Latest news with #Juul
Daily Record
3 days ago
- General
- Daily Record
I quit vapes overnight after doing 1 thing as disposable e-cigarettes are now banned
A UK-wide ban on disposable vapes came into force on Sunday, June 1 A nationwide ban on disposable vapes has been enforced from Sunday, June 1, making it illegal to sell single-use e-cigarettes across the UK. While reusable vaping products will still be available, the ban is anticipated to encourage many vapers to quit - a feat I accomplished after three years of addiction to these colourful devices. I never imagined I'd be grappling with a nicotine addiction in my thirties. I was never a heavy smoker; it was a habit I picked up at university and quickly dropped. However, vaping posed a completely different challenge. It turned out that I was inhaling the equivalent of 100 cigarettes per week through vaping. Like any addiction, the habit subtly took over - initially, it was just a few puffs during social gatherings or post-dinner relaxation. Before I knew it, I was dependent on disposable vapes like Juul and Lost Mary, never leaving home without one. Boredom soon became an excuse for vaping. In no time at all, I was vaping from dawn till dusk, reports the Express. I vaped at home, at my desk, while watching telly - I even vaped in bed. It all seemed harmless until the side effects began to appear: constant dry mouth, headaches, shortness of breath, and mental fog. I realised I needed to quit, but I had no idea where to begin. A Lost Mary BM600 disposable vape, available in a variety of fruit flavours, is roughly equivalent to 20 cigarettes due to its 20mg nicotine content. At my worst, I was using five a week. This means that I was taking in 100mg of nicotine, equivalent to 100 cigarettes. However, the maximum legal nicotine level in the UK for these devices is 40mg of nicotine, which is dispensed over 500 to 600 puffs. The NHS has stated that while vaping is less harmful than traditional smoking, it's not without risks. The long-term effects of e-cigarettes remain unclear, but they have been linked with lung damage, causing inflammation and tissue harm which can lead to chronic coughing, breathlessness and other respiratory issues. The NHS also warns of additional side effects such as dry mouth and throat, irritation, headaches, and dizziness. Nicotine, a key ingredient in e-cigarettes, is a highly addictive substance that can result in withdrawal symptoms when attempting to quit. Furthermore, e-cigarettes pose a significant environmental hazard due to their composition of plastic, copper, rubber and a lithium-ion battery, all of which can take decades to decompose. Despite numerous attempts to quit, including gradually reducing usage, chewing gum, and leaving my vape by the front door, I always found myself returning to it. I would justify my actions by convincing myself that at least I wasn't smoking cigarettes, but deep down, I knew I was still hooked. Then, one day, I stumbled upon a book that transformed my perspective: Dopamine Nation: Why our Addiction to Pleasure is Causing us Pain by Dr. Anna Lembke, a psychiatrist and addiction specialist at Stanford University. Though her speciality primarily lies in the US opioid crisis, she has delved into various forms of addiction, from shopping and food to social media and sex. Dr Lembke argues that addiction isn't just about the substance itself, but rather the brain's reward system. Nicotine provides an immediate dopamine rush, offering a transient sense of pleasure. The initial pleasurable buzz nicotine offers quickly dissipates, leaving a user grappling with discomfort, irritability, and anxiety. This vicious cycle is fuelled by an escalating reliance on nicotine just to feel 'normal', with alterations to brain pathways vital for learning, stress management, and self-regulation making quitting the habit seem impossible. For me, the realisation that my relentless pursuit for that satisfying hit from my vape was actually causing more harm than good was a revelation. After immersing myself in a life-altering book, my mindset underwent a dramatic shift, empowering me to quit vaping for good. The initial 48 hours off the vape were torturous; I was besieged by an intense yearning for dopamine, fatigue set in, and my mood plummeted, leaving me longing for my beloved juicy peach-flavoured Lost Mary. Yet, by day five, a noticeable shift occurred - the fog in my brain cleared, my vigour returned, and it dawned on me that I had been veiled in a nicotine fog for far too long. Kicking the habit was far from simple, but grasping the mechanics of addiction proved pivotal. Acknowledging that my vaping habit was merely a series of ephemeral pleasures followed by dissatisfaction altered my perspective on other vices, like alcohol and sugar. Having silenced the "nicotine noise", I now celebrate one month without vaping. Here are some vital insights from 'Dopamine Nation' that ignited this change:. 1. Minimise temptations. 2. Accept discomfort. 3. Opt for abstinence. 4. Utilise prosocial shame. Rather than concealing my battle, I informed my friends and family about my decision to quit. Knowing that they were observing and rooting for me provided a sense of accountability. For those finding it tough to stop vaping, I can't recommend this book enough, priced at £9.55 on Amazon. It might just be what you need to break free overnight. Additionally, the NHS offers valuable advice on quitting vaping.
