Another year, another decarbonization bill. And more angst about a deadline.
A new report commissioned by the Rhode Island General Assembly offers a laundry list of problems — and up to $1.4 million in annual costs — preventing the state from collecting energy and emissions information from large privately owned buildings.
Yet the city of Providence has already managed to pull off its own version of a building energy benchmarking program, with one half-time employee and a $28,000 city budget, according to information from Priscilla de la Cruz, city sustainability director.
The state's Act on Climate Law mandates the state cut emissions 45% below 1990 levels by 2030. Preliminary modeling already suggests the state might miss its 2030 target if it doesn't take action, including in the building sector, which accounted for nearly half of annual emissions in 2022, the most recent data available.
'You can't reduce what you don't measure,' said Tina Munter, Rhode Island policy advocate for Green Energy Consumers Alliance. 'This is a long-term investment for the future of Rhode Island in order for us to meet the mandatory Act on Climate emissions reductions. It is on our state to prioritize something we need to do, which was already signed into law by our governor in 2021.'
Rep. Rebecca Kislak, a Providence Democrat, has been trying to warm legislative leaders to the prospect of creating a state building energy benchmarking program for years. Her decarbonization bill last year was stripped down to a study by the Rhode Island Office of Energy Resources, which published a report on Feb. 10.
Kislak worries it's already too late to meet the 2030 deadline.
'As I was putting together the draft this year, I kept looking at these dates and thinking, 'are we really going to wait this long?'' Kislak said in a recent interview.
Kislak's 2025 bill, introduced in the Rhode Island House of Representatives on Feb. 13, accompanies similar, though not identical legislation in the Senate from Pawtucket Democratic Sen. Meghan Kallman.
The legislation calls on the state to begin tracking energy usage from public and privately owned buildings larger than 50,000 square feet in 2026. Private buildings between 25,000 and 50,000 square feet would have to begin reporting energy and emissions usage in 2027.
The annual reporting data would be used to develop building emissions standards by June 2029.
The Environmental Council of Rhode Island, a consortium of 60 organizations and individuals, considers the legislation a top priority this year — the second consecutive year.
Gov. Dan McKee appears on board with at least part of the plan, allocating $139,000 in his proposed fiscal 2026 budget for one new employee to begin tracking energy and emissions from state-owned buildings.
However, there is no money or acknowledgement of expanding the program to the private sector in his budget proposal.
Olivia DaRocha, a spokesperson for McKee's office, cited lack of data and infrastructure as barriers to creating a program for private sector buildings.
'Expanding to the private sector should be considered in the future based on funding availability and the creation of data and building inventory infrastructure,' DaRocha said.
Creating a list of the estimated 2,300 buildings statewide larger than 25,000 square feet requires pulling from multiple datasets, including municipal tax databases, GIS systems and commercial information, according to the OER report. Meanwhile, the state's primary utility supplier, Rhode Island Energy, is still developing a system to automate individual building energy usage based on customer bills, the report says.
'Given the lack of requisite data and infrastructure to support the rollout of a program for large municipal and private buildings, OER should focus on leading a program for certain large state-owned and state-occupied buildings that would lay the foundation for future expansion to large municipal and private buildings,' the report states.
The OER estimated an initial $600,000 cost to expand an energy benchmarking program beyond state-owned buildings, rising to $1.4 million for technical support to implement performance standards around emissions.
Emily Koo, senior policy director and Rhode Island program director at Acadia Center, was unconvinced the problems were as big, or costly, as the report suggested.
'Providence has already done the work to stand this kind of program up,' said Koo, who previously worked as the city's sustainability director. 'This is the absolute lowest-hanging fruit.'
The capital city released its inaugural building energy report in December 2024 with energy and emissions usage for 63 city-owned buildings above 10,000 square feet. The program will expand to include privately owned large buildings within the city limits this year.
Three states — including Massachusetts — and 16 cities have passed laws requiring statewide benchmarking of energy and emissions use from large public, commercial and multi-family residential buildings, according to data collected by the Institute for Market Transformation. Additional states and cities have enacted more stringent laws that also require actions by building owners to reduce emissions.
