Latest news with #MRO
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sport
- Sydney Morning Herald
Dees earn scrutiny as bigger loser in clash of AFL's most disappointing duo
Bump language shows mindset change Whether Steven May is suspended or not, the moment was proof the mindset of the game has fundamentally changed. You change behaviours by changing language, and the May case is proof the AFL has already changed the narrative on these types of collision incidents. Instantly, the discussion centred on the velocity of May, what his plan was and the expectation of collision if and when he arrived late. It was also about the change of the duty of care, that pulling up or pulling out of a contest is OK if it means you don't concuss the other player. Previously, the reaction would have typically been that the MRO shouldn't even look at the case because both players were going for the ball and it was just an unfortunate collision. Loading That could still ultimately be what the tribunal decides, but significantly the discussion – even among veteran players – reflects the sort of change the AFL has been seeking. Now the conversation is whether what May did was fair and reasonable when his opponent, Francis Evans, came off concussed and bleeding from the head with a lost tooth. May may be cleared, like Fremantle's Alex Pearce was earlier in the season, or he might go for weeks as North Melbourne's Jackson Archer did. That is not the point. The point is the shift in the conversation. 'He was going to go and win that football', Nathan Buckley said in commentary before adding that he was not sure 'our game can allow that any more'. Jack Riewoldt offered on Fox: 'if you come in with that sort of velocity … this incident has a little bit of the Jackson Archer about it and that cost him three weeks. 'He came that fast into the contest, the collision was inevitable. Steven May has a duty of care because Francis Evans has the ball there.' David King added: 'What we had to do is look at it from the victim's point of view. What are we asking Evans to do?' Whether May's action is considered more akin to Archer or to Pearce will determine May's fate, but the bigger outcome has already been realised with the change in the language and the idea of what the game should tolerate. Time to topple Tassie roof The Tasmanian state election does not deliver a majority government, but logically it does deliver a majority of MPs who support a new football stadium. Liberal and Labor have both backed a stadium. Combined they have the numbers to now approve the stadium. Logic would say they do, though logic is rare in politics Don't waste a crisis is a truism of politics, which – if applied to Tasmania – would say that the new government, in whatever minority form it takes, has the chance to leverage its precarious political position to achieve what should have been the AFL and state government position from the outset and abandon the roof. The roof was a desirable, if expensive, luxury item the AFL added to the stadium as an ambit claim. The AFL logic was that, at the moment of their strongest bargaining position, they needed to ask for everything they wanted. The rationale was that if they didn't get what they wanted now, they would never get it. So they set a roofed stadium – not just a stadium – as a precondition. It was the sort of negotiating position Tony Soprano would've applauded. A roofed stadium would be an easier sell when recruiting players and for luring travelling fans to fly down to watch their team play against the Devils. But in making the demand, the AFL managed to turn what should have been a unifying moment for Tasmania and its football into an election issue and a flashpoint in a state that does not have to go searching for things to fight about. Infrastructure projects that come in on budget are as rare as Tasmanian tigers. The stadium will cost more than budgeted, and the federal government, which is committing every spare sports dollar it has to the Brisbane 2032 Olympics, has made it clear there will be no more money for the stadium. They put a ceiling on the roof. The AFL has said it won't throw in more cash, so if and when the costs run over, the state will be left scrambling for more. A roof in a cold but relatively dry state would be an excellent addition, particularly if combined with air conditioning/heating. But that would only add to the expense. And, yes, this idea of abandoning the roof is said in the knowledge of the foul weather experienced by Hawthorn and Port Adelaide at the weekend and after personally covering a North v West Coast game at Bellerive in horrendous conditions, with a wind so strong the ball blew back over players' heads. Let's not forget, football was played in Canberra in snow. No one demanded a roofed stadium for the Giants to come into the competition. If the Libs and Labor in Tassie don't join together and push the stadium through in its current state because they hate each other or maybe the minority Greens and independents demand concessions, what happens then? Is the AFL truly going to walk away from a team this far down the track, with funding offered by governments, a CEO and football staff employed, player movement rules and concessions drafted and clubs making decisions on the trading of players and draft picks in anticipation of the team's arrival? To go ahead requires the agreement of the majority of AFL clubs. Will they really cut and run on Tassie now with no roofed stadium? The AFL has the opportunity to pivot and reposition their brand in Tasmania, which has taken a hit even among the large number of Tasmanians who support a team and stadium. Rioli's revives Bosustow memories Peter Bosustow, who died earlier in the year, kicked goal of the year in his first season for a smother then recovering the ball and snapping a goal. He played in the era of Maurice Rioli. What Maurice Rioli Jnr (MJ) did against West Coast was very like Bosustow. His diving smother to then soccer the ball to himself, gather and chip to the goal square was superb. It was all Bosustow, right to the moment he didn't just kick the goal himself but passed it. Later he produced diving rundown tackle that was just as thrillingly team-lifting. It was one of those slow-motion moments where everyone but the ball carrier could see what was about to happen next. Poor Brady Hough. MJ has taken time to find his place in the Tigers' team. He is not a big possession winner, his skills can be loose, but his speed and pressure is elite.
