Latest news with #MichaelKosta
Daily Mail
11-07-2025
- Health
- Daily Mail
Joe Rogan makes explosive claim about insidious disease spreading through US: 'It was weaponized'
Joe Rogan 's explosive claims about an insidious disease are gaining new attention as the illness spreads throughout the US this summer. During a recent episode of the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, Rogan claimed that there's evidence Lyme disease, which is spread by tick bites, was actually a man-made weapon which leaked out of an island lab near Connecticut. Rogan, 57, has continued to claim the devastating illness was artificially created by scientists on his podcast for several years, discussing the alleged Lyme disease conspiracy in 2019 and 2020. During a March 14 interview with comedian Michael Kosta, Rogan added that US Health and Human Services secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr also believes the tick-borne illness was part of a botched US bioweapons program in the 1970s. 'Turns out there's a lot of real evidence that Lyme disease was weaponized... It came out of a lab called Plum Island, which was close to Lyme, Connecticut. And RFK Jr. firmly believes that this was a weapons program,' Rogan said. Lyme disease is an infection caused by a bacterium called Borrelia burgdorferi. Scientists have continued to call Rogan's claims a debunked conspiracy, citing evidence that the bacteria existed in North America in prehistoric times. In the US, between 30,000 and 40,000 cases are reported annually to the CDC, but the health agency has noted that up to 476,000 cases occur yearly and go unreported or undiagnosed. Along with a telltale rash around the bite, symptoms often include fever, fatigue, and muscle aches, but severe and untreated cases can also lead to fatal complications like heart problems, neurological issues, and brain inflammation. In the US, between 30,000 and 40,000 cases are reported annually to the CDC, but the health agency has noted that up to 476,000 cases occur yearly and go unreported or undiagnosed In June and July, nymph-stage ticks are most likely to bite people. The Rogan claims from March were reposted on X Thursday, leading to a resurgence in attention, with the clip already being viewed more than a million times. 'What they were going to do is develop these fleas and ticks with a disease that spreads rapidly, wipes out the medical system of a community,' Rogan claimed in the March 14 podcast episode. 'So, you could dump them from a plane, everybody gets infected, overwhelms their medical system, and then they're more vulnerable if you want to attack them,' he continued. Plum Island is a 840-acre island off the northeastern coast of Long Island, New York. It's home to the Plum Island Animal Disease Center (PIADC) and has been used by the US government for research on infectious animal diseases since the 1950s. In 2019, Rogan said that there was a 'popular thought' that the natural spread of Lyme disease from this one area in Connecticut 'doesn't necessarily make sense.' A year later, Rogan revealed how New Jersey congressman Chris Smith had called for an investigation by the Pentagon into claims that secret research was conducted on Plum Island and at Fort Detrick in Maryland on weaponizing ticks. 'Can you imagine if those c**** created a f****** disease and now everyone on the East Coast has it? Because it's mostly out there,' Rogan said during a January 2020 episode of his podcast. The US Department of Homeland Security has written in a statement that the government facility at Plum Island 'does not and has not performed research on Lyme disease.' In 2024, RFK Jr made the same claims about the disease, alleging on his own podcast that government scientists were experimenting with ticks on this island in the Northeast. 'The ticks are an epidemic because of what happened at Plum Island and the other labs,' the health secretary said in the January 2024 episode of the RFK Jr Podcast. 'We also know that they were experimenting with diseases of the kind, like Lyme disease, at that lab, and they were putting them in ticks and then infecting people,' RFK Jr added. A year later, during his US Senate confirmation hearing, RFK Jr was questioned about his reported belief that Lyme disease was created as a US bioweapon, saying that he 'never believed that' but the public should follow wherever the evidence leads. Both Rogan and RFK Jr have cited multiple reports and books which have investigated the topic, as well as interviews with scientists who were allegedly involved in these tick experiments. One of those books, Bitten by Kris Newby, featured an interview with Willy Burgdorfer, the scientist who identified the Lyme disease bacterium, who admitted that he had worked on turning fleas, ticks, and mosquitoes into potential bioweapons. Lyme disease annually spreads throughout the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, and Upper Midwest, particularly in states like Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin when the weather warms up between April and October. The most common areas where ticks attach themselves to people are in outdoor spaces with lots of high grass and vegetation, like a field or in the woods. When an infected tick bites a person and stays attached for 36 to 48 hours, it allows the bacteria to transfer to the insect's victim. Ticks pick up the bacteria by feeding on infected animals like deer or mice. It does not spread from person to person. Within three days to a month, a red, bull's-eye rash at the bite site will appear in 70 to 80 percent of cases. Flu-like symptoms such as fever, chills, fatigue, headache, muscle aches, and swollen lymph nodes are common as well. Lyme disease is treatable, especially when caught early, with the primary treatment being antibiotics that eliminate the Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria. If left untreated, however, later stages of the disease can lead to joint pain or swelling, facial paralysis (Bell's palsy), heart palpitations, nerve pain, memory problems, or potentially fatal inflammation of the brain and spinal cord. Despite the growing claims of a government conspiracy, multiple doctors and scientists have pushed back on the theory Lyme disease did not come from nature. Studies by the American Lyme Disease Foundation and Yale researchers have found Borrelia burgdorferi in dead animals from 1870 to 1919, which were preserved in museum collections.
