Latest news with #MARPOL
Yahoo
02-06-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Asia-Pacific Container Fleet LNG Bunkering Market Forecast Report 2025-2030 Featuring Analysis of Cheniere Energy, Shell, TotalEnergies, ExxonMobil, Cameron LNG and Other Major Players
The Asia-Pacific container fleet LNG bunkering market presents opportunities in the green maritime sector by capitalizing on expanding LNG bunkering infrastructure in major ports like Singapore, Shanghai, and Tokyo. Key drivers include regulatory compliance and sustainability goals, despite high initial investment and infrastructure challenges. Dublin, June 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Asia-Pacific Container Fleet LNG Bunkering Market, By Country, Competition, Forecast & Opportunities, 2020-2030F" has been added to offering. The Asia-Pacific Container Fleet LNG Bunkering Market was valued at USD 415 Million in 2024, and is expected to reach USD 544 Million by 2030, rising at a CAGR of 4.47%. Container Fleet LNG Bunkering refers to the process of refueling liquefied natural gas (LNG)-powered container ships using specialized infrastructure and vessels. LNG bunkering is an essential aspect of sustainable maritime transportation, providing a cleaner alternative to traditional marine fuels such as heavy fuel oil and diesel. It reduces greenhouse gas emissions, sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter, aligning with international environmental regulations like the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) MARPOL. The container fleet LNG bunkering process involves different methods, including truck-to-ship, ship-to-ship, and terminal-based bunkering. Ship-to-ship bunkering is the most common method for large container vessels, ensuring efficiency and minimal downtime. Ports worldwide are expanding LNG bunkering facilities to accommodate the growing demand for greener shipping solutions. With the increasing adoption of LNG-powered container ships, LNG bunkering infrastructure is rapidly evolving to support global trade while minimizing environmental impact. This shift is driven by regulatory compliance, fuel cost considerations, and long-term sustainability goals. As the maritime industry continues its transition toward decarbonization, LNG bunkering for container fleets plays a critical role in shaping the future of eco-friendly shipping and global logistics. Key Market Drivers Expanding LNG Infrastructure and Bunkering Facilities The rapid expansion of LNG bunkering infrastructure across Asia-Pacific is a key driver of market growth. Governments and port authorities are investing in LNG supply chains, storage terminals, and bunkering facilities to support the transition to cleaner marine fuels. Major port hubs such as Singapore, Shanghai, Busan, and Tokyo are strengthening their LNG bunkering capabilities to cater to the increasing number of LNG-fueled container vessels. Singapore, the world's largest bunkering hub, has been at the forefront of LNG bunkering development. The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) has launched initiatives to enhance LNG infrastructure, including the deployment of LNG bunkering vessels and the establishment of LNG supply chains. Similarly, China is aggressively expanding its LNG bunkering capacity with projects in major ports like Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou. South Korea and Japan are also ramping up investments in LNG refueling infrastructure. South Korea's Green Ship Initiative and Japan's roadmap for LNG bunkering highlight their commitment to alternative fuels. These developments are critical in ensuring a reliable LNG supply for container fleets, further encouraging ship operators to adopt LNG as their primary fuel. The growing network of LNG terminals and bunkering vessels ensures seamless refueling operations, reducing downtime for container fleets and increasing LNG adoption in the maritime sector. As infrastructure continues to expand, the Asia-Pacific LNG bunkering market is set to witness substantial growth. In 2023, China's LNG imports reached 71.32 million tons, marking a 12.6% increase from the previous year. The Guangdong Energy Group's new LNG receiving terminal in Huizhou, Guangdong province, commenced operations in September 2024. This USD 1 billion facility has an annual processing capacity of 4 million metric tons. Key Market Challenges High Initial Investment and Infrastructure Development Costs One of the major challenges facing the Asia-Pacific container fleet LNG bunkering market is the high cost associated with infrastructure development and vessel conversion. Unlike conventional marine fuels such as heavy fuel oil (HFO) and marine gas oil (MGO), LNG requires specialized storage, transportation, and refueling infrastructure. The development of LNG bunkering facilities, including liquefaction plants, storage terminals, and bunkering vessels, involves substantial capital investment. Port authorities and private stakeholders must invest in dedicated LNG infrastructure to ensure a reliable supply chain. However, not all ports in the Asia-Pacific region