The Age
a day ago
- Sport
- The Age
Dees earn scrutiny as bigger loser in clash of AFL's most disappointing duo
Bump language shows mindset change Whether Steven May is suspended or not, the moment was proof the mindset of the game has fundamentally changed. You change behaviours by changing language, and the May case is proof the AFL has already changed the narrative on these types of collision incidents. Instantly, the discussion centred on the velocity of May, what his plan was and the expectation of collision if and when he arrived late. It was also about the change of the duty of care, that pulling up or pulling out of a contest is OK if it means you don't concuss the other player. Previously, the reaction would have typically been that the MRO shouldn't even look at the case because both players were going for the ball and it was just an unfortunate collision. Loading That could still ultimately be what the tribunal decides, but significantly the discussion – even among veteran players – reflects the sort of change the AFL has been seeking. Now the conversation is whether what May did was fair and reasonable when his opponent, Francis Evans, came off concussed and bleeding from the head with a lost tooth. May may be cleared, like Fremantle's Alex Pearce was earlier in the season, or he might go for weeks as North Melbourne's Jackson Archer did. That is not the point. The point is the shift in the conversation. 'He was going to go and win that football', Nathan Buckley said in commentary before adding that he was not sure 'our game can allow that any more'. Jack Riewoldt offered on Fox: 'if you come in with that sort of velocity … this incident has a little bit of the Jackson Archer about it and that cost him three weeks. 'He came that fast into the contest, the collision was inevitable. Steven May has a duty of care because Francis Evans has the ball there.' David King added: 'What we had to do is look at it from the victim's point of view. What are we asking Evans to do?' Whether May's action is considered more akin to Archer or to Pearce will determine May's fate, but the bigger outcome has already been realised with the change in the language and the idea of what the game should tolerate. Time to topple Tassie roof The Tasmanian state election does not deliver a majority government, but logically it does deliver a majority of MPs who support a new football stadium. Liberal and Labor have both backed a stadium. Combined they have the numbers to now approve the stadium. Logic would say they do, though logic is rare in politics Don't waste a crisis is a truism of politics, which – if applied to Tasmania – would say that the new government, in whatever minority form it takes, has the chance to leverage its precarious political position to achieve what should have been the AFL and state government position from the outset and abandon the roof. The roof was a desirable, if expensive, luxury item the AFL added to the stadium as an ambit claim. The AFL logic was that, at the moment of their strongest bargaining position, they needed to ask for everything they wanted. The rationale was that if they didn't get what they wanted now, they would never get it. So they set a roofed stadium – not just a stadium – as a precondition. It was the sort of negotiating position Tony Soprano would've applauded. A roofed stadium would be an easier sell when recruiting players and for luring travelling fans to fly down to watch their team play against the Devils. But in making the demand, the AFL managed to turn what should have been a unifying moment for Tasmania and its football into an election issue and a flashpoint in a state that does not have to go searching for things to fight about. Infrastructure projects that come in on budget are as rare as Tasmanian tigers. The stadium will cost more than budgeted, and the federal government, which is committing every spare sports dollar it has to the Brisbane 2032 Olympics, has made it clear there will be no more money for the stadium. They put a ceiling on the roof. The AFL has said it won't throw in more cash, so if and when the costs run over, the state will be left scrambling for more. A roof in a cold but relatively dry state would be an excellent addition, particularly if combined with air conditioning/heating. But that would only add to the expense. And, yes, this idea of abandoning the roof is said in the knowledge of the foul weather experienced by Hawthorn and Port Adelaide at the weekend and after personally covering a North v West Coast game at Bellerive in horrendous conditions, with a wind so strong the ball blew back over players' heads. Let's not forget, football was played in Canberra in snow. No one demanded a roofed