Latest news with #MikeFlannigan
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Climate
- Yahoo
This is our second-worst wildfire season on record — and could be the new normal
This year's wildfire season is already the second-worst on record in Canada, and experts are warning that this might be the new normal. More than 7.3 million hectares have burned this year so far, more than double the 10-year average for this time of year, according to the latest figures from the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC) and Natural Resources Canada. "It's the size of New Brunswick, to put it into context," Mike Flannigan, a professor of wildland fire at Thompson Rivers University, told CBC News. The last three fire seasons are among the 10 worst on record, according to a federal database dating back to 1972, with 2023's devastating blazes taking the top spot. "I've never seen three bad fire seasons in a row," Flannigan, who has been studying fires since the '70s, said. "I've seen two in a row: '94, '95. I've never seen three. This is scary." Manitoba and Saskatchewan account for more than half the area burned so far, but British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario are all also well above their 25-year averages. Fire bans have been announced in multiple provinces, including a total ban on going in the woods in Nova Scotia. Meanwhile, the military and coast guard were called in to help fight fires in Newfoundland and Labrador this week. Around 1,400 international firefighters have also helped fight Canadian fires so far this year, according to the CIFFC. Scientists say that climate change, driven by the burning of fossil fuels, has created longer fire seasons and drier landscapes, sparking more intense and widespread forest fires. "I used to always say… some years are cooler and wetter and we will get quiet years," Flannigan said. "But maybe every year's going to be a bad fire year now." Dry conditions across the country have allowed fires to quickly balloon this fire season. "The forests of Canada are too dry, too hot," Environment Canada climatologist David Phillips told CBC News. "This year… there's no kind of reprieve from what we've seen." This year has seen notable blazes in regions where we haven't historically, such as Newfoundland and Labrador, where one fire has grown to over 5,200 hectares. Yan Boulanger, a research scientist in forest ecology at Natural Resources Canada, says Newfoundland "is not used to [seeing] huge fires." "But we will have to get more and more used to it, because those ecosystems are also projected to see an increase in fire activity in the upcoming decades." The other outlier is Quebec, which was one of the hardest-hit provinces in 2023, when an estimated 4.5 million hectares burned. This year, the province has had a much milder fire season, thanks to frequent precipitation in the spring and early summer, Boulanger says. But a sudden bout of dry conditions in August, usually a quiet fire month for the province, has experts recommending vigilance. Consequences of repeated fires Bad back-to-back fire seasons can have huge consequences. Fire is a natural part of the lifecycle for many tree species, but a forest can become damaged to the point where trees cannot regrow in the area for years, or even decades. It's called "regeneration failure." "The problem is when we have too much fire and we are getting out of what we are calling the natural variability of the system," Boulanger said. "When such things happen… the forest can lose its resilience." Scientists are already seeing it in regions of Quebec that were heavily damaged in 2023, and in parts of the Northwest Territories and Alberta, Boulanger says. Right now, around 300,000 to 400,000 hectares are affected by regeneration failure in Quebec. Fewer trees means less carbon being stored, exacerbating the problem of increased emissions that occur during widespread forest fires. The 2023 fires produced nearly a quarter of the year's global wildfire carbon emissions. Meanwhile, wildfire smoke has been linked to a myriad of health complications, including a higher risk of dementia. WATCH | Calls picking up for a national wildfire agency: With intense wildfires becoming an annual problem in Canada on a new scale, we need more strategies, experts say. The Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs (CAFC) has called on Ottawa to establish a national forest fire co-ordination agency to ensure that personnel and equipment can be distributed across the country when different regions are seeing heavy fires, and that fire chiefs are at the table when national policies are made. The government has been studying the possibility of creating a national disaster response agency since 2023, and met with CAFC to discuss it in December. But it's time to move beyond the planning stage, according to Ken McMullen, the organization's president and fire chief in Red Deer, Alta. "All parties are saying that they think it's a good idea. The reality is nobody's helped pick up the ball and get it across the finish line," he said. Flannigan, at Thompson Rivers University, supports the idea, but believes we need to go further and create a robust national emergency management agency that would be able to provide training for fighting wildfires, forecast where fires are likely to occur and whether they're a danger, and then move resources there proactively. "Yes, it's going to cost money, but if it prevents one Jasper, one Fort McMurray, it pays for itself," he said, referring to the Alberta communities ravaged in recent years by fires. "The status quo doesn't seem to be working. We're spending billions and billions of dollars on fire management expenditures, but our area burned has quadrupled since the 1970s."