are equipped with LNG bunkering facilities, leading to uneven availability across trade routes. While major hubs like Singapore, Shanghai, and Busan are expanding their LNG infrastructure, many smaller ports lack the necessary investment to support LNG bunkering operations. This creates logistical challenges for shipping companies operating LNG-powered container fleets, as they must carefully plan refueling stops based on available LNG supply points. The cost of building LNG-fueled container ships is significantly higher than traditional vessels. Shipowners must invest in specialized LNG storage tanks, fuel supply systems, and dual-fuel engines, which increase the upfront cost of fleet expansion. Although LNG provides long-term operational savings and regulatory compliance benefits, the initial financial burden deters some shipping companies from making the transition. Government incentives and financial support play a crucial role in overcoming this challenge. Some Asia-Pacific countries, including China, South Korea, and Japan, have introduced subsidies, tax benefits, and investment programs to encourage LNG adoption. However, the slow return on investment remains a concern for private investors, limiting the speed of infrastructure expansion. Without widespread LNG bunkering infrastructure, the industry faces a bottleneck that could hinder the large-scale adoption of LNG-powered container ships. To address this challenge, coordinated efforts between governments, port authorities, and private stakeholders are essential to accelerate LNG infrastructure development and make LNG bunkering more accessible across the Asia-Pacific region. Key Market Trends Expansion of LNG Bunkering Infrastructure and Port Facilities One of the most prominent trends in the Asia-Pacific container fleet LNG bunkering market is the rapid expansion of LNG refueling infrastructure. As demand for LNG-powered container ships grows, ports across the region are investing in LNG storage, transportation, and bunkering facilities to support the transition to cleaner fuels. Leading maritime hubs such as Singapore, Shanghai, Busan, and Tokyo are actively developing LNG bunkering capabilities. Singapore, a global leader in marine fuel supply, has implemented an extensive LNG bunkering program, including LNG bunker vessels, storage terminals, and partnerships with major shipping companies. Similarly, China is expanding LNG bunkering operations in key ports like Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen to meet its growing fleet of LNG-powered vessels. South Korea and Japan are also investing in LNG bunkering networks to strengthen their positions as regional refueling hubs. Governments and port authorities are playing a crucial role in accelerating LNG infrastructure development. Regulatory incentives, public-private partnerships, and financial support programs are helping to establish a reliable LNG supply chain across the Asia-Pacific region. The increasing number of LNG bunkering locations is enhancing the accessibility of LNG fuel for container fleets, reducing operational constraints, and encouraging more shipping companies to adopt LNG-powered vessels. As infrastructure expands, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to become a major LNG bunkering hub, facilitating the growth of sustainable maritime transport. Key Players Profiled in the Asia-Pacific Container Fleet LNG Bunkering Market Cheniere Energy, Inc. Shell plc TotalEnergies SE ExxonMobil Corporation Cameron LNG, LLC Chevron Corporation PetroChina Company Limited Sempra Energy Woodside Energy Group Limited Eni S.p.A. Report Scope In this report, the Asia-Pacific Container Fleet LNG Bunkering Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends, which have also been detailed below: Asia-Pacific Container Fleet LNG Bunkering Market, By End User: Ferries Cruise-Ships Bulk & General Cargo Fleet Offshore Support Vessels Asia-Pacific Container Fleet LNG Bunkering Market, By Distribution Channel: Direct Sales Bunkering Stations Asia-Pacific Container Fleet LNG Bunkering Market, By Country: China India Japan Australia South Korea Indonesia Vietnam Singapore Rest of Asia-Pacific Key Attributes Report Attribute Details No. of Pages 121 Forecast Period 2024-2030 Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2024 $415 Million Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2030 $544 Million Compound Annual Growth Rate 4.4% Regions Covered Asia-Pacific For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Sign in to access your portfolio
Mint
31-05-2025
- Business
- Mint
India to notify new rules to meet IMO's zero emission regulations; to get ports and shipping green compliant
