Latest news with #LoyolaUniversityChicagoSchoolofLaw
Chicago Tribune
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: Why the Art Institute's handling of Gustave Caillebotte's sexuality is disappointing
We read with interest Hannah Elgar's feature 'How light a touch is too light?' (Aug. 3) about the handling of Gustave Caillebotte's sexuality by the Art Institute and the renaming of the exhibition 'Painting His World.' We were especially struck by the comments from Jonathan Katz because of our experience visiting the Caillebotte exhibit and 'The First Homosexuals' at Wrightwood 659, curated by Katz. I am a scholar of anti-discrimination law (and a faculty member at Loyola University Chicago School of Law), and my husband, David, is a teacher and student of art history. While we enjoyed the Caillebotte exhibit very much, we were disappointed at its elliptical (at best) treatment of Caillebotte's sexuality, for two reasons. It seemed insensitive to the realities of class, which in large part enabled Caillebotte to paint what he wished without worrying about sales or a disapproving public. But worse, one of our closest friends, Mark Brosmer, is a gay artist in Los Angeles — and an exhibit curated this way all but denies the artistic legacy of gay artists and gay life throughout history. In many of Caillebotte's paintings, we recognized a loving depiction of the sociability of gay men together in the past, something we have observed and enjoyed in the present day. 'The First Homosexuals,' by contrast, enthusiastically explores that legacy, helping the viewer to understand which artists felt freer to express their same-sex orientation in their art, and why; what those risks were and who was willing to take those risks. We immediately thought, 'Caillebotte belongs here!' — in an exhibit where the sensual, erotic and homosocial dimensions of his work and life could be foregrounded and celebrated. We hope many Chicagoans felt the her review of the Gustave Caillebotte show now on view at the Art Institute, Hannah Edgar questions the museum's decision to change the title of the exhibit from 'Caillebotte: Painting Men,' used by the Getty and Musee d'Orsay, to 'Caillebotte: Painting His World.' Her article explores whether this title change is based on an Art Institute decision to downplay the homoerotic aspects of some of the paintings. This change of title and emphasis strike me as minor considering that all three museums have displayed the same paintings and offered the same biographical information. There is a lack of evidence that Caillebotte was gay. Which makes the assertion of an art historian Edgar consults — that this is an example of queer erasure and is consistent with the Art Institute's pathological 1950s mindset — completely over the top and in fact a time when Catholics in Chicago are visibly proud of their religion, it is shameful than one organization has chosen to focus on the worst parts of their history. On May 8, Robert Prevost was elected as Pope Leo XIV, and the Chicago papers claimed him as 'Chicago's pope.' Everyone, no matter what their religion, was proud that Chicago could produce a man who was elevated to the papacy. Then in June, Chicago recognized the good work of another Catholic, Sister Rosemary Connelly. For over 50 years, Connelly was a dynamic force building Misericordia into a healthy home for children and adults with physical and developmental challenges. Politicians and church leaders were effusive in their praise of her work, and Chicago papers gave extensive coverage as a real testament to her years of service to the church. Recently, the church was once again recognized as a beacon of hope when the news focused on the works two valiant nuns, Sister Patricia Murphy and Sister JoAnn Persch, after Murphy passed away. Both women were recognized for spending more than 40 years championing the rights of the poor and the immigrants. They spent long hours with immigrants in detention and found ways to house the asylum-seekers sent to Chicago by Texas Gov. Abbott. These three wonderful church champions have made all Catholics feel good about their church and have encouraged many to emulate their actions. That is why it is so disconcerting that the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, or SNAP, has chosen to grab the headlines by bringing up decades-old sexual abuse allegations. SNAP should continue to investigate these allegations, as it has been doing for the last many years, but it should do it quietly and stop grabbing the headlines and erasing the euphoric feelings of the Catholics in the Chicago Cubs will host the 2027 All-Star Game. It's about time the sport focuses its promotional energy on the upcoming event, rather than on special attraction games at a motor speedway park or a cornfield. I imagine a return to Hawaii or a game at an amusement park site is next. Wrigley Field is a showcase because it's a classic. Fans aren't clamoring for more bells and whistles. I hope Major League Baseball doesn't take it for granted.I won't be at Wrigley Field in 2027 for the All-Star Game, an ostentatious display of no consequence other than to line the pockets of sponsors and appease the egos of overpaid, uninterested athletes. But I agree with Jack Lavin's Aug. 5 op-ed ('MLB All-Star Game in 2027? Let's fly the 'W' for Chicago's economy') that it's good for the city and a chance to showcase the most iconic stadium in MLB. Sorry, Fenway Park, your Green Monster can't compete with Wrigley Field's ivy-covered walls. I hope the visitors enjoy the city and try a Chicago hot dog — with mustard, of course.
