Latest news with #Kislak
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Opponents put in their two cents on a proposed $2 event ticket tax at R.I. House panel hearing
The VETS, shown center left in a view from the Rhode Island State, is among the venues that would be affected by a bill that would allow municipalities to add a $2-per-ticket tax for venues with more than 800 seats. (Photo by Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current) Members of the House Committee on Finance on Thursday appeared to see the need for a bill that would let municipalities impose a $2 tax on tickets to large venue events despite opposition from event promoters and business owners. Providence Democratic Rep. Rebecca Kislak introduced her bill with a shout-out to her mom in Miami by recounting her mother's words: ''Why are you in the news about this ticket tax? What's the big deal? All big metropolitan areas and cities have taxes like this to support the cities where events are held.' So thanks, Mom, for that.' Kislak's H6334 was submitted at the request of the Providence City Council as part of a multipronged approach to fend off budget chaos following a multimillion dollar settlement last November between the city and the state education department. Kislak is also the sponsor of H6162, by Providence Mayor Brett Smiley, which would allow the city to increase its total tax levy in fiscal year 2026 beyond the state-mandated 4% growth cap. The tax levy bill passed the House floor 56-17 Tuesday after about an hour of heated discussion, with House Republicans joining progressive Democrats in opposing the bill's passage. The legislation lingers still in the Senate, where it was heard in committee for the first time, also on Tuesday. Kislak's event ticket tax bill bears the signature of at least one Providence Democratic co-sponsor, Rep. David Morales, who opposed the levy bill, plus five other Providence Democrats, and Democratic Reps. Brandon Potter of Cranston and June Speakman of Warren. While the bill was designed with Providence in mind, it would authorize any municipality to adopt a local tax of up to $2 per ticket on events held at 'large venues,' or those with 800 or more seats, per the bill's definition. The Division of Taxation would be responsible for collecting the tax and then redistributing it to municipalities. Revenue from ticket taxes would not count toward the tax levy hike cap codified in state law. That complements the tax levy hike legislation, by allowing towns and cities to up their tax income without risking the chance of going over the 4% annual limit on how much municipalities can raise taxes. 'Every city and town, increasingly, is facing difficulties in overreliance on property tax as the main workhorse for how we can do our business, how we can take care of city services,' Providence City Council President Rachel Miller told the committee Thursday, adding that the bill 'is one kind of tool in the toolbox' to help dig the city out of its fiscal hole. Miller estimated the new fee could generate around $3 million annually for Providence, which would help offset the rising cost of services in the capital city without discouraging event attendance. The bill was held for further study Thursday, as is standard practice. City Council Chief of Staff June Rose said in an email Friday that a Senate companion is in the works. Anthony Vega, a spokesperson for Mayor Smiley, said the city administration is still reviewing the bill. The state's Division of Taxation has read the bill, however, and thinks it needs to be redrafted. In a letter to the committee, Neena Savage, tax administrator, testified that parts of the bill as written are 'ambiguous' and suggested filing it under local tax statutes rather than the state's broader sales tax code. Asked about the tax official's take, Kislak said via text Friday that she was planning to review everything over the weekend, and 'would be glad to provide additional clarifications based on the feedback last night.' 'This is enabling legislation and I'm confident the cities and towns will refine this in locally appropriate ways as they write ordinances, if they so choose,' Kislak wrote. Kislak's bill managed to coalesce support among her colleagues. It also did the same for the opposition — venue managers and hospitality lobbyists — who showed up Thursday night to oppose the bill, many of whom argued that the proposed fee is small, it will disadvantage Rhode Island in a competitive live entertainment market. 'It's not so much about passing it on to the patron,' said Dan Schwartz, general manager of The VETS Auditorium. 'You know, what we hear when bills like this come up is, 'We're just going to skip bringing our show to Rhode Island.'' Written testimonies opposing the legislation also came from the legal counsel for the Providence Bruins, South Kingstown Town Councilor Jay G. Wégimont, and Joseph Paolino Jr., former Providence mayor and noted downtown real estate magnate. 