The Union government is planning new rules for ships and ports to meet the forthcoming International Maritime Organisation (IMO) emission regulations, according to two persons aware of the matter. This move will have a significant bearing on the country's ambitious maritime development agenda. The new regulations will have an impact on design, construction and operation costs of ships; along with structural design of existing and new mega ports and shipyards. It will also include new fuel standards for ships and a global pricing mechanism for emissions. The rules will specify norms for putting up green fuel filling stations at ports including programmes for training of manpower in related activities, the two persons in the know said. The rules will also suggest design parameters for new ships being built at Indian shipyards so that they have dual fuel options for ships or design ships that are completely built to use green fuel such as compressed natural gas/liquefied natural gas, methanol, ammonia, green hydrogen and even electricity. Currently, diesel is the primary fuel for vessels, ferries and tugboats plying on inland waterways, certain coastal routes and on international routes. The rules will also have provisions for phased reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, and a time-bound plan for green upgrade of ports; with mandatory engagement of classification societies for earlier compliance assessment. 'The directorate general of shipping (DGS) under ministry of ports, shipping and waterways has already issued guidance note on IMO's Net Zero Framework and Greenhouse Gas Fuel Intensity (GFI)-based compliance measures to enable stakeholders across across the Indian maritime ecosystem to understand, prepare for, and comply with the forthcoming regulatory requirements under the IMO's Revised GHG Strategy 2023,' said the first person quoted above. 'The Guidance Note shall serve as an initial orientation document until formal rules and national-level implementation guidance including operational guidelines, compliance templates, and capacity-building frameworks are notified by the directorate in line with forthcoming IMO decisions,' he added. The new IMO regulations for the shipping industry aims to achieve net-zero emissions from international shipping by or around 2050, subject to national circumstances through mid-term measures comprising a technical Global Fuel Standard (GFS) and a market-based GHG (green house gas) pricing mechanism. The GFI-based mechanism, expected to formally come into force in March 2027 and effectively from 2028, mandates aprogressive reduction in the lifecycle carbon intensity of fuels used by ships above 5,000 GT engaged in international voyages. The mechanism is applicable to all ships flying the flag of a party to MARPOL (International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships). MARPOL is the primary international convention, developed by the IMO, aimed at preventing marine pollution from ships. 'The IMO regulations will have significant operational, economic, and strategic implications for shipowners, ports, training institutes, classification societies, and fuel suppliers. The new regulations will prepare the industry to comply with International obligations while also establishing national-level policies on green shipping,' said the second person quoted above. According to the Directorate General of Shipping, the total compliance cost for India is projected at $87-100 million annually by 2030, assuming partial reliance on remedial units. This is equivalent to a 14% increase in fuel cost and 5% increase in freight rates—well within industry operating margins. But, India may also benefit from IMO regulations, given its target of producing 5 million tonnes (MT) of green hydrogen by 2030. This enables production of 28 MT of ammonia and 26.3 MT of methanol, which qualify under the IMO's GFI reward system. Green fuels with lower lifecycle emissions earn compliance credits and shipping rewards, boosting India's export potential and investment in clean bunkering infrastructure. Query mailed to the ministry of ports , shipping and waterways (MoPSW) remained unanswered till press time. The country is already taking big strides towards greening its maritime structure, which includes the development of green hydrogen hubs and the initiation of alternate fuel programmes at ports. 'Kandla and Tuticorin ports are set to become the country's first green hydrogen and green ammonia refuelling hubs for green shipping,' said Rajiv Jalota, former chairperson of Mumbai Port Authority and advisor at Indian Ports Authority. The government has also initiated a green tug programme under which harbour tugs powered by cleaner and more sustainable fuels would be used at all major ports. 'Moreover, Harit Sagar, green port guidelines have been issued by the shipping ministry that targets reduction of carbon emissions at major ports through focused implementation and close monitoring of green initiatives. Ports are being encouraged to plan infrastructure for green bunkering and digital inspection protocols to streamline compliance verification. These should allow India to comply with any global regulations without having any adverse impact on the industry,' he added. The main issue with the proposed IMO regulation on net zero emissions is the distribution of money collected by the organisation by levying penalties on ships that are non-compliant with emission standards, he said. 