Latest news with #MSOs
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
SC seeks Andhra response on plea against Sakshi TV's ‘blackout'
The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought response from the Andhra Pradesh government on a plea filed by the owners of Sakshi TV alleging the television channel's blackout in the state was guided purely by political considerations. The channel was promoted by former chief minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy and his wife is its current chairperson. (ANI PHOTO) The channel was promoted by former chief minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy and his wife is its current chairperson. It approached the court through its holding company Indira Television Private Limited and a whole time director claiming that AP State Fibernet Limited , a state-owned distribution firm, was directed to take the channel off air after the Chandrababu Naidu government came to power in June last year. Following this, threats were issued to multi service operators (MSO) to stop beaming the channel, the plea claimed. A bench of justices PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar issued a notice to the state and the MSOs and posted the matter after three weeks. 'Issue notice on the prayers for interim relief as well as on the writ petition,' the court said. Senior advocate V Giri appearing along with advocate Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki for the petitioner channel said, 'We cannot function in the given circumstances. The state cannot do this.' The petition pointed out that the coordinated suppression of a media outlet by state is 'politically motivated' as AP State Fibernet Limited abruptly disconnected the channel without giving any prior notice. This was followed by similar disconnections by major MSOs across the state. Senior advocate Niranjan Reddy also appearing for the channel said that selective targeting of the petitioner violates Article 14 for being arbitrary and throttles freedom of speech and expression, guaranteed to media outlets under Article 19(1)(a). The election results in the state were announced on June 4 last year. Within a fortnight on June 20, Andhra Pradesh State Fibernet disconnected the petitioner's channel. Against this order, the channel filed appeals before the Andhra Pradesh high court and the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT). The high court on June 28, 2024, and TDSAT on July 5, 2024, directed that there should be unhindered and uninterrupted transmission of Sakshi TV. However, by then, the channel claimed it was taken off air by majority MSOs, leading to the channel's black out across 80% of the state.
The Hindu
2 days ago
- Politics
- The Hindu
Supreme Court issues notices on ‘blocking' of Sakshi TV channel
Justice P.S. Narasimha of the Supreme Court ordered that notices be issued to the State of Andhra Pradesh and 11 other respondents, including the A.P. State FiberNet Ltd. (APSFL), in a writ petition filed by Indira Television Limited (Sakshi TV) wholetime Director B. Ramana Reddy against the alleged disconnection of the channel by the APSFL and nearly all the major Multi System Operators (MSOs) across the State due to the threats allegedly given by the State and its officials. Mr. Ramana Reddy stated in the petition that the APSFL had disconnected the channel from its distribution platform after the 2024 general elections allegedly without any notice or explanation, and it was quickly followed by similar disconnections by the MSOs. Resultantly, the channel was effectively 'blacked out' across the State. The petitioner's counsel, Mahfooz A. Nazki, prayed for a declaration that the actions of the respondents, including the disconnection of the channel and the coercive measures taken against the MSOs, were arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The court was also urged to direct the respondents to forthwith restore the transmission of the channel to the status as it existed on June 3, 2024, and to refrain from taking any coercive, indirect, or extra-legal measures that interfered with the transmission / distribution of the channel. The matter was posted for further hearing after three weeks.
Malaysian Reserve
19-07-2025
- Business
- Malaysian Reserve
AIDCF Calls on MIB to Reject TRAI's Proposal on DTH License Fee Reduction
Urges Government to Uphold Competitive Balance and Spectrum Equity in Broadcasting Sector NEW DELHI, July 19, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — The All India Digital Cable Federation (AIDCF) has submitted a formal representation to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) opposing the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's (TRAI) recommendation to reduce and eventually waive the license fee currently levied on Direct-to-Home (DTH) operators. AIDCF, India's apex body representing Digital Multi-System Operators (MSOs), has expressed serious concerns over the far-reaching consequences of this proposal. If accepted, it would deepen the regulatory imbalance between DTH and digital cable operators and jeopardize the viability of over 880 MSOs and 1.6 lakh Local Cable Operators (LCOs) nationwide. The potential fallout could also impact over 10 lakh livelihoods directly tied to the cable TV distribution sector. 'This move threatens the very foundation of equitable competition in the broadcasting distribution space. Spectrum for DTH is already allocated administratively—without auction or cost—whereas cable operators continue to bear substantial Right of Way (RoW) charges and heavy capital expenditure on underground infrastructure. Any waiver of license fees would not only distort the market but also violate the principle of regulatory neutrality,' said an AIDCF spokesperson. Reducing license fee for DTH will accelerate subscriber churn from digital cable TV operators, who as per AIDCF, are already struggling under financial duress due other unregulated platforms like Free Dish, FAST TV, OTTs and Digital DPOs. AIDCF has emphasized that the regulatory framework must reflect the full commercial value of the spectrum allocated to DTH operators. Instead of reducing or waiving the fee, the Federation recommends the development of a more balanced mechanism that ensures fair cost recovery from all platform providers, in line with spectrum valuation norms. AIDCF has urged the Ministry to reject TRAI's recommendation and maintain a level playing field that protects the economic viability of all stakeholders in the broadcasting distribution chain. Photo – –
