Latest news with #MSCIACWIIndex


Cision Canada
5 days ago
- Business
- Cision Canada
La Caisse posted a mid-year 2025 return of 4.6% over six months and 7.7% over five years Français
Five-year return beats benchmark portfolio and exceeds depositors' needs Ten-year return of 7.0% also higher than the benchmark portfolio Depositor plans in excellent financial health, reflecting their assets' good performance MONTRÉAL, Aug. 12, 2025 /CNW/ - La Caisse today presented an update of its results as at June 30, 2025. Over six months, the weighted average return on its depositors' funds was 4.6%, above its benchmark portfolio's 4.3%. Over five years, the average annualized return was 7.7%, also outpacing the benchmark portfolio's 6.6%. Over ten years, the average annualized return was 7.0%, also higher than its benchmark portfolio, which stood at 6.4%. As at June 30, 2025, La Caisse's net assets were $496 billion, up $23 billion over six months. "In the first half of the year, tariff issues related to U.S. policy were a major concern. Financial markets were highly volatile, with a correction in April followed by a robust rebound. Despite this overall performance, we must remain vigilant as we have yet to see the full effects of the U.S. administration's measures," said Charles Emond, President and Chief Executive Officer of La Caisse. "Against significant rate increases, stock market concentration and challenges in real estate over the past five years, our portfolio held strong and outperformed its benchmark portfolio. Our depositors' plans, and therefore Quebecers' pensions, are in excellent financial health." Return highlights Equities Equity Markets: Performance powered by Europe, Canada and emerging markets In the first half of the year, global stock markets responded to the back-and-forth on tariffs with volatility, yet recorded gains. The MSCI ACWI Index, which includes both developed and emerging markets, posted a 4.4% return, hampered by the U.S. market, which suffered from uncertainty around the country's economic policy. Indexes from several major regions, including the eurozone, Canada and emerging markets, delivered excellent performance. In this context, the Equity Markets portfolio recorded a 6.0% return, outperforming its benchmark portfolio's 5.5% return. This result was due to all management mandates, with a significant contribution from Canadian and emerging market stocks, as well as timely risk-taking during the slide in early April. Over five years, the annualized return was 13.3%, compared with 12.9% for the index. Drivers of this performance include the increase in exposure to major technology stocks and the contribution of Canadian portfolio companies over the period. Private Equity: Portfolio companies continue to grow despite the market slowdown Over six months, the portfolio turned in a 3.4% return, above its benchmark index, which posted a 2.0% return. The performance is explained by growth in the profitability of portfolio companies, both in Québec and internationally, but that was more moderate in a slowing environment. During the six-month period, the teams pursued their disposition strategy and completed just over $8 billion in materializations, while making new investments of $4 billion. Over five years, the portfolio's annualized return was 16.7%, compared with 15.4% for the benchmark index. Exposure to the technology, finance and industrial sectors was particularly beneficial over the period. Fixed Income: Strong current yield due to high rate environment and credit premiums The first half of the year was characterized by escalating trade tensions and the risk of economic recession in the United States, as well as U.S. yields diverging from the rest of the world. In this context, the Fixed Income asset class generated a 3.9% six-month return, above its benchmark index's 3.0%. The performance is due to a strong current yield of 2.8% and positive execution in government debt, corporate credit and capital solutions activities. Over five years, the asset class posted an annualized return of 0.2%, still largely affected by 2022's major market correction, compared to the index's -0.8%. The quality of all credit activities explains the difference with the index. Infrastructure: Constant return in an unstable geopolitical context Over six months, the Infrastructure portfolio continued to be a pillar of stability for the overall portfolio. The return was 4.5%, buoyed primarily by transportation assets. Its benchmark index was 8.1%, boosted by the public stocks that compose it, which continue to be stimulated by the energy demand driven by artificial intelligence. In an environment that remains competitive due to the asset class's particularly attractive profile, the teams were proactive. They completed nearly $4 billion of acquisitions, primarily abroad, in sectors such as telecommunications, data centres and power transmission. They also made targeted strategic sales to materialize gains and ensure portfolio turnover. Over five years, the annualized return was 11.2%, compared with 9.0% for the index. The portfolio once again benefited from sound asset diversification and its favourable positioning in promising sectors, including renewable and transition energy, ports, highways and telecommunications. In the first half of the year, the portfolio earned a 0.1% return, compared with the 1.2% return of its benchmark. The vast majority of sectors that make up the portfolio saw their values stabilize during the six-month period. Shopping centres