5 hours ago
- Climate
This is our second-worst wildfire season on record — and could be the new normal
This year's wildfire season is already the second-worst on record in Canada, and experts are warning that this might be the new normal. More than 7.3 million hectares have burned this year so far, more than double the 10-year average for this time of year, according to the latest figures from the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC) and Natural Resources Canada. It's the size of New Brunswick, to put it into context, Mike Flannigan, a professor of wildland fire at Thompson Rivers University, told CBC News. The last three fire seasons are among the 10 worst on record, according to a federal database dating back to 1972, with 2023's devastating blazes taking the top spot. I've never seen three bad fire seasons in a row, Flannigan, who has been studying fires since the '70s, said. I've seen two in a row: '94, '95. I've never seen three. This is scary. Manitoba and Saskatchewan account for more than half the area burned so far, but British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario are all also well above their 25-year averages. Fire bans have been announced in multiple provinces, including a total ban on going in the woods in Nova Scotia. Enlarge image (new window) Source: Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre Photo: CBC See interactive chart here (new window) Meanwhile, the military and coast guard were called in to help fight fires in Newfoundland and Labrador this week. Around 1,400 international firefighters have also helped fight Canadian fires so far this year, according to the CIFFC. Scientists say that climate change, driven by the burning of fossil fuels, has created longer fire seasons and drier landscapes, sparking more intense and widespread forest fires. I used to always say… some years are cooler and wetter and we will get quiet years, Flannigan said. But maybe every year's going to be a bad fire year now. Dry conditions across the country have allowed fires to quickly balloon this fire season. Enlarge image (new window) Wildfires burn near Sherridon, Man., on May 27. Photo: Gouvernement du Manitoba The forests of Canada are too dry, too hot, Environment Canada climatologist David Phillips told CBC News. This year… there's no kind of reprieve from what we've seen. This year has seen notable blazes in regions where we haven't historically, such as Newfoundland and Labrador, where one fire has grown to over 5,200 hectares. Yan Boulanger, a research scientist in forest ecology at Natural Resources Canada, says Newfoundland is not used to [seeing] huge fires. But we will have to get more and more used to it, because those ecosystems are also projected to see an increase in fire activity in the upcoming decades. The other outlier is Quebec, which was one of the hardest-hit provinces in 2023, when an estimated 4.5 million hectares burned. This year, the province has had a much milder fire season, thanks to frequent precipitation in the spring and early summer, Boulanger says. But a sudden bout of dry conditions in August, usually a quiet fire month for the province, has experts recommending vigilance. Consequences of repeated fires Bad back-to-back fire seasons can have huge consequences. Fire is a natural part of the lifecycle for many tree species, but a forest can become damaged to the point where trees cannot regrow in the area for years, or even decades. It's called regeneration failure. Enlarge image (new window) A firefighter works on the Wesley Ridge wildfire, burning about 60 kilometres northwest of Nanaimo, B.C., on Sunday. Photo: La Presse canadienne / BC Wildfire Service The problem is when we have too much fire and we are getting out of what we are calling the natural variability of the system, Boulanger said. When such things happen… the forest can lose its resilience. Scientists are already seeing it in regions of Quebec that were heavily damaged in 2023, and in parts of the Northwest Territories and Alberta, Boulanger says. Right now, around 300,000 to 400,000 hectares are affected by regeneration failure in Quebec. Fewer trees means less carbon being stored, exacerbating the problem of increased emissions that occur during widespread forest fires. The 2023 fires produced nearly a quarter of the year's global wildfire carbon emissions. Meanwhile, wildfire smoke has been linked to a myriad of health complications, including a higher risk of dementia. WATCH | Calls picking up for a national wildfire agency: With intense wildfires becoming an annual problem in Canada on a new scale, we need more strategies, experts say. The Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs (CAFC) has called on Ottawa to establish a national forest fire co-ordination agency (new window) to ensure that personnel and equipment can be distributed across the country when different regions are seeing heavy fires, and that fire chiefs are at the table when national policies are made. The government has been studying the possibility of creating a national disaster response agency since 2023, and met with CAFC to discuss it in December. But it's time to move beyond the planning stage, according to Ken McMullen, the organization's president and fire chief in Red Deer, Alta. All parties are saying that they think it's a good idea. The reality is nobody's helped pick up the ball and get it across the finish line, he said. Flannigan, at Thompson Rivers University, supports the idea, but believes we need to go further