'While discussions are still on how to distribute funds accumulated by IMO to countries such as India to help its industry get technology and fuel required to reduce emissions by the industry,' Jalota said. To facilitate the Indian shipping sector in smoothly embracing the 2027 IMO regulations, there is a need for a concerted, multi-stakeholder approach, said Pushpank Kaushik, CEO & head of Business Development at Jassper Shipping, a Hyderabad-based global shipping and logistics firm. The government needs to offer transparent regulatory road maps complemented by green finance interventions, tax breaks, and retrofitting incentives. 'Refurbishment of domestic shipyards is vital, and their inclusion in the Harmonized Master List of Infrastructure Sub-sectors is a welcome and opportune step,' Kaushik added. As significant is building capacity, Indian seafarers and technical staff need to be equipped to deal with new propulsion technologies and alternative fuels. Use of digital fleet management systems to track emissions and optimize operational efficiency will also be critical. 'India will also have to partner with global maritime organizations and utilize tools such as the IMO Net-Zero Fund to fund green infrastructure and training of the workforce,' he added. With sound policies, collaborations, and investments, regulatory compliance can be a dynamic driver of maritime innovation and world leadership, he said. According to the DGS, all stakeholders—including Indian shipowners, managers, port authorities, fuel suppliers, classification societies, and training institutions have been advised to review the Guidance Note issued by it in detail and initiate necessary preparatory measures. This includes monitoring ship-level fuel intensity data; reviewing procurement strategies for low-GHG fuels; enhancing technical training on GFI methodologies; planning green infrastructure upgrades at ports and engaging with classification societies for early compliance assessment. The immediate impact of IMO regulations would be limited on the Indian Maritime segment, given that out of India's current fleet (Indian flagged) strength of 1,524 registered vessels; only 212 ships (14%) qualify as foreign-going and are of above 5,000 gross tonnage (GT). Also, of these, only 135 ships are regularly engaged in overseas trade and would be subject to IMO compliance. While the global shipbuilding market is dominated by China, South Korea and Japan; India currently has 28 shipyards. But, Indian yards are already exploring retrofitting solutions and green ship designs. The regulation incentivizes demand for dual-fuel ships, alternative propulsion, and emission monitoring systems-creating new opportunities for domestic innovation and international competitiveness. Also, exporters chartering foreign ships will indirectly bear additional freight costs if vessels are non-compliant. Indian exporters are encouraged to factor GHG compliance in chartering decisions to minimise long-term freight inflation risks, the first person said.
The Hindu
13-05-2025
- Business
- The Hindu
How is the shipping industry tackling emissions?
The story so far: After a decade of deliberations towards decarbonising the maritime industry, at its 83rd session, the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC-83) of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) was faced with the challenge of coming to a consensus on a proposed emissions levy on global shipping. The session's objective was to adopt a Market-Based Measure (MBM) that balanced environmental effectiveness with economic fairness. What were the proposals? Five distinct proposals were tabled in the meeting. The first was by the International Chamber of Shipping which advocated for a fixed levy per every tonne of CO₂ emitted. Secondly, China proposed a market-driven approach where ships could trade compliance units and invest in alternative fuels. The European Union suggested a fixed Greenhouse Gas (GHG) levy, managed by an IMO-administered fund while India propositioned a 'bridging mechanism', which would target only under-compliant ships to bear the financial burden, while rewarding those using Zero or Near-Zero (ZNZ) fuels. Finally, Singapore also joined the fray by proposing an enhanced version of India's model, involving a GHG Fuel Standard (GFS) and a tiered system rewarding surplus emission units and requiring the purchase of remedial units for underperformance. Even before the debate on MBMs could fully unfold in the IMO, geopolitical tensions took centre-stage. The U.S. Trump administration, which had already withdrawn from the Paris Agreement and stripped the agency that responds to disasters from their climate work related responsibilities, did not participate in the IMO deliberations. It warned of 'reciprocal measures' if the EU-backed uniform carbon levy were passed. What was decided? The MPEC-83 of IMO voted 63 to 16 in favour of accepting Singapore's hybrid model based on India's proposal as the IMO's Net Zero Framework, making international shipping the first global industry to adopt a mandatory emissions levy framework. Having piloted a compromise formula amidst extremely divergent views, both India