and offices posted good current yields after the pandemic shock. However, performance was limited by the impact of the higher-rate environment. Over five years, the annualized return on the portfolio stands at 0.3%, in line with its index at 0.4%, reflecting the cyclical and structural challenges affecting the entire industry in recent years. The difference with the index is mainly due to the portfolio's longstanding concentration in the U.S. office sector, which experienced difficulties over the period. It should be noted that the sectoral repositioning of the real estate portfolio toward sectors of the future, such as logistics, since 2020 was favourable over five years. Impact of currencies on returns In the first half of the year, the portfolio's exposure to foreign currencies adversely impacted overall performance, mainly due to the sharp depreciation of the U.S. dollar. The partial hedging of this currency implemented by the teams, however, offered significant protection, offsetting nearly half of the negative impact. Over five years, foreign currency exposure contributed positively to overall performance, mainly due to the strength of the U.S. dollar over the period and the portfolio's large exposure to it. Québec: Support for local companies and structuring projects as the global economy redefines itself The beginning of the year helped consolidate the positions of some Québec leaders in strategic industries, in addition to continuing to advance structuring projects. Highlights included: Support to grow companies Innergex: Announcement of the acquisition of this renewable energy leader, bringing the enterprise value to $10 billion Norda Stelo: $28 million for an equity stake in this impact engineering leader, following two years as a lender, thereby reinforcing our partnership focused on sustainable innovation Germain Hotels: Leading a financing round for a total of $160 million to accelerate its expansion, and support for the company's succession Synex Business Performance: Equity stake as a minority shareholder and support in the form of debt for this growing company in the Canadian insurance brokerage sector Structuring projects REM: Migration of all operations to Brossard and start of the test period on two new branches (Deux-Montagnes and Anse-à-l'Orme) before the dry run stage at the end of the summer Québec-Toronto high-speed train: The Government of Canada selected the Cadence team, led by CDPQ Infra, as a private partner of Alto, the federal Crown corporation responsible for carrying out this major project for Canadian mobility TramCité: Announcement of consortia qualified for two major contracts as part of requests for expressions of interest led by CDPQ Infra; ultimately, this new 19-km modern tramway network will become the backbone of mobility in the Québec City region Financial reporting Cost management remains a priority for the organization. As such, the integration of the real estate subsidiaries, Ivanhoé Cambridge and Otéra Capital, into La Caisse, continued to benefit from the full potential of a simplified organization and to generate efficiency gains. Note that this integration, which began last year, will conclude in 2026. The synergies achieved already represent annual savings beyond the initial target of $100 million. Information on internal and external investment management costs as at December 31 will be presented in the annual disclosure. The credit rating agencies reaffirmed La Caisse's investment-grade ratings with a stable outlook, namely AAA (DBRS), AAA (S&P), Aaa (Moody's) and AAA (Fitch Ratings). ABOUT LA CAISSE At La Caisse, formerly CDPQ, we have invested for 60 years with a dual mandate: generate optimal long-term returns for our 48 depositors, who represent over 6 million Quebecers, and contribute to Québec's economic development. As a global investment group, we are active in the major financial markets, private equity, infrastructure, real estate and private credit. As at June 30, 2025, La Caisse's net assets totalled CAD 496 billion. For more information, visit or consult our LinkedIn or Instagram pages. La Caisse is a registered trademark of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec that is protected in Canada and other jurisdictions and licensed for use by its subsidiaries. SOURCE La Caisse


Business Wire
07-08-2025
- Business
- Business Wire
MSCI Equity Indexes August 2025 Index Review
LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--MSCI Inc. announced the results of the August 2025 Index Review for the MSCI Equity Indexes. All changes will be implemented as of the close of August 26, 2025. Highlights include: MSCI Global Standard Indexes: Forty-two securities will be added to and 56 securities will be deleted from the MSCI ACWI Index. The three largest additions to the MSCI World Index measured by full company market capitalization will be Rocket Lab Corp (USA), SoFi Technologies (USA) and Affirm Holdings A (USA). The three largest additions to the MSCI Emerging Markets Index measured by full company market capitalization will be China CITIC Bank A (HK-C) (China), Dian Swastatika Sentosa (Indonesia) and Laopu Gold H (China). MSCI Global Small Cap Indexes: There will be 194 additions to and 107 deletions from the MSCI ACWI Small Cap Index. MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes: There will be 176 additions to and 103 deletions from the MSCI ACWI Investable Market Index (IMI). MSCI Global All Cap Indexes: There will be 120 additions to and 60 deletions from the