Fast Company
02-07-2025
- Business
- Fast Company
How I navigate uncertainty: A strategy for survival and sanity
In uncertain markets, survival is the first strategy. When I'm facing volatility—especially the kind we're seeing now—I look for something I can count on. With the tariff situation and a general sense of instability in the market, the challenge is clear. But it's not only about tariffs. It's more about how to identify some level of certainty to serve the business purpose, whether for growth, cost reduction, or any particular focus you may have at a given time. In our business, we sell to telcos, MSOs, and data centers. Many industries and market sectors are uncertain right now, but one thing I do see as certain is that the AI -driven data center market is growing, no matter what policy comes. That's a point of certainty. But to get there, I start by understanding the uncertainty. What's the worst-case scenario? This is the first question I ask during a time of uncertainty. Take the tariff situation, for example—the worst case is that you can't rely on the existing supply chain. From there, I ask: What's the highest tariff rate we can absorb? If the answer is none, then maybe we need to stop that part of the business. Every probable option should be on the table for consideration at this point, whether I am mentally prepared to accept it or not. It's not easy—moving a supply chain is not going to happen overnight. Some of the questions worth asking include: What certainty can be identified from the customer end? What certainty can be identified within the supply chain? Where's the flexibility? That's the kind of thinking I follow. Can the supplier and the customer take some of the pain out of it together with us? If we can work together as a whole ecosystem, maybe we can still make the business sustainable. After understanding the worst-case scenario, I try to work backwards to figure out the best thing I could do. First of all, what can happen if tariffs skyrocket? Can we afford that situation? If not, then we may have to be ready to close that business, or at least try to pivot. Are we ready for this? If not, we'd better prepare ourselves for this worst-case scenario first. Once you understand the worst-case scenario and are prepared for it, you may start working towards the best scenario by identifying the opportunities that may be hidden behind the challenges. For my company, that means focusing on the AI-driven data center infrastructure business for growth. We're not abandoning other business lines, but we're prioritizing what's most certain right now in terms of the market drive. That's on the business side—on the target customer segment perspective. We may do this scenario planning from the worst towards the best by working within the entire ecosystem—the customer end, the supply end, and internally. How can we absorb that extra cost? That's how we try to maintain the business. One part is long-term. The other part is near-term mitigation. Of course, we can do other things like lobbying, but being a small or mid-sized business, you need to be able to survive first. A MENTAL MODEL FOR DECISION-MAKING To make sense of complexity, I rely on a simple framework I call the point-line theorem, where I take a pen and look at it first from the tip, then from the side. It helps me think through things from various perspectives to identify the best possible solution to a given problem at that given time. The first principle of this theorem is the incompleteness of perspectives. For instance, if you take n pictures of any object, I can always take a new one (or the n +1 one) to show you a different one. That's why brainstorming is so important. If you're working by yourself, then fine—brainstorm by yourself. But if you can talk to your customer, your client, your supplier, then do it. The more people, the better, because everyone has a different experience and a different background, and can give new, fresh perspectives. The second principle of the point-line theorem is what I call the symmetry of the perspectives: Who is right, the point or the line? I say they're symmetric, so you cannot objectively say which one is better. It depends on how you see it. That helps me welcome new ideas—even ones that seem contradictory or on the opposite side of what we already have. The third principle is the breaking of symmetry. If there's a hole in the table and you want to keep the pen on the table, the line perspective works. But if you want the pen to drop into the hole, then the point perspective works. So, when a problem is presented or when a goal is identified, you can distinguish which perspective is most useful under this set of criteria you have. After the brainstorming session, I try to put everything on the wall, even if it's messy. Then I pick the best that serves the purpose. Take into account the available perspectives and the goal you want to achieve—that's how I make a decision. FIND SANITY BEFORE CERTAINTY You cannot brainstorm forever. You cannot keep doing it unless you can afford it. So, when it's time to make a decision, sometimes you just have to make it. In the tariff example, this isn't about how to deal with the tariffs specifically. It's about using that example to open up your mind. When you live in that uncertain world, what can you do to get some certainty, or sanity, back and to move forward? The goal isn't to eliminate uncertainty—it's to find the clarity that lets you act anyway.
