logo
#

Latest news with #JohnLennon

Paul McCartney, 83, Says a Fellow Beatle Saved His Most Famous Lyric From Being Cut
Paul McCartney, 83, Says a Fellow Beatle Saved His Most Famous Lyric From Being Cut

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Entertainment
  • Yahoo

Paul McCartney, 83, Says a Fellow Beatle Saved His Most Famous Lyric From Being Cut

Paul McCartney, 83, Says a Fellow Beatle Saved His Most Famous Lyric From Being Cut originally appeared on Parade. Most people would think being one of the most iconic rock stars of all time would silence all hints of self-doubt, but recently said that wasn't the case. 'As a performer, you're often thinking, 'Is this any good? Is this rubbish? Is this a cliché?'' McCartney admitted in an interview with Guitar Player published on July 21, 2025. Even with a laundry list of hits, McCartney said that he still second-guesses himself. He's previously been open about his insecurities and how fellow Beatle John Lennon provided encouragement over the years. 'Any time you write a song, you're going, 'This is crap. This is terrible. Come on,'' the iconic songwriter revealed to GQ in 2020. 'So I kick myself and say, 'Get it better. If it's terrible, get it better.' And sometimes someone will come along, someone who you respect, and say, 'No, that's great. Don't worry about that,' and then show you a side to it that you didn't notice and, then you'll go, 'Oh, yeah.'' Related: One moment in particular involved McCartney showing Lennon a song he was working on. While he considered one line a 'crummy placeholder,' Lennon immediately saw its potential. The song in question? The timeless classic 'Hey Jude.' 'A classic example of that was when I was playing 'Hey Jude' to John,' McCartney explained, 'and I said, 'The movement you need is on your shoulder.' I turned round to him and Yoko [Ono], who was standing behind me, and said, 'Don't worry, I'll fix that.'' He continued, 'And John said, 'No, you won't. That's the best line in it.' When someone's that firm about a line that you're going to junk, and he said, 'No, keep it in,' so, of course, you love that line twice as much because it's a little stray, it's a little mutt that you were about to put down and it was reprieved and so it's more beautiful than ever.' 🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬 Paul McCartney, 83, Says a Fellow Beatle Saved His Most Famous Lyric From Being Cut first appeared on Parade on Jul 21, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 21, 2025, where it first appeared.

Thucydides trap averted: China speed, dodgy data and the Houthis
Thucydides trap averted: China speed, dodgy data and the Houthis

