logo
14 Wall Street Journal Reporters Caught Lying to Cover Up Roberts & Boasberg's Judicial Corruption

14 Wall Street Journal Reporters Caught Lying to Cover Up Roberts & Boasberg's Judicial Corruption

The Wall Street Journal deliberately misled the public to cover up Chief Justice John Roberts' illegal use of executive power and Judge James Boasberg's fabrication of 15 unlawful 'minute' orders - including 9 rushed, instant orders over the weekend.
ST. JOHNS, FL / ACCESS Newswire / March 20, 2025 / The Wall Street Journal continues to lie to suppress the truth about the weaponization of the judiciary against President Donald J. Trump, this time by falsely portraying Chief Justice John Roberts as a defender of judicial independence while ignoring his leadership role in coordinating judicial misconduct.
Manuel P. Asensio, Chairman of St. Johns GOP, said, 'I used the expression 'false and untrue' instead of lie as the nation's Pioneer of Activist Short Selling on Wall Street, but I have never seen a bigger lie than that told by The Wall Street Journal in their latest anti-Trump propaganda piece, Chief Justice Roberts Criticizes Trump's Call to Impeach Judges.' Asensio has pioneered information arbitrage in financial and political investigations, ensuring the truth reaches the public despite media suppression.
The WSJ deliberately lied the public to shield Roberts from accountability while discrediting President Trump. Rather than addressing the systemic judicial misconduct that Trump has exposed, the WSJ lied to falsely reduces the issue to a procedural dispute over legal rulings.
The idea that this is about legal rulings is a lie.
The truth is that this is a power struggle between two branches of government, with Roberts hiding behind his judicial role while wielding unchecked executive power at the U.S. Judicial Conference. The real issue is not Trump's criticism of the courts but Roberts' ability to fabricate judicial policies, protect corrupt judges, and manufacture rulings designed to entrap Trump in perpetual legal warfare.
What the Wall Street Journal Lied About:
Judge James Boasberg's Record of Judicial Misconduct Boasberg was handpicked by Roberts for the FISA Court, where he upheld fraudulent surveillance warrants used against Trump's campaign.
Boasberg works as an executive policy maker with Roberts at the US Judicial Conference.
Boasberg was the subject of a Judicial Conduct Complaint in an election-related case, which was summarily dismissed by his subordinates without any real review.
Boasberg also presided over cases tied to the Mueller probe, where he protected Democrat-aligned entities and helped block full transparency into the FBI and DOJ's handling of the Russia collusion investigations.
Chief Justice Roberts' Role in the Judicial War Against Trump Roberts controls judicial policymaking at the U.S. Judicial Conference, where he enforces fabricated legal doctrines that ensure anti-Trump rulings at every level of the judiciary.
By declaring that Trump should simply appeal Boasberg's barrage weekend bombing, Roberts is attempting to eliminate all avenues of judicial accountability while keeping Trump trapped in a process that he and his judicial allies control.
Roberts has shielded judges like Boasberg, who have engaged in misconduct that directly impacted Trump's presidency, campaign, and legal defense.
Despite Having Evidence, The Wall Street Journal's 14 Reporters Chose to Lie
Despite being provided with evidence directly by our team, including documented proof of Boasberg's misconduct, a team of 14 WSJ reporters refused to acknowledge the facts and instead published a pack of lies in an article deliberately designed to mislead the public and protect Roberts.
Instead of investigating or reporting on the documented corruption within the U.S. Judicial Conference, they ignored clear evidence and framed Trump's entire fight as nothing more than an attack on judicial independence-a narrative crafted to deceive the public while protecting the entrenched power structure.
Trump Must Challenge Roberts' Abuse of Power at the U.S. Judicial Conference
President Trump is being misled by the legal establishment into believing that his only recourse is to appeal case-by-case. This is a trap. The courts have already been stacked with judges who follow Roberts' judicial policies rather than neutral constitutional principles.
Yesterday, we published our letter to White House Chief of Staff showing that we have done the work and have the information Trump needs to deal with Chief Justice John Roberts for his role in weaponizing the judiciary against him. His unchecked executive authority at the U.S. Judicial Conference must be exposed and dismantled.
The Wall Street Journal had access to this information and refused to report on it. Their reporters were provided with the evidence, yet they chose to ignore it in favor of protecting Roberts and Boasberg.
We Demand Accountability
The WSJ article appeared a day after we published our first letter to Trump's Chief of Staff. Yesterday we published on www.stjohnsgop.org a second letter to the White House Chief of Staff dealing with the WSJ's and Roberts's conduct. A copy is directly available at St. Johns GOP's website .
We are calling on President Trump to stop treating these cases as legitimate legal disputes and instead address the true source of judicial corruption-Roberts use of executive power at the U.S. Judicial Conference.
For media inquiries, interviews, or access to our full report, please contact:
St. Johns Republican Presidential Executive Committee
5122 A1A South
St. Augustine, Florida 32080 (561) 946-1000
[email protected]
SOURCE: St. Johns Republican Presidential Executive Committee
press release
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request
West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request

