20-03-2025
14 Wall Street Journal Reporters Caught Lying to Cover Up Roberts & Boasberg's Judicial Corruption
The Wall Street Journal deliberately misled the public to cover up Chief Justice John Roberts' illegal use of executive power and Judge James Boasberg's fabrication of 15 unlawful 'minute' orders - including 9 rushed, instant orders over the weekend.
ST. JOHNS, FL / ACCESS Newswire / March 20, 2025 / The Wall Street Journal continues to lie to suppress the truth about the weaponization of the judiciary against President Donald J. Trump, this time by falsely portraying Chief Justice John Roberts as a defender of judicial independence while ignoring his leadership role in coordinating judicial misconduct.
Manuel P. Asensio, Chairman of St. Johns GOP, said, 'I used the expression 'false and untrue' instead of lie as the nation's Pioneer of Activist Short Selling on Wall Street, but I have never seen a bigger lie than that told by The Wall Street Journal in their latest anti-Trump propaganda piece, Chief Justice Roberts Criticizes Trump's Call to Impeach Judges.' Asensio has pioneered information arbitrage in financial and political investigations, ensuring the truth reaches the public despite media suppression.
The WSJ deliberately lied the public to shield Roberts from accountability while discrediting President Trump. Rather than addressing the systemic judicial misconduct that Trump has exposed, the WSJ lied to falsely reduces the issue to a procedural dispute over legal rulings.
The idea that this is about legal rulings is a lie.
The truth is that this is a power struggle between two branches of government, with Roberts hiding behind his judicial role while wielding unchecked executive power at the U.S. Judicial Conference. The real issue is not Trump's criticism of the courts but Roberts' ability to fabricate judicial policies, protect corrupt judges, and manufacture rulings designed to entrap Trump in perpetual legal warfare.
What the Wall Street Journal Lied About:
Judge James Boasberg's Record of Judicial Misconduct Boasberg was handpicked by Roberts for the FISA Court, where he upheld fraudulent surveillance warrants used against Trump's campaign.
Boasberg works as an executive policy maker with Roberts at the US Judicial Conference.
Boasberg was the subject of a Judicial Conduct Complaint in an election-related case, which was summarily dismissed by his subordinates without any real review.
Boasberg also presided over cases tied to the Mueller probe, where he protected Democrat-aligned entities and helped block full transparency into the FBI and DOJ's handling of the Russia collusion investigations.
Chief Justice Roberts' Role in the Judicial War Against Trump Roberts controls judicial policymaking at the U.S. Judicial Conference, where he enforces fabricated legal doctrines that ensure anti-Trump rulings at every level of the judiciary.
By declaring that Trump should simply appeal Boasberg's barrage weekend bombing, Roberts is attempting to eliminate all avenues of judicial accountability while keeping Trump trapped in a process that he and his judicial allies control.
Roberts has shielded judges like Boasberg, who have engaged in misconduct that directly impacted Trump's presidency, campaign, and legal defense.
Despite Having Evidence, The Wall Street Journal's 14 Reporters Chose to Lie
Despite being provided with evidence directly by our team, including documented proof of Boasberg's misconduct, a team of 14 WSJ reporters refused to acknowledge the facts and instead published a pack of lies in an article deliberately designed to mislead the public and protect Roberts.
Instead of investigating or reporting on the documented corruption within the U.S. Judicial Conference, they ignored clear evidence and framed Trump's entire fight as nothing more than an attack on judicial independence-a narrative crafted to deceive the public while protecting the entrenched power structure.
Trump Must Challenge Roberts' Abuse of Power at the U.S. Judicial Conference
President Trump is being misled by the legal establishment into believing that his only recourse is to appeal case-by-case. This is a trap. The courts have already been stacked with judges who follow Roberts' judicial policies rather than neutral constitutional principles.
Yesterday, we published our letter to White House Chief of Staff showing that we have done the work and have the information Trump needs to deal with Chief Justice John Roberts for his role in weaponizing the judiciary against him. His unchecked executive authority at the U.S. Judicial Conference must be exposed and dismantled.
The Wall Street Journal had access to this information and refused to report on it. Their reporters were provided with the evidence, yet they chose to ignore it in favor of protecting Roberts and Boasberg.
We Demand Accountability
The WSJ article appeared a day after we published our first letter to Trump's Chief of Staff. Yesterday we published on a second letter to the White House Chief of Staff dealing with the WSJ's and Roberts's conduct. A copy is directly available at St. Johns GOP's website .
We are calling on President Trump to stop treating these cases as legitimate legal disputes and instead address the true source of judicial corruption-Roberts use of executive power at the U.S. Judicial Conference.
For media inquiries, interviews, or access to our full report, please contact:
St. Johns Republican Presidential Executive Committee
5122 A1A South
St. Augustine, Florida 32080 (561) 946-1000
[email protected]
SOURCE: St. Johns Republican Presidential Executive Committee
press release