MSCI World All Cap Index. MSCI Frontier Markets Indexes: There will be nine additions to and four deletions from the MSCI Frontier Markets Index. The three largest additions to the MSCI Frontier Markets Index measured by full company market capitalization will be FPT Corp (Vietnam), Asyad Shipping Company (Oman) and Société Générale de Banques en Côte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast). There will be 28 additions to and 11 deletions from the MSCI Frontier Markets Small Cap Index. In light of currently observed market accessibility issues, MSCI will continue to not implement changes as part of this Index Review for any securities classified in Bangladesh for the MSCI Bangladesh Indexes or impacted composite indexes. These changes, along with other changes across MSCI Equity Indexes including the MSCI US Equity Indexes, MSCI US REIT Index, MSCI China A Onshore Indexes and China All Shares Indexes are available on MSCI's "Index Review" web page: -Ends- About MSCI MSCI Inc. (NYSE: MSCI) strengthens global markets by connecting participants across the financial ecosystem with a common language. Our research-based data, analytics and indexes, supported by advanced technology, set standards for global investors and help our clients understand risks and opportunities so they can make better decisions and unlock innovation. We serve asset managers and owners, private-market sponsors and investors, hedge funds, wealth managers, banks, insurers and corporates. To learn more, please visit Media Inquiries PR@ Melanie Blanco +1 212 981 1049 Konstantinos Makrygiannis +44 77 6893 0056 Tina Tan +852 2844 9320 MSCI Global Client Service EMEA Client Service + 44 20 7618 2222 Americas Client Service +1 888 588 4567 Asia Pacific Client Service + 852 2844 9333 This document and all of the information contained in it, including without limitation all text, data, graphs, charts (collectively, the 'Information') is the property of MSCI Inc. or its subsidiaries (collectively, 'MSCI'), or MSCI's licensors, direct or indirect suppliers or any third party involved in making or compiling any Information (collectively, with MSCI, the 'Information Providers') and is provided for informational purposes only. The Information may not be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced or redisseminated in whole or in part without prior written permission from MSCI. All rights in the Information are reserved by MSCI and/or its Information Providers. The Information may not be used to create derivative works or to verify or correct other data or information. For example (but without limitation), the Information may not be used to create indexes, databases, risk models, analytics, software, or in connection with the issuing, offering, sponsoring, managing or marketing of any securities, portfolios, financial products or other investment vehicles utilizing or based on, linked to, tracking or otherwise derived from the Information or any other MSCI data, information, products or services. The user of the Information assumes the entire risk of any use it may make or permit to be made of the Information. NONE OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDERS MAKES ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION (OR THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE USE THEREOF), AND TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EACH INFORMATION PROVIDER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ORIGINALITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE) WITH RESPECT TO ANY OF THE INFORMATION. Without limiting any of the foregoing and to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, in no event shall any Information Provider have any liability regarding any of the Information for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential (including lost profits) or any other damages even if notified of the possibility of such damages. The foregoing shall not exclude or limit any liability that may not by applicable law be excluded or limited, including without limitation (as applicable), any liability for death or personal injury to the extent that such injury results from the negligence or willful default of itself, its servants, agents or sub-contractors. Information containing any historical information, data or analysis should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of any future performance, analysis, forecast or prediction. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The Information may include 'Signals,' defined as quantitative attributes or the product of methods or formulas that describe or are derived from calculations using historical data. Neither these Signals nor any description of historical data are intended to provide investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any investment decision or asset allocation and should not be relied upon as such. Signals are inherently backward-looking because of their use of historical data, and they are not intended to predict the future. The relevance, correlations and accuracy of Signals frequently will change materially. The Information should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. All Information is impersonal and not tailored to the needs of any person, entity or group of persons. None of the Information constitutes an offer to sell (or a solicitation of an offer to buy), any security, financial product or other investment vehicle or any trading strategy. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class or trading strategy or other category represented by an index is only available through third party investable instruments (if any) based on that index. MSCI does not issue, sponsor, endorse, market, offer, review or otherwise express any opinion regarding any fund, ETF, derivative or other security, investment, financial product or trading strategy that is based on, linked to or seeks to provide an investment return related to the performance of any MSCI index (collectively, 'Index Linked Investments'). MSCI makes no assurance that any Index Linked Investments will accurately track index performance or provide positive investment returns. MSCI Inc. is not an investment adviser or fiduciary and MSCI makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any Index Linked Investments. Index returns do not represent the results of actual trading of investible assets/securities. MSCI maintains and calculates indexes, but does not manage actual assets. The calculation of indexes and index returns may deviate from the stated methodology. Index returns do not reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor may pay to purchase the securities underlying the index or Index Linked Investments. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause the performance of an Index Linked Investment to be different than the MSCI index performance. The Information may contain back tested data. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. There are frequently material differences between back tested performance results and actual results subsequently achieved by any investment strategy. Constituents of MSCI equity indexes are listed companies, which are included in or excluded from the indexes according to the application of the relevant index methodologies. Accordingly, constituents in MSCI equity indexes may include MSCI Inc., clients of MSCI or suppliers to MSCI. Inclusion of a security within an MSCI index is not a recommendation by MSCI to buy, sell, or hold such security, nor is it considered to be investment advice. Data and information produced by various affiliates of MSCI Inc., including MSCI ESG Research LLC and Barra LLC, may be used in calculating certain MSCI indexes. More information can be found in the relevant index methodologies on MSCI receives compensation in connection with licensing its indexes to third parties. MSCI Inc.'s revenue includes fees based on assets in Index Linked Investments. Information can be found in MSCI Inc.'s company filings on the Investor Relations section of MSCI ESG Research LLC is a Registered Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and a subsidiary of MSCI Inc. Neither MSCI nor any of its products or services recommends, endorses, approves or otherwise expresses any opinion regarding any issuer, securities, financial products or instruments or trading strategies and MSCI's products or services are not a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such, provided that applicable products or services from MSCI ESG Research may constitute investment advice. MSCI ESG Research materials, including materials utilized in any MSCI ESG Indexes or other products, have not been submitted to, nor received approval from, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any other regulatory body. MSCI ESG and climate ratings, research and data are produced by MSCI ESG Research LLC, a subsidiary of MSCI Inc. MSCI ESG Indexes, Analytics and Real Estate are products of MSCI Inc. that utilize information from MSCI ESG Research LLC. MSCI Indexes are administered by MSCI Limited (UK) and MSCI Deutschland GmbH. Please note that the issuers mentioned in MSCI ESG Research materials sometimes have commercial relationships with MSCI ESG Research and/or MSCI Inc. (collectively, 'MSCI') and that these relationships create potential conflicts of interest. In some cases, the issuers or their affiliates purchase research or other products or services from one or more MSCI affiliates. In other cases, MSCI ESG Research rates financial products such as mutual funds or ETFs that are managed by MSCI's clients or their affiliates, or are based on MSCI Inc. Indexes. In addition, constituents in MSCI Inc. equity indexes include companies that subscribe to MSCI products or services. In some cases, MSCI clients pay fees based in whole or part on the assets they manage. MSCI ESG Research has taken a number of steps to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and safeguard the integrity and independence of its research and ratings. More information about these conflict mitigation measures is available in our Form ADV, available at Any use of or access to products, services or information of MSCI requires a license from MSCI. MSCI, Barra, RiskMetrics, IPD and other MSCI brands and product names are the trademarks, service marks, or registered trademarks of MSCI or its subsidiaries in the United States and other jurisdictions. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and S&P Dow Jones Indices. 'Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)' is a service mark of MSCI and S&P Dow Jones Indices. MIFID2/MIFIR notice: MSCI ESG Research LLC does not distribute or act as an intermediary for financial instruments or structured deposits, nor does it deal on its own account, provide execution services for others or manage client accounts. No MSCI ESG Research product or service supports, promotes or is intended to support or promote any such activity. MSCI ESG Research is an independent provider of ESG data.