stadium for the Giants to come into the competition. If the Libs and Labor in Tassie don't join together and push the stadium through in its current state because they hate each other or maybe the minority Greens and independents demand concessions, what happens then? Is the AFL truly going to walk away from a team this far down the track, with funding offered by governments, a CEO and football staff employed, player movement rules and concessions drafted and clubs making decisions on the trading of players and draft picks in anticipation of the team's arrival? To go ahead requires the agreement of the majority of AFL clubs. Will they really cut and run on Tassie now with no roofed stadium? The AFL has the opportunity to pivot and reposition their brand in Tasmania, which has taken a hit even among the large number of Tasmanians who support a team and stadium. Rioli's revives Bosustow memories Peter Bosustow, who died earlier in the year, kicked goal of the year in his first season for a smother then recovering the ball and snapping a goal. He played in the era of Maurice Rioli. What Maurice Rioli Jnr (MJ) did against West Coast was very like Bosustow. His diving smother to then soccer the ball to himself, gather and chip to the goal square was superb. It was all Bosustow, right to the moment he didn't just kick the goal himself but passed it. Later he produced diving rundown tackle that was just as thrillingly team-lifting. It was one of those slow-motion moments where everyone but the ball carrier could see what was about to happen next. Poor Brady Hough. MJ has taken time to find his place in the Tigers' team. He is not a big possession winner, his skills can be loose, but his speed and pressure is elite.
The Hindu
3 days ago
- Business
- The Hindu
Closure of Vizianagaram Rythu Bazaar likely as court says land belongs to Pusapati family
The closure of Rythu Bazaar at the Old Maharaja Hospital in Vizianagaram appears imminent, as officials have confirmed that the land belongs to the Pusapati family, which won the case in connection with the property in court. According to sources, the family members of the Vizianagaram royal family have appealed to the government to remove the property from the 22-A prohibitory list, pointing out that they have won the case in the court and that relevant documents in have been submitted to get back the piece of land located near the MRO office. Vizianagaram Collector B.R. Ambedkar told The Hindu that the Pusapati family approached the government five years ago over the property issue and that it has now submitted the details of the court order. 'Rythu Bazaar was unofficially set up as the revenue officials permitted the farmers to sell their produce after the hospital was shifted to the new premises. We will try to accommodate 30 farmers in the remaining three Rythu Bazaars in the city to protect their livelihood,' the Collector said. A source in the Pusapati family said that the family of P.V.G. Raju, the last Maharaja of Vizianagaram, had donated land worth crores of rupees for the construction of schools, colleges and hospitals. 'It is unfair to question the royal family when the court has given a favourable order to take back the land. We could not take it back all these years since it was kept in the 22-A list,' he said. Meanwhile, farmers and citizens staged a demonstration, demanding that the government allow the Rhythu Bazaar to continue in the same place. Vizianagaram Pattana Powra Samskshema Sangham president Reddi Shankara Rao claimed that the land belonged to the government as per the 1968 revenue records. 'Each farmer has been paying a rent of around ₹3,800 per month to the Marketing Department since 1999. Around ₹15 lakh has been collected by the government from each farmer in the last 26 years. It is absolutely unfair to ask the farmers to vacate the land, without issuing individual notices. The decision will cause inconvenience to more than 1,000 consumers,' he said. Kumili G. Lakshmi, a farmer, said that the government must come to their rescue. Echoing the same view, Kondamama, another farmer, said that the government should construct a new Rythu Bazaar before asking them to vacate the land. A. Venkateswara Rao, a citizen, urged the government officials and the Pusapati family to rethink the decision to resume the land, saying that the Rhythu Bazaar has been catering to the needs of thousands of citizens and hundreds of farmers. 'The closure of the Rythu Bazaar will affect the farmers and the people as well. Vizianagaram has a population of around 16 lakh, and more Rythu Bazaars are needed. Moreover, closure of the Rythu Bazaar would damage the reputation of the Pusapati family,' said S. Sankara Rao, a consumer.