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Health
- Daily Mirror
I gave up disposable vapes overnight after doing just one thing
A UK-wide ban on single-use vapes came into force on Sunday, July 1, making them illegal to sell A nationwide ban on disposable vapes has been enforced in the UK since Sunday, June 1, making it illegal to sell single-use e-cigarettes. While reusable vaping products will still be available, the ban is anticipated to encourage many vapers to quit - a feat I achieved after three years of addiction to these colourful devices. I never imagined I'd be grappling with a nicotine addiction in my thirties. I wasn't a heavy smoker; it was a habit I picked up at university and quickly dropped. However, vaping posed a completely different problem. It turned out I was inhaling the equivalent of 100 cigarettes per week through vaping. Like any addiction, the habit sneakily took over - initially, it was just a few puffs during social gatherings or after dinner relaxation. Soon enough, I found myself dependent on disposable vapes like Juul and Lost Mary, never leaving home without one. Boredom soon became an excuse for vaping. Before I knew it, I was vaping from dawn till dusk. I vaped at home, at my desk, while watching telly - I even vaped in bed. It all seemed harmless until the side effects began to show: constant dry mouth, headaches, shortness of breath, and mental fog. I realised I needed to quit, but I had no idea where to begin. A Lost Mary BM600 disposable vape, available in a variety of fruit flavours, is roughly equivalent to 20 cigarettes due to its 20mg nicotine content. At my worst, I was using five a week. This means that I was taking in 100mg of nicotine, equivalent to 100 cigarettes. However, the maximum legal nicotine level in the UK for these devices is 40mg of nicotine, which is dispensed over 500 to 600 puffs. The NHS has stated that while vaping is less harmful than traditional smoking, it's not without risks. The long-term effects of e-cigarettes remain unclear, but they have been linked with lung damage, causing inflammation and tissue harm which can lead to chronic coughing, breathlessness and other respiratory issues. The NHS also warns of additional side effects such as dry mouth and throat, irritation, headaches, and dizziness. Nicotine, a key ingredient in e-cigarettes, is a highly addictive substance that can result in withdrawal symptoms when trying to quit. Furthermore, e-cigarettes pose a significant environmental hazard due to their composition of plastic, copper, rubber and a lithium-ion battery, all of which can take decades to decompose. Despite numerous attempts to quit, including gradually reducing usage, chewing gum, and leaving my vape by the front door, I always found myself going back to it. I would justify my actions by convincing myself that at least I wasn't smoking cigarettes, but deep down, I knew I was still hooked. Then, one day, I stumbled upon a book that transformed my perspective: Dopamine Nation: Why our Addiction to Pleasure is Causing us Pain by Dr. Anna Lembke, a psychiatrist and addiction specialist at Stanford University. Though her speciality primarily lies in the US opioid crisis, she has delved into various forms of addiction, from shopping and food to social media and sex. Dr Lembke argues that addiction isn't just about the substance itself, but rather the brain's reward system. Nicotine provides an immediate dopamine rush, offering a brief moment of pleasure. The initial pleasurable sensation nicotine offers quickly dissipates, leaving a user grappling with discomfort, irritability, and anxiety. This vicious cycle is fuelled by an escalating reliance on nicotine just to feel 'normal', with alterations to brain pathways vital for learning, stress management, and self-regulation making quitting seem impossible. For me, the realisation that my relentless pursuit for that satisfying hit from my vape was actually causing more harm than good was a revelation. After immersing myself in a life-altering book, my mindset underwent a dramatic shift, empowering me to quit vaping for good. The initial two days without my vape were torturous; I was hit by a fierce longing for dopamine, felt utterly exhausted, and became irritable and emotionally depleted, yearning for the sweet taste of my go-to juicy peach-flavoured Lost Mary. Yet, by day five, there was a noticeable shift - the fog in my brain cleared, my vitality surged back, and it dawned on me that I'd been shrouded in a nicotine fog for far too long. Kicking the habit was far from simple, but grasping the mechanics of addiction proved to be key. Realising that my vaping habit was just a series of ephemeral pleasures followed by periods of dissatisfaction changed my perspective on other vices like booze and sugar. One month into my vape-free journey, I've silenced the "nicotine noise" and here's what I've learned from the enlightening read 'Dopamine Nation': 1. Minimise temptations. 