Latest news with #KualaLumpurLocalPlan2040
The Star
11 hours ago
- Business
- The Star
Rezoning row raises questions on stewardship
THE more than two-decades saga of Vivekananda Ashram in Brickfields offers a timely opportunity to reflect on the principle of stewardship. Its key application in governance is that stewards are entrusted to discharge responsibilities in an accountable and transparent manner. Officials exercise power on behalf of an entity; they are custodians of its resources and not owners. This trust must extend to all stakeholders – not just shareholders or members – but also to the broader community with a legitimate interest. According to a report in StarMetro on May 26, 2025, Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) said the landowners of the 120-year-old Vivekananda Ashram had requested its site be zoned as 'main commercial'. With the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (KLLP 2040) now gazetted and due to come into force on June 11, the key players involved in the ashram's rezoning must reflect on the cardinal principle of stewardship. The Vivekananda Ashrama Kuala Lumpur was incorporated as a Company Limited by Guarantee in 1934. Its core mission is described as 'involved in educational, spiritual, cultural and welfare activities'. There had been public appeals to rezone the site for educational and welfare use – appeals entirely in line with the organisation's stated purpose. The board of trustees' 2014 plan to build a 23-storey tower over the heritage site triggered public backlash and led to the building's heritage gazettement in 2016. The fact that this gazettement was challenged by the trustees and that they have now accepted 'main commercial' zoning speaks volumes. Even so, the ashram remains a cherished institution with deep intergenerational significance to the wider community. The 876 objections submitted from across the country and abroad, as well as the high participation in the public hearing, reflect this. DBKL's decision to rezone the 0.4ha heritage site is surprising. The agency had access to detailed presentations during the public hearing and subsequent submissions from the Save Vivekananda Ashram Brickfields community. Yet, it appears to have treated the board as just another landowner, without weighing the broader implications of its stewardship responsibilities. Was the entire community engagement process merely a performative exercise? It would be a welcome surprise if DBKL reconsidered its decision and rezoned the site as 'public facilities' before June 11. Is that too much to ask of those who govern a 'City for All'? The community must continue playing its stewardship role. Section 17 of the Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982 [Act 267] provides a mechanism to alter the gazetted KLLP 2040. This avenue remains open for the board to submit an application to rezone the site as 'Public Facilities'. Meanwhile, the community must remain vigilant. Any proposed commercial development should be monitored to ensure full compliance with National Heritage Department guidelines and that all necessary approvals are obtained. At a minimum, the trustees should share their plans and adopt a more inclusive stewardship model. No matter how dwarfed the ashram may become by future soulless structures, its legacy as a monument to the contributions of Malaysia's pioneer generation will endure. Jayanath Appudurai Kuala Lumpur
The Star
2 days ago
- Business
- The Star
Desecration risks in rezoning Vivekananda Ashram
The status of Vivekananda Ashram in Brickfields has changed from mixed development to main commercial in successive Kuala Lumpur local plans. — Filepic A NATIONAL heritage group has raised concerns over the rezoning of the century-old Vivekananda Ashram in Brickfields under the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (KLLP 2040). Badan Warisan Malaysia (BWM) president Lim Wei-Ling said the ashram building was 'at real risk of being desecrated'. 'Gazetted in 2016, it is an important heritage building of historical and cultural significance, together with the site on which it sits in Brickfields. 'The rezoning and classification also pose an alarming risk of not having a sufficient buffer zone around the building. 'While we agree on the need for development, this should happen within reason and land around heritage sites should not be prone to overdevelopment,' she said in a media statement. Lim was responding to a StarMetro report on May 26, 'Vivekananda Ashram at a crossroads' where stakeholders highlighted an inconsistency in the revised draft of the KLLP 2040. While the ashram is classified as a Category 1 Heritage Building under the National Heritage Act 2005, the 0.4ha site is now zoned as 'main commercial', raising concerns that it could be overshadowed by future development. In the earlier draft of KLLP 2020, the land surrounding the ashram was designated for facilities, utilities and infrastructure within a heritage zone. By the time the KLLP 2020 plan was gazetted, the zoning had changed to 'mixed development'. Lim also expressed support for stronger provisions in the KLLP 2040 to protect heritage sites from development. 'Sites like Vivekananda Ashram, which are surrounded by skyscrapers, are in jeopardy of being lost and demolished within Kuala Lumpur. 'These small and meaningful heritage sites are part of the diverse historical references that define Kuala Lumpur. 'They should be celebrated and protected as part of Warisan Kuala Lumpur, an initiative launched recently by our Prime Minister,' said Lim. She stressed that authorities should offer greater protection to heritage buildings and sites in support of that vision. When contacted, Kuala Lumpur mayor Datuk Seri Maimunah Mohd Sharif said in the case of the ashram, 'if a proposal is submitted and follows the local plan, we can look into the sensitive design around the site.' 'There are mechanisms in place to protect the heritage building,' she said. On concerns that stakeholder input was not considered in the amended KLLP 2040, Maimunah said that when she assumed office in August, the local plan study was already nearing completion after public participation. 'The committee presented me with the outcomes and proposed amendments in October. 'Proposals that align with the plan will be approved while those that do not, will be rejected,' she said.