New York Times
14-02-2025
- Politics
- New York Times
Recent Resignations Recall Nixon-Era Saturday Night Massacre
At least six Justice Department officials decided this week to quit rather than obey an order to drop the corruption case against New York City's mayor, Eric Adams. The sheer number of resignations in such a short period of time has reminded legal experts of the Saturday Night Massacre. It was Oct. 20, 1973, and President Richard M. Nixon was seeking to fire Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor leading the Watergate investigation. Mr. Nixon and his subordinates had sought to cover up a connection between the White House and a botched burglary attempt at the Washington office building that gave the scandal its name. But the attorney general at the time, Elliot L. Richardson, refused to fire Mr. Cox and chose to resign instead. The deputy attorney general, William D. Ruckelshaus, also refused to do so and was fired. The order was eventually carried out by Robert Bork, the solicitor general. (Mr. Nixon was impeached, and eventually resigned.) What happened this week in the Adams case was the Saturday Night Massacre 'on steroids,' Steve Vladeck, a law professor at Georgetown University, wrote on Thursday. In both instances, there was a 'clash between the president's personal preferences and what Justice Department lawyers think the rule of law requires,' Mr. Vladeck said in an interview on Friday. Danielle R. Sassoon, the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, chose to offer her resignation on Thursday instead of dropping the Adams case. The lead prosecutor on the investigation, Hagan Scotten, has also announced his resignation. Ms. Sassoon has accused the mayor's lawyers of urging 'what amounted to a quid pro quo' of assistance with the president's immigration crackdown if the mayor's case is dismissed. On Thursday afternoon, Mr. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that he had not asked for the case to be dropped. But experts still see parallels with Mr. Nixon. 'You have a sort of Damocles hanging over the mayor in the event that he does not cooperate with the president and his immigration policy objectives,' said Juliet Sorensen, a former federal prosecutor and professor at Loyola University Chicago School of Law who has also written a case book on public corruption and the law. She said that it could be inferred by the directive that the mayor's indictment could be reinstated. Mr. Nixon wanted to stave off the Watergate investigation and now, she said, Mr. Trump wants Mr. Adams to cooperate with his immigration policy agenda. She also said that in both cases, career lawyers resigned in protest 'as a matter of professional responsibility and refused to get in line behind a blatantly political objective.' Since 1973, there have been plenty of examples of lawyers resigning rather than following directives given by their superiors, Mr. Vladeck said. 'But we haven't seen this sort of large-scale resignation all because the lawyers refuse to do something the political masters wanted them to do since that Saturday night in 1973,' he said. Garrett Graff, who has written a book about Watergate, said that comparisons to the Saturday Night Massacre were 'inescapable,' and even argued that what happened this week was worse. 'Nixon's fight with the special prosecutor was a question of presidential power and executive authority,' Mr. Graff said. What is happening now, he said, is 'even more fundamentally corrupting for the foundation and principles of the rule of law in American life, which is a Justice Department dropping legitimate charges against a public official in exchange for political favors.' Mr. Vladeck said the resignations were likely to influence what happened to the mayor's case and could lead courts to question the Justice Department's credibility. The Adams case is being overseen by Judge Dale E. Ho of Federal District Court in Manhattan. The resignations could also make it difficult for the department to recruit high-power lawyers like Ms. Sassoon and her colleagues, Mr. Vladeck said. 'These are the people you want in those jobs,' he said. 'If you're coming out of law school and you're interested in a career public service, this is a flashing red light about whether you really want to go work for this particular department.'
