logo
Another year, another decarbonization bill. And more angst about a deadline.

Another year, another decarbonization bill. And more angst about a deadline.

Yahoo21-02-2025

The city of Providence began tracking energy and emissions use from large, city-owned buildings in 2024, with plans to include private buildings this year. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
A new report commissioned by the Rhode Island General Assembly offers a laundry list of problems — and up to $1.4 million in annual costs — preventing the state from collecting energy and emissions information from large privately owned buildings.
Yet the city of Providence has already managed to pull off its own version of a building energy benchmarking program, with one half-time employee and a $28,000 city budget, according to information from Priscilla de la Cruz, city sustainability director.
The state's Act on Climate Law mandates the state cut emissions 45% below 1990 levels by 2030. Preliminary modeling already suggests the state might miss its 2030 target if it doesn't take action, including in the building sector, which accounted for nearly half of annual emissions in 2022, the most recent data available.
'You can't reduce what you don't measure,' said Tina Munter, Rhode Island policy advocate for Green Energy Consumers Alliance. 'This is a long-term investment for the future of Rhode Island in order for us to meet the mandatory Act on Climate emissions reductions. It is on our state to prioritize something we need to do, which was already signed into law by our governor in 2021.'
Rep. Rebecca Kislak, a Providence Democrat, has been trying to warm legislative leaders to the prospect of creating a state building energy benchmarking program for years. Her decarbonization bill last year was stripped down to a study by the Rhode Island Office of Energy Resources, which published a report on Feb. 10.
Kislak worries it's already too late to meet the 2030 deadline.
'As I was putting together the draft this year, I kept looking at these dates and thinking, 'are we really going to wait this long?'' Kislak said in a recent interview.
Kislak's 2025 bill, introduced in the Rhode Island House of Representatives on Feb. 13, accompanies similar, though not identical legislation in the Senate from Pawtucket Democratic Sen. Meghan Kallman.
The legislation calls on the state to begin tracking energy usage from public and privately owned buildings larger than 50,000 square feet in 2026. Private buildings between 25,000 and 50,000 square feet would have to begin reporting energy and emissions usage in 2027.
The annual reporting data would be used to develop building emissions standards by June 2029.
The Environmental Council of Rhode Island, a consortium of 60 organizations and individuals, considers the legislation a top priority this year — the second consecutive year.
Gov. Dan McKee appears on board with at least part of the plan, allocating $139,000 in his proposed fiscal 2026 budget for one new employee to begin tracking energy and emissions from state-owned buildings.
However, there is no money or acknowledgement of expanding the program to the private sector in his budget proposal.
Olivia DaRocha, a spokesperson for McKee's office, cited lack of data and infrastructure as barriers to creating a program for private sector buildings.
'Expanding to the private sector should be considered in the future based on funding availability and the creation of data and building inventory infrastructure,' DaRocha said.
Creating a list of the estimated 2,300 buildings statewide larger than 25,000 square feet requires pulling from multiple datasets, including municipal tax databases, GIS systems and commercial information, according to the OER report. Meanwhile, the state's primary utility supplier, Rhode Island Energy, is still developing a system to automate individual building energy usage based on customer bills, the report says.
'Given the lack of requisite data and infrastructure to support the rollout of a program for large municipal and private buildings, OER should focus on leading a program for certain large state-owned and state-occupied buildings that would lay the foundation for future expansion to large municipal and private buildings,' the report states.
The OER estimated an initial $600,000 cost to expand an energy benchmarking program beyond state-owned buildings, rising to $1.4 million for technical support to implement performance standards around emissions.
Emily Koo, senior policy director and Rhode Island program director at Acadia Center, was unconvinced the problems were as big, or costly, as the report suggested.
'Providence has already done the work to stand this kind of program up,' said Koo, who previously worked as the city's sustainability director. 'This is the absolute lowest-hanging fruit.'
The capital city released its inaugural building energy report in December 2024 with energy and emissions usage for 63 city-owned buildings above 10,000 square feet. The program will expand to include privately owned large buildings within the city limits this year.
Three states — including Massachusetts — and 16 cities have passed laws requiring statewide benchmarking of energy and emissions use from large public, commercial and multi-family residential buildings, according to data collected by the Institute for Market Transformation. Additional states and cities have enacted more stringent laws that also require actions by building owners to reduce emissions.
Providence's initial rollout hasn't been seamless. For example, the city didn't realize that Rhode Island Energy would not be able to automatically enter private billing data into a third-party dashboard used to track energy usage. The city and utility company are working to teach the estimated 300 businesses affected how to manually request and upload the necessary information until an automation is completed, de la Cruz said.
Evelyn Garcia, a spokesperson for Rhode Island Energy, said the company is working to evaluate vendors now, developing the interface in the second quarter of the year. She declined to comment on the state legislation until legislative hearings occur.
Another potential sore spot: availability of federal funding. The city has leaned on federal money to prop up its program and promoted separate federal incentives for building owners to reduce emissions through energy efficiency upgrades and conversions to electric heat pumps.
'Recent changes at the federal level have introduced uncertainty around the availability and consistency of energy-related grants, making it challenging to predict current and future funding opportunities,' the report states.
Since Jan. 27, OER has been locked out of $125 million in approved federal funding for energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, according to a federal lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island.
Munter suggested low-interest loans through the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank's Efficient Buildings Fund as an alternative funding source for municipalities and school districts.
'What is the cost of inaction?' she asked. 'We're talking about our ability to be resilient in the face of climate change.'
The Rhode Island General Assembly is on winter recess this week. Hearings on Kislak's and Kallman's bills had not been scheduled as of Thursday.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal judge approves Colorado law banning people under 21 from buying a gun
Federal judge approves Colorado law banning people under 21 from buying a gun

