Latest news with #LabourRebels
The Sun
12 hours ago
- Business
- The Sun
How Keir Starmer will use persuasion, arm-twisting & dark arts to save Labour as he goes into crisis mode
IT was only last July that Sir Keir Starmer cruised to a landslide victory. Yet, not even a full 12 months later, he looks haunted. A man under real pressure. 2 2 No PM this early in their tenure should have to use an international summit to insist they are ' very confident ' of still being in post at the next election. Yet such is the scale of the revolt over the Government's modest package of welfare savings that No10 has gone into crisis mode. Ministers may be keeping calm in public but, like a duck's feet furiously paddling below the surface, in private they are panicking. I can reveal that Sir Keir 's diary was being rejigged last night so he can personally lead the ring-round of Labour rebels upon his return from his Nato dash to Holland. It is therefore perhaps a happy coincidence that his aides recently discovered the Downing Street vending machine has started stocking Red Bull. They are going to need all their energy for a fraught few days that could decide the fate of Labour's entire premiership. The golden rule in politics is knowing how to count — so some numbers: Around 120 Labour backbenchers are threatening to torpedo the government's £5billion package in benefit cuts. They say the squeeze on Personal Independence Payments specifically could push 250,000 claimants into poverty. Combined with the opposition parties, they have marshalled enough troops to easily wipe out Sir Keir's 156 majority when the vote happens in just five days' time. Defeat would strike a humiliating blow to Sir Keir's authority and throw into doubt his ability to push through any serious reform. National inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal finally ordered by Keir Starmer in another Labour U-turn If he cannot even convince his troops to get behind £5billion in welfare cuts, what hope does he have of reining in a sickness benefits bill set to balloon to £100billion within five years? Downing Street has been left with two options: Postpone the vote and buy time to redraw their proposals in a way that satisfies the rebels, despite the stench of weakness. Or roll the dice, stand firm, and try to peel off as many mutineers as possible. For now, Starmer has chosen to call their bluff, with both him and his deputy Angela Rayner publicly stressing the vote on Tuesday will happen. Over the next few days the PM, his ministers and his whips will use a mix of persuasion, arm-twisting, and downright dark arts to smash the revolt. A 'bleeding stumps' pitch has seen rebels told that popular policies — like more cash for hospitals and school breakfast clubs — could all be at risk without welfare savings. Meanwhile the more career-driven MPs are being gently warned that their hopes of a government job will evaporate if they walk through the wrong voting lobby. The name of one ambitious newbie who has been excitably telling colleagues he wants 'regime change' has worked its way back to No10. He can kiss goodbye to a ministerial red box . . . 'EMBARRASSING U-TURNS' But even MPs loyal to Starmer — and there are still a lot of them — are not convinced anything other than serious concessions will pull the rebels back from the brink. One member of the government tells me: 'It's hard to see how they can get this over the line on the current voting timeline without some concessions to get some of the heavy hitters to change course. 'But it is unclear if that reality has yet fully landed with No10.' Another supportive MP reckons a commitment on the floor of the House of Commons to soften the package later down the line is 'the only way to keep the show on the road'. One senior rebel insists they 'can find a compromise' but Downing Street 'need to take their fingers out of their ears'. And the rebellion is not just contained to the backbenches. One MP swears that as many as five Parliamentary Private Secretaries — the first rung on the ministerial ladder — are willing to abstain in protest. Many see this whole mess as symptomatic of a deeper problem running through his premiership: a growing sense he is not in control. A string of embarrassing u-turns — from winter fuel cuts to the grooming gangs national inquiry — are a dangerous smoke signal to his MPs that he can be pushed around. And worryingly to the Government — much like the Brexit Spartans who hamstrung Theresa May 's government — the new Labour rebels are organised. Experienced committee chairs on the soft left of the party have developed a sophisticated shadow whipping operation to marshall their troops. That No10 was totally blindsided by the ambush on Monday night — to the alarm of those in Starmer's inner circle — is testament to their tactics. Why would they care about rebelling on something they feel strongly about if they'll be out in four years time anyway Labour insider Or as one Labour MP put it: 'The amendment landed like a Viet Cong ambush from the soft-left — swift, unexpected, and overwhelming in its force.' Terrified of party whips getting wind, the ringleaders recruited disgruntled MPs to their cause through snatched conversations in corridors and on the Commons terrace. As one MP warns: 'They have spreadsheets and they can count. This whole saga has given them intel on how to whip'. And you can bet that fighting benefits cuts will not be their only rallying cause over the next four years. Axing the two-child benefit cap — on which the PM has already shown ankle at the mere flickers of backbench grumblings — will be next. The danger for Sir Keir now is spiralling into a doom loop of chaos, which breeds unpopularity, which breeds more chaos, which breeds more unpopularity. For some MPs watching endless polls predicting their seats falling to Reform, they are resigned to being one-term wonders. 'Why would they care about rebelling on something they feel strongly about if they'll be out in four years time anyway?', says one party insider. Almost one year ago our beaming PM walked into Downing Street with the most seats since Tony Blair. Next week's benefits vote will be a test of whether he is the master of that majority - or a mere passenger in his own government . . .
The Independent
a day ago
- Business
- The Independent
How will your MP vote on Labour's welfare bill – and could Starmer's government be defeated?
Labour 's controversial welfare cuts face a significant hurdle at a crunch Commons vote on Tuesday as more than 100 Labour MPs have joined the growing rebellion against the plans. An amendment signed by the 123 rebels – a figure which grew by 15 on Wednesday morning – would essentially halt the reforms if passed, as it would prevent the government's bill from progressing any further through Parliament. The episode marks a major challenge to Sir Keir Starmer's government. Should all of the rebels stand by the amendment – alongside MPs from other parties – then they would hold a majority of 44. This would be more than enough to secure an embarrassing and uncommon defeat for the Labour government. However, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has staged a last-minute intervention, signalling that she will ask her members to back the government's plans. While this would allow the bill to pass, it is likely not the ideal outcome for the prime minister. This scenario would see him defeating many of his own backbenchers by relying on opposition support. Entitled the 'Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill', the government's proposed legislation would see the eligibility and/or payment rates of both of these benefits sharply cut back for disabled claimants. The changes put forward by the group of Labour rebels would not halt these plans forever, but essentially lists several issues that mean the signatories cannot abide by the changes as things stand. Speaker of the House Lindsay Hoyle would need to select this amendment for it to be voted on, but with the amount of support it is unlikely that he would not. If this were to happen, MPs would still be required to vote on the main bill anyway, keeping the door open for a potential rebellion. Five key reasons are listed in the amendment, including the lack of a formal consultation with disabled people, and the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) analysis that the plans would push 250,000 into poverty, including 50,000 children. Also listed as a key issue is that the OBR is not due to publish its employment impact of the reforms essentially an analysis of how many people they would support into work, until autumn – months after MPs are expected to vote on them. However, the text of the amendment does also begin by 'noting the need for the reform of the social security system,' as well as 'agreeing with the government's principles for providing support to people into work and protecting people who cannot work.' The amendment has been signed by 11 Commons committee chairs, including Dame Meg Hillier (Treasury select committee) and Debbie Abrahams (Work and Pensions select committee). Confirming her decision to sign the amendment on Bluesky, Ms Abrahams said: 'I've signed this as I believe there are alternative ways we can achieve the Government's goals of increasing employment while reducing sickness and disability cases, therefore reducing overall disability benefits spending.' 'This can be achieved through improvements in the Labour market, along side increases in NHS and employment support. Not by impoverishing disabled people and their families further from next April by cutting their benefits before all these measures are in place.'
