logo
#

Latest news with #LegalProfessionAct1966

24 law firms probed for conveyancing of properties seized from money launderers, two to pay penalties
24 law firms probed for conveyancing of properties seized from money launderers, two to pay penalties

Business Times

time15-07-2025

  • Business
  • Business Times

24 law firms probed for conveyancing of properties seized from money launderers, two to pay penalties

[SINGAPORE] Twenty-four law firms are being investigated by the government for their involvement in the conveyancing of real estate properties seized in 2023's S$3 billion anti-money laundering bust. So far, probes against 11 have concluded, with the Director of Legal Services (DLS) ordering two law practices to pay penalties of S$30,000 and S$100,000, respectively. A third law firm was issued a statutory notice of intention for a fine of S$70,000. A final decision will be made after receiving and considering its written representations, if any, said the Ministry of Law (MinLaw) in a press statement on Tuesday (Jul 15). Another law practice was privately remanded, and a lawyer referred to the Law Society of Singapore for disciplinary action. No further regulatory action will be taken against the other seven law firms. Meanwhile, the DLS is considering the inquiry findings for the remaining 13 law firms, and whether any other lawyers should be referred to the Law Society of Singapore for disciplinary action, said MinLaw. Under the Legal Profession Act 1966, all law practices and lawyers are subjected to anti-money laundering obligations. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up These include performing an adequate analysis of the risks of money laundering related to each client, performing customer due diligence measures, filing a suspicious transaction report with the police if the firm or lawyer has reasonable grounds to suspect that the client may be engaged in money laundering, as well as substantiating and documenting reasons for the decision should they continue to act for the client despite these suspicions. MinLaw said law practices should also have internal anti-money laundering policies, procedures and controls that fulfil the regulatory requirements and are sufficiently robust. A law practice that breaches its anti-money laundering obligations is liable, among other things, to face regulatory control action against its licence. Lawyers who breach their obligations are also liable, among other things, to face disciplinary proceedings that could result in monetary penalties, suspension from legal practice or disbarment. 'Singapore has a comprehensive anti-money laundering regime. However, the landscape is constantly changing, as new money laundering risks and typologies emerge,' said MinLaw. 'Everyone has a role in ensuring that Singapore's anti-money laundering systems continue to be robust.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store