logo
#

Latest news with #KellyMeyer

Pentagon seeks to slash red tape for mass drone production
Pentagon seeks to slash red tape for mass drone production

The Hill

time7 days ago

  • Business
  • The Hill

Pentagon seeks to slash red tape for mass drone production

The Trump administration is slashing red tape to quickly equip troops with more small, easily replaced drones in a bid to keep up with the likes of Russia and China, the Pentagon's chief technology officer told NewsNation's Kelly Meyer in an exclusive interview. Emil Michael, the under secretary of Defense for research and engineering, said the U.S. is speedily moving to reduce bureaucratic barriers and expand the quantities and types of drones U.S. troops can use to defend American bases, forces and interests. 'You've got to cut the red tape out,' when it comes to drone production, he told Kellie Meyer from The Hill's sister network. 'A lot of the regulations around what you could build and how you could build it, and even how you could test it were limited in the last administration.' Drones are the new frontline of modern conflicts, featuring prominently in Russia's war in Ukraine and Israel's conflicts in the Middle East. Nowhere were drones displayed so mightily that in June with Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb, where Kyiv spent months smuggling hundreds of small drones deep inside Russia for coordinated strike that destroyed upwards of 40 Russian warplanes on five airbases. The operation showed that even far reaching targets were not safe from drone attack, including the United States, a country buffered by two oceans and no significant adversary on its borders. Case in point, in late 2024 and earlier this year, military bases and sensitive sites struggled to counter swarms of unauthorized drones that flew over them at night, ​​leading to concerns about security and possible spying. But the United States is currently outpaced by Russia and China in military drone use, a gap caused by a dearth in companies approved to make drones for the U.S. military as well as limited equipment and expertise needed to mass-produce drones, according to a new report released Tuesday by The Heritage Foundation. Only 14 companies currently can make drones for the Defense Department while just one Chinese company, DJI, accounts for 70 percent of all worldwide drone sales and makes millions of drones each year, putting Washington at a disadvantage. U.S. law bars the military from buying Chinese drones. 'Given its current capabilities, the United States in all probability would not be able to win a drone war with China,' the report states, pointing out that the 20 models and hundreds of copies Washington would be able to deploy today are dwarfed in comparison to Beijing's millions of unmanned aerial vehicles. Michael insisted, however, that the United States is not only keeping up in the drone race but also 'going for dominance,' pointing to President Trump's June 6 executive order titled Unleashing American Drone Dominance.' The order directs federal agencies to fast-track approvals for U.S. drone manufacturers and protect the supply chain from 'undue foreign influence.' That was followed by a series of new policies and investments, announced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth last month, to make it easier for defense officials to buy drones and train troops to use them. 'Lethality will not be hindered by self-imposed restrictions, especially when it comes to harnessing technologies we invented but were slow to pursue. Drone technology is advancing so rapidly, our major risk is risk-avoidance,' Hegseth wrote in a July 10 memo. 'The department's bureaucratic gloves are coming off.' Michael echoed that viewpoint. 'We're going to have the best technology, we're going to have mass production, and to do that, we're going to cut the red tape, and we're going to let innovation happen in private industry,' Michael said in the interview. 'You're going to see us become dominant, more dominant than we already are in unmanned warfare.' He did not give a timeline for the U.S. to produce enough drones to meet the Pentagon's needs – a feat that will take significant investment and time to grow such a domestic industry – but he said that the administration has 'invested hundreds of millions of dollars through various programs' for the effort. 'The idea is to have an industrial base that could produce hundreds of thousands of these per month over time, because that's what we're seeing out there in the world right now,' he said. While the United States is adept at developing large, sophisticated and expensive unmanned aircraft such as the Predator and Reaper – both costing tens of millions of dollars each – its industrial base struggles to produce the smaller, inexpensive drones that dominate the conflicts in Ukraine and Middle East and are made with Chinese components. To fast-track more drones for the U.S. military, Micahel said the Pentagon will now hold two events per year known as the Technology Readiness Experimentation, or T-REX, where manufacturers can demonstrate their drones. T-Rex, started under the Biden administration's now defunct Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve, gives live-fire exercises and prototype demonstrations to help military users assess the technology for real-world use. 'Some of them are just gathering intelligence, or gathering an understanding of what's happening on the battlefield. Some are carrying weapons. Some are countering other drones,' he said of the range of drones tested. 'They could be anything from a few pounds to, you know, a couple 100 pounds, and they could be launched in different ways too. . . . that's because there's so many situations that they may have to be used to defend a military base, defend on a battlefield.' In addition, 18 drone prototypes – all which passed through the T-REX program – are currently under accelerated development at the Pentagon. The U.S. government also conducted a wargame on how to defend military bases in the United States from drone attacks in March in Alaska.

Clearwater leaders delay vote on selling street to Church of Scientology
Clearwater leaders delay vote on selling street to Church of Scientology

Yahoo

time04-04-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Clearwater leaders delay vote on selling street to Church of Scientology

The Brief Clearwater City Council postponed voting on the sale of South Garden Avenue between Court Street and Franklin Street to the Church of Scientology. The church wants to close the street and build an auditorium. Dozens of residents spoke against the proposed sale during public comment. CLEARWATER, Fla. - After hours of heated debate and discussion, Clearwater City Council voted Thursday to postpone voting on the sale of a public street to the Church of Scientology for another month. The city held a public hearing on selling South Garden Avenue between Court Street and Franklin Street to the Church of Scientology for $1.375 million. The church expressed to the city that it wants to close that street and build an auditorium there. But dozens of residents packed the council chambers arguing against the sale. What they're saying Residents at the meeting voiced concerns about the church owning more property potentially contributing to the dwindling businesses downtown and vacant storefronts. Others brought up concerns of impacts to drivers and not having enough time for public feedback. The request for proposals for vacating and selling the street was open for 30 days. "Our concerns are that the due diligence hasn't been done we feel in giving other citizens and companies opportunities to bid on this piece of property," said Kelly Meyer, a Clearwater resident. "I think it was a shock that it was even something that would be available. It is a city street and it's our public property that has parking spaces that generate income for the city." PREVIOUS: Clearwater City Council debates selling the Church of Scientology a city-owned street Clearwater Mayor Bruce Rector said he's against the sale agreement and thinks the church could build their building on the lot they already have without needing the street. "I was willing to consider closing the street depending upon if they would offer terms that were favorable to the city of Clearwater. We've had a downtown that needs revitalized and if there are ways for them to help us revitalize it, then I was willing to consider those in exchange for closing the street. But those terms did not make it into the final agreement," said Rector. "We just want to make sure that whatever they're developing there, at least I do, does not impact negatively all these other development activities that are going on in Clearwater. The future is bright. I just want to make sure that if we close the street, it wouldn't negatively impact all these other things." The other side Some residents during public comment expressed support for giving the church a fair shot, and they liked the potential events the auditorium could bring to the city. There was also an alternate proposal submitted just hours before the deadline and the council meeting to turn that area into a memorial garden for African American burial grounds that were paved over. Follow FOX 13 on YouTube What's next City council will now have to look through that proposal in more detail with their decision to postpone a vote for 30 days. The city expects to bring the topic back for discussion and a vote in May. The Source Information for this story was gathered by FOX 13's Briona Arradondo. STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 13 TAMPA: Download the FOX Local app for your smart TV Download FOX Local mobile app: Apple | Android Download the FOX 13 News app for breaking news alerts, latest headlines Download the SkyTower Radar app Sign up for FOX 13's daily newsletter

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store