logo
#

Latest news with #KathyNesbitt

Denver city workers call proposed rule change "Betrayal" ... "Slap in the face"
Denver city workers call proposed rule change "Betrayal" ... "Slap in the face"

CBS News

time18-06-2025

  • Business
  • CBS News

Denver city workers call proposed rule change "Betrayal" ... "Slap in the face"

A steady stream of Denver City workers on Wednesday blasted a proposed rule change that would make it easier to lay off city workers, regardless of their seniority. At a public hearing before the cities' Career Service board, one city employee called the proposed change to Career Service Rule 14 a "betrayal" while another termed the potential change a "slap in the face." CBS Another said if the rule change is passed, it would create a Hunger Games-type scenario with city employees doing all they can to avoid being laid off. Citing Denver's expected $200 million deficit in 2026, the city's Office of Human Resources executive director, Kathy Nesbitt, this month proposed altering city personnel rules that provide job protection and seniority privileges for long term city workers. Mayor Michael Johnston has said he supports the rule changes that would impact which city workers are laid off to deal with the projected budget deficit. City administrators said Wednesday they should know the size and scope of the layoffs by mid-August. Denver has about 10,000 employees covered by career service rules. The Wednesday hearing before the five member Career Service Board was aimed at getting approval for the changes. Hundreds of city workers watched the hearing in person, online or via closed circuit feed. More than a dozen testified against the proposed changes. Audra Burgos, who has worked for Denver Parks and Recreation for 37 years, spoke against the change and said seniority and institutional knowledge are important to maintain in the city workforce. "Knowledge cannot be taken away and that's what I have," said Burgos. "It's important seniority is still considered. It's the major reason why people want to work for Denver," she said. Nesbitt testified the city has not been in a position like this before in terms of budget pressures. She said when it comes to layoffs, under the proposed changes, job performance, history, ability and length of service would all be considered in deciding who gets laid off -- not just tenure. "This isn't about getting rid of employees who have been here for a long time," she said. Nesbitt said under the rule changes, "bumping" would no longer be allowed. That rule let senior workers who were laid off stay on the city payroll by taking over the job of a more junior employee. The rule changes would do away with "bumping." Karla Pierce, a labor lawyer with Denver's City Attorney's office, indicated the rule changes would allow layoffs to be made based more on performance than length of service. But she said ultimately, "We're going to lay off people who perform well." Neither Pierce nor Nesbitt specified how many layoffs are coming. Pierce said layoffs would be "substantial" and said city agencies are being asked to slash their budgets by 15% to 20%. Many of the city workers who testified said the proposed changes would make laying off workers a more subjective proposition and would diminish due process protections. One city worker testified the rule change would create fear and intimidation in the workplace as bosses try to eliminate critics and career rivals. Career service board members declined to vote on the proposed changes saying more precision and definition was needed before they could make any changes. They scheduled a follow-up meeting for July 1.

Denver proposes sweeping personnel changes to deal with 2026 deficit: "Like betrayal," says one city worker
Denver proposes sweeping personnel changes to deal with 2026 deficit: "Like betrayal," says one city worker

CBS News

time06-06-2025

  • Business
  • CBS News

Denver proposes sweeping personnel changes to deal with 2026 deficit: "Like betrayal," says one city worker

The executive director of Denver's Office of Human Resources, Kathy Nesbitt, said Thursday the city's projected $200 million deficit in 2026 would likely mean "hundreds" of city workers will be laid off, necessitating dramatic changes in some city personnel rules. CBS The estimate of "hundreds" of workers being cut from their jobs marked the first time the city has provided a firm estimate of the number of layoffs the city will have to implement. Nesbitt has also unveiled proposed changes to a city personnel rule that provided job protection and seniority privileges for long term city workers. Career Service Rule 14 provided job protection for workers based on their years of service, and allowed them to move to other city positions if their position was cut. Nesbitt's proposed changes -- which are supported by Mayor Mike Johnston -- would do away with those protections and make it easier to lay off longer term city workers. "I will tell you," said Nesbitt, "I wouldn't be looking at this right now but for the budget deficit we are facing for 2026." Her agency said the proposed rule revisions are to make sure layoffs "are implemented in a more streamlined manner that is consistent with the merit-based career service personnel system ... The impact will be that layoffs will now be determined solely on performance instead of a combination of seniority and performance." The proposed changes will be the subject of a hearing June 18. "It does feel like a betrayal," said one veteran city worker, who asked their identity be concealed for fear of reprisals. "I think that it is a huge disservice to people who have dedicated their careers to the city. This is dismantling not only the seniority system but the right to be reinstated if you are laid off," said the city worker. Denver City Councilmember Amanda Sawyer said of the proposed rule changes, "I'm not thrilled about it but I think they're doing what has to be done." "Layoffs are hard. Changing rule 14 midstream feels like adding insult to injury for our staff. But it needs to be done," said Sawyer. It's unclear precisely how many city workers might be potentially impacted by the rule change, but the Office of Human Resources said the majority of current city workers had been hired in the last 10 years. Nesbitt said by Thursday afternoon, her office had started hearing from city workers about the proposed changes. "I would say about 75% are dissatisfied," said Nesbitt, who agreed the potential change likely feels "earth-shattering" for some city employees. The city has about 10,000 workers covered by career service rules.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store