29 high-energy focused funds we track). The top names held by these energy funds are ARC (Restricted), Tourmaline, Topaz, Advantage, and Headwater (with Peyto and Paramount new to the list). 2. What were the best-performing E&P stocks in 1Q25; which institutional funds had the foresight to buy these names in the preceding quarter, and what are these funds buying today? Collectively, these funds are now buying Whitecap, Topaz, and MEG (Restricted) … We highlight the names that have seen the most 'new buyers.' Names to highlight include Topaz, Baytex, Spartan Delta, and Whitecap' *** Also in the energy sector, RBC Capital Markets head of global energy research Greg Pardy assesses the importance of Strathcona Resources' (SCR-T) bid for MEG Energy (MEG-T), 'Strathcona Resources—Bold + Strategic. As framed in Strategically Bold, Strathcona's $2.84 billion Montney disposition and subsequent takeover bid for MEG constitutes a bold strategic thrust aimed at building a first-quartile oil sands producer that would afford quality scale, increase its float shares outstanding (currently 20% of outstanding shares) and enhance its portfolio. The company's 2026 pro[1]forma MEG outlook screens well financially. Cenovus Energy—Most Logical Fit. In our minds, Cenovus would be a logical acquirer of MEG given the proximity of its Christina Lake operations and potential for operating synergies beyond overhead/ cost savings that could be accretive to our 2026 pro-forma scenario analysis (using a 50/50 debt/equity financing structure). Timing would be less ideal given that Cenovus is completing a major capital cycle in 2025 aimed at adding up to 150,000 boe/d of production in 2026 and beyond and undertaking initiatives to improve its US refinery performance. Nonetheless, where there is a will there is a way, and we think this could involve the sale of assets as a partial funding source, possibly Cenovus' Liwan field in the South China Sea. Imperial Oil—Possible. Imperial is in an enviable position to acquire given its premium relative cash flow multiple and strong balance sheet (hence a potential 50/50 equity/debt financing scenario). The company's 2026 pro-forma MEG scenario looks solid by our yardstick, while strategically, a deal could complement its upstream portfolio with top-quartile SAGD operations'. *** Morgan Stanley cross asset strategist Serena Tang is impressed that the global economy has avoided recession and favours U.S. equities for the remainder of 2025, 'The global economy is not in a recession: Despite unprecedented policy uncertainty, the global economy is still in expansion mode, albeit with slowing growth. Off-ramps for de-escalation of trade tensions exist and we expect that tariffs will not end at the extreme levels in the aftermath of Liberation Day. Substantial monetary easing is ahead along with the benefits of deregulation. US assets remain compelling versus the RoW: US Treasuries, equities, and credit outperform their RoW counterparts on our forecasts. We push back against the idea that foreign investors would or should abandon US assets significantly, although we expect greater currency hedging. Persistent USD weakness: We expect USD to continue to weaken thanks to both a convergence in US rates and growth to peers … We roll forward our S&P 500 price target of 6,500: We've already experienced rolling earnings recessions across the equity market for the last ~3 years. This makes comparisons less onerous and sets the stage for a more synchronous EPS recovery over the course of our forecast horizon. We see 2025 EPS of US$259 (7% growth), 2026 EPS of US$283 (9% growth), and 2027 EPS of US$321 (13% growth)' *** Bluesky post of day: Diversion: 'Supercharged Antibodies: Scientists Engineer Potent New Weapon Against Cancer' – SciTechDaily

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store