'This legislation targets the very institutions that help drive Providence's economic engine, and at the worst possible time,' Paolino wrote, adding that his luxury hotel The Beatrice is always booked when a popular show or game is in town. Contrasting the naysayers was the Finance Committee, including a relentless Rep. Teresa Tanzi. The South Kingstown Democrat asked many questions of the industry advocates who came to testify, although she was befuddled as to why they even showed up. 'This $2 thing — I'm shocked that you guys are even here opposing it, to be quite honest with you,' Tanzi said. 'Because in the larger scheme of things, your ticket holders are being ripped off on so many other levels, and the city is being inconvenienced on so many other levels.' Tanzi suggested that if proprietors were truly concerned about ticket prices, they would investigate different options for ticket delivery — like Dice, a platform that allows people to resell tickets only at face value, and only through its own app, rather than secondary markets. Tanzi also grilled Lawrence Lepore, the general manager of the Amica Mutual Pavilion. Tanzi asked Lepore to what extent the state subsidizes its largest concert venue at 14,000 seats. Lepore replied it's about $27 million a year, including debt service. 'So you're not self-sustaining anyway,' Tanzi said. 'The operation is self-sustaining. But of course, the debt service is not,' Lepore replied. 'We subsidize it to a tune of $27 million a year?' Tanzi asked. 'That's correct,' Lepore said, and Tanzi concluded with a 'Thank you. Thank you very much.' Rich Lupo sold his titular concert venue in 2017, but the longtime music promoter warned that Providence is already 'a secondary city in the booking world.' '[This bill] would just piss them off,' Lupo said of booking companies. 'I think it could be $1, it could be $10. You just don't want to anger the powerful agencies, and bands as well.' From his seat on the committee, bill co-sponsor Hull was canny with Lupo, pointing out that he's known him for decades, and fondly recalls how Lupo grew his titular venue since opening it in 1975. 'I've seen what you're capable of doing,' Hull told Lupo. That's why Hull was firm that the businesses should be capable of weathering a $2 surcharge — especially places like the Amica Mutual Pavilion, which is housed in the tax-exempt Rhode Island Convention Center but still benefits from city services. Sharon Steele, speaking on behalf of the Jewelry District Association, disagreed. She pointed to another Smiley proposal and Kislak bill for a 7% 'consumption tax' on the city's parking lots and garages. The ticket tax would add 'insult to injury' for downtown venues already burdened by tax policies, she said. Hull told Steele he subscribes to the Rhode Island Philharmonic — Steele was once on its board — then narrowed his eyes, smiled, and made a case for the value of expression: 'The arts are special. And if I had to pay an extra $2 to see the arts, I'd be more than happy to pay it.' 'I appreciate that, but the Philharmonic's not doing well these days,' Steele said, adding that such plights are common right now for nonprofits. 'And we're sure not getting any help from the feds.' 'The $2 is necessary,' Hull replied. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
22-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Providence tax levy bill clears House committee, but lingers still in Senate
Providence City Hall is pictured in the city's downtown. Providence officials say their fiscal 2026 budget depends on a proposed 7.5% property tax levy increase now under consideration at the State House. (Photo by Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current) A proposal to let Providence exceed Rhode Island's tax levy cap cleared a Rhode Island House of Representatives committee Tuesday, moving the city one step closer to the 7.5% increase city officials are seeking in total tax revenue for fiscal year 2026. The House Committee on Municipal Government and Housing voted to move bill H6162, led by Rep. Rebecca Kislak and three other Providence Democrats, to the House floor. The bill authorizes the capital city to exceed Rhode Island's 4% property tax levy cap. The levy comprises owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied residential properties, commercial properties, tangible properties and natural growth, or increase in value, of real estate. But not everyone was on board. Five committee members voted against the bill's passage — a third of the 15-member committee. Kislak predicted as much. 