Latest news with #LB512
Yahoo
13-03-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
HHS Committee advances two abortion-related bills to full Nebraska Legislature
State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair. March 22, 2023. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — Abortion appears likely to be debated on the floor of the Nebraska Legislature again this year after a legislative committee advanced two related bills on Wednesday night. The Health and Human Services Committee voted 5-0 to advance Legislative Bill 632 from State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair. That bill would require any health care facility performing and completing on-site elective abortions to dispose of the remains of the aborted fetus by cremation or burial, or, if not possible, in a manner directed by the State Board of Health. The committee also voted 4-2 to advance LB 512 from State Sen. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue, which would require doctors to screen pregnant women for ectopic pregnancies and schedule a follow-up appointment 3 to 28 days after prescribing abortion-inducing medications. LB 632, from Hansen, is mirrored off of a Minnesota law adopted in 1987, which at least 15 other states also have adopted. The Minnesota law defines 'remains of a human fetus' to mean a fetus that has 'reached a stage of development so that there are cartilaginous structures, fetal or skeletal parts after an abortion or miscarriage.' Hansen's bill defines 'aborted unborn child' as 'physical remains of an unborn child at any stage of gestation whose life has been terminated by an elective abortion.' Hansen also noted that a Nebraska law from 2003 already requires licensed hospitals to have a written policy about the 'disposition of the remains of a child born dead at such hospital.' LB 632 would not require health care facilities to notify women who receive an abortion of the method of disposition. At his bill's hearing last week, Hansen said LB 632 is about public health and human dignity. 'All of us understand the horror that is felt when a human body has been subjected to indignity, desecration or neglect,' Hansen testified. 'Both reasons — public and environmental health and the basic respect to the bodies of the dead — are as applicable to the tissue and blood of children who have died by elective abortions as to babies who have died from natural causes.' Andi Curry Grubb, executive director of Planned Parenthood North Central States, blasted the bill as 'vague and unworkable' and said it would effectively impose a funeral requirement at any stage of pregnancy. She called the requirements 'shortsighted and disrespectful' and said the bill could impose religious or spiritual views. 'It does nothing other than burden abortion providers and patients, shame and stigmatize care and further remove patients' control over their own health,' Curry Grubb testified. 'All of these issues highlight that this bill is unserious and simply a political statement.' State Sen. Brian Hardin of Gering, chair of the HHS Committee, and Curry Grubb disagreed over whether the bill addressed 'human remains' or 'fetal tissue,' and Hardin asked what Planned Parenthood currently does with the remains after an abortion. 'What we do currently is completely in line with what most other health care providers who manage fetal tissue do,' she responded. Hansen responded that he had never seen a testifier 'grasp at so many straws.' On her religion allegations, he said his bill had 'nothing to do with that whatsoever' and that he wasn't seeking to restrict access to care. State Sen. Dan Lonowski of Hastings chose Hansen's bill as his 2025 priority, increasing the likelihood it will be scheduled for debate this year. 'Just to dispose of aborted remains in a haphazard way, I think it just lowers the dignity and the respect we should have for all human life,' Lonowski said Thursday. Opponents of Holdcroft's bill related to chemical abortions said it could put reproductive care farther out of reach or push them to find the medications in less safe or regulated ways. State Sen. Merv Riepe of Ralston, a Republican and former hospital administrator, opposed that bill. He said Wednesday that Holdcroft's bill wasn't about protection and was instead a blockade. State Sen. Glen Meyer of Pender countered that he viewed the bill as in the interests of women's health and that he would oppose the bill if it was a back-door attempt to ban access. Hansen noted Holdcroft's bill would not require women to show up for the follow-up appointment. State Sen. John Fredrickson of Omaha, the other 'no' vote, said voters had already weighed in. State Sen. Dan Quick of Grand Island was the lone senator not to vote for or against the bill, saying he was waiting until he understood more how the bill would impact women. Quick and Fredrickson were 'present, not voting' on Hansen's bill. Holdcroft confirmed Thursday that his bill is unlikely to get a priority designation this year, but said he would still work to find a path forward for his measure he said was 'pro-women's health.' 'We're going to just look for an opportunity on the floor to possibly amend it to a like bill and see what can be done there,' Holdcroft said. 'Otherwise, we'll carry it over to next year.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