AllAfrica

time16-07-2025

  • Politics
  • AllAfrica

Thucydides trap averted: China speed, dodgy data and the Houthis

You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will be as one John Lennon Humanity may have lucked out. China speed, dodgy data and the Houthis may just have derailed the 21st Century Thucydides trap. Meme: imgflip While Athens and Sparta careened unstoppably towards the Peloponnesian war, each powerless to arrest rising tensions, today's Sparta should consider itself lucky: It cannot win the 21st Century Peloponnesian War and, as such, will not press for one. The most consequential military development of the past few years – and there have been legion – is empirical proof that expeditionary navies are obsolete. China proved it in the South China Sea. Ukraine proved it in the Black Sea. And the Houthis (the Houthis!) proved it in the Red Sea. Like the Blitzkrieg field-tested during the Spanish Civil War and Azerbaijan's drone warfare against Armenia, recent littoral challenges against expeditionary navies will prove more consequential in a completely different theater. But in a good way – more to preclude future conflict than as a field test for future tactics. Contrary to popular belief, China does not covet the South China Sea for mere scraps like oil, natural gas or fish. China is more than happy to negotiate with other claimants to exploit South China Sea resources. What China wants in the South China Sea are airstrips, missile sites, naval bases and electronic listening posts, extending the southern maritime security perimeter. What China really wants in the South China Sea is a theater, far away from anything of real value (Taiwan, for example), to demonstrate US Naval impotence for all of Asia to witness. China's Nine-Dash Line. Source: Facebook China does not make a move unless strategic advantage has been established and escalation dominance is assured. China started large-scale island building in the South China Sea's Spratly Islands in late 2013. This was a declaration of two things: that China was going to take its 9- (now 10-) dashed line claims seriously, and that the PLA Rocket Force's anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs) had been thoroughly tested and were deployed and operational. Without a missile shield providing escalation dominance, the US Navy could have stopped island construction with the mere presence of a carrier strike group (CSG). In 1996, before China could threaten American aircraft carriers, President Clinton sent two US Navy CSG into the Taiwan Strait as the PLA was conducting missile tests to sway Taiwan's presidential election. Out-flexed by the US Navy CSGs, China's intimidation tactics failed with President Lee Teng-hui, the despised 'separatist,' handily winning reelection. China developed ASBMs to prevent the US Navy from besting the PLA in future showdowns. Given the PLA Rocket Force's missile umbrella over the South China Sea in the 2010's, China was able to construct and militarize seven artificial islands unchallenged. On April 22, 2022, Ukrainian fighters launched two R-360 Neptune cruise missiles at the Moskva cruiser, Russia's Black Sea fleet flagship. It was the largest Russian ship to sink since WWII. The Moskva carried S-300F missiles which provided long-range air defense for the Black Sea fleet then bombarding Ukrainian positions. Ukrainian fighters have subsequently sunk or damaged additional Russian ships and a submarine with a combination of missiles and naval drones. Russia has since relocated its Black Sea fleet east, from Sevastopol to Novorossiysk, largely taking it out of the fight. In 2024, with the PLA Navy having grown from 255 to 400 ships over the past decade while the US Navy shrank from over 300 to 299 ships, China began aggressively enforcing its claim on an atoll occupied by a purposely shipwrecked Filipino vessel. China Coast Guard (CCG) ships harassed Filipino boats supplying the handful of marines stationed on the crumbling wreck. The world saw dramatic footage of large China Coast Guard cutters water hosing and ramming small Filipino supply boats. In one incident, Chinese Coast Guard personnel boarded a Philippine supply boat and engaged in melee combat using handheld weapons. A Filipino soldier lost a thumb. The US Navy's response was to redeploy the carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and its escorts from East Asia to the Middle East. This left the Western pacific without a CSG at the height of South China Sea tensions involving a US treaty ally. Thus it was revealed that 1) the US Navy was spread very thin and 2) the US Navy was not going to be maneuvered into a showdown with China's brand-new navy and rocket force by the Philippines. In May of this year, President Trump reached an unsatisfying ceasefire agreement with the Houthis after intensive bombing operations proved ineffective and were marred by mishaps. US Navy operations against the Houthis have resulted in the loss of three F/A-18 fighters (one to 'friendly fire' and two to 'accidents'), more than a dozen MQ-9 Reaper drones and more than $1 billion worth of ammunition. The ceasefire fell well short of President Trump's promise to 'completely annihilate' the Houthis. The Yemeni fighters have only agreed to refrain from attacking US Navy ships. They have continued their operations against Israeli-connected shipping. The ceasefire neutered the US Navy in the Red Sea. They could be there. Or they could not be there. It doesn't make a shred of difference. That the Houthis fought the US Navy to a draw can only be seen as a humiliating defeat by Asia. Compare Japan (and South Korea/Taiwan/Australia) to the Instagram model who just watched her bodybuilder boyfriend get beat up by a skinny migrant worker. According to press leaks, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby pressed Japan and Australia to clarify their intentions in a Taiwan contingency. Leaking Colby's demand shuts down Washington's pressure tactics by airing them to domestic political opprobrium in those countries. The leak was unsurprising given the US Navy's less-than-stellar performances in the Red Sea and the South China Sea, demonstrating Japan's and Australia's lack of confidence in US resolve and capabilities. Why would anyone commit to defend Taiwan if the US itself refuses to do so? Why would Japan and Australia commit to helping a navy that hung the Philippines out to dry only to get humiliated by the Houthis? China's anti-ship missiles and drones are likely to be more effective than those used by the Houthis. What we are witnessing is the US attempting to do hegemony on the cheap. Alliances in this situation are structurally brittle. Alliance partners want to free ride while a fading hegemon tries to buck-pass. When the hegemon has not demonstrated the resolve and cannot demonstrate the capability to shoulder all the costs, there is not much incentive for the hangers-on to help lighten the load. And without commitments from alliance partners to enter the fray, US resolve to go it alone is diminished as well. The Thucydides trap theorizes that war is likely when a rising power challenges a dominant established power. The fear inspired by a rising power causes the dominant power to attempt to suppress the challenger, resulting in ever-increasing tensions and an inevitable path to war. With this backdrop, many Western media reports on China begin with the stock phrase, 'China, the world's second largest economy .…' While this bit of data-delusion has hamstrung efforts to contain China, it could very well prove to have been a great boon for humanity, short-circuiting the Thucydides trap with its every utterance. Vaclav Havel said China's economic rise was so fast that 'we had not yet had time to be astonished.' Calling China the world's second largest economy is a media tick that the West has yet to abandon. Any proper accounting of China's productive and consumptive powers results in an economy twice the size of the US (see here). Taking liberties with the UN System of National Accounts, China has flown under the radar, delaying the moment of proper Western astonishment. China is no longer the rising power but the established power. All efforts to contain China from tech sanctions to trade wars to media slander have been ineffectual if not counterproductive. China's manufacturing sector is twice that of the US in exchange rate terms and three times that of the US in purchasing power parity terms. On most indices (i.e. top journals, citations, patents), China's scientific and technological output is well above if not multiples of the US and increasing exponentially. China's human capital pipeline is a juggernaut, producing 6-8 times the STEM graduates as the US. Ancient Greece was not dealing with an Athens suddenly twice Sparta's size. The Peloponnesian War could very well have been averted if Athens rose so quickly that Sparta 'had not yet had time to be astonished' and we would never have heard of Thucydides because his 'History of the Peloponnesian Peace' would have been a tedious snoozefest. Over the past few weeks, modern Sparta appears to be coming apart at the seams. Japan angrily denounced American efforts to dictate its defense budget. South Korea elected a China-leaning president. Spain's intelligence agency awarded its communications contract to Huawei. The French Parliament produced a report pushing the EU to realign with China. Brazil will explore building a transcontinental railroad with China. When nations realize that expeditionary navies are obsolete and their breath catches up to China's astonishing growth, the speed of the realignment will be just as astonishing. It will resemble nothing short of a rout. This should benefit everyone involved, from put upon Europeans to the bonsai-ed Japan and South Korea (see here) to LGBTQIAS2S+-ed Taiwan (see here) to Legalist Qin-esque PRC able to finally relax into its Confucian Tang-esque form. Most of all, it will benefit the United States of America, which can finally come home, circle wagons, lick wounds, plant trees and recover from eight decades of shouldering the costs of hegemony.