Al Etihad
4 days ago
- Business
- Al Etihad
Sanad reports robust H1 2025 revenue of Dh3.2 billion as global orderbook surpasses Dh38 billion
17 July 2025 19:16 ABU DHABI (ALETIHAD)Sanad, the global aerospace engineering and leasing solutions leader wholly owned by Abu Dhabi's sovereign investor Mubadala Investment Company PJSC (Mubadala), today announced strong financial and operational results for the first half of 2025, reinforcing its role as a strategic enabler of the UAE's aviation and industrial recorded revenues of Dh 3.2 billion for H1 2025, marking a 39% increase over the same period last year, driven by continued momentum across its Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) and Asset Management divisions. Building on its Dh 4.92 billion achieved in 2024, Sanad is on track to achieve projected full-year revenues of Dh 5.4 billion in 2025. With 99% of H1 2025 revenues generated from international markets, Sanad is not only expanding its global footprint but also channeling international revenue streams into the UAE economy, reinforcing Abu Dhabi's position as a net exporter of advanced aerospace services and a rising force in the global aviation value chain. Expanding Global Orderbook and Strategic Agreements The Group's global orderbook has reached an all-time high of Dh 38 billion, driven by long-term agreements with key partners and an expanding global footprint. Notable developments include Sanad's entry into the Pratt & Whitney GTF MRO Network as the first and only provider in the SAMENA region, as well as the expansion of MRO operations to Al Ain through its strategic partnership with AMMROC. New engine maintenance agreements were signed with leading global airliners such as Lion Air and Garuda Indonesia, while the Group strengthened its long-standing collaboration with CFM International to provide full overhaul services for LEAP-1A and LEAP-1B MRO division has successfully inducted 90 engines in the first half of 2025 and is on pace to complete 210 inductions by year-end, a 30% increase over 2024. This growth has been enabled by major infrastructure and tooling investments to expand capacity and meet rising global demand. Investing in Infrastructure, Tooling, and expanded Capabilities As part of its long-term strategy to position Abu Dhabi as a global hub for engine MRO, Sanad is investing over Dh 150 million to expand and modernize its infrastructure, tooling, and facility capacity, laying the foundation for accelerated growth and enhanced service delivery worldwide:Upgraded engine test cell to enable full live testing of CFM LEAP engines, supporting both current and future customer requirementsCommenced phased rollout of full LEAP engine MRO capabilities, positioning Sanad among a select group of global MRO providers equipped to service this high-demand platformAdded new critical engine component repair capabilities for both LEAP and GEnx engines, marking a major milestone in expanding its advanced repair expertise and supporting faster turnaround times for airline parallel, Sanad expanded its Abu Dhabi headquarters by 3,600 sqm and commissioned a new 5,000 sqm MRO facility in Al Ain in partnership with AMMROC. These strategic investments significantly elevate Sanad's global competitiveness, technical capabilities and operational resilience, reinforcing its role as a catalyst for industrial innovation in the UAE and a trusted partner in the global aerospace value chain. Asset Management and Leasing Milestones Sanad continued to advance its position as a global asset management leader in H1 2025, executing high-impact transactions that are redefining aftermarket capabilities and strengthening its role in the global aviation supply chain. The Group acquired a portfolio of Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines from Etihad Airways, significantly expanding its global asset management portfolio. In parallel, Sanad completed a strategic parts portfolio sale to AerSale, enhancing its aftermarket support one of the most notable transactions in the aviation leasing sector, Sanad also finalized a landmark Dh 400 million engine and component sale with AerCap Materials, marking one of the largest asset sales of its kind to strategic milestones reflect Sanad's agile, value-driven approach to asset management and underscore its growing influence in shaping the future of the global aviation aftermarket. Workforce Growth and Emirati Talent Development Sanad's success is driven by its people and the ability to attract, retain, and develop high-caliber talent in an increasingly competitive global aerospace market. Amid global talent shortages, the Group continued to grow and invest in future-ready capabilities:The workforce grew by 15% year on year, reaching 621 employees, including 51 new hires this year Emiratization rose to 34.6%, up from 28.3% in H1 2024 Delivered over 1384 training hours in H1 2025, focused on advanced MRO skills, safety, and leadership. In