2. Accept discomfort. 3. Opt for abstinence. 4. Utilise prosocial shame. I didn't keep my quitting journey a secret; instead, I informed my mates and family. Knowing they were keeping an eye out and rooting for me provided a sense of accountability. For those finding it tough to ditch the vape, 'Dopamine Nation', priced at £9.55 on Amazon, might just be your overnight game-changer. The NHS also offers some handy advice on how to stop vaping.
Ammon
15-05-2025
- Business
- Ammon
Norwegian Ambassador commends Jordan's role in delivering aid to Gaza
Ammon News - Norwegian Ambassador to Jordan Mona Juul affirmed her country's appreciation for the key role Jordan is playing, under the leadership of His Majesty King Abdullah II, in delivering and facilitating humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip. On the occasion of Norway's National Day, Juul expressed deep concern over the blockade imposed by Israel on Gaza. She stressed the importance of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law and allowing the delivery of humanitarian assistance to the Strip. She also noted that Norway has recently recognized the State of Palestine. The ambassador highlighted the strength of the relationship and partnership between the two countries across various fields, supported by the distinguished ties between the royal families. She noted that mutual visits have contributed to the development of these relations. Juul pointed to the existence of excellent cooperation, consultation, and coordination between the two countries at different levels on regional issues and matters of mutual interest. She added that despite the modest volume of trade exchange, there is a shared interest in enhancing and expanding economic cooperation. She emphasized the promising opportunities for collaboration in the renewable energy sector, noting Norway's strong and efficient companies in this field and Jordan's growing interest in developing solar and wind energy. She added that other sectors of mutual interest could include tourism and organic agriculture. According to Juul, Norway's exports to Jordan mainly consist of oil, gas, seafood, and fish, while Jordan's exports to Norway primarily include textiles and vegetables. She stated that Norway is proud to partner in the Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Growth, implemented in cooperation with the Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation and the World Bank, to provide technical support aimed at stimulating growth in Jordan's economy. Norway, she added, remains committed to supporting Jordan's economic reform program for no less than the next five years. This year, the country pledged an additional USD 2 million to this effort. Juul stressed that human rights and women's empowerment are among Norway's top priorities, both domestically and internationally. She said Norway supports the International Labour Organization's efforts in Jordan to promote gender equality, safety, and inclusion in the workplace, in addition to supporting various women's organizations and local NGOs. She indicated that Norway's total contribution to development cooperation in Jordan is expected to reach nearly USD 14 million in 2024. Of this, USD 10 million is managed by the Norwegian embassy in Amman, while the remaining USD 4 million is administered from Oslo as humanitarian aid. The ambassador praised Jordan's generosity in hosting refugees and reaffirmed Norway's commitment to providing substantial support to Syrian and Palestinian refugees. She also commended Jordan's efforts to integrate Syrian refugee children into the national education system. She noted that Norway supports double-shift schools in collaboration with the Ministry of Education and contributed approximately USD 6.5 million to support the ministry in this area last year. Petra
Yahoo
14-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Skin Care Pioneer Ole Henriksen Announces ‘The Glowing Man' Biopic in Cannes