On This Day: The Heartbreaking Tragedy That Changed John Lennon Forever
On This Day: The Heartbreaking Tragedy That Changed John Lennon Forever

Yahoo

time15-07-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Yahoo

On This Day: The Heartbreaking Tragedy That Changed John Lennon Forever

On This Day: The Heartbreaking Tragedy That Changed John Lennon Forever originally appeared on Parade. John Lennon was at the start of his music journey when a devastating tragedy struck, leaving a lasting impact on the young man he was and the music legend he would become. The future Beatles founder was profoundly shaped by one person whose influence and sudden loss would alter the course of his life and help define his path to global superstardom. On this day, July 15, 1958, John's mother, JuliaLennon, was struck and killed by an off-duty police officer named Eric Clague. Lennon was just 17 at the time of the tragedy, and his mother was 44. Parade Daily🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬 John was born on Oct. 9, 1940, to Julia and Alfred Lennon. He was their only child together. When he was four, the future musician was taken in by his aunt, Mimi Smith, and uncle, George Smith, to provide the young boy with a stable home life. John would live with the couple throughout his childhood and adolescence. Although John resided with Mimi, he maintained a strong and affectionate bond with his mother, Julia. She nurtured his early love of music, buying him his first guitar and teaching him basic chords on the banjo and ukulele. John's childhood friend Nigel Walley shared his memories of the tragedy per The Beatles Bible. He said, "I went to call for John that evening, but his Aunt Mimi told me he was out. Mimi was at the gate with John's mum, who was about to leave." Walley continued, "We stood chatting and John's mum said 'Well, you have the privilege of escorting me to the bus stop!' I said 'That will do me fine. I'll be happy to do that.'" "We walked down Menlove Avenue and I turned off to go up Vale Road, where I lived. I must have been about 15 yards up the road when I heard a car skidding. I turned round to see John's mum going through the air. I rushed over but she had been killed instantly." Julia's death deeply traumatized John, who would later refer to her in the songs "Julia," "Mother," and "My Mummy's Dead." His first son, Julian, with wife Cynthia Lennon, was named for her. "I lost her twice," John later told Playboy. "Once as a 5-year-old when I was moved in with my auntie. And once again when she actually physically died." "That made me more bitter; the chip on my shoulder I had as a youth got really big then. I was just really re-establishing the relationship with her, and she was killed." John Lennon would go on to achieve worldwide fame as a member of The Beatles, alongside Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr. In addition to his first son, Julian, he later became a father to Sean Ono Lennon, his only child with wife Yoko Ono. On This Day: The Heartbreaking Tragedy That Changed John Lennon Forever first appeared on Parade on Jul 15, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 15, 2025, where it first appeared.