West Virginia sends hundreds of National Guard members to Washington at Trump team's request WASHINGTON (AP) — Hundreds of West Virginia National Guard members will deploy across the nation's capital as part of the Trump administration's effort to overhaul policing in the District of Columbia through a federal crackdown on crime and homelessness. Gov. Patrick Morrisey, announced Saturday that he was sending a contingent of 300 to 400 to nearby Washington at the Republican administration's request. They will arrive in the district along with equipment and specialized training services, his office said in a statement. 'West Virginia is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital,' Morrisey said. 'The men and women of our National Guard represent the best of our state, and this mission reflects our shared commitment to a strong and secure America.' The move comes as federal agents and National Guard troops have begun to appear across the heavily Democratic city after Trump's executive order Monday federalizing local police forces and activating about 800 D.C. National Guard troops. By adding outside troops to join the existing National Guard deployment and federal law enforcement officers temporarily assigned to Washington, the administration is exercising even tighter control over the city. It's a power play that the president has justified as an emergency response to crime and homelessness, even though district officials have noted that violent crime is lower than it was during Trump's first term in office. The West Virginia activation also suggests the administration sees the need for additional manpower, after the president personally played down the need for Washington to hire more police officers. Maj. Gen. James Seward, West Virginia's adjutant general, said in a statement that members of the state's National Guard 'stand ready to support our partners in the National Capital Region' and that the Guard's 'unique capabilities and preparedness make it an invaluable partner in this important undertaking.' Federal agents have appeared in some of the city's most highly trafficked neighborhoods, garnering a mix of praise, pushback and alarm from local residents and leaders across the country. City leaders, who are obliged to cooperate with the president's order under the federal laws that direct the district's local governance, have sought to work with the administration though have bristled at the scope of the president's takeover. On Friday the administration reversed course on an order that aimed to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as an 'emergency police commissioner' after the district's top lawyer sued to contest. After a court hearing, Trump's attorney general, Pam Bond, issued a memo that directed the Metropolitan Police Department to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. District officials say they are evaluating how to best comply. In his order Monday, Trump declared an emergency due to the 'city government's failure to maintain public order.' He said that impeded the 'federal government's ability to operate efficiently to address the nation's broader interests without fear of our workers being subjected to rampant violence.' In a letter to city residents, Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, wrote that 'our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now." She added that if Washingtonians stick together, 'we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy -– even when we don't have full access to it.' ___ Associated Press writer Josh Boak contributed to this report. Matt Brown And Mike Pesoli, The Associated Press

White House Backs Off 'Hostile Takeover' of D.C. Police
White House Backs Off 'Hostile Takeover' of D.C. Police

Time​ Magazine

time11 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

White House Backs Off 'Hostile Takeover' of D.C. Police

The White House has backed off plans for a full takeover of the D.C. police force and will allow for the city's police chief to remain in charge after a judge indicated they would block the move. President Donald Trump this week invoked emergency powers to take control of the D.C. police department and call in the National Guard to a city that he claimed is overrun by "bloodshed, bedlam and squalor"—a claim that is disputed by experts. Read More: Trump Paints a Picture of D.C. as a Crime-Ridden Hell-Hole. Here Are the Facts As part of the federal takeover, Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed Drug and Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance C. Cole as 'Emergency Police Commissioner,' a move that would have given the White House extraordinary powers over policing. The city's Attorney General Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit calling for an emergency restraining order to block the move, accusing the Trump Administration of implementing a 'hostile takeover' of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) that would lead to 'imminent, irreparable harm'. 'In my nearly three decades in law enforcement, I have never seen a single government action that would cause a greater threat to law and order than this dangerous directive,' Smith wrote in the lawsuit Judge Ana Reyes said in a Friday hearing that, according to the Home Rule Act, the Department of Justice needed to rewrite the section of the executive order that placed Cole in charge, and that he needed to go through the city's mayor. Reyes stopped short of issuing a restraining order, but indicated that if the DOJ did not rewrite the section, she would. Read More: Trump Took Over the D.C. Police. He Can't Do It In Other Cities, Legal Experts Say 'The statute [The Home Rule Act] would have no meaning at all if the president could just say 'we're taking over your police department,'' Reyes said. In a press conference after the hearing, Schwalb touted the result as a 'very important win for Home Rule today.' A new directive by Bondi following the lawsuit allowed for Chief Pamela Smith to remain in charge of the force, though the city will still be under the Administration's control, and orders will be sent through the city's Mayor Muriel Bowser. The Trump Administration will still essentially have control over the city, but Smith will maintain control of the day-to-day operations of the MPD. In Bondi's new directive, though, she also required MPD to comply with the Trump Administration's aggressive immigration tactics, rescinding two police practices that limited MPD's immigration enforcement—also known as 'sanctuary policies.' D.C's At-Large Councilmember Christina Henderson reacted on X that, 'Respectfully, the Attorney General does not have the authority to revoke laws.' In the first week alone of the Trump Administration's federal takeover, nearly 200 arrests have been reported in the city, including many undocumented immigrants, which has alarmed civil rights groups.

