Latest news with #MaheshChandraTripathi
Time of India
6 days ago
- Politics
- Time of India
Allahabad HC directs Ghaziabad development body to maintain status quo on demolition notice
PRAYARGRAJ: The Allahabad High Court has directed that status quo be maintained with regards to the demolition notices issued by Ghaziabad Development Authority ( GDA ) over alleged illegal properties built on public land. Hearing a writ petition, a division bench comprising Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Prashant Kumar granted time to the district administration and GDA to place on record how they intend to rehabilitate the old inhabitants of the properties. The court also restrained the petitioners from creating any third-party interests or undertaking any development on the disputed property. The court also observed, "In the facts and circumstances of the case, we also find that it is not in dispute that the petitioners have been occupying the place for the last 40-50 years." "At this stage, we find that some indulgence and reprieve is to be accorded to the inhabitants who belong to the weaker sections of society and we further direct the authorities to ensure the formulation and implementation of a rehabilitation scheme for such persons," it said. The bench said the rehabilitation scheme shall be provided by the district administration and the GDA in the next hearing. The next hearing is listed for August 22. The petitioners filed the present writ petition for quashing the demolition notice dated June 16, 2025, issued by the GDA under section 26-A of the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The GDA initially issued notice to 172 illegal occupants of public land on September 6, 2024, which is earmarked in the master plan. Consequently, 89 persons filed their objections which were considered and the impugned order (order under challenge) was passed. During the course of hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are old inhabitants and in absence of any rehabilitation scheme as per the law, the old inhabitants, who are occupying small pieces of land for their shelter and admittedly belong to the lower sections of society, will suffer irreparable loss, if uprooted. After hearing both sides, the court in its order dated July 31 passed the above directives and observed, "It is informed that in response to the earlier court's order, till date the GDA has not taken any remedial measures to rehabilitate the persons who were in illegal occupation for the last 40 years."
News18
02-08-2025
- Politics
- News18
Allahabad HC directs GDA to maintain status quo on demolition notice
Prayagraj(UP), Aug 2 (PTI) The Allahabad High Court has directed that status quo be maintained with regards to the demolition notices issued by Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) over alleged illegal properties built on public land. Hearing a writ petition, a division bench comprising Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Prashant Kumar granted time to the district administration and GDA to place on record how they intend to rehabilitate the old inhabitants of the properties. The court also restrained the petitioners from creating any third-party interests or undertaking any development on the disputed property. The court also observed, 'In the facts and circumstances of the case, we also find that it is not in dispute that the petitioners have been occupying the place for the last 40-50 years." 'At this stage, we find that some indulgence and reprieve is to be accorded to the inhabitants who belong to the weaker sections of society and we further direct the authorities to ensure the formulation and implementation of a rehabilitation scheme for such persons," it said. The bench said the rehabilitation scheme shall be provided by the district administration and the GDA in the next hearing. The next hearing is listed for August 22. The petitioners filed the present writ petition for quashing the demolition notice dated June 16, 2025, issued by the GDA under section 26-A of the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The GDA initially issued notice to 172 illegal occupants of public land on September 6, 2024, which is earmarked in the master plan. Consequently, 89 persons filed their objections which were considered and the impugned order (order under challenge) was passed. During the course of hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are old inhabitants and in absence of any rehabilitation scheme as per the law, the old inhabitants, who are occupying small pieces of land for their shelter and admittedly belong to the lower sections of society, will suffer irreparable loss, if uprooted. After hearing both sides, the court in its order dated July 31 passed the above directives and observed, 'It is informed that in response to the earlier court's order, till date the GDA has not taken any remedial measures to rehabilitate the persons who were in illegal occupation for the last 40 years." PTI CORR RAJ SKY SKY view comments First Published: August 03, 2025, 00:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hindustan Times
02-08-2025
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Allahabad HC directs GDA to maintain status quo on demolition notice