Yahoo
04-08-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
A Confluence of Catalysts Drove Aristotle Capital's Global Equity Composite to Build a Position in Capital One Financial Corporation (COF)
Aristotle Capital Management, LLC, an investment management firm, released its 'Global Equity Strategy' investor letter for the second quarter of 2025. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. During the quarter, the global equity market surged, with the MSCI ACWI Index rising 11.53%. Aristotle Capital Global Equity Strategy returned 9.58% gross of fees (9.45% net of fees) in the second quarter, underperforming the MSCI ACWI Index's 11.53% return and the MSCI World Index's 11.47% return. Additionally, you can review the fund's top 5 holdings to see its best picks for 2025. In its second-quarter 2025 investor letter, Aristotle Capital Global Equity Strategy highlighted stocks such as Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF). Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) is a financial services holding company for Capital One, National Association that offers various financial products and services. The one-month return of Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) was -6.08%, and its shares gained 52.42% of their value over the last 52 weeks. On August 1, 2025, Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) stock closed at $207.47 per share, with a market capitalization of $132.68 billion. Aristotle Capital Global Equity Strategy stated the following regarding Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) in its second quarter 2025 investor letter: "Founded in 1988 and headquartered in McLean, Virginia, Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) is one of the largest credit card issuers in the U.S. The company was spun out of Signet Financial in 1995 under the leadership of founder and current Chairman and CEO Richard Fairbank. Over the past three decades, Capital One has evolved from a monoline credit card lender into a diversified financial services firm offering a broad range of consumer and commercial banking products. A smiling face of a customer as they make a deposit at this company's branch. Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) is not on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 93 hedge fund portfolios held Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) at the end of the first quarter, which was 89 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. In another article, we covered Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) and shared the list of cheap value stocks to buy according to Warren Buffett. Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) was the top contributor to Oakmark Equity and Income Fund's performance during Q2 2025. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q2 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
02-08-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Aristotle Capital's Global Equity Strategy Sold PayPal Holdings (PYPL) for a More Compelling Opportunity
Aristotle Capital Management, LLC, an investment management firm, released its 'Global Equity Strategy' investor letter for the second quarter of 2025. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. During the quarter, the global equity market surged, with the MSCI ACWI Index rising 11.53%. Aristotle Capital Global Equity Strategy returned 9.58% gross of fees (9.45% net of fees) in the second quarter, underperforming the MSCI ACWI Index's 11.53% return and the MSCI World Index's 11.47% return. Additionally, you can review the fund's top 5 holdings to see its best picks for 2025. In its second-quarter 2025 investor letter, Aristotle Capital Global Equity Strategy highlighted stocks such as PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) is a technology platform that enables digital payments. The one-month return of PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) was -10.22%, and its shares gained 10.94% of their value over the last 52 weeks. On July 31, 2025, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) stock closed at $68.76 per share, with a market capitalization of $65.692 billion. Aristotle Capital Global Equity Strategy stated the following regarding PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) in its second quarter 2025 investor letter: "During the quarter, we sold our positions in PayPal Holdings and Rational and invested in Capital One and Uber. We first invested in PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL), the online and mobile e-commerce payments company, in the third quarter of 2015. Over the past decade, we have admired PayPal's ability to expand its unique and hard-to-replicate dual-sided network, even amid intensifying competition. In 2023, Alex Chriss succeeded Dan Schulman as CEO and refocused the company on profitable growth by enhancing the checkout experience and deepening user engagement, rather than emphasizing top-line expansion. Partnerships with Apple, J.P. Morgan, Amazon and Shopify support this shift, embedding PayPal more deeply across digital commerce ecosystems. Mr. Chriss has also prioritized higher-margin branded checkout while phasing out select Braintree deals that were unprofitable or contributed little to earnings. Braintree primarily serves large enterprise clients—such as Uber, Airbnb and Live Nation—through unbranded, custom-priced processing agreements. While these actions have moderated near-term revenue growth, we view them as a more disciplined and sustainable approach to long-term value creation. That said, we remain concerned about PayPal's continued investment in its 'One Platform' strategy, which includes expanding into offline and omnichannel payments—a direction that has shown limited success to date. While we will continue monitoring Mr. Chriss's progress and the broader payments landscape, we ultimately determined PayPal was the most suitable candidate for sale in order to fund what we believe is a more compelling investment opportunity." A consumer in a cafe paying for goods using a mobile payment app. PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) is not on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 92 hedge fund portfolios held PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) at the end of the first quarter which was 94 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. In another article, we covered PayPal Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PYPL) and shared the list of stocks Jim Cramer recently talked about. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q2 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
02-07-2025
- Business
- Bloomberg
2025 midyear outlook: Global asset managers
Three keys for 2025: Global asset managers Asset-manager stocks track market despite 12% cut to 2025-26 EPS Asset-manager stock returns have kept pace with the broader market in 2025, despite a 12% cut to 2025-26 EPS estimates tied to April turmoil. Though forecasts have stabilized, they've trailed the wider rebound amid lingering macroeconomic uncertainty, tempering earlier double-digit profit-growth expectations. Valuations have recovered, yet the group still trades at a 50% discount to the broader sector. Asset managers match 7% market return year to date Global large-cap asset managers have performed roughly in line with the broader market's 7% year-to-date return, following a year of outperformance in 2024 that reversed underperformance in 2022-23. Asset-price gains — particularly in equities — remain critical to supporting top- and bottom-line outlooks, with improved organic-growth trends offering an additional lift. Still, sustained optimism hinges on a more stable macroeconomic backdrop. Peers in the BI large-cap asset-manager index rose by a median 26% in 2024, topping the MSCI ACWI's 18% gain, after underperforming by 9 percentage points in 2023. DWS leads year-to-date gains at 25%, while T. Rowe is the weakest with a 16% decline. CI Financial led 2024 performance on a take-private bid, while Franklin trailed amid Western Asset-related strain that emerged in 2H. Markets drive 12% cut to managers' 2025-26 EPS Asset-manager EPS estimates have stabilized since late April, though they've trailed the broader market rebound following sharp cuts amid the earlier equity drawdown. Full-year 2025 and 2026 EPS forecasts are down 12%, with aggregate revenue estimates 6% lower and operating income off 8% year to date. T. Rowe has seen the steepest revenue downgrade (8%), given its equity-heavy exposure, while Franklin shows the largest profit-expectation cut amid unique Wamco-related strain. BlackRock's estimates have held up best, reflecting platform resilience and support from M&A. Among BI-tracked peers, Franklin and AllianceBernstein show the widest positive gap between stock-price change and EPS revisions — lifting multiples — while T. Rowe and Invesco reflectnegative gaps that have compressed valuations. Multiples reclaim 1Q levels, reflect secular pressure The BI large-cap asset-manager peer group's forward P/E has recovered from April lows and now sits slightly above its long-term average, having reclaimed early 1Q when global asset prices were near their peak. At 10.4x, the group trades above its 2023-24 average of 9.6x, aided by market gains and generally supportive organic growth, though volatility surrounding broader macroeconomic uncertainty remains a risk. Still, valuations are well above the 8.9x seen in 2022,when sharp equity and bond declines were a top and bottom-line headwind. The five-year average stands at 9.9x — roughly a 50% discount to the MSCI ACWI Index — a gap that's widened after holding a premium through much of 2010 to mid-2014. The persistent valuation gap reflects fee and margin pressure alongside structural organic-growth headwinds. BlackRock tops manager multiples amid market swings BlackRock's 21x 2025 P/E highlights its leadership in organic growth, profitability and resilience –supporting a premium to its 19x historical average and leading traditional peers. Group valuations appear mostly elevated relative to norms, though fundamentals remain mixed. Franklin (11x) trades the furthest above trend, despite Wamco challenges that are reshaping its franchise. T. Rowe also trades at 11x but sits the furthest below norms, as equity-heavy exposure heightens profit sensitivity to persistent outflows. Invesco's 9x multiple, the lowest among peers, reflects a painful but necessary asset-mix transition that weighs on its earnings power. The group's 11x five-year median still trails the 15x for BI-tracked alternative managers, underscoring divergent growth, fee and margin trajectories. PE-manager multiples reflect core fee growth, exit challenges US private equity manager valuations account for resilient core-fee fundamentals overcoming industry challenges due to market uncertainty. Exit delays weigh on 2025 profit prospects, even as managers express some 2H optimism. Credit operators are faring better, reflecting demand and asset growth, as well as managers less dependent on monetization. Shares fell a median 18% through June 18, yet most P/E multiples recovered from April lows, with the group trading over 19x. Fee growth may persist, while activity and exits are key 2H variables. Brookfield's valuation leads on lack of exit dependence as Ares' holds on its credit operations, along with Blackstone. KKR's and TPG's growth helps. Apollo's multiple was helped by credit business, but insurance's slower growth has weighed. Carlyle's multiple held in 1H, yet trails peers.