Latest news with #KeystoneEducationGroup
Observer
2 days ago
- Politics
- Observer
International students turn to Asian universities as a refuge
SEOUL, South Korea — For Jess Concepcion, a microbiology student from the Philippines, obtaining a doctorate from a university in the United States had been a dream. It was where most of his academic mentors had studied and done research, and he wanted to follow in their footsteps. But when the United States, under President Donald Trump, started pausing visa interviews during peak season this spring, threatening to deport international students for political speech and slashing funding for academic research, he quickly changed plans. Applications for doctoral programs take years and have to be tailored to specific schools, so he is aiming for programs in Switzerland and Singapore instead. 'That uncertainty made me stop in my tracks and choose another country,' Concepcion, 24, said. 'Immigration policy is quite restrictive, and I'm on a different side of the world. So living in that kind of instability that far away isn't healthy for me.' It's a quandary facing many young people around the world. According to the United Nations, 6.9 million people studied outside their home country in 2022. The United States has long attracted the most foreign students, 1.1 million in the 2023-24 academic year. It's too soon to know whether more foreign students will choose not to attend U.S. schools. But warning signs abound. Major international education search platforms, including IDP and Keystone Education Group, have detected a marked decline in student interest in American programs. Among academic administrators polled by the Institute of International Education this spring, more than usual reported drops in international applications for the coming year. These are not the first signs that American higher education is losing its dominant position. For years, countries in Asia have been strengthening their universities and marketing them to students around the world. With more appealing alternatives, the Trump administration's hostile stance may hasten the decline in U.S. higher education preeminence. 'We're shifting from a world in which there were only a few primary target destination countries to a much more multipolar world,' said Clay Harmon, the executive director of the Association of International Enrollment Management, which represents recruitment agencies. 'It's all adding up to this narrative that 'maybe that's not the right destination for me after all,'' Harmon said. ''And there are a whole bunch of other countries that are eager to take my money instead.'' Asia Steps Up For decades, in the English-speaking world, Oxford and Cambridge in Britain, the Ivy League in the United States, and other name-brand universities in Australia and Canada tended to top application checklists. Gradually, schools in China, Japan, Taiwan and Singapore started showing up in annual rankings of the top universities — and with lower prices. Governments dispatched representatives to college fairs and set goals for the number of students they wanted to bring in every year. So when Trump, soon after starting his second term, began pushing international students away, Asian nations started welcoming students who couldn't continue their studies at American schools. Take South Korea, where Concepcion went for his master's degree after winning a scholarship from the South Korean government that covered living expenses and tuition. He added a year of mandatory language study and enrolled at Korea University in Seoul, where his program starts in earnest this fall. In the spring, Korea University was among several institutions to offer relief measures as the U.S. government began canceling some student visas and terminating funding programs. Another South Korean school, Yonsei University, will open rolling admissions for undergraduate transfers year round starting in 2026 and is planning a customized visiting program for students whose coursework is interrupted in the United States. Trump has added urgency to such plans, but this effort has been underway in Asia for decades. South Korea has for years sent students to other countries, while attracting few from overseas. In the early 2000s, leaders started to think of that imbalance as a kind of trade deficit and set out to boost their international recruitment. They took guidance from a similar effort in Japan, which had about 337,000 foreign students last year and is aiming for 400,000 by 2033. South Korea's latest target was set in 2023: 300,000 international students by 2027. For 2026, Seoul was named the top city for international students in the closely followed Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings. Early on, the South Korean government's work was intended to buoy flagging schools in smaller towns, where low birthrates and emigration to larger cities have shrunk classes of high school graduates. Foreign students are also not subject to tuition caps that apply to domestic students, creating a new revenue stream to keep universities afloat. Meekyung Shin, the director of educational globalization for South Korea's Ministry of Education, said that at first those foreign students were generally expected to return home after their studies. More recently, officials have started to see foreign students as an answer to the nation's labor shortage as well. Seoul established a support center to help foreign students get jobs, and visa policies have been loosened to help them work after graduation. 