Trump administration to keep DC police chief in place, but under immigration enforcement order
Trump administration to keep DC police chief in place, but under immigration enforcement order

Chicago Tribune

time17 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Trump administration to keep DC police chief in place, but under immigration enforcement order

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Friday reversed course and agreed to leave the Washington, D.C., police chief in control of the department, while Attorney General Pam Bondi, in a new memo, directed the District's police to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. The order from Bondi came after officials in the nation's capital sued Friday to block President Donald Trump's takeover of the Washington police. The night before, his administration had escalated its intervention into the city's law enforcement by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department, essentially placing the police force under the full control of the federal government. The attorney general's new order represents a partial retreat for the Trump administration in the face of intense skepticism from a judge over the legality of Bondi's earlier directive. But Bondi also signaled the administration would continue to pressure D.C. leaders to help federal authorities aggressively pursue immigrants in the country illegally, despite city laws on the books that limit cooperation between police and immigration authorities. In a social media post Friday evening, Bondi criticized D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, saying he 'continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety.' But she added, 'We remain committed to working closely with Mayor Bowser.' Mayor Muriel Bowser's office said late Friday that it was still evaluating how it can comply with the new Bondi order on immigration enforcement operations. The police department already eased some restrictions on cooperating with federal officials facilitating Trump's mass-deportation campaign but reaffirmed that it would follow the district's sanctuary city laws. In a letter sent Friday night to D.C. citizens, Bowser wrote: 'It has been an unsettling and unprecedented week in our city. Over the course of a week, the surge in federal law enforcement across D.C. has created waves of anxiety.' She added that 'our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now,' but added that if Washingtonians stick together, 'we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy – even when we don't have full access to it.' The legal battle was the latest evidence of the escalating tensions in a mostly Democratic city that now has its police department largely under the control of the Republican president's administration. Trump's takeover is historic, yet it had played out with a slow ramp-up in federal law enforcement officials and National Guard troops to start the week. As the weekend approached, though, signs across the city — from the streets to the legal system — suggested a deepening crisis over who controls the city's immigration and policing policies, the district's right to govern itself and daily life for the millions of people who live and work in the metro area. The two sides sparred in court for hours Friday before U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, who is overseeing the district's lawsuit. She indicated the law likely doesn't grant the Trump administration power to fully take over city police, but it probably does give the president more power than the city might like. 'The way I read the statute, the president can ask, the mayor must provide, but the president can't control,' said Reyes, who was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Joe Biden. The judge pushed the two sides to make a compromise. An attorney for the Trump administration, Yaakov Roth, said the move to sideline Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith came after an immigration order that still held back some aid to federal authorities. He argued that the president has broad authority to determine what kind of help police in Washington must provide. The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major U.S. cities, and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the Trump administration has portrayed. The president has more power over the nation's capital than other cities, but D.C. has elected its own mayor and city council since the Home Rule Act was signed in 1973. Trump is the first president to exert control over the city's police force since it was passed. The law limits that control to 30 days without congressional approval, though Trump has suggested he'd seek to extend it. Bondi's Thursday night directive to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terry Cole, in charge of the police department came even after Smith had told MPD officers hours earlier to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop or checkpoint. The Justice Department said Bondi disagreed with the police chief's instructions because they allowed for continued practice of 'sanctuary policies,' which generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers. Meanwhile, advocates in Washington were trying to advise immigrants on how to respond. Anusce Sanai, associate legal director for the Washington-based immigrant nonprofit Ayuda, said they're still parsing the legal aspects of the policies. 'Even with the most anti-immigrant administration, we would always tell our clients that they must call the police, that they should call the police,' Sanai said. 'But now we find ourselves that we have to be very careful on what we advise.' Amy Fischer, an organizer with Migrant Solidarity Mutual Aid, said that before the federal takeover, most of what they had seen in the nation's capital was Immigration and Customs Enforcement targeting specific individuals. But since last Friday night they've seen a 'really significant change,' she said, with ICE and federal officers doing roving patrols around the city. She said a hotline set up by immigration advocates to report ICE activity 'is receiving calls almost off the hook.' ICE said in a post on X that their teams had arrested 'several' people in Washington Friday. A video posted on X showed two uniformed personnel putting handcuffs on someone while standing outside a white transport van. A population already tense from days of ramp-up has begun seeing more significant shows of force across the city. National Guard troops watched over some of the world's most renowned landmarks, and Humvees took position in front of the busy main train station. Volunteers helped homeless people leave long-standing encampments — to where was often unclear. Friday night along the district's U Street, a popular nightlife corridor, an Associated Press photographer saw officers from the FBI, the DEA, the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Park Police, U.S. Marshals and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. As the District challenged the Trump administration in court Friday, more than 100 protesters gathered less than a block away in front of police headquarters, chanting 'Protect home rule!' and waving signs saying 'Resist!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store