New York Times
04-06-2025
- Business
- New York Times
Late Night Hopes Trump and Musk Can Patch Things Up
Welcome to Best of Late Night, a rundown of the previous night's highlights that lets you sleep — and lets us get paid to watch comedy. Here are the 50 best movies on Netflix right now. Big, Beautiful and Disgusting On Tuesday, Elon Musk expressed his displeasure on X over President Trump's 'big, beautiful' domestic policy bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and shaming House members who'd voted for it. On 'The Daily Show,' Michael Kosta said it was sad that 'two men who previously had never had a friend' were seeing their relationship get 'D.O.G.E.'d.' 'Oh, no, not my two favorite people fighting! Don't make me choose who I love more.' — MICHAEL KOSTA 'I'm not sure who to root for. It's like Diddy versus R. Kelly.' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'But, yes, Elon is worried that Trump's bill will raise the deficit too high. And when Elon is worried about something getting too high, you know it's too high.' — MICHAEL KOSTA 'Boy, when he's off the ketamine, he is a lot less fun.' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'And he may be right, but Elon has to be careful. You come out that hard against Trump's central legislative achievement, and you're going to be the first white person to get deported.' — MICHAEL KOSTA 'Shame on those who voted for it? Who bankrolled these people that voted for it? I want the name of whoever bankrolled — oh, wait, it's his name.' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'Just days after leaving his official role at the White House, Elon Musk is now blasting President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination.' And that's coming from the guy who made the Cybertruck.' — JIMMY FALLON 'Yep, Elon called it 'massive,' 'outrageous' and 'pork-filled.' And Trump was, like, '[imitating Trump] I don't know what you're talking about, but I'll take two.'' — JIMMY FALLON The Punchiest Punchlines (New Portrait, Who Dis? Edition) Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
30-05-2025
- Entertainment
- New York Times
How did a tennis player ranked 864th in the world find a career in comedy? He learned how to lose
Editor's Note: This story is a part of Peak, The Athletic's new desk covering leadership, personal development and success through the lens of sports. Peak aims to connect readers to ideas they can implement in their own personal and professional lives. Follow Peak here. You may know Michael Kosta as a stand-up comedian and rotating host of 'The Daily Show' on Comedy Central. But two decades ago, he had another title: The 864th-ranked men's singles tennis player in the world. Advertisement The story of Kosta's time as a professional tennis player is the subject of his new memoir, 'Lucky Loser: Adventures in Tennis & Comedy,' published earlier this year. The book is a sometimes funny, sometimes poignant (and sometimes NSFW) tale about falling in love with a sport, chasing a dream and how ultimately losing a lot provided the tools for a second career. I reached out to Kosta with a simple pitch: Let's talk about losing and how we handle it. It turned out to be a conversation about the importance of our parents in building self-belief, why timing can be everything, and how to bounce back from a brutal loss. So I want to ask you about losing. But we should note, before you were a 'failed' tennis player, you won a lot. Did becoming a 'loser' change you in any fundamental way? You know, it's like a, I'm allowed to say I'm a loser, but no one else is type of thing. Because in that first 95 percent of my time as a tennis player, I was a winner, right? So when you start losing so much, which is what happens when you're pro, it is very jarring. It's not like I was a mediocre tennis player my whole life, and then I kind of understood the mechanics and rhythms of losing. It was a huge transition: 'Oh, s—, I'm not the number one player in the world. I'm losing a lot.' And it was a hard adjustment. Did you feel like it changed your identity or the way you look at the world? It humbled me and it toughened me up, but it doesn't eliminate your self-belief. It doesn't make you a coward or change my ability to believe in myself, because you still have to have those things to try to win a few matches at least in pro tennis, and obviously those lessons that you learn helped me a lot in my next career. You wrote in the book how it gave you a sort of armor to pursue comedy and take risks. I remember these older comics living in Michigan, 10, 15 years ahead of me. Maybe they were kind of trying to insult me, and I didn't pick up on it, but they would say: 'Hey, you know, I saw you yesterday and that looked like kind of a rough set, but you're back out here again today?' It gave me this armor that I almost didn't take it personally. And in a lot of ways, that's tennis. Advertisement I remember winning or losing in college, and our coach would sometimes make us run afterwards. Even if you won, you had to remember that you were capable of a higher level. And when you lost, you could see the running as punishment, but it was really just, this is a very long-form process. So that little thing that happened today in comedy, you bombed the set, that wasn't the success or failure. The success