logo
#

Latest news with #KapitSessionsCourt

High Court upholds 7-year sentence for man convicted of drug use
High Court upholds 7-year sentence for man convicted of drug use

Borneo Post

time2 days ago

  • Borneo Post

High Court upholds 7-year sentence for man convicted of drug use

Judge Wong emphasised that mental illness does not automatically render someone unfit to plead, and Fadzlan's conduct during proceedings showed he understood the case. – Stock photo SIBU (Aug 15): The High Court here today dismissed Mohamad Fadzlan Shaini's appeal against his conviction and sentence for consuming dangerous drugs. Fadzlan was sentenced by the Kapit Sessions Court on Nov 14 last year to seven years' imprisonment and three strokes of the cane after pleading guilty to consuming amphetamine and methamphetamine under Section 15(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act (DDA) 1952, with sentencing under Section 39C(2) of the Act. In rejecting the appeal, High Court Judge Wong Siong Tung said the Sessions Court had complied with procedural requirements, including explaining the charge and its consequences to the appellant in Bahasa Malaysia, and found no evidence to challenge the legality of the proceedings. Regarding Fadzlan's mental health, the court noted that the medical report presented was neither submitted to the Sessions Court nor conclusive about his fitness to plead. Judge Wong emphasised that mental illness does not automatically render someone unfit to plead, and Fadzlan's conduct during proceedings showed he understood the case. The court also found no evidence that a police officer had influenced Fadzlan's guilty plea. Affidavits submitted failed to show any direct communication between the officer and the appellant. Judge Wong concluded that the appellant's grounds were inconsistent and lacked credibility, upholding the conviction and sentence. Fadzlan, who had a previous drug offence, was represented by lawyer Harold Emparak, while Deputy Public Prosecutor Mark Kenneth Netto represented the prosecution. appeal dismiss drugs jail Kapit Sibu

Sibu High Court upholds man's seven-year jail sentence for drug charges
Sibu High Court upholds man's seven-year jail sentence for drug charges

The Star

time2 days ago

  • The Star

Sibu High Court upholds man's seven-year jail sentence for drug charges

SIBU: The High Court has dismissed an appeal by a man convicted of consuming dangerous drugs, upholding the seven-year prison sentence and three strokes of the cane handed down by the Kapit Sessions Court last year. Mohamad Fadzlan Shaini, had pleaded guilty before the Sessions Court on Nov 14, 2024, to consuming dangerous drugs, an offence under Section 15(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, punishable under Section 39C(2) of the same Act. In his appeal on Friday (Aug 15), he raised three main grounds - that the Sessions Court had failed to ensure he understood the nature and consequences of his guilty plea, that he was unfit to plead due to schizophrenia and antipsychotic medication, and that his plea was allegedly induced by a police officer. Delivering the broad grounds of the decision, the High Court found that the Kapit Sessions Court had complied with Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code, with the charge, its nature, and legal consequences explained in Bahasa Malaysia. The appellant had confirmed his understanding and maintained his guilty plea. On the claim of mental unfitness, Judge Wong Siong Tung noted that medical reports relied on in the appeal had not been tendered at the trial and were not conclusive regarding his fitness to plead. He stressed that mental illness does not automatically render an accused unfit to plead and found nothing in his demeanour to suggest he could not understand the proceedings. Regarding the allegation of inducement, the court held there was no evidence connecting any police officer's advice to the appellant's decision to plead guilty. An affidavit from the appellant's father did not show direct communication between the officer and the appellant, and the appellant himself had not sworn any affidavit on the matter. The court concluded that the appeal grounds were inconsistent and lacked credibility, dismissing the appeal and affirming both the conviction and sentence. The prosecution was led by DPP Mark Kenneth Netto while Harold Emparak represented the accused.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store