13-02-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
Testifiers question need for proposed Nebraska requirements for abortion pills
State Sen. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue prepares to testify Thursday to the Nebraska Legislature's Health and Human Services Committee. (Screenshot of Nebraska Public Media stream) LINCOLN — Advocates for a Nebraska legislative bill that would add new steps women must take to access abortion pills said they want to make using the pills safer for pregnant women. Opponents testifying during the public hearing Thursday for Legislative Bill 512 said the goal of the measure by State Sen. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue is to reduce the use of the drugs. LB 512 does not outright ban or directly restrict mifepristone or misoprostol, the typical two-drug regimen for a medical abortion. But it adds several required steps. It would require women to see a doctor three to 14 days after being given the pill, in addition to before, which state law already required. It would require testing for an ectopic pregnancy. The bill also would require doctors to estimate and document the gestational age of the pregnancy before the pill is given and to report information about the use of the pill to the state. Part of the screening requirement had been aimed at ensuring whether the woman's blood type requires offering women an additional treatment to reduce the likelihood of future miscarriages. But Holdcroft told the Health and Human Services Committee that he introduced a white-copy amendment to remove that blood screening because medical practices have moved away from the value of that type of testing. He said his goal is to make sure no place acts the way he perceives some abortion clinics have, by providing abortion pills without proper oversight. 'No matter how any of us feels about the issue of abortion, we can all agree that no pregnant woman should ever be neglected or endangered by a careless abortion provider,' Holdcroft said. Abortion-rights groups and medical professionals supportive of reproductive rights said the result of the new restrictions and requirements on the use of abortion pills is aimed at reducing the ease of use. While Nebraska law requires in-person dispensing of abortion pills, some women still obtain them online from out-of-state sources. Opponents argued that the bill's additional restrictions could push more women toward darker corners of the internet to seek out pills, which they said would likely increase risks. Some also said they fear the state or federal government knowing what they were doing. Critics of how the pill is used said the ease with which abortion pills can be obtained online makes enforcing time-tied abortion bans like Nebraska's difficult to enforce. They want the bill to more strictly and explicitly clarify that the pills cannot be ordered and delivered independently of a local medical provider. Supporters argued they cannot accurately track complications like excessive bleeding and ineffective or incomplete abortions from the abortion pills without requiring a follow-up appointment. They say they want to close the data gap on medical abortions, particularly any going untracked today. Nebraska law today prohibits most abortions after 12 weeks gestational age, with legal exceptions after that for the life of the mother or for rape or incest. Voters in November passed a state constitutional amendment cementing current law as the latest an abortion could happen, banning abortions after the first trimester of pregnancy. The way the amendment was written left room for state lawmakers to restrict abortion further, up to a full ban, so Holdcroft's bill would be legal, if approved. Gov. Jim Pillen and some in the administration of President Donald Trump have embraced the anti-abortion movement's focus on tightening restrictions on medical abortions. Some abortion opponents opposed LB 512 on Wednesday, fearing that its language might somehow codify the legality of medical abortions in Nebraska beyond the scope of the bill. Teresa Fondren of Abolish Abortion Nebraska said her God equates abortion with murder. She says she opposes LB 512 and all forms of abortion, including medical abortion. She said she doesn't want to make it safer. 'This bill plainly treats abortion like health care, which can be regulated, rather than murder,' she said. State Sen. John Fredrickson of Omaha apologized to the crowd of testifiers for the all-male HHS Committee not having at least one member who knows what it means to be pregnant. State Sen. Merv Riepe of Ralston, a swing vote on abortion bills, questioned why the measure appeared worded broadly enough to affect more than the state's two abortion clinics. 