H1, Sanad signed an MoU with GE Aerospace to drive immersive training and knowledge exchange. In parallel, two Emirati engineers began a six-month exchange program at Rolls-Royce facilities in the UK, part of a strategic initiative announced last year during the Farnborough structured programs like the Sanad Technical Development Programs, Future Leaders Program, and OEM-certified trainings, are designed to cultivate a world-class aerospace talent Siddiqui, Group Chairman of Sanad, stated: "Sanad's strong performance in the first half of 2025 reflects strategic clarity, disciplined execution, and the continued trust of our global partners. What sets Sanad apart is its unwavering commitment to building future-ready capabilities—investing in people, technology, and global collaborations. Through knowledge exchange and advanced technical development, Sanad is helping shape a resilient, knowledge-based aerospace ecosystem that embodies the UAE's bold industrial vision. It stands as a powerful example of how UAE-born champions can deliver sustainable growth, global relevance, and lasting impact."Mansoor Janahi, Managing Director and Group CEO of Sanad, said: "Our performance in H1 2025 reflects the strength of our strategy, execution, and long-standing global partnerships. The expansion of our LEAP and GTF capabilities, the successful asset sale transactions, and our investments in infrastructure and talent all underscore Sanad's growing influence on the global aerospace stage. By embedding innovation into everything we do, whether through advanced MRO solutions or transformative talent development, we are not only meeting the evolving needs of our customers but also reinforcing Abu Dhabi's position as a global hub for aerospace excellence.' Looking ahead With a strong H1 foundation, Sanad is poised to deliver continued growth in H2 2025. The Group will advance global partnerships, scale infrastructure, and drive innovation to support rising demand for advanced MRO and asset management services. As Sanad continues to shape the future of aerospace, it remains committed to strengthening the UAE's industrial ecosystem and expanding its leadership across the global aviation value chain.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
What You Need to Know Ahead of W.W. Grainger's Earnings Release
W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW), headquartered in Lake Forest, Illinois, distributes maintenance, repair, and operating products and services. Valued at $50.9 billion by market cap, the company's products include motors, HVAC equipment, lighting, hand and power tools, pumps, packaging, material handling, adhesives, safety, janitorial, electrical, and metalworking equipment. The MRO giant is expected to announce its fiscal second-quarter earnings for 2025 before the market opens on Friday, Aug. 1. Ahead of the event, analysts expect GWW to report a profit of $10 per share on a diluted basis, up 2.5% from $9.76 per share in the year-ago quarter. The company surpassed the consensus estimates in two of the last four quarters while missing the forecast on two other occasions. Palantir Just Launched Warp Speed for Warships. Does That Make PLTR Stock a Buy? This Analyst Just Doubled His Price Target on AMD Stock How High Can Nvidia Stock Go as Jensen Huang Heads to China? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! For the full year, analysts expect GWW to report EPS of $40.47, up 3.9% from $38.96 in fiscal 2024. Its EPS is expected to rise 11.2% year-over-year to $45.01 in fiscal 2026. GWW stock has outperformed the S&P 500 Index's ($SPX) 11.6% gains over the past 52 weeks, with shares up 15.2% during this period. However, it underperformed the Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLI) 21.6% rise over the same time frame. GWW's strong performance can be attributed to two significant factors: a growing shortage of skilled labor, which is prompting businesses to outsource non-core tasks, and the continuous expansion of its product offerings to attract more business from existing customers. These factors are expected to create ample opportunities for the company in the future. On May 1, GWW shares closed up more than 2% after reporting its Q1 results. Its EPS of $9.86 surpassed Wall Street expectations of $9.46. The company's revenue was $4.31 billion, missing Wall Street forecasts of $4.32 billion. GWW expects full-year EPS to be $39 to $41.50, and expects revenue in the range of $17.6 billion to $18.1 billion. Analysts' consensus opinion on GWW stock is cautious, with a 'Hold' rating overall. Out of 16 analysts covering the stock, three advise a 'Strong Buy' rating, 11 give a 'Hold,' one recommends a 'Moderate Sell,' and one advocates a 'Strong Sell.' GWW's average analyst price target is $1,109.55, indicating a potential upside of 4.9% from the current levels. On the date of publication, Neha Panjwani did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