The Star
30-05-2025
- Politics
- The Star
KL residents say local plan ignores their concerns
THE soon-to-be gazetted Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (KLLP2040) continues to draw criticism from stakeholders who say it does not address their concerns. KLLP2040 will come into force on June 11, according to the Federal Government Gazette dated May 28 published by the Attorney General's Chambers. It contains written statements detailing objectives and proposals for developments, land use, socioeconomic planning and traffic management in the capital. Kuala Lumpur Residents Action for Sustainable Development Association chairman Tan Booi Charn said the group was concerned about land previously meant for community use turning into development zones. Tan: Land designated for community use has been turned into development zones. She pointed to Lot 481440 in Taman Danau Desa, previously reserved for a playground. 'The community submitted 1,000 objections to Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) but their pleas fell on deaf ears. 'Following enquiries, they were informed that the land title had changed and the plan must be adjusted accordingly,' she said. She added that some city lots had their plot ratios increased to accommodate potential future redevelopments. Another point of contention was flood retention ponds in Taman Desa, Taman Wahyu and Kampung Bohol turned into development land, said Tan. She said this contravened principles outlined in Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2040 that retention ponds should remain untouched. Tan estimated that only 13% of public objections were taken into account in the final draft of KLLP2040. 'We are disappointed because the public spent lots of time and effort preparing presentations and submitting objections.' Save Kuala Lumpur chairman Datuk M. Ali called for another round of engagements for DBKL to explain why feedback was not heeded. 'There have been severe shortfalls in the overall process of KLLP2040, which warrants rectifications,' he said. Ali said KLLP2040 failed to provide adequate safeguards for the capital's 52 water retention ponds. 'This is despite a directive from Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for the ponds to be restored to their original status,' he said. Naidu: KLLP2040 seems to side with developers and landowners rather than communities. Brickfields Rukun Tetangga chairman SKK Naidu said many suggestions raised during engagements with DBKL were not implemented, especially with regard to green areas and development density. 'The final KLLP2040 seems to side with developers and landowners rather than communities,' he noted. KLLP2040 was adopted in accordance with Sections 16 and 17 of Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982 (Act 267). Copies can be downloaded from DBKL's website, or inspected or purchased during office hours at DBKL Urban Planning Department at Menara DBKL 1 from June 11. For details, visit
The Star
25-05-2025
- Business
- The Star
Vivekananda Ashram ‘at a crossroads'
Fears loom on loss of greenery in Brickfields after revised KL local plan allows commercial zoning around heritage site STAKEHOLDERS have flagged a critical inconsistency in the revised draft Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (KLLP2040) pertaining to the century-old Vivekananda Ashram in Brickfields. While the premises is classified as a Category 1 Heritage Building under National Heritage Act 2005, the 0.4ha site is zoned as 'main commercial'. Kuala Lumpur residents, who attended a three-day public inspection of KLLP2040 from May 7 to 9, said this fact rang alarm bells over the possibility of future development encroaching into the ashram's setting. In the earlier draft KLLP2020, the land was classified as a facility, utility and infrastructure zone within a heritage area. However, when the plan was eventually gazetted, the zoning was changed to 'mixed development', already paving the way for commercial or high-rise projects. The latest push for a full 'main commercial' designation has now further intensified fears of the ashram being dwarfed by concrete and glass. According to news reports, the ashram's landowner had made several attempts over the past 25 years to either sell or develop the site. Its board of trustees even rejected the government's offer in 2008 to gazette the building as a heritage site. The ashram was officially gazetted as a heritage site on June 16, 2016, following public outcry over a proposal to redevelop the land that included a residential tower and carpark. The designation by National Heritage Department (JWN) came after the trustees withdrew a legal challenge against the site's heritage status. Last year, 876 objection forms were submitted to Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) opposing the rezoning of the Vivekananda Ashram land to 'main commercial'. Worrying classification Conservationists fear the dual classification could open the door to commercial blocks being built around the ashram, gradually chipping away its historical character and natural setting, eventually turning the area into yet another concrete jungle. 