'I don't know that it's going to be unanimous on committee,' she said in a conversation Tuesday in the House chamber before committee meetings began. Providence Democratic Reps. David Morales and José Batista have previously expressed their deep dissatisfaction with the bill and voted to block its passage. Rep. Cherie Cruz, a progressive Pawtucket Democrat, and two Republicans, Rep. Richard Fascia of Johnston and Rep. Robert Quattrocchi of Scituate, resisted the bills alongside Morales and Batista. The only Providence delegate to vote in support of the bill in committee was Democratic Rep. Raymond Hull. Anthony DeSimone, another Providence Democrat, was absent for the vote Tuesday. Kislak's bill would allow an increase up to 8% over the previous year. Mayor Brett Smiley and the Providence City Council have shared their plans to increase by 7.5% the total tax levy for the upcoming fiscal year to help the city weather a court-mandated public school funding settlement from November 2024. Smiley said in April that the next year's budget hinges almost entirely on the tax levy hike. The city's budgeting process is set to end in June, ahead of the new fiscal year's start on July 1, and the City Council will need to review and revise the current spending plan if the levy hike falls through. But the Senate Committee on Finance has yet to schedule a hearing on Sen. Sam Zurier's companion legislation S1041, as of Thursday. The Providence Democrat introduced the bill on May 9. 'I was not able to gain any cosponsors from the PVD Senate delegation,' Zurier wrote in a Wednesday night email. 'I expect the Finance Committee to hear the bill in the next couple of weeks. I am optimistic about its chances, but there is still uncertainty.' The mayor's office is staying calm, said spokesperson Josh Estrella in an email Wednesday. 'We do not have any concerns — we expect the bill to be heard within the next couple of weeks,' he wrote. Estrella called the bill 'critically important' to the city in order to avoid cuts to city services. He noted that similar measures have passed recently for Middletown, Warren, and New Shoreham. Helen Anthony, chair of the City Council's Committee on Finance, shared that view in an email Tuesday. 'Without action by the General Assembly, the mayor's budget cannot move forward,' Anthony wrote. 'That's why the city council passed a one-year exemption to the 4% levy increase cap.' Kislak said she expects House passage. 'When a mayor and a unanimous City Council request something of the General Assembly, we should give it to them,' she said before the committee vote Tuesday. A number of Providence legislators, residents and landlords feel the tax increase will disproportionately affect both owners and occupants of smaller, multifamily homes. Critics like Morales and Batisita have argued the city has not fully explored other revenue sources, such as Providence's industrial waterfront or its myriad of tax-exempt nonprofits both big and small. While Smiley's proposal would actually lower direct tax rates for fiscal year 2026, the sharp increase in Providence real estate pricing during a recent evaluation means that most properties citywide would see increases in their tax bills regardless. Single-family and condo homeowners could see a 4% tax increase. Multifamily homes with between two and five units, owner-occupied or not, could face hikes up to 16%. In her email message, Anthony underlined that the budget process has not yet concluded. 'The City Council is doing our job of vetting the proposed budget in detail, but the city needs flexibility,' she wrote. 'I urge the General Assembly to pass this exemption and to work with us in the months and years ahead to find creative, fair and balanced ways for our state's cities to raise revenue without overburdening residents.' Council spokesperson Marc Boyd said in an email Thursday that the City Council will hold a second public hearing on the budget on Monday, June 9, at 5:30 p.m. at City Hall. Residents can also discuss their concerns with their ward's elected councilor during regularly scheduled ward meetings, Boyd said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
02-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
‘We will not be erased': RI House backs LGBTQIA+ rights