CANNES, France — Skin care guru Ole Henriksen is readying for a closeup of his life. The Danish businessman, self-help author and TV personality is prepping to go into production on a biopic titled 'The Glowing Man,' backed by executive producer Niels Juul with a screenplay written by British author James Wyllie. More from WWD Bath & Body Works' New Off the Vine Scent Collection Confirms the Return of Tomato Girl Summer Halle Berry, Juliette Binoche Wave the French Flag at Cannes Film Festival Opening Ceremony Eva Longoria in Beaded Tamara Ralph Gown, Heidi Klum in Floral Elie Saab and More Cannes Film Festival 2025 Red Carpet Arrivals Juul, former managing director of Von Dutch and chief executive officer of Hot Tuna, moved into film in 2008. Since then he's been behind a series of Martin Scorsese projects, including 'Silence,' 'The Irishman' and 'Killers of the Flower Moon.' He also worked on Michael Mann's 'Ferrari,' starring Adam Driver and Penélope Cruz under his No Fat Ego banner. The Henriksen project was launched at a splashy boat party in the Cannes harbor where the trio discussed the project. 'He is an icon, a hero. He is humble. People think he's a jumping clown with a skin care [brand], but this man has done more for gay rights than you could possibly imagine,' Juul said. 'There's a story here you want to watch.' Henriksen relayed a story of his battle with U.S. immigration authorities for legal status to remain as an openly gay man at a time when it was illegal. Homosexual orientation was categorized as 'psychopathic personality' and grounds for deportation from 1967 to 1990. Henriksen added that this story is in the script, in which he details the fight and psychological examinations he had to undergo before the law was overturned. Still, the film will not be a drama. Instead, the team framed it as an ebullient film with musical touches and a strong soundtrack featuring songs from gay icons of the times, including Diana Ross and David Bowie — both of whom became personal pals and clients of Henriksen. 'This is really a movie that's about inspiring the audience to also go out there and fulfill their dreams to express yourself the way you need to express yourself. Be proud of the person you are. Keep your head high, have fun, laugh. Have a sense of humor about yourself,' he said of the film's anticipated 'feel good' vibe. 'The truth is, we're gonna pick as many songs as we can afford,' joked Juul. The film will also include the original song 'Dope' by Danish duo Puls, on which Henriksen was featured. The song became a hit in his native Denmark in 2011. The team also hopes to enlist some of his famous friends such as Sylvester Stallone and Cher for cameos. Henriksen's brand was acquired by LVMH's Kendo beauty division in 2011. Juul said the project has the full support of the group. 'We work with them, very actively. [They are] incredibly supportive, providing us with the skin care, making sure that all is respected,' he told WWD. He will look at marketing options with the group. 'If there is anything we can do to do co-branding, co-marketing with Sephora, absolutely we will.' Henriksen said that working with Kendo has allowed him freedom to develop his product and personality. 'What's great about LVMH is they are brilliant at highlighting the DNA of each and every brand they own. They want to bring that to life. They want to give you bigger biceps, muscles to grow, and they never step in and say, 'We have to change,'' he said. However, both were clear that the film will be a true biopic and not an ad. 'How do you work with a brand? Well, you do that carefully…I would like LVMH to be happy,' he said. 'Because why can't a brand tell a story without it being a commercial? If the story is good, there's no reason why we cannot work with LVMH.' Juul added that coming from a fashion business background, he understands the concerns that brands can have around a film. He said that the movie is not currently being financed by LVMH or its 22 Montaigne film division, but that when the script is finalized with talent attached, that topic may be revisited. 'I cannot sell a movie in the current marketplace as drama. Forget about it. If I want to do a $10 million movie, forget it. The algorithms are going to tell you, go f–k yourself, give me Kate Winslet,' Juul said on the need for star power. Juul is in the process of casting and has a specific A-list actor on his radar, but the project is due to be shot 30 percent in Danish and 70 percent in English. Ensuring that the actor can learn some Danish is a key criterion for the role. The script is nearly finished, Juul said, and the film is expected to go into production this fall. The team is currently in talks with Danish production company Nordisk Film. Juul added that he misses the fast pace of the fashion industry and working on seasonal collections. 'I gotta be honest with you, I like the movie business, but I miss product,' he said. 'I love fashion.' The executive said he is also working on a project with the Valentino brand, as well as Adidas, which will be announced later this week in Cannes. Best of WWD The Best Makeup Looks in Golden Globes History A Look Back at Golden Globes Best Makeup on the Red Carpet, From Megan Fox to Sophia Loren [PHOTOS] The Best Hairstyles in Golden Globes History