is continuing in the process of improvement. Which sounds very, very cliche. But you know what? It's cliche for a reason. I've always thought tennis seems like the most vulnerable sport in terms of losing. What do you think of that? Yeah, I agree. I think you're alone. Your face is not covered. There's no one to turn to. It's individual — look, HDTV has made it even worse. It's like in basketball, we really love basketball players because we can really see their faces. Tennis, more so, there's nobody else for the camera to show. It is incredibly vulnerable. It hurts a lot, and one of the more unique things about the sport of tennis — if you're in the finals and you lose, you have to stand there and do the ceremony with the winner. What other sport does the losing player or team stand out there? Losing is an indelible part of a tennis player's life. Roger Federer gave a speech last year in which he noted that he only won 54 percent of his points during his career. And you're thinking, 'Wow, one of the best players ever wins 54 percent of points.' Almost half the time, he's failing. I thought it was a great thing to share with young people — that there's going to be a lot of failure, a lot of grit. The other thing that I took from that speech and morphed it into comedy in some ways was that timing is everything. You say that in comedy: Timing is everything. He only won 54 percent of his points, but I would love to see how he did on break points, match points. He always brought his best at the right time. And that's an important part of comedy, too. Like, you can have a rough five minutes in your set. You can lose the audience. But as long as you get them back by the end, I think that's kind of most important. Advertisement So when you're up on stage and a joke doesn't go very well, it's the sports thing of thinking, 'All right, next joke, next joke…' Not even next joke. More like, 'This is a long match. You got another 52 minutes to go. You got a lot of time here.' And that was very much a tennis thing. That was very much similar to the self-talk you do in tennis. You get broken, you're down 2-0 in the first set. It's very easy to start thinking about, like, 'When's the next flight out of here?' But it's like, 'This is a long match. You can break back and get right back on serve.' In the book, you mentioned a match you lost when you were playing professionally, where afterward you just kind of went over to the track next door to the court and started running. What other rituals did you have after tough losses? Did anything make you feel better? Practicing always helped. But it was very hard to do that. I remember traveling with Raven Klaasen, who became a top-10 doubles player in the world. He helped mature me in a way that was like, 'You're not practicing fast enough after a loss.' And I thought, 'Oh, well, it's because I'm really sad about my loss.' And he was like, 'That's kind of the point. Get over it. Get out there and keep practicing.' I used to keep what I call a 'lessons journal,' and it was a loss journal. After I would lose, I would write down what I learned from that match. But I gave up on that. I didn't like that. I felt like I was over-analyzing the losses. I mean, sometimes you just lose. Sometimes the guy plays good. Sometimes you play bad. Sometimes it's windy. Sometimes you're jet lagged. I thought I was kind of digging into these failures too heavily. Yeah, a few years ago, some researchers were looking at failure. And the conventional wisdom is that failure is motivating. But they argued that people don't learn as much from their failures as we actually think because it can be so de-motivating. They argued that people still should try to learn from failure, of course, but one of the best ways to do that is actually to talk about them. When you finished playing your career, did you struggle to talk about the losing? I think I'm still trying to tell people about it — that's why I wrote the book. And honestly, as I've gotten older, I would say about losing — and this is true for comedy, too — instead of wallowing in or analyzing the defeat, it's really just like, 'Keep going. Just go do another set, go play another match, go do cross-court backhands. Go find an open mic.' And I think the best players — and Roger is definitely this way — they let it go. Their memory is short. One of the things that I learned about myself in writing this book was this match that I blew in South Korea. I mean, it affected me sooooo much. It still does. I still think about it. And it's like, now as I've gotten older and I've studied more people that have had success in comedy, it's like, 'Hey man, that hurt you too much. That should have just been a f—– up match. You blew it, water off a duck's back, keep going.' But the fact that it stuck with me so long is telling that I was taking these losses too personally for something that really wasn't. Why do you think you did that? Well, that's a good therapy question. Probably attaching too much (self) worth to outcome, still hoping my parents pay attention to me at the dinner table, wanting my picture in the paper. A lot of good reasons. Advertisement One of the things I always think about: Anytime I've moved up in my career or gotten to the next level, it feels like, yes, I've arrived — a reward for my hard work. And then what