'Now we are very interested in how we help them decide to stay here,' Shin said. There are about 70,000 students in South Korea from China and 50,000 from Vietnam. Myanmar and Nepal send thousands each year. For South Korean companies, the students offer an opportunity: potential hires who could help expand the business into their home countries or manage overseas factories. Hyundai, for example, makes many of its cars in Vietnam and is trying to sell them in Singapore. Kyle Guadana is a Singaporean student studying at Yonsei University, where he leads the Foreign Student Union. He said Hyundai, among other companies, had reached out directly. 'They are looking for foreigners who will be able to work with them,' Guadana, 24, said. 'They are specifically targeting Southeast Asian students, because they are trying to expand their bases here.' The recruiting drive has had some complications, however. To hit its targets, the government has accepted a wider range of language proficiency tests and lowered the minimum bank balance required to obtain a visa. It has also increased the number of hours students can work in a week. Some students have used university enrollment primarily as a way to earn money in South Korea, which is not otherwise easy to do. That's particularly true outside Seoul, according to Jun Hyun Hong, a professor at Chung-Ang University who was involved in earlier efforts to bring international students to South Korea's higher education system. Local governments are happy to have more people willing to work in factories and on farms, something that colleges facilitate. 'If we focus mainly on achieving the numerical goal,' Hong said, 'and ignore the quality of international students and the educational capacity of the university, there are concerns about whether maintaining these numbers will be sustainable in the long term.' Shin, the education official, said the government was working to ensure the quality of the programs. Right now, international students make up about 10% of the total student population, and she thinks that's a good ratio to maintain. But the larger challenge may be making sure that those who come primarily to study are able to work in South Korea when they graduate — and that they want to stay. Keity Rose Mendes, 21, grew up in Mozambique and received the same scholarship granted to Concepcion, studying industrial engineering at Seoul National University. She chose South Korea for its safety and because she wanted to learn about its manufacturing techniques. But after three years of classes, she felt that collaboration wasn't valued and that foreign students weren't well integrated. 'A lot of them, especially non-Asian international students, just want to finish their studies and leave,' said Mendes, who is the president of the school's International Student Association. 'I wish that the same effort that they're putting into bringing international students, they also tried to put into creating facilities to maintain them here.' Hedging Their Bets For millions of students deciding where to study, the United States is still the leading destination. Degrees from top American universities command societal respect — and lucrative job offers — in countries like South Korea. But even that shine has been dulled by new obstacles since Trump took office, said Pierre Huguet, the CEO of the global admissions consulting firm H&C Education. 'Many saw the U.S. as offering more freedom and an escape from rigid social pressures in Korea,' Huguet said. 'Now they fear visa revocations, invasive online presence reviews, and a chilled campus climate, which is the opposite of what they were hoping for.' Huguet said his clients were focusing on Britain and Australia. The number of South Korean students studying abroad overall has been dropping as the country's universities climb the rankings. And the United States isn't the only developed country to push back against international students. Canada and Australia limited international student visas last year, while Britain raised visa fees and was contemplating shortening postgraduate work visas. 'No country is being extremely welcoming at this stage,' said Yash Sharma, who runs an admissions consultancy called Longshore Education focused on the market in India. 'Everywhere in the English-speaking world, there is anti-immigration sentiment going around.' To add to political uncertainty, post-graduation job opportunities are changing. Tech companies, which have long been a strong draw to the United States, have pulled back on hiring entry-level workers as artificial intelligence reduces the number of people needed to do simpler tasks. That's what ultimately changed Divyank Rawat's mind. After working as a data analyst in India after college, he decided to pursue a master's degree in the United States because he felt it was the only place he could learn certain skills. Rawat, 25, was admitted to a handful of good programs. But after he spoke with other Indians who had recently graduated in the United States, the job market looked grim. Combined with the risk of not getting a student visa and new threats to the three-year, post-graduation period when students are allowed to work using their student visas, he decided to stay in India to work for the time being. 'Let's suppose I end up in the U.S. with $70,000 debt and no kind of job security,' Rawat said. 'It is really scary to imagine that.' He regrets not applying to European programs: 'The mistake was that I didn't have a backup plan.' This article originally appeared in
Arabian Post
30-05-2025
- Politics
- Arabian Post
Global Universities Capitalise on US Academic Policy Shift