and Singapore have claimed credit for the successful outcome. However, the decision of the MEPC-83 is not final yet. Despite the vote, the path to implementation is far from straightforward. The MEPC-83's decision, having approved the Net Zero Framework, now needs to amend Annex VI of the MARPOL convention, which governs air pollution from ships. The amendment will undergo a six-month circulation period among all contracting parties to MARPOL. For final adoption, it requires a two-thirds majority of votes from members present and voting; this means that if all 101 parties participate, at least 67 must support the measure. Even if adopted, the amendment could still be blocked, should one-third of the parties — provided they account for at least 50% of global shipping tonnage — formally object in writing. Currently, with 63 votes in favour, 16 against, and 22 abstentions, the outcome remains uncertain. The process ahead is critical and could reshape the dynamics of global shipping regulation for decades to come. What other interests were at play? The wide range of positions expressed during the MEPC-83 underscores the enduring dominance of national interests in global climate diplomacy. Oil-exporting countries, led by Saudi Arabia, opposed any significant transition to green fuels, prioritising the protection of their fossil fuel markets. In contrast, small island nations and least developed countries advocated for steep carbon levies, seeking to redirect revenues into broader green development initiatives. Moreover, China, along with other large shipping nations, pushed for minimal levies to preserve competitiveness while focusing on investments in cleaner fuels. Norway and other Scandinavian countries have been seeking recognition for their early and costly efforts in decarbonising shipping, proposing that these efforts be rewarded through surplus credit systems. Brazil has been advocating for a rapid shift to methanol as a primary marine fuel, while several nations, citing a lack of viable green technologies, hoped for delayed implementation. Even after voting, scepticism has lingered among shipowners in traditional maritime powerhouses like Greece, who question the necessity and feasibility of a green levy altogether. The range of these responses illustrates the immense challenge the IMO faces in crafting a universally acceptable emissions framework. Why does green shipping matter? Shipping may seem invisible to most consumers, but it plays an outsized role in global emissions. The sector emits approximately one billion metric tonnes of GHG each year, representing about 2.8% of total global emissions. If ranked as a country, international shipping would be the sixth-largest emitter in the world, between Germany and Japan. Projections indicate that, without corrective action, emissions from shipping could rise by as much as 50 to 250% by 2050. Even though the sector contributes less than road transport emissions, they face heavier regulatory pressure because of their international nature. Therefore, to align with the 13th UN Sustainable Development Goal as well as the Paris Agreement, the IMO began implementing emissions-reduction measures in 2011, followed by the Initial GHG Strategy in 2018 and the updated IMO GHG Strategy in 2023. It has also included a technical measure such as the Energy Efficiency Design Index in Annex VI of the MARPOL convention; an operational measure, the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan, for reduction of GHG emissions from ships; and introduced mandatory recording and reporting of fuel oil consumption. Consistent with the 'Paris agreement temperature goals' it has also adopted 'levels of ambition' and 'guiding principles'. Between 2018 and 2023, it has agreed to fix a target for reducing carbon intensity (CO2 emissions per transport work) by at least 40% by 2030 compared to 2008 levels, and by 70% by 2040, ultimately achieving net-zero by 2050. This is notably more concrete than the International Civil Aviation Organization, which has only pledged a 'long-term aspirational goal' of net-zero emissions by 2050 without setting interim targets. Is it an equitable distribution? There has been a gradual erosion of the guiding principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities' (CBDR-RC) incorporated in the 2018 initial GHG strategy. The CBDR-RC is a core principle enshrined in climate agreements like UNFCCC, Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. It acknowledges that all nations must address climate change but recognise historical responsibility and unequal capacities. Developed nations, with their longer industrial histories, are expected to bear greater burdens. However, recent IMO proceedings reflect an effort by wealthier nations to shift responsibility onto developing economies, despite stark differences in income and consumption. How does India benefit? While the carbon levy and GHG targets set by the IMO may pose short-term challenges for certain sectors of the Indian economy, India is likely to emerge as a long-term beneficiary of the new MBM