ends up happening is that I realize I have a whole new group of people to compare myself to. Who are actually better than your last group. Exactly. Tennis feels like the ultimate example of that. Because not only is there a group of people. They actually keep the ranking in the form of a ladder. Did you struggle with comparing yourself to other players? Yeah, even on my mirror to this day, in my bathroom, in my handwriting, it says, 'Comparison is the thief of joy.' Some smart person said that. I have to remind myself of that to this day. When I was playing tennis, there was this thing called 'Steve G Tennis.' It was an internet message board and he would post all of the results around the world. So if I was picking between going to Montreal or Mexico and I picked Mexico, I would lose in the first round or whatever. And then I would quickly go on Steve G and see that the Montreal draw was really weak and I would go, 'Damn it, I blew it!' So many players would do this, and I remember finally thinking, 'This is not helping me. This is hurting me.' Why did that quote connect? I remember as soon as I heard it, it connected with me and reminded me of my tennis days. There's Instagram and TikTok as a comedian now. How do I not pay attention to all my other peers? Every time I open up these apps, it's showing me everything they've done. So I just thought that was a good reminder: 'Don't focus on them. Focus on you.' You mentioned that when you were playing tennis, you would write jokes in your journal. I would always do this thing in my journal that would just say like, 'This is something that made me laugh today.' That was just a thing from a very early age that I started to do, when my mom would put me to bed when I was really young. We would just talk about something that made us laugh today. I've tried to do this with my daughters today. But my daughters usually tell me, 'Go away, Dad.' Then when I started playing pro tennis, it was less about, 'What's one thing that made me laugh today?' And it was more, 'What are funny ideas or jokes that happened throughout this experience?' So I guess I just leveled it up a little more. Now, why? I didn't think I was gonna be a comedian. I wasn't seeing it as comedy training. It just helped me. Did playing tennis and the experience of all of that losing in a short period inform your writing? It gave me a lot of time to write and gave me a lot of time to go experience stuff. So, I'm in the Netherlands. I've got six and a half days till the next tournament. Probably what I should have been doing is just staying at the courts every day and practicing. But I would take the train in Amsterdam, or I would go try to find something interesting and those experiences of cultivating my life outside of tennis really help you as a comedian. Advertisement To circle back to something you said at the beginning: You said you were able to still hold on to belief while losing, and whether it was belief that you're going to win the next match or belief that you can succeed in comedy in a new career. This might be another therapy question. But where does that belief come from? How does somebody build up belief? That's a very good question because you can't just say it comes from external reward. I think external reward is helpful, but we all know people who have had a lot of external rewards who are still self-conscious and not fulfilled. It has to come from within, and it's incredibly important to have self-belief. And self-belief is really the only reason I think anybody does anything. You have to believe you can do it. It probably comes from some form of unconditional support and love from one of your parents. (Laughs). For me, one of the biggest, most helpful tools I used as a tennis player that I also use now as a comedian is that I remind myself of previous achievements. For instance, a tennis example: All right, it's 5-4 in the third (set), I'm serving for the match. I'm feeling nervous. This guy's return is great. I can't believe I'm even in this position. He's ranked so much higher than me. I'll say, 'Self-belief, Michael. You did this. You served out this match a year ago in Toronto. Two years ago, to win the doubles future (event), you did this before. In high school, you won the state tournament with this exact same score.' And I do that with comedy every time. 'Oh my God, this crowd is tough. Oh, they were certainly hard on the opener. What am I doing here? You're gonna really open with a Trump joke? Half these people might have voted for this guy.' It's like, 'Michael, relax, you crushed two weeks ago, and you felt the exact same thing.' I was watching the PGA Championship and after Scottie Scheffler won, his dad gave him a hug. Some TV mics picked up his dad saying how proud he was. It's interesting to think that self-belief really can come from those people who believe in you unconditionally. Yeah, and I think probably as you are forming into a human. Because we know adults who hear it to this day, and it doesn't resonate. But I think when children are being formed, their personalities are being formed, you've got to tell them that they're enough, that you can do it, you can do hard things. And you might be able to get that from other people or places, but for me, that seems like a pretty natural answer. (Illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; Jeff Kravitz/FilmMagic/Getty Images)