A sweeping crackdown on international students under President Donald Trump's administration has triggered a global realignment in higher education, as universities across Europe and Asia move swiftly to attract displaced talent and research funding. The United States, long considered the premier destination for international scholars, is witnessing a sharp decline in its appeal. A survey by the Keystone Education Group indicates that 42% of prospective international students are now unlikely to consider the US for higher studies, citing visa restrictions, safety concerns, and an increasingly hostile political climate. European students are particularly affected, with 58% expressing diminished interest. At the centre of the controversy is Harvard University, which has become a focal point of the administration's intensified scrutiny. In May 2025, the US government revoked Harvard's authority to enrol international students, citing alleged irregularities in its admissions processes. This move is part of a broader effort to penalise institutions perceived to violate federal policies. Harvard has responded with legal action, asserting that the government failed to follow proper administrative procedures. A federal judge has since extended a temporary restraining order, blocking the administration's attempt to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students. ADVERTISEMENT The Trump administration has also directed all US consular missions to intensify vetting procedures for non-immigrant visa applicants affiliated with Harvard. This policy affects prospective students, faculty, employees, contractors, guest speakers, and tourists intending to visit Harvard for any reason. The directive claims Harvard has failed to maintain a campus free from violence and antisemitism, justifying the need to screen for individuals with histories of antisemitic behaviour. Consular officers are also instructed to consider applicants' credibility if their social media accounts are private, requesting they be made public during the application process. These measures have caused fear and confusion among international students, leading to visa delays and increased scrutiny at borders. Over 7,000 international students and scholars depend on Harvard for legal US residency. Harvard maintains that these moves threaten the foundational autonomy of American higher education. The Trump administration has pursued changes to Harvard's governance as part of broader political grievances, prompting claims from Harvard of retaliation for resisting political interference. The administration's actions have had a ripple effect across the US academic landscape. The Department of Homeland Security has revoked Harvard's certification to host foreign students, and the administration has frozen $2.3 billion in federal research funding for the university. Additionally, the Internal Revenue Service has been asked to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status. These punitive measures are part of a broader crackdown on immigration and higher education institutions accused of harbouring anti-American sentiment. In response to these developments, universities worldwide are seizing the opportunity to attract international students and researchers. Asian countries, particularly Japan, have moved quickly to position themselves as alternative destinations. Leading institutions such as the University of Tokyo and Kyoto University are stepping up to accommodate displaced or discouraged students, signalling a shift in the global academic landscape. European universities are also actively recruiting US researchers, offering themselves as a haven for those keen to escape the Trump administration's crackdown on research and academia. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, for instance, has opened 12 postdoctoral positions for international researchers, with a particular focus on Americans. The Pasteur Institute in Paris is working to recruit people from across the Atlantic for work in fields such as infectious diseases. ADVERTISEMENT In the UK, Sir Adrian Smith, President of the Royal Society, believes the country could surpass the US in science leadership if it reforms its immigration system, particularly by reducing the high costs of obtaining visas for scientists. Smith described a deteriorating scientific climate under the Trump administration, marked by $40 billion in science funding cuts and restrictions on international student admissions. The Royal Society has established an international fellowship programme aimed at attracting top global talent, with a particular eye on disaffected US researchers. Australia's leading research institutions have raised alarms over the Trump administration's abrupt restrictions on US funding, jeopardising critical scientific collaborations. The Group of Eight, representing the nation's most research-intensive universities, has disclosed that several Australian researchers have seen their US financial support curtailed, while others face onerous bureaucratic hurdles. Recipients of US federal funding were compelled to complete an exhaustive 36-point compliance questionnaire, ostensibly designed to assess the alignment of their work with President Trump's political priorities. The Trump administration's aggressive rollback of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programmes has ignited a legal and ideological battle over the future of academic freedom in the United States. A lawsuit filed by leading academic organisations challenges what it calls an unconstitutional overreach of executive power. The plaintiffs argue that the orders violate fundamental rights, disrupt institutional policies, and imperil decades of progress in fostering inclusive learning environments.