framework. According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, the impact of the MBM on India's maritime logistics costs will be modest in the near term — ranging from 4.98 to 7.29% on imports and 5.92 to 8.09% on exports by 2030. By 2050, these figures are projected to rise to about 33 to 35%. However, the actual impact on trade volumes is expected to be minimal. India currently operates nearly 236 ships over 5,000 gross tonnage, with only 135 involved in international voyages. Since MBMs apply only to international shipping, India's coastal fleet remains unaffected. At present, India spends roughly $400 million per year on fuel for its international fleet. The MBM is projected to increase this by approximately $108 million by 2030 — a manageable rise given the scale of India's maritime economy. Perhaps the most exciting implication of the MBM framework is the potential for India to become a global hub for clean energy exports. As the world's third-largest importer of fossil fuels, India is now investing heavily in green hydrogen through its National Hydrogen Mission. Industrial giants such as Reliance, Adani, and JSW are planning to scale up production, while three Indian ports are preparing to offer green hydrogen bunkering services. Under the mission's guidelines, Indian green hydrogen must meet a well-to-wake greenhouse gas fuel intensity of no more than 2 kg CO₂e per kilogram of hydrogen, translating to about 16.7 grams of CO₂ equivalent per megajoule. This standard positions Indian hydrogen well within the IMO's reward thresholds, which are capped at 19.0 g CO₂e/MJ until 2034 and 14.0 g CO₂e/MJ thereafter. This alignment creates a significant opportunity for India to export green fuels globally and capitalise on international incentives. Global shipping now stands at a transformative moment. Despite persistent disagreements and uncertain implementation pathways, the adoption of a MBM by the IMO represents a milestone in the journey toward decarbonisation. If successful, this framework could make shipping the first truly global sector to operate under binding climate goals, setting a powerful precedent for others to follow. Amitabh Kumar, a retired IRS officer, is former Director General of Shipping, Government of India. Views expressed are personal.
Yahoo
15-03-2025
- Yahoo
Shipping companies slammed with nearly $2M fine after deceiving US Coast Guard — here's what you need to know
Two foreign shipping companies have been banned from doing business in the United States after committing environmental crimes. The crimes occurred aboard the M/V ASL Singapore, a carrier owned and operated by ASL Singapore Shipping Limited and Jia Feng Shipping Limited. According to U.S. Attorney Michael M. Simpson, a routine Coast Guard inspection found the ship had used a "magic pipe" — a flexible hose attached to a portable pump — to discharge oily bilge water overboard. This action violated the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, also known as MARPOL, which regulates how such waste must be disposed of. The inspection also found that falsified oil record books had been presented to the Coast Guard in an attempt to hide that oily bilge water had been repeatedly dumped overboard since at least June 2023. The companies pleaded guilty, resulting in the ban and a combined $1.85 million in fines. The ship's chief engineer, Fei Wang, was separately sentenced to three months in prison and three years of supervised release. Bilge water, which gathers in the lowest part of a ship's hull, typically contains various oils and other contaminants from the ship's engine. When not disposed of properly, that oil becomes a major threat to marine life. Even small amounts of oil can be deadly to animals. It can coat wildlife's feathers or fur, preventing birds from flying or making fur less insulating. The toxins within oil can also cause major long-term health problems. Much of this pollution is carried out by companies that also boast about being environmentally friendly. This tactic, called greenwashing, is commonplace among polluters. Such corporations will use commercials and other public-facing means to promote green projects while continuing to damage Earth when few people are looking. Perhaps unsurprisingly, ASL Singapore Shipping Limited has a large section on its website dedicated to its sustainability efforts. Could America stop using oil and gas by 2050? For sure No way Only certain states could I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. The M/V ASL Singapore is not the first ship to be fined, or banned from doing business, because of its illegal dumping practices. So far this year, several Greek shipping companies have been found guilty of polluting our waters and had to pay fines of $4.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively. There are also nonprofits, like SkyTruth, that use satellite images to detect oil pollution, which can frequently occur in remote areas of the ocean that are hard to monitor. SkyTruth's Cerulean tracking system is free for anyone to see when and where oil pollution has occurred. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