CNN
16-05-2025
- Entertainment
- CNN
What's so funny about tennis? Daily Show's Michael Kosta says it could prepare you for a life in comedy
Have you heard the one about the funny tennis player? You probably haven't, by the nature of their work, they are notoriously serious people; but one man can vouch for them. Michael Kosta was once among the top-ranked tennis players in the world and now he's a successful, Emmy-winning comedian. His journey is as unorthodox as it is fascinating, and he says that it's tennis that made him funny, although he wasn't laughing much at the time. Kosta made it up to number 864 in the ATP singles rankings, which certainly makes him one of the best tennis players in the world. 'Just to give you some insight into how proud I am of that,' he told CNN Sports, 'I'm 45 years old now, I've been a comedian for 22 years and number 864 is still my email signature to this day.' But as he explains in his new book 'Lucky Loser,' there is nothing glamorous about the life of a tennis pro who is struggling to make it. He recalled a tournament in Mexico City where he had partnered with a college friend to split the cost of a hotel room: 'The draw came out and we were playing each other. I went to bed that night and said good night to my opponent, who then beat me the next day. 'He said, 'Well, now that I've qualified, I get a free hotel room. Do you want to stay with me?' So not only did I stay with the guy I was about to play, I then stayed with the guy who beat me. For some reason, I don't feel like Roger (Federer) and Rafa (Nadal) are managing that.' Despite having won so many junior trophies that his family had to rent a storage unit to keep them, he found himself living on a shoestring budget to try and keep his dream alive. Kosta traveled all over the world to try and make it as a professional. But in the end, he ran out of money and self-belief, he'd barely made $11,000 on the ATP Tour and he knew it was time to try something else. 'It's very, very tough,' he surmised. 'It sucks.' Kosta might not quite have realized it at the time, but the grind of being a wannabe tennis pro was preparing him for life as a comedian. 'You lose a lot when you're 864 in the world,' he told CNN. 'I would lose on a Monday or Tuesday, that would give me five or six days until the next tournament. Instead of obsessing over my matches or the difficult life I had chosen, I would write down these ideas, jokes and interactions that I thought were funny. It was a good way to decompress from the stress of it all.' Not only that, he understood that the tennis circuit was an interminable slog through some questionable establishments in backwater towns, the comedy circuit for a beginner would be no different. 'You're alone, you're problem solving,' he said of the similarities between the two professions. 'Playing tennis, dealing with difficult situations, gets you ready for the real world. 'I've done a bit, it's going great, and then the waitress trips and drops all the glasswear, or you get heckled, or the microphone goes out. I felt comfortable handling those situations because of tennis.' Is there any other sport where the loser has to give a speech? Tennis players learn to be good communicators. Kosta felt as though he had an advantage over many of the fledgling comedians he encountered at the start, he'd been coached to tuck his shirt in, shake hands with strength, look people in the eye and project confidence. He noted in Lucky Loser that the people telling jokes for a living were often the complete opposite. 'Comedians are dressed very poorly, many are noticeably drunk, half are not speaking clearly or are mumbling, they aren't making eye contact with the audience,' he wrote in the book. When he exchanged tennis sets for sets on stage, he brought an athlete's mentality to his craft. 'I remember these older comics would say, 'Man, it seems like when you have a bad set, you just keep going, it seems like it doesn't bother you.' And I go, 'Oh, I didn't know I was supposed to sit around and be sad about it, I just thought it was time to go practice!' 'The whole reason I've been able to climb up the comedy ladder is because I experienced loss and disappointment over and over again as a tennis player.' That's not to say that he ever enjoyed failing in either profession, but he discovered that a bad night on stage was much worse than a defeat on the court. 'Physically, emotionally,' he explained, 'to be a professional tennis player is harder than being a professional comedian. But to bomb a joke, the rejection is personal. When I lose, maybe my opponent played well, maybe I was injured. But to bomb a joke that came from your soul, when a group of people say, 'Absolutely not,' that hurts way more than losing 6-0, 6-0.' So, are tennis players funny? Kosta thinks some are, but they just can't show it. He recalls the impersonations that Novak Djokovic used to do at the start of his career, which he stopped because it was only fueling his opponents. 'I believe Iga Świątek is actually pretty funny, but when you're No. 1 in the world, everyone's trying to bring you down, she's reluctant to share it,' he said. 'Coco Gauff is remarkably light-hearted and goofy for someone who plays at such a high level, and I appreciate that so much.'