Providence's initial rollout hasn't been seamless. For example, the city didn't realize that Rhode Island Energy would not be able to automatically enter private billing data into a third-party dashboard used to track energy usage. The city and utility company are working to teach the estimated 300 businesses affected how to manually request and upload the necessary information until an automation is completed, de la Cruz said.
Evelyn Garcia, a spokesperson for Rhode Island Energy, said the company is working to evaluate vendors now, developing the interface in the second quarter of the year. She declined to comment on the state legislation until legislative hearings occur.
Another potential sore spot: availability of federal funding. The city has leaned on federal money to prop up its program and promoted separate federal incentives for building owners to reduce emissions through energy efficiency upgrades and conversions to electric heat pumps.
'Recent changes at the federal level have introduced uncertainty around the availability and consistency of energy-related grants, making it challenging to predict current and future funding opportunities,' the report states.
Since Jan. 27, OER has been locked out of $125 million in approved federal funding for energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, according to a federal lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island.
Munter suggested low-interest loans through the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank's Efficient Buildings Fund as an alternative funding source for municipalities and school districts.
'What is the cost of inaction?' she asked. 'We're talking about our ability to be resilient in the face of climate change.'
The Rhode Island General Assembly is on winter recess this week. Hearings on Kislak's and Kallman's bills had not been scheduled as of Thursday.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom Gets Major Polling Boost After Trolling Onslaught of Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom has received a significant bump in the polls after launching a barrage of sharp attacks on President Donald Trump, according to new survey data. The latest POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab survey, conducted between July 31-August 11, shows that California Democrats would take Newsom over Kamala Harris in a 2028 presidential primary. According to the poll, the governor leads the former vice president 25 percent to 19 percent among the state's registered Democratic voters and Democratic-leaning independents. It comes amid Newsom's online trolling campaign against Trump. In recent weeks, Newsom's press office has transformed its social media presence into a barrage of all-caps taunts, pop culture spoofs, and AI-generated memes—mocking Trump's style even as it pushes back on Republican policies. California Governor Gavin Newsom can be seen speaking about California redistricting plans at a press conference at the Democracy Center, Japanese American Museum on August 14, 2025, in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty... California Governor Gavin Newsom can be seen speaking about California redistricting plans at a press conference at the Democracy Center, Japanese American Museum on August 14, 2025, in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by) More "DONALD TRUMP, IF YOU DO NOT STAND DOWN, WE WILL BE FORCED TO LEAD AN EFFORT TO REDRAW THE MAPS IN CA TO OFFSET THE RIGGING OF MAPS IN RED STATES," read an August 11 X post from @GovPressOffice after Trump called for Texas to send "five more Republicans" to Congress, which prompted Newsom to hit back with his own plan to send more Democrats from California to Congress. "BUT IF THE OTHER STATES CALL OFF THEIR REDISTRICTING EFFORTS, WE WILL DO THE SAME. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!" the August 11 post said. Since then, the account has ramped up its trolling efforts against the president and his allies. The posts are biting, confrontational, and deliberately echo the president's own online persona.