'With the zoning favouring commercial use and no heritage buffer beyond the building's footprint, there is a real fear that the ashram could soon be dwarfed by high-rises,' said Save Kuala Lumpur Coalition (SKL) member Charles Tan. 'During consultations with City Hall officers at the draft local plan open day recently, we were told that the landowners wanted the land to remain classified as 'main commercial'. 'We are very concerned because this zoning leaves the surrounding land wide open for overdevelopment. 'Concrete structures could soon pop up all around the heritage site, eroding its historical value and ruining its visual charm,' said Tan. He opined that if, for some reason, the Heritage Department ever delisted the building, there would be nothing to stop full-blown commercial redevelopment. Pointing out another contradiction about the city's local plan, he said: 'DBKL has said it must comply with 'syarat nyata' listed on a land title, even when this clashes with the goals of the local plan.' (Syarat nyata or express condition is a specific rule written on the land title that tells what the land can be used for – such as for housing, commercial buildings, or agriculture. It is legally binding and tied to the land itself, not just the owner.) 'It makes a mockery of the planning process,' said Tan. 'Instead of the land title being guided by the local plan, we have the local plan bending to the land title's terms.' He said that although the Kuala Lumpur mayor was a member of the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Land Executive Committee (JKTWPKL), she only had one vote and could be overruled. 'DBKL should have the authority to veto syarat nyata changes when they go against sound planning principles,' Tan added. Calls for reclassification P. Tamilwanan, a member of the Save Vivekananda Ashram Group, said the draft KLLP2040 clearly categorised the site under the 'main commercial' sub-category geared towards high-density development to attract investment and employment. 'The plan states that at least 90% of land in these zones must be used for commercial purposes, and 676ha have been allocated for this, including the ashram site,' he said. Tamilwanan said residents were pushing for the ashram to be reclassified under the 'public facilities' sub-category, which caters to community-based functions like religion, culture, healthcare and recreation – more in line with the ashram's 120-year-old legacy. He noted that relying on heritage status alone was misleading, as it created a dangerous loophole. 'You have a building that is protected, but the land around it is a free-for-all. 'That is how you end up with a concrete jungle engulfing the ashram and wiping out its cultural value,' he pointed out. DBKL responds Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) City Planning Department senior deputy director Rosli Nordin clarified that any development application must first be approved by JWN. 'I understand the public's concerns. There are clearly two conflicting elements here. 'The land is zoned 'main commercial', but the building itself is heritage-listed. 'On one side, you have the public with over 800 individuals submitting objections to the rezoning. 'On the other, you have the ashram trustees pushing for commercial zoning,' said Rosli, adding that the landowners had also requested the area remain zoned as 'main commercial. 'Even if the trustees apply to DBKL for development, they still need the green light from JWN. 'Without that, DBKL cannot and will not invoke Section 17 of Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982, which allows the mayor to alter or replace the local plan, provided there is public notification, room for objections and a formal hearing process under Sections 14 and 15.' Rosli also noted that even if the trustees secured JWN's approval, any new construction would likely be limited in scale. 'They wouldn't be able to put up a skyscraper. 'At most, it might be a three- to seven-storey structure.' On getting feedback from the ashram as well as surrounding landowners, he said, 'We have to listen to both sides.' Planning must reflect place Local government legal expert Derek Fernandez said DBKL must impose controls on the entire ashram site within the draft KLLP2040 before its gazettement and not only protect the building. 'They cannot just rely on the National Heritage Act. 'Those protections must be written into KLLP2040 itself. 'DBKL has a duty to do this, especially since the area is a designated heritage zone. 'It cannot allow increased development intensity or building height beyond what is already there,' he said, adding that it might be acceptable to build something in line with the ashram's purpose, like a classroom. 'But anything more goes against the site's character. 'The planning approach should be like Penang's Unesco heritage zone, where the structure and facade of old shoplots are preserved. 