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — The Rhode Island House of Representatives passed a resolution Thursday affirming support and solidarity for the state's LGBTQIA+ community. The bill, 2025-H 6125, asserts that 'every human being has the right to love freely and live their lives openly as who they are,' in response to growing threats to the rights and safety of transgender and nonbinary Rhode Islanders. Sponsor Rep. Rebecca Kislak pointed to Rhode Island's foundation on religious freedom and its long history of welcoming, protecting, and valuing the diversity of LGBTQIA+ residents. 'We are important parts of the diverse threads of our community, which, when woven together make our Rhode Island the strong and vibrant place we call home,' Kislak said. 'We should do everything we can, and I will do everything, to ensure that no one has to go back into the closet.' The bill states that Rhode Island remains committed to protecting the civil rights of LGBTQIA+ individuals and ensuring their 'dignity and full access to public life,' free from discrimination, fear, or prejudice. House Speaker Joe Shekarchi, who co-sponsored the bill, mentioned his fight for issues that 'challenged the status quo,' including the passage of the Rhode Island Uniform Parentage Act and the enactment of a Healthcare Provider Shield law. 'When I became Speaker, I wanted to use my platform to make sure that ALL Rhode Islanders — regardless of background, gender identity, religion, or who they love — would have a voice,' Shekarchi said. 'Today, our country is at a crossroads. Many of our rights, and our community's rights, are under attack,' he added. 'Today, we are showing that our collective voice is powerful, and that we will not be erased.' Trump administration proposes getting rid of crisis hotline serving LGBTQ+ youth LGBTQIA+ Action RI extended thanks to the bill's sponsors and General Assembly members for 'championing our community amid a national barrage of harmful anti-LGBTQIA+ policies and rhetoric.' The state Senate passed a companion bill on April 10, after Democratic LGBTQ+ Caucus members 'spoke powerfully' about the state's need for visible leadership and how legislative action for equal rights and dignity had deep personal impacts, according to LGBTQIA+ Action RI. The group also noted senators who shared personal stories of coming out, facing discrimination, experiencing loss, and expressing gratitude for what the resolution represents. 'It's important and valuable at this moment in time to have those in positions of power affirming that they stand with us,' said LGBTQIA+ Action RI's Denise Crooks. 'We hope Rhode Island continues to be a state at the forefront of protecting and advancing LGBTQIA rights and equality.'House-Resolution-2025-H-6125-—-EXPRESSING-SUPPORT-FOR-THE-LGBTQIA-COMMUNITYDownload Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
21-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Another year, another decarbonization bill. And more angst about a deadline.
The city of Providence began tracking energy and emissions use from large, city-owned buildings in 2024, with plans to include private buildings this year. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) A new report commissioned by the Rhode Island General Assembly offers a laundry list of problems — and up to $1.4 million in annual costs — preventing the state from collecting energy and emissions information from large privately owned buildings. Yet the city of Providence has already managed to pull off its own version of a building energy benchmarking program, with one half-time employee and a $28,000 city budget, according to information from Priscilla de la Cruz, city sustainability director. The state's Act on Climate Law mandates the state cut emissions 45% below 1990 levels by 2030. Preliminary modeling already suggests the state might miss its 2030 target if it doesn't take action, including in the building sector, which accounted for nearly half of annual emissions in 2022, the most recent data available. 'You can't reduce what you don't measure,' said Tina Munter, Rhode Island policy advocate for Green Energy Consumers Alliance. 'This is a long-term investment for the future of Rhode Island in order for us to meet the mandatory Act on Climate emissions reductions. It is on our state to prioritize something we need to do, which was already signed into law by our governor in 2021.' Rep. Rebecca Kislak, a Providence Democrat, has been trying to warm legislative leaders to the prospect of creating a state building energy benchmarking program for years. Her decarbonization bill last year was stripped down to a study by the Rhode Island Office of Energy Resources, which published a report on Feb. 10. Kislak worries it's already too late to meet the 2030 deadline. 