Time Business News
01-05-2025
- Business
- Time Business News
Litigation Cases Involving Vape Manufacturers
Over the past decade, vaping has surged in popularity, especially among younger demographics. Marketed as a safer alternative to traditional smoking, e-cigarettes and vape products have carved out a multibillion-dollar industry. However, as health concerns grow and regulatory scrutiny increases, vape manufacturers have become frequent targets of litigation. These lawsuits span a wide range of claims, including product liability, deceptive marketing, health risks, and regulatory violations. Major players like Juul Labs, NJOY, and others have found themselves embroiled in significant legal battles, often involving consumers, state attorneys general, and even school districts. This blog explores the most prominent litigation cases against vape manufacturers, analyzing the causes, legal strategies, and broader implications. In today's fast-paced world, reliable energy solutions are essential for both personal and professional use. One standout innovation is the hayati pro ultra 25000, which delivers exceptional power capacity and fast charging technology. Designed for versatility, this high-performance power bank caters to the demands of travelers, remote workers, and tech enthusiasts alike. With its sleek design and durable build, it effortlessly supports multiple device types, ensuring uninterrupted connectivity. Whether on a long journey or during unexpected outages, it proves to be a trustworthy companion. Its advanced safety features further enhance user confidence, setting new standards in portable energy solutions. One of the earliest waves of litigation against vape manufacturers focused on product liability, especially surrounding adverse health effects. Plaintiffs in these cases argued that manufacturers failed to warn users about potential health risks associated with nicotine inhalation and chemical exposure from vape liquids. For instance, in 2019 and 2020, numerous individuals across the United States filed lawsuits after suffering from EVALI (e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury). Though the majority of EVALI cases were eventually linked to vitamin E acetate in illicit THC products, the initial wave of panic brought immense scrutiny to all vape products. These product liability claims allege that manufacturers had a duty to warn consumers of all foreseeable risks and failed to meet that responsibility. In several cases, plaintiffs also cited defective design or manufacturing flaws that led to device explosions or overheating, causing serious burns and injuries. Such incidents spurred not only individual lawsuits but also class action suits, creating a substantial legal and financial burden on companies. Another major legal theme in vaping litigation has been the accusation of youth-targeted advertising. Perhaps no company has faced more criticism in this regard than Juul Labs. Dozens of lawsuits, including those filed by state attorneys general, claim that Juul deliberately designed its products and marketing strategies to appeal to teenagers. These claims point to the sleek design of Juul devices, the use of sweet and fruity flavors, and the social media marketing campaigns that allegedly glamorized vaping culture. In December 2022, Juul Labs agreed to pay over $1.7 billion in settlements to resolve thousands of lawsuits that alleged the company contributed to a youth vaping epidemic. The company neither admitted wrongdoing nor conceded to the allegations but opted to settle as a way to manage ongoing legal costs and reputational damage. Other companies, including Altria (which had invested in Juul), also became entangled in related legal actions, raising the stakes even further. In a particularly innovative and growing category of vaping litigation, numerous school districts across the United States have filed lawsuits against vape manufacturers. These districts argue that vaping has