logo
#

Latest news with #Kishanlal

Jaipur court acquits 13 in 25-yr-old double murder case
Jaipur court acquits 13 in 25-yr-old double murder case

Time of India

time5 days ago

  • Time of India

Jaipur court acquits 13 in 25-yr-old double murder case

Jaipur: A special court in Jaipur handling statewide cases related to communal riots, Tuesday acquitted 13 individuals accused of a double murder committed nearly 25 years ago in Malpura town of Tonk district. The lower court's decision was based on the prosecution's failure to substantiate the charges against the accused with adequate evidence. The acquitted individuals, however, remain implicated in a second double-murder case from the same riots, the verdict of which is expected on Aug 24. In her judgment, the court's presiding officer Shweta Gupta stated, "The prosecution failed to prove the crime against the accused with proper evidence and investigation." The individuals acquitted included Ratanlal, Kishanlal, Ramswaroop, Devkaran, Shyoji Ram, Ramkishore, Sukhlal, Chhotu, Bachchraj, Kistur, Hiralal, Satyanarayan and Kishanlal. As per court docuements, Mohammad Ali and his nephew Mohammad Salim were murdered in Malpura on July 10, 2000, during a time of heightened communal tensions. The case was initiated after Shahzad, a relative of the victims, lodged a police report asserting that members of a particular community were responsible for the killings. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Secret Lives of the Romanovs — the Last Rulers of Imperial Russia! Learn More Undo Following this, a total of 22 individuals were charged. Out of the original 22 accused, eight had previously been discharged by the High Court in 2016, while one was classified as a minor, resulting in his case being referred to the Juvenile Court. The remaining 13 were acquitted on Tuesday, with the court granting them the benefit of doubt. Defense attorneys argued that the investigation conducted by the police was inadequate. VK Bali, one of the defense counsels, emphasised that the FIR was based on second-hand information and highlighted the imposition of Section 144 at the time of the incident, which raised doubts about the reliability of the purported eyewitnesses. Additionally, the defense pointed out the absence of the murder weapon and criticised the lack of a proper identification parade for the accused. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store