and create a robust national emergency management agency that would be able to provide training for fighting wildfires, forecast where fires are likely to occur and whether they're a danger, and then move resources there proactively. Yes, it's going to cost money, but if it prevents one Jasper, one Fort McMurray, it pays for itself, he said, referring to the Alberta communities ravaged in recent years by fires. The status quo doesn't seem to be working. We're spending billions and billions of dollars on fire management expenditures, but our area burned has quadrupled since the 1970s. Alexandra Mae Jones (new window) · CBC News Alexandra Mae Jones is a senior writer for CBC News based in Toronto. She has written on a variety of topics, from health to pop culture to breaking news, and previously reported for CTV News and the Toronto Star. She joined CBC in 2024. You can reach her at With files from The Canadian Press
CBC
11 hours ago
- Climate
- CBC
This is our second-worst wildfire season on record — and could be the new normal
Social Sharing This year's wildfire season is already the second-worst on record in Canada, and experts are warning that this might be the new normal. More than 7.3 million hectares have burned this year so far, more than double the 10-year average for this time of year, according to the latest figures from the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC) and Natural Resources Canada. "It's the size of New Brunswick, to put it into context," Mike Flannigan, a professor of wildland fire at Thompson Rivers University, told CBC News. The last three fire seasons are among the 10 worst on record, according to a federal database dating back to 1972, with 2023's devastating blazes taking the top spot. "I've never seen three bad fire seasons in a row," Flannigan, who has been studying fires since the '70s, said. "I've seen two in a row: '94, '95. I've never seen three. This is scary." Manitoba and Saskatchewan account for more than half the area burned so far, but British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario are all also well above their 25-year averages. Fire bans have been announced in multiple provinces, including a total ban on going in the woods in Nova Scotia. Meanwhile, the military and coast guard were called in to help fight fires in Newfoundland and Labrador this week. Around 1,400 international firefighters have also helped fight Canadian fires so far this year, according to the CIFFC. Scientists say that climate change, driven by the burning of fossil fuels, has created longer fire seasons and drier landscapes, sparking more intense and widespread forest fires. "I used to always say… some years are cooler and wetter and we will get quiet years," Flannigan said. "But maybe every year's going to be a bad fire year now." Dry conditions across the country have allowed fires to quickly balloon this fire season. "The forests of Canada are too dry, too hot," Environment Canada climatologist David Phillips told CBC News. "This year… there's no kind of reprieve from what we've seen." This year has seen notable blazes in regions where we haven't historically, such as Newfoundland and Labrador, where one fire has grown to over 5,200 hectares. Yan Boulanger, a research scientist in forest ecology at Natural Resources Canada, says Newfoundland "is not used to [seeing] huge fires." "But we will have to get more and more used to it, because those ecosystems are also projected to see an increase in fire activity in the upcoming decades." The other outlier is Quebec, which was one of the hardest-hit provinces in 2023, when an estimated 4.5 million hectares burned. This year, the province has had a much milder fire season, thanks to frequent precipitation in the spring and early summer, Boulanger says. But a sudden bout of dry conditions in August, usually a quiet fire month for the province, has experts recommending vigilance. Consequences of repeated fires Bad back-to-back fire seasons can have huge consequences. Fire is a natural part of the lifecycle for many tree species, but a forest can become damaged to the point where trees cannot regrow in the area for years, or even decades. It's called "regeneration failure." "The problem is when we have too much fire and we are getting out of what we are calling the natural variability of the system," Boulanger said. "When such things happen… the forest can lose its resilience." Scientists are already seeing it in regions of Quebec that were heavily damaged in 2023, and in parts of the Northwest Territories and Alberta, Boulanger says. Right now, around 300,000 to 400,000 hectares are affected by regeneration failure in Quebec. Less trees means less carbon being stored, exacerbating the problem of increased emissions that occur during widespread forest fires. The 2023 fires produced nearly a quarter of the year's global wildfire carbon emissions. Meanwhile, wildfire smoke has been linked to a myriad of health complications, including a higher risk of dementia. WATCH | Calls picking up for a national wildfire agency: 'Alarming' Canadian wildfire season fuels increased calls for national wildfire administration 10 hours ago Heat warnings remain in place for much of Canada as hot and humid temperatures continue to fuel wildfires. Ken McMullen, fire chief for Red Deer, Alta., is calling for the development of a national wildfire administration to allocate resources and co-ordinate rescue efforts between provinces. With intense wildfires becoming an annual problem in Canada on