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal judge approves Colorado law banning people under 21 from buying a gun

A federal judge upheld Colorado's restriction on firearms sales requiring buyers to be 21 or older after Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and two people looking to purchase firearms sued Democratic Gov. Jared Polis. Chief U.S. District Judge Philip A. Brimmer agreed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit's decision that age-based requirements for purchase do not fall under the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms. The 10th Circuit and Brimmer agree that the issue falls under a "safe harbor" exclusion, placing it outside the scope of the Constitution. The only exceptions to Colorado's firearm purchase age restriction are for those in the U.S. Military and for peace officers. In both cases, the person must be making the purchase while on duty and is "serving in conformance with the policies" of their respective agency. Supreme Court Declines To Examine Appeals Over Maryland, Rhode Island Gun Control Laws "Governor Polis is committed to making Colorado one of the ten safest states, and common-sense laws encourage responsible gun ownership and keep people safe. For decades in Colorado, you had to be 21 to purchase a handgun, per federal law. The requirement to be 21 was expanded to rifles and shotguns with the signing of SB23-169, and Governor Polis is glad to see the court affirm that Colorado's common sense law does not infringe on Second Amendment rights. Governor Polis is confident this law has and will help keep Coloradans and our communities safe," Polis' Communications Director Conor Cahill said in a statement to Fox News Digital. Brimmer acknowledged that Adrian Pineda and Matthew Newkirk — the two individuals under 21 who sued Polis together with Rocky Mountain Gun Owners — are part of "the people" as written in the Second Amendment. However, he referred to the 10th Circuit's decision, saying it had resolved the case back in 2023, according to Courthouse News Service (CNS). Read On The Fox News App Debate Over Whether To Ban Handgun Sales To Teens Could Soon Head To The Supreme Court The decision in Colorado comes in contrast to one issued by the Supreme Court in 2022 in which justices determined that New York issued unconstitutional requirements for carrying a concealed weapon in public. Then-President Joe Biden said he was "deeply disappointed" by the ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. He said that SCOTUS had "chosen to strike down New York's long-established authority to protect its citizens." "This ruling contradicts both common sense and the Constitution, and should deeply trouble us all," Biden said in a statement at the time. He went on to reaffirm his commitment to reducing gun violence and making communities safer. Brimmer is also going against a decision made by the New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which struck down a federal restriction banning the sale of firearms to anyone below the age of 21. That court held that those aged 18 to 20 are protected under the Second Amendment, according to The Trace, an organization of journalists who report on gun violence in the U.S. "The federal government has presented scant evidence that eighteen-to-twenty-year-olds' firearm rights during the founding-era were restricted in a similar manner to the contemporary federal handgun purchase ban," Judge Edith H. Jones wrote in the opinion. Several states, including New York, Massachusetts, California, Florida, Illinois, Delaware and Vermont have raised the age for purchasing firearms, according to the Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund. While some states have limited the age restrictions to handgun purchases, others have applied the restriction to any kind of article source: Federal judge approves Colorado law banning people under 21 from buying a gun

Pentagon watchdog investigates if staffers were asked to delete Hegseth's Signal messages

time22 minutes ago

Pentagon watchdog investigates if staffers were asked to delete Hegseth's Signal messages

WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon watchdog is looking into whether any of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's aides was asked to delete Signal messages that may have shared sensitive military information with a reporter, according to two people familiar with the investigation and documents reviewed by The Associated Press. The inspector general's request focuses on how information about the March 15 airstrikes on Houthi targets in Yemen was shared on the messaging app. This comes as Hegseth is scheduled to testify before Congress next week for the first time since his confirmation hearing. He is likely to face questions under oath not only about his handling of sensitive information but also the wider turmoil at the Pentagon following the departures of several senior aides and an internal investigation over information leaks. Hegseth already has faced questions over the installation of an unsecured internet line in his office that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols and revelations that he shared details about the military strikes in multiple Signal chats. One of the chats included his wife and brother, while the other included President Donald Trump's top national security officials and inadvertently included The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg. Neither the Pentagon nor the inspector general's office immediately responded to Friday requests for comment on the investigation. Besides finding out whether anyone was asked to delete Signal messages, the inspector general also is asking some past and current staffers who were with Hegseth on the day of the strikes who posted the information and who had access to his phone, according to the two people familiar with the investigation and the documents reviewed by the AP. The people were not authorized to discuss the investigation and spoke on the condition of anonymity. Democratic lawmakers and a small number of Republicans have said that the information Hegseth posted to the Signal chats before the military jets had reached their targets could have put those pilots' lives at risk and that for any lower-ranking members of the military it would have led to their firing. Hegseth has said none of the information was classified. Multiple current and former military officials have said there is no way details with that specificity, especially before a strike took place, would have been OK to share on an unsecured device. 'I said repeatedly, nobody is texting war plans,' Hegseth told Fox News Channel in April after reporting emerged about the chat that included his family members. 'I look at war plans every day. What was shared over Signal then and now, however you characterize it, was informal, unclassified coordinations, for media coordinations and other things. That's what I've said from the beginning.' Trump has made clear that Hegseth continues to have his support, saying during a Memorial Day speech at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia that the defense secretary 'went through a lot' but 'he's doing really well.' Hegseth has limited his public engagements with the press since the Signal controversy. He has yet to hold a Pentagon press briefing, and his spokesman has briefed reporters there only once. The inspector general is investigating Hegseth at the request of the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, and the committee's top Democrat, Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island. Signal is a publicly available app that provides encrypted communications, but it can be hacked and is not approved for carrying classified information. On March 14, one day before the strikes against the Houthis, the Defense Department cautioned personnel about the vulnerability of the app. Trump has said his administration targeted the Houthis over their 'unrelenting campaign of piracy, violence and terrorism.' He has noted the disruption Houthi attacks caused through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, key waterways for energy and cargo shipments between Asia and Europe through Egypt's Suez Canal.

MSNBC silent on fallout from Karine Jean-Pierre's White House memoir
MSNBC silent on fallout from Karine Jean-Pierre's White House memoir

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

MSNBC silent on fallout from Karine Jean-Pierre's White House memoir

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre's upcoming memoir in which she reportedly calls the Democratic Party 'broken' is making waves across major news networks — except at MSNBC. The left-leaning network has remained silent since Jean-Pierre announced on Wednesday that she is ditching the party and becoming a registered independent, Former President Joe Biden's mouthpiece touted the party switch while plugging the release of her book, 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines.' 4 MSNBC has not devoted coverage to the fallout from an upcoming memoir by former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. REUTERS In the book, due out in October, she distances herself from the Democratic Party and reportedly paints a damning portrait of her former workplace, describing the Biden administration as 'broken.' Jean-Pierre spent two years as the public face of the Biden White House and was the first black, openly gay woman to hold the role. Her abrupt political shift, combined with criticism of the president she once loyally defended, has triggered a flurry of reaction — especially among Biden allies. Former colleagues have not held back. Several have dismissed the book as a 'grift' and criticized her performance as press secretary, echoing complaints that have appeared in anonymous leaks to outlets like Politico and Axios. One former staffer reportedly told Axios: 'Nobody took her seriously in the building.' While harsh, the wave of criticism arguably reinforces the core claim of her book: that dysfunction inside the administration runs deep. The media response has been swift — at least on some networks. 4 Jean-Pierre revealed in her new memoir due out this fall that she is no longer a member of the Democratic Party. AP According to transcript data, Fox News mentioned Jean-Pierre by name 72 times between Wednesday and Thursday afternoon, according to Mediaite. CNN, despite its closer proximity to the Biden administration, referenced her 44 times. But MSNBC, where Jean-Pierre once worked as a contributor and was a regular on-air presence, has not mentioned her once, said Mediate, which first reported on the network's odd silence. 'The fact that MSNBC is still ignoring the story (as of 1:15 p.m. Thursday) reveals that the editorial direction at the left-leaning network is not yet ready to cover political news that may not align with their past comments and positions,' one media analyst told Mediaite. 4 Former Biden officials have anonymously criticized Jean-Pierre in several news reports. Getty Images The Post has sought comment from MSNBC and Jean-Pierre. Before joining the White House, Jean-Pierre was a frequent progressive voice on the network, where she appeared on panels to support Democratic messaging and criticize the first Trump administration. Her visibility on the network played a key role in raising her public profile and likely aided her appointment to the White House podium following the departure of Jen Psaki. This isn't the first time MSNBC has avoided uncomfortable stories involving the Biden administration. Earlier this year, the network largely sidestepped coverage of 'Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,' the book co-authored by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson that revealed new details about Biden's cognitive decline and internal efforts to shield him from scrutiny. At the time, CNN and Fox News featured wall-to-wall coverage. MSNBC, by contrast, barely acknowledged the book at all. 4 Jean-Pierre was a frequent contributor to MSNBC before she joined the Biden administration. Shutterstock Critics say this selective editorial approach reflects a broader hesitance by MSNBC to air narratives that contradict its on-air talent's previous claims — especially about Biden's fitness for office or the strength of his administration. That discomfort, they argue, translates into silence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store