CNN
16-05-2025
- Entertainment
- CNN
What's so funny about tennis? Daily Show's Michael Kosta says it could prepare you for a life in comedy
Have you heard the one about the funny tennis player? You probably haven't, by the nature of their work, they are notoriously serious people; but one man can vouch for them. Michael Kosta was once among the top-ranked tennis players in the world and now he's a successful, Emmy-winning comedian. His journey is as unorthodox as it is fascinating, and he says that it's tennis that made him funny, although he wasn't laughing much at the time. Kosta made it up to number 864 in the ATP singles rankings, which certainly makes him one of the best tennis players in the world. 'Just to give you some insight into how proud I am of that,' he told CNN Sports, 'I'm 45 years old now, I've been a comedian for 22 years and number 864 is still my email signature to this day.' But as he explains in his new book 'Lucky Loser,' there is nothing glamorous about the life of a tennis pro who is struggling to make it. He recalled a tournament in Mexico City where he had partnered with a college friend to split the cost of a hotel room: 'The draw came out and we were playing each other. I went to bed that night and said good night to my opponent, who then beat me the next day. 'He said, 'Well, now that I've qualified, I get a free hotel room. Do you want to stay with me?' So not only did I stay with the guy I was about to play, I then stayed with the guy who beat me. For some reason, I don't feel like Roger (Federer) and Rafa (Nadal) are managing that.' Despite having won so many junior trophies that his family had to rent a storage unit to keep them, he found himself living on a shoestring budget to try and keep his dream alive. Kosta traveled all over the world to try and make it as a professional. But in the end, he ran out of money and self-belief, he'd barely made $11,000 on the ATP Tour and he knew it was time to try something else. 'It's very, very tough,' he surmised. 'It sucks.' Kosta might not quite have realized it at the time, but the grind of being a wannabe tennis pro was preparing him for life as a comedian. 'You lose a lot when you're 864 in the world,' he told CNN. 'I would lose on a Monday or Tuesday, that would give me five or six days until the next tournament. Instead of obsessing over my matches or the difficult life I had chosen, I would write down these ideas, jokes and interactions that I thought were funny. It was a good way to decompress from the stress of it all.' Not only that, he understood that the tennis circuit was an interminable slog through some questionable establishments in backwater towns, the comedy circuit for a beginner would be no different. 'You're alone, you're problem solving,' he said of the similarities between the two professions. 'Playing tennis, dealing with difficult situations, gets you ready for the real world. 'I've done a bit, it's going great, and then the waitress trips and drops all the glasswear, or you get heckled, or the microphone goes out. I felt comfortable handling those situations because of tennis.' Is there any other sport where the loser has to give a speech? Tennis players learn to be good communicators. Kosta felt as though he had an advantage over many of the fledgling comedians he encountered at the start, he'd been coached to tuck his shirt in, shake hands with strength, look people in the eye and project confidence. He noted in Lucky Loser that the people telling jokes for a living were often the complete opposite. 'Comedians are dressed very poorly, many are noticeably drunk, half are not speaking clearly or are mumbling, they aren't making eye contact with the audience,' he wrote in the book. When he exchanged tennis sets for sets on stage, he brought an athlete's mentality to his craft. 'I remember these older comics would say, 'Man, it seems like when you have a bad set, you just keep going, it seems like it doesn't bother you.' And I go, 'Oh, I didn't know I was supposed to sit around and be sad about it, I just thought it was time to go practice!' 'The whole reason I've been able to climb up the comedy ladder is because I experienced loss and disappointment over and over again as a tennis player.' That's not to say that he ever enjoyed failing in either profession, but he discovered that a bad night on stage was much worse than a defeat on the court. 'Physically, emotionally,' he explained, 'to be a professional tennis player is harder than being a professional comedian. But to bomb a joke, the rejection is personal. When I lose, maybe my opponent played well, maybe I was injured. But to bomb a joke that came from your soul, when a group of people say, 'Absolutely not,' that hurts way more than losing 6-0, 6-0.' So, are tennis players funny? Kosta thinks some are, but they just can't show it. He recalls the impersonations that Novak Djokovic used to do at the start of his career, which he stopped because it was only fueling his opponents. 'I believe Iga Świątek is actually pretty funny, but when you're No. 1 in the world, everyone's trying to bring you down, she's reluctant to share it,' he said. 'Coco Gauff is remarkably light-hearted and goofy for someone who plays at such a high level, and I appreciate that so much.'