Prayagraj, The Allahabad High Court has directed that status quo be maintained with regards to the demolition notices issued by Ghaziabad Development Authority over alleged illegal properties built on public land. Allahabad HC directs GDA to maintain status quo on demolition notice Hearing a writ petition, a division bench comprising Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Prashant Kumar granted time to the district administration and GDA to place on record how they intend to rehabilitate the old inhabitants of the properties. The court also restrained the petitioners from creating any third-party interests or undertaking any development on the disputed property. The court also observed, "In the facts and circumstances of the case, we also find that it is not in dispute that the petitioners have been occupying the place for the last 40-50 years." "At this stage, we find that some indulgence and reprieve is to be accorded to the inhabitants who belong to the weaker sections of society and we further direct the authorities to ensure the formulation and implementation of a rehabilitation scheme for such persons," it said. The bench said the rehabilitation scheme shall be provided by the district administration and the GDA in the next hearing. The next hearing is listed for August 22. The petitioners filed the present writ petition for quashing the demolition notice dated June 16, 2025, issued by the GDA under section 26-A of the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The GDA initially issued notice to 172 illegal occupants of public land on September 6, 2024, which is earmarked in the master plan. Consequently, 89 persons filed their objections which were considered and the impugned order was passed. During the course of hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are old inhabitants and in absence of any rehabilitation scheme as per the law, the old inhabitants, who are occupying small pieces of land for their shelter and admittedly belong to the lower sections of society, will suffer irreparable loss, if uprooted. After hearing both sides, the court in its order dated July 31 passed the above directives and observed, "It is informed that in response to the earlier court's order, till date the GDA has not taken any remedial measures to rehabilitate the persons who were in illegal occupation for the last 40 years." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
01-08-2025
- Business
- Time of India
SC hearing next week, Sports City builders start repaying their dues
Noida: Following Noida Authority's notices to developers, some builders involved in the Noida Sports City projects have initiated payments to start clearing their outstanding dues. Notably, a consortium partner in the Sector 150 Sports City project led by Lotus Green Constructions has deposited Rs 80 crore. Officials said that several other consortium partners in the Sector 150 Sports City project have expressed willingness to pay and are likely to follow suit soon. In March, the Authority had issued notices directing developers to settle long-pending dues within a month, in compliance with a high court order issued in Feb. These dues include pending premiums, interest on premiums, penalty interest, lease rent, time extension fees, and the 64.7% additional compensation amount. An official said that 62 notices were issued to various developers across the four Sports City projects in the city. These projects collectively owe Rs 11,000 crore in dues to the Authority. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida While the projects were originally awarded to four lead developers, they later subdivided the plots and sub-leased them to their consortium partners. In a set of rulings on Feb 24 this year, the Allahabad High Court directed the Authority to issue notices to all stakeholders, demanding payment of outstanding dues, including interest and penalties. It warned that failure to comply would result in the automatic cancellation of allotments. Exposing what it described as a "dirty nexus" between real estate developers and Noida Authority officials, the high court had ordered investigations by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) into three of four Sports City projects, citing massive financial and planning irregularities. A division bench comprising Justices Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Prashant Kumar passed 10 separate judgments detailing violations of land use norms, misappropriation of public land, financial mismanagement, and a systematic failure to construct the promised sports infrastructure. In response, many developers approached the Supreme Court, challenging the High Court's verdict. While the apex court did not stay the CBI and ED investigations, it restrained the agencies from taking any coercive action against the developers for the time being. The next round of hearings is scheduled for the first week of Aug. To oversee compliance, the Authority constituted a committee, led by an additional CEO, to pursue recoveries, enforce court-mandated timelines, and monitor the development of the sports infrastructure. The court's scrutiny has focused on Sports City projects in Sectors 78, 79, and 101, developed by Xanadu Estate, and two major projects in Sector 150, developed by Logix Infra Developers and Lotus Greens Constructions. The fourth project is led by ATS Homes in Sector 152. Developers were found to have violated project norms by prioritising residential and commercial development over the mandated sports facilities, which were supposed to occupy 70% of the allotted land. The Xanadu and Logix projects are both currently under insolvency proceedings, which the court criticised as strategic attempts to evade liabilities. First conceptualised in 2004 and launched between 2010 and 2016, the Sports City projects were planned across 798 acres in Noida, promising world-class sports infrastructure, including three golf courses and an international cricket stadium. However, developers focused instead on residential and commercial construction, failing to deliver the promised sports infrastructure.