'As I was putting together the draft this year, I kept looking at these dates and thinking, 'are we really going to wait this long?'' Kislak said in a recent interview. Kislak's 2025 bill, introduced in the Rhode Island House of Representatives on Feb. 13, accompanies similar, though not identical legislation in the Senate from Pawtucket Democratic Sen. Meghan Kallman. The legislation calls on the state to begin tracking energy usage from public and privately owned buildings larger than 50,000 square feet in 2026. Private buildings between 25,000 and 50,000 square feet would have to begin reporting energy and emissions usage in 2027. The annual reporting data would be used to develop building emissions standards by June 2029. The Environmental Council of Rhode Island, a consortium of 60 organizations and individuals, considers the legislation a top priority this year — the second consecutive year. Gov. Dan McKee appears on board with at least part of the plan, allocating $139,000 in his proposed fiscal 2026 budget for one new employee to begin tracking energy and emissions from state-owned buildings. However, there is no money or acknowledgement of expanding the program to the private sector in his budget proposal. Olivia DaRocha, a spokesperson for McKee's office, cited lack of data and infrastructure as barriers to creating a program for private sector buildings. 'Expanding to the private sector should be considered in the future based on funding availability and the creation of data and building inventory infrastructure,' DaRocha said. Creating a list of the estimated 2,300 buildings statewide larger than 25,000 square feet requires pulling from multiple datasets, including municipal tax databases, GIS systems and commercial information, according to the OER report. Meanwhile, the state's primary utility supplier, Rhode Island Energy, is still developing a system to automate individual building energy usage based on customer bills, the report says. 'Given the lack of requisite data and infrastructure to support the rollout of a program for large municipal and private buildings, OER should focus on leading a program for certain large state-owned and state-occupied buildings that would lay the foundation for future expansion to large municipal and private buildings,' the report states. The OER estimated an initial $600,000 cost to expand an energy benchmarking program beyond state-owned buildings, rising to $1.4 million for technical support to implement performance standards around emissions. Emily Koo, senior policy director and Rhode Island program director at Acadia Center, was unconvinced the problems were as big, or costly, as the report suggested. 'Providence has already done the work to stand this kind of program up,' said Koo, who previously worked as the city's sustainability director. 'This is the absolute lowest-hanging fruit.' The capital city released its inaugural building energy report in December 2024 with energy and emissions usage for 63 city-owned buildings above 10,000 square feet. The program will expand to include privately owned large buildings within the city limits this year. Three states — including Massachusetts — and 16 cities have passed laws requiring statewide benchmarking of energy and emissions use from large public, commercial and multi-family residential buildings, according to data collected by the Institute for Market Transformation. Additional states and cities have enacted more stringent laws that also require actions by building owners to reduce emissions. Providence's initial rollout hasn't been seamless. For example, the city didn't realize that Rhode Island Energy would not be able to automatically enter private billing data into a third-party dashboard used to track energy usage. The city and utility company are working to teach the estimated 300 businesses affected how to manually request and upload the necessary information until an automation is completed, de la Cruz said. Evelyn Garcia, a spokesperson for Rhode Island Energy, said the company is working to evaluate vendors now, developing the interface in the second quarter of the year. She declined to comment on the state legislation until legislative hearings occur. Another potential sore spot: availability of federal funding. The city has leaned on federal money to prop up its program and promoted separate federal incentives for building owners to reduce emissions through energy efficiency upgrades and conversions to electric heat pumps. 'Recent changes at the federal level have introduced uncertainty around the availability and consistency of energy-related grants, making it challenging to predict current and future funding opportunities,' the report states. Since Jan. 27, OER has been locked out of $125 million in approved federal funding for energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, according to a federal lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island. Munter suggested low-interest loans through the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank's Efficient Buildings Fund as an alternative funding source for municipalities and school districts. 'What is the cost of inaction?' she asked. 'We're talking about our ability to be resilient in the face of climate change.' The Rhode Island General Assembly is on winter recess this week. Hearings on Kislak's and Kallman's bills had not been scheduled as of Thursday. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