'That is what needs to happen here. No expanding the footprint, raising the roofline or altering the aesthetic DNA of the site,' he emphasised. Legacy of learning, culture Long-time advocate for the preservation of Vivekananda Ashram, lawyer Deva Kunjari Sambanthan said the institution was established over a century ago as a social service organisation. 'Although it would be classified as a non-governmental organisation by today's standards, the ashram is actually managed by an elected committee and registered under the Companies Act as a company limited by guarantee,' she said. The committee, she said, was not only responsible for the Brickfields site where the ashram stood, but also for the management of four schools, three of which are Tamil schools. 'Our forefathers were really forward-thinking when they bought this land back in the early 1900s,' she added. The ashram was built in the early 20th century and has a unique architectural charm. Named in honour of Swami Vivekananda, who visited Malaya in 1893, the ashram became a centre for religious and cultural life, said Deva Kunjari. 'Swami Vivekananda was born in 1863 and was a Hindu monk, philosopher and spiritual leader from India who played a key role in introducing Vedanta and Yoga philosophies to the western world. 'It started off as a simple Reading Room in 1904, but slowly grew into a place for cultural and religious gatherings. 'These days, the hall has been used as makeshift classrooms for yoga, music, dance and thevaram lessons,' she added. Kuala Lumpur mayor Datuk Seri Maimunah Mohd Sharif told StarMetro that all necessary procedures for KLLP 2040 had been completed, including public participation and formal hearings. She added that the Prime Minister has been briefed on the plan, which is expected to be launched and gazetted within the month.
The Star
09-05-2025
- Business
- The Star
Mixed views on revised KL plan
Members of the public perusing the revised KLLP2040. SEVERAL key recommendations by stakeholders remain unaddressed in the revised draft Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (KLLP2040), says Save Kuala Lumpur (SKL) coalition group. Its chairman Datuk M. Ali said Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) had acknowledged some suggestions by ratepayers, including the plot ratios for green lungs and public halls. However, he said, concerns remained over questionable and ambiguous categorisation of open spaces. 'Yes, they have made some adjustments to the plot ratios, but the larger concern is how easily public open spaces are being reclassified for private use. 'It feels like they are legitimising commercial development at the expense of green lungs. 'For instance, a Public Open Space (OS1) in Jalan Damansara has been reclassified to Private Open Space (OS3), effectively allowing a hotel's development. 'Similarly, in Jalan Maarof (Bangsar), a five-storey commercial building is now being legitimised despite standing amid predominantly low-rise residential structures,'' he said. Photo at left: Kok (left) and her staff talking to DBKL staff on issues related to the plan. Ali also voiced discontent over changes in Taman Tun Dr Ismail (TTDI), where land for a public hall was being rezoned for commercial purposes. 'We requested it be reinstated as institutional (use for public facility). 'If one request (to rezone) is allowed, everyone will start asking for it,' he said. Ali was among many Kuala Lumpur residents who attended a three-day public inspection of the KL Local Plan, which ended yesterday. The display of the plan at Menara DBKL was scheduled for 9.30am to 4.30pm, with a two-hour lunch break from 12.30pm to 2.30pm each day. However, some participants claimed they were not aware that there would be a two-hour lunch break each day. DBKL is planning to launch KLLP2040 this month. When met at Menara DBKL, Seputeh MP Teresa Kok told StarMetro that many areas in her constituency and across the city had been earmarked for redevelopment. She also voiced her frustration on learning that the police reserve land in Taman Desa had changed hands, with plans for a condominium. She claimed that the 0.32ha plot was sold for RM1.9mil, a fraction of its RM14mil market value. 'It is shocking. The government is selling prime land in KL at such bargain prices,' Kok said, adding that these deals needed to be reviewed. Happy Garden Residents Association secretary Evelyn Lau said that out of 20 pages of suggestions that they had submitted, only two were partially considered. She said Jalan Kelang Lama was extremely congested, with cars clogging the roads and developments consuming valuable infrastructure. She urged DBKL to take a closer look at the neighbourhood and prioritise sustainable development. Meanwhile, business owner Allen Lim was happy to find out that premises on Jalan Abdullah, Lorong Abdullah and Lengkok Abdullah in Bangsar would be retained for commercial use. The former houses-turned-businesses were categorised as residential in the initial KLLP2040. This, Lim said, would have disrupted businesses in the area.