John Lennon Admitted He Was ‘Scared' of This Rock Legend Despite Wanting to Work With Him
John Lennon Admitted He Was ‘Scared' of This Rock Legend Despite Wanting to Work With Him

Yahoo

time15-07-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Yahoo

John Lennon Admitted He Was ‘Scared' of This Rock Legend Despite Wanting to Work With Him

John Lennon Admitted He Was 'Scared' of This Rock Legend Despite Wanting to Work With Him originally appeared on Parade. Despite being one of the most popular musicians of all time, John Lennon still had his own insecurities when it came to other stars. In a resurfaced interview, Lennon once admitted that he was 'scared' of Elvis Presley. '[Bob] Dylan would be interesting because I think he made a great album in Blood on the Tracks, but I'm still not keen on the backings. I think I could produce him great. And Presley. I'd like to resurrect Elvis,' Lennon told Rolling Stone during a 1975 interview, when asked which musicians he'd most like to work with. 'But I'd be so scared of him I don't know whether I could do it. But I'd like to do it. Dylan, I could do, but Presley would make me nervous.' He continued, 'But Dylan or Presley, somebody up there. I know what I'd do with Presley. Make a rock 'n' roll album. Dylan doesn't need material. I'd just make him some good backings. So if you're reading this Bob, you know….' However, Lennon and Presley had previously crossed paths, and the 'Kentucky Rain' singer allegedly wasn't a fan of the Beatle due to his political stances. 'His dislike of the pacifist Beatle was born from the night I took the Fab Four to his house for their first — and last — meeting,' journalist Chris Hutchins, who introduced the two men, told the Daily Mail in 2011, per Express. 'John had annoyed Presley by making his anti-war feelings known the moment he stepped into the massive lounge and spotted the table lamps — model wagons engraved with the message: 'All the way with LBJ.'' He continued, 'Presley allied himself with the FBI director Edgar Hoover and encouraged him to have Lennon thrown out of the US.' Hutchins added that Lennon was vocal about his 'hatred' of President Lyndon B. Johnson because he 'raised the stakes in the Vietnam War.' Presley, on the other hand, was a supporter of Johnson and Lennon's opinion rubbed him the wrong way. 🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬 John Lennon Admitted He Was 'Scared' of This Rock Legend Despite Wanting to Work With Him first appeared on Parade on Jul 14, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 14, 2025, where it first appeared.

Lennon's love letter bemoaning Paul's snoring goes on sale
Lennon's love letter bemoaning Paul's snoring goes on sale

Free Malaysia Today

time15-07-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Free Malaysia Today

Lennon's love letter bemoaning Paul's snoring goes on sale

The 1962 love letter John Lennon wrote to his then future wife Cynthia Powell. (AFP pic) LONDON : A 1962 love letter from John Lennon to his future wife Cynthia, in which he complains about Paul McCartney's snoring, will be sold at Christie's next month, the London auction house said. The 21-year-old Lennon wrote the letter over five nights in April 1962, during the Beatles' residency at the Star-Club in Hamburg. 'I love love love you and I'm missing you like mad,' wrote the songwriter, before adding a lewd suggestion. The letter is expected to fetch up to £40,000 when it is sold on July 9. In it, Lennon mentions close friend and original Beatles' bassist Stuart Sutcliffe, who had died days before, saying he had considered visiting his fiancée Astrid 'but I would be so awkward'. He opposed Cynthia's plans to share a house with McCartney's then girlfriend Dot Rhone in Liverpool, saying: 'we would never be alone really … imagine having her there all the time when we were in bed – and imagine Paul coming all the time'. He complained about his bandmate's bedtime habits, writing 'Paul's leaping about on my head (he's in a bunk on top of me and he's snoring) … Shurrup M carntey (sic)!… Lennon signed off the letter: 'I love you I love you please wait for me and don't be sad and work hard be a clever little Cyn Powell'. Cynthia Powell dated Lennon from 1958 and they married in August 1962, giving birth to their son Julian in April 1963. They divorced in 1968, and a year later Lennon married Yoko Ono.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store