Latest news with #MicheleReynolds
Yahoo
18-04-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Bipartisan bill would offer legal support for Ohioans facing eviction
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — A bipartisan bill would offer state funding for legal costs to low-income Ohioans facing eviction, an issue of great concern in Franklin County. Sponsored by State Sens. Michele Reynolds (R-Canal Winchester) and Hearcel Craig (D-Columbus), Senate Bill 83 would revise eviction and property laws in Ohio to assist households facing eviction. The bill would establish a legal services housing defense fund to finance legal services to eligible Ohioans, bringing more direct state support for residents in eviction hearings. According to the Eviction Lab, eviction is a prevailing concern in Franklin County. There have been more than 100,000 eviction filings in Franklin County in the past five years, 25% of which occurred in the past year alone. What to know as Canada geese nest across central Ohio Franklin County evictions noticeably increased after COVID-19. According to the Eviction Lab, evictions from the past year are 39% higher than average eviction filings before COVID-19. Further, data shows the eviction crisis is likely to worsen as pandemic-era federal funding runs out. See previous coverage of eviction concerns in the video player above. Senate Bill 83 wants to reduce barriers for Ohioans facing eviction. The new state fund would cover legal costs for eligible households, or households with an established annual income under 300% of the federal poverty level. Poverty levels vary by household size, but a four-person home would be eligible if it makes less than $96,450 annually. The bill would also allow parties involved in eviction filings to request nonbinding mediation to help come to an understanding. To help protect tenants' rights, any eviction notice would have to include the right to free legal representation and information on how to see if they are eligible. S.B. 83 would keep all associated records private until an eviction was formalized. Any eviction case documents could also be removed from public record if both parties agree to it. In those cases, only authorized judicial staff, parties directly involved in the case or someone with a court order could access the records. What's new and coming soon at Easton Town Center The bill would also adjust property and inspection laws. Under S.B. 83, any property transaction would need to provide proof the involved parties are real people before the county auditor would endorse the sale. Building code enforcement certification would also have to be 'as accessible as possible' without compromising safety. Finally, S.B. 83 would require inspections of construction projects within 30 days of receiving a plan review or inspection request. Local building boards would also have to publish a list of approved and certified third-party inspectors. 'How we resolve the housing crisis impacts our future economic development and the strength of our schools and local governments,' Craig said. S.B. 83 was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee in February but has not had hearings since. The program would require the General Assembly to allocate funding to the bill, and it could emerge in ongoing Senate discussions of Ohio's biennial budget. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
14-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Bill addresses decision-making for Ohioans with developmental disabilities
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – A bill in the Ohio Statehouse seeks to establish a presumption that all adults with developmental disabilities are capable of making their own decisions unless otherwise determined by a court. Senate Bill 35, sponsored by Sens. Michele Reynolds (R-Franklin County) and Jerry Cirino (R-Kirtland), was introduced in January. Along with declaring that adults with developmental disabilities should be presumed capable of managing their affairs, the bill would legally establish a 'less restrictive' alternative to guardianship, called 'supported decision making' (SDM), according to Reynolds. SDM allows individuals with developmental disabilities to retain their legal decision making authority while receiving support from chosen advisers who can help them understand, make and communicate their decisions. The bill would allow the advisors to be formally chosen through a written plan, or chosen informally. In a guardianship, a family member or other entity is in charge of an individual's affairs and ultimately makes decisions for them, when a court finds that person is incapable of making their own decisions due to a mental disability, according to the nonprofit Disability Rights Ohio. 'This legislation addresses a significant need in our current system,' Reynolds said at the bill's first hearing in February. 'Many adults with developmental disabilities find that full guardianship is more restrictive than necessary, while complete independence may not provide adequate support.' Under the bill, entering into a SDM plan could not be used as grounds for a court to find that an adult is incapable of managing their own affairs. Adults with developmental disabilities who use a SDM plan would be allowed to act independently of their advisors and end the plan at any time. The bill additionally clarifies that adults with developmental disabilities could not be forced into a SDM plan. Reynolds said that the approach recognizes that 'disability exists on a spectrum' and that many adults with developmental disabilities are capable of making their own decisions. Twenty-three states have enacted similar legislation, according to the lawmakers. 'Supported decision making protects adults with developmental disabilities from exploitation because they maintain control over their own lives and decisions,' Cirino said. If the bill were to pass, the Ohio Department of Developmental Disabilities would develop example SDM plans and educational materials. The bill had its second hearing earlier this month, where 13 entities testified in support of the legislation, including the Down Syndrome Association of Central Ohio and the Ohio Association of County Boards of Developmental Disabilities (OACB). 'Unfortunately, in many instances, guardianship represents an all-or-nothing decision for the courts to make when they are asked to balance a person's health and safety with their ability to make decisions about their own future,' said Jake Dowling, a legislative affairs manager with OACB. 'Supported decision making offers a middle path that preserves both.' Greg Carter, the parent and legal guardian of an adult with developmental disabilities, told NBC4 he questions how the legislation would affect those currently under a guardianship arrangement. 'A parent who has been a part of their child's life all along should not have to jump through any hoops to continue in the role of decision maker for their loved one simply because the calendar turns a page,' Carter said. 'I question the motivation and need for a [policy] such as this.' While a hearing for opponent testimony has not yet been held for the legislation, some critics of the concept have come out against a recently introduced budget bill including language that would codify SDM in Ohio law. Caroline Lahrmann, an Ohio mother, testified against the budget bill (HB 96) saying those with developmental disabilities can already have friends and family assist them with decision making without new legislation. Harris Capps, a parent and legal guardian, echoed the same sentiment, calling sections of the bill addressing SDM 'unnecessary' and 'redundant.' 'SDM as policy could result in a degradation of Ohio's guardianship system while providing more opportunities for frivolous lawsuits,' Capps said. Current Ohio law requires those with developmental disabilities to be able to manage their financial affairs if they are able, participate in decisions that affect their lives, and select a parent or advocate to act on their behalf. Cirino introduced a similar bill in the last General Assembly that did not pass before the end of the legislative session. SB 35 was assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee and currently has one Republican cosponsor. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