created a public nuisance in schools, diverted administrative resources, and harmed student health. Schools cite the widespread use of e-cigarettes in bathrooms and hallways, the difficulty in monitoring student use, and the disciplinary challenges associated with enforcement. A landmark example includes the multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of California, where hundreds of school districts, alongside individuals and municipalities, consolidated their lawsuits against Juul and other vape companies. These cases claim that the companies' actions directly contributed to the vaping crisis in schools. The resulting settlements have included funds earmarked for education, prevention, and cessation programs, reflecting an unusual but meaningful remedy. Beyond civil lawsuits, vape manufacturers have faced intense scrutiny and enforcement from government agencies. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued numerous warning letters to companies for illegal marketing practices, mislabeling, or selling unauthorized products. In some cases, these regulatory actions have been used by plaintiffs to bolster their legal claims, arguing that a company's non-compliance with federal law demonstrates negligence or willful misconduct. State governments have also taken action. In 2020, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey reached a $41 million settlement with e-cigarette manufacturer Eonsmoke for allegedly marketing products to minors without FDA authorization. Similarly, North Carolina settled with Juul Labs for $40 million, with funds designated for combating youth vaping. These actions show that litigation is not confined to private individuals but also includes a concerted effort by public agencies to hold vape manufacturers accountable. The regulatory environment remains dynamic, and with new rules being issued, companies must navigate a complex legal terrain that continues to evolve. Many lawsuits against vape manufacturers have been consolidated into class actions or multidistrict litigation (MDL). This legal mechanism allows for efficiency in managing similar claims brought by large groups of plaintiffs. MDLs streamline pre-trial proceedings, reduce court backlogs, and often lead to global settlements that can resolve hundreds or thousands of cases simultaneously. The Juul MDL mentioned earlier is one of the most significant in recent memory, encompassing school districts, individuals, and local governments. These consolidated cases focus on a range of claims—from health impacts to false advertising—and have already led to billion-dollar settlements. The use of MDLs also underscores the scale of the legal issues facing vape manufacturers and sets a precedent for how future litigation may unfold. The cumulative effect of these lawsuits has been profound. Companies have been forced to pay massive settlements, overhaul their marketing strategies, and comply with stricter regulatory standards. Some smaller vape companies have gone bankrupt under the weight of legal expenses, while larger ones like Juul have seen their market share and public image decline dramatically. These legal battles have also reshaped the regulatory conversation around vaping. There is growing pressure for comprehensive federal regulation, clearer warning labels, and tighter restrictions on flavorings and marketing practices. Consumer advocacy groups continue to push for stronger protections, especially for minors, while the vaping industry lobbies for balanced regulation that allows ***** access while preventing youth use. As litigation continues, the industry must adapt quickly. New lawsuits may arise over long-term health impacts, environmental concerns (such as waste from disposable vape devices), and evolving scientific evidence. For now, the legal landscape remains a minefield, and manufacturers must tread carefully. Litigation involving vape manufacturers has become one of the most complex and high-profile areas of legal activity in recent years. From product liability and deceptive marketing to regulatory violations and public nuisance claims, the cases paint a picture of an industry under siege. While some companies have chosen to settle and move forward, others remain locked in protracted legal battles that could define the future of vaping in the United States. For consumers, regulators, and industry leaders alike, these lawsuits serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of accountability, transparency, and public health. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