Time of India
27-07-2025
- Business
- Time of India
Favouritism? GNIDA's Rs 241-crore trash tender under Allahabad high court scanner
Noida: Greater Noida Authority's move to appoint a private agency for waste collection in Greater Noida West has come under scrutiny from Allahabad high court. The contract — pegged at over Rs 241 crore — pertains to integrated mechanical sweeping, manual sweeping, door-to-door collection and transportation of waste in Zone 1 and 2 of Greater Noida (West). The HC has restrained Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) from finalising any contract under the latest tender until further orders. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida The court is examining allegations that the bidding process was repeatedly cancelled and modified in a manner designed to favour one particular bidder and exclude others. As an interim measure, a division bench of Justices Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Prashant Kumar ruled, "Although the tender process pursuant to RFP dated June 18 may proceed, no final decision shall be taken or contract awarded without leave of this court." GNIDA has been granted two weeks to respond to the allegations and explain the rationale for cancelling previous RFPs and altering eligibility norms. The matter will next be heard on Aug 11. The court observed the allegations, if true, raise serious questions about the transparency of public procurement and compliance with judicial orders. The allegations pertain to the RFP and eligibility criteria. The court, while hearing a petition filed by two private agencies on July 17, observed, "The allegations raised by the petitioners, if found to be true, have serious implications upon fair competition, transparency in public procurement and compliance with judicial orders." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cargo Ship Meets Pirates - Watch What the Captain Does Next! Tips and Tricks Undo The court also took note of serious allegations that the Authority issued the request for proposal (RFP) five times in the span of a year, particularly the clause concerning consortium participation and financial eligibility criteria. These changes, the petitioners allege, were arbitrary and appeared designed to disqualify them while giving undue advantage to a preferred bidder. The first RFP was floated on July 2, 2024 and later modified through a corrigendum on Aug 24, allowing consortium bids. However, it was cancelled due to only two bidders participating. A second RFP was issued on Nov 6 with an expanded scope of work but without the provision for consortiums and was also later withdrawn. A third RFP was floated on Jan 13, 2025 with the same project scope and again disallowing consortium bids. Petitioners challenged this in the HC, seeking inclusion of consortiums, but the HC disposed of the petition after GNIDA informed it that it opened the technical bids and the tender process was in the final stage of finalisation. However, on May 2, GNIDA issued the same RFP for the fourth time. The two companies submitted a joint bid as a consortium, seeking that their application be accepted and considered on merits. When the Authority did not address their submission, they again approached the HC. On May 17, the HC directed the development authority to examine the prayer of the petitioners and take an appropriate decision. However, the Authority once again cancelled the fourth RFP on June 3 without addressing the petitioners' concerns. The matter was again brought before the court, prompting the HC to seek clarity from GNIDA on June 9 regarding compliance with its May 17 directive. However, the Authority issued a fifth RFP on June 18, again excluding consortiums and slightly altering the eligibility criteria. For instance, the required average turnover was increased from Rs 42.25 crore to Rs 44.10 crore — a change the petitioners allege lacks any rational justification and was intended to disqualify them. "The eligibility conditions in the RFPs have been tinkered with in a manner that appears to be tailored to suit a particular bidder, to the exclusion of others. These minor, odd increases in financial turnover thresholds, without any rational basis or objective justification, appear to be made solely to render the petitioners ineligible and to favour another bidder. The figures are not rounded off, nor are they explained through any financial model or policy rationale, which strongly suggests that the changes are deliberate, artificial and discriminatory in nature," the petitioners said in their latest plea filed earlier this month. Defending its actions, GNIDA informed the court that tendering was a matter of policy and administrative discretion.