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Elon Musk Responds to Report He's 'Pumping the Brakes' on Third Party Plans
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Elon Musk has responded to a new report that suggested he is slowing his plans to launch a new political party. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has been "quietly pumping the brakes" on his America Party, The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday citing people with knowledge of his plans. "Nothing [The Journal] says should ever be thought of as true," Musk wrote on his X social media platform on Wednesday, in response to a post about the reporting. Newsweek has not verified the Journal report and has contacted Musk for more information via email to X's press office. Why It Matters A new political party backed by Musk, the world's richest man and former close ally of President Donald Trump, could take votes away from Trump's Republican Party. Musk build a large following among conservatives during his time headlining the second Trump administration's efforts to reduce "waste, fraud, and abuse" through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But he had a very public falling-out with the president over the Trump-backed 'One Big Beautiful Bill," with Musk concerned the tax cuts and spending plans would add to the United States' national debt. What To Know The Journal reported that Musk had slowed his new party plans to focus on his companies, was reluctant to alienate Republican leaders, and was considering backing Vice President JD Vance in a 2028 presidential run. Musk's allies said the billionaire "hasn't formally ruled out" building the new party, and could change his mind as the midterms get closer, the paper said. Elon Musk attends a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, on Friday, May 30, 2025. Elon Musk attends a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, on Friday, May 30, 2025. Evan Vucci/AP Photo Musk first broached the idea of a new party in July. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom," he wrote on X after conducting a snap poll on whether users wanted a new political party. Under the Constitution, Trump cannot run for a third presidential term. Previous polling has shown Vance as the clear GOP primary front-runner; though a new poll suggests Vance could lose to Democratic favorites Gavin Newsom or Pete Buttigieg. As a foreign-born U.S. citizen, Musk cannot run for president. He could support third-party candidates, who can put themselves on the ballot in every state, if they have enough signatures to support their bid. Traditionally been difficult for third-party candidates to break through significantly in federal U.S. elections. Instead, third parties often act as spoilers for the two main parties. What People Are Saying Democratic strategist Denny Salas, co-founder of Gotham Polling & Analytics, told Newsweek on July 10: "I believe there is enough pent-up anger within the American psyche to enable a third party, like the America Party, to successfully recruit legitimate candidates and gain the support of many voters. A likely problem I see is how sustainable and genuine this effort by Elon Musk is. Political parties aren't successful just because billionaires decide to start one on a whim; they succeed because they are built from the ground up through grassroots organizing."
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas House to take up GOP congressional map delayed by Democrats' walkout
The Republican-led Texas House on Wednesday was set to advance a new congressional map crafted to hand five additional U.S. House seats to the GOP over fierce opposition from Democrats, who cast the plan as an attempt by President Donald Trump to stack the deck in next year's midterm election. Republican lawmakers are pursuing the unusual mid-decade redistricting plan, which has set off a national map-drawing war, amid pressure from Trump to protect the GOP's slim majority in Congress. The effort comes just four years after the Legislature last overhauled the state's congressional map following the 2020 Census. Democrats in the Texas House staged a two-week walkout over the plan in a bid to stall the map's passage and rally a national response among blue states, where lawmakers could launch their own retaliatory redistricting efforts. The roughly two dozen Texas Democrats who returned to Austin on Monday said they were starting the next phase of their fight: putting the screws on their Republican colleagues and establishing a record that could be used in a legal challenge to the map. Republicans have said the new districts were drawn purely to maximize their partisan advantage, arguing that the GOP's margins of victory in 2024 supported new lines that entrenched their hold on power. They have also framed the effort as a response to Democratic gerrymandering elsewhere. 'In the context of balancing what Democratic states have already done, what Texas is doing is eminently fair,' Rep. Cody Vasut, R-Angleton and chair of the House's redistricting committee, said this month. 'This is about making sure that when we go into the congressional election in [2026], Republicans are on a level playing field to be able to compete with Democrats.' To create up to five Republican pickup opportunities, the map dismantles Democratic strongholds around Austin, Dallas and Houston and makes Democrat-held seats in South Texas redder — all without seriously jeopardizing any of the 25 districts Republicans already control. 'I'm not beating around the bush,' Rep. Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi and the map's bill sponsor, said during an Aug. 1 committee hearing. 'We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.' The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that states can draw electoral maps on partisan grounds. But under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the map cannot diminish the voting power of people of color. Democrats have condemned the plan, arguing it widens Republicans' partisan edge by unconstitutionally packing people of color — who are driving almost all of Texas' population growth — into some districts while spreading them throughout others to reduce their ability to elect their preferred candidates. 'These illegal maps are based on already racist and unconstitutional maps that were litigated just barely a month ago,' Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said Monday, referring to an ongoing legal challenge to Texas' current map. 'It can only get worse from there. This is probably — from the experts that we've talked to — the worst racial discrimination in redistricting since the Jim Crow era.' The proposed map also would push a handful of Democratic members of Congress into seats already represented by other Democrats, setting up possible primary battles between long-serving members of the Texas delegation and younger newcomers. More all-star speakers confirmed for The Texas Tribune Festival, Nov. 13–15! This year's lineup just got even more exciting with the addition of State Rep. Caroline Fairly, R-Amarillo; former United States Attorney General Eric Holder; Abby Phillip, anchor of 'CNN NewsNight'; Aaron Reitz, 2026 Republican candidate for Texas Attorney General; and State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.