'Why wouldn't you limit this piece of legislation to just abortion centers?' Riepe asked. Holdcroft said he wrote the bill to limit the reach to abortion providers. Riepe said the language of the bill risked reaching accidentally into miscarriage care and other medical care. Doctors who testified argued that the pills commonly prescribed for chemical abortions can be used during miscarriage care, and are sometimes prescribed for that purpose. Holdcroft said the bill would hold no woman responsible if she does not attend the follow-up exam. It aims consequences at physicians, and Riepe said that might create liability concerns. 'What my bill does is it tries to establish a standard of care for chemical abortions,' Holdcroft said. 'That's all it is.' Dr. Timothy Tesmer, Nebraska's chief medical officer, represented Pillen's support for LB 512. He said the state would like to know more about complications. The lack of follow-up appointments and U.S. Food and Drug Administration research on potential complications like bleeding and infection show the need for more information and data on what the drugs do to pregnant women. He said the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services can't say much about the impacts of the drugs HHS says were responsible for 82% of Nebraska abortions in 2023. Under questioning from Fredrickson about the medical safety of one drug used in medical abortions, Tesmer said, 'I'd have to say it's safe to use … in the right or proper context.' Marion Miner of the Nebraska Catholic Conference said the church would prefer no abortions, but they would rather see a minimum standard of care than see pregnant women die or be injured. 'You screen for ectopic pregnancy,' Miner said in his testimony. 'You schedule a follow-up afterward. You report complications. It's that simple.' Sandy Danek, executive director of Nebraska Right to Life, said her group opposes abortion but backs LB 512 because 'supporting the woman who participates in an abortion is not an approval of the procedure.' Dr. Elizabeth Constance, a maternal-fetal specialist testifying for the Nebraska Medical Association, pushed back on the bill, saying it stepped the Legislature once again in between patients and the best care physicians can provide. She said she runs a fertility clinic in Omaha and said the same medications used to terminate pregnancies can also be used to help with miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. 'Requiring in-person follow-up does nothing to help patient safety,' Constance said. 'But it does put an unnecessary and undue burden on our patients, particularly those from rural communities who may have to travel several hours.' Constance said requiring reporting of heavy or adverse bleeding misunderstands what the drugs do, because 'every single person' who uses the drug will have 'heavy bleeding.' Adelle Burk, senior manager of public affairs for Planned Parenthood North Central States, said her group opposes LB 512 because it is 'unnecessary government overreach.' Burk said there is no medical reason to require the follow-up appointment. She said the reporting process is designed to make life more difficult for clinics. 'LB 512 creates a one-size-fits-all political mandate that doesn't consider the patient's individual needs,' she said. State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair asked Burk if her organization might be more willing to be neutral on the bill if the mandated visit and reporting requirements were tweaked. Burk said changes could make the bill 'better,' but she stopped short of saying the organization would support it. Dr. Emily Patel, an OB-GYN speaking in her personal capacity, called LB 512 a 'thinly veiled attempt' to make abortion care harder for patients to obtain and more difficult for medical professionals to provide. She said that if safety were the priority, the bill would regulate the drug for all uses, not just some. She said research shows erectile dysfunction pills are riskier and less regulated. 'Let me be clear, LB 512 will not improve patient safety or help outcomes,' she said. 'It is about controlling women's reproductive choices.' Taylor Givens-Dunn of I Be Black Girl called LB 512 a 'direct attack on reproductive autonomy' that she said could disproportionately impact people in poverty and people of color. 'It undermines the doctor-patient relationship and disregards the expertise of medical professionals,' she said. Bailey Joy Annenson of the League of Women Voters of Nebraska said she and her partner are deciding where and whether to have a family and that state laws like LB 512 will have an impact. She said the risk of having fewer maternal care doctors is a very real risk for young professionals deciding where to locate and where to raise young families. Holdcroft and Riepe agreed at the end of the hearing that they need HHS to do a better job holding wayward providers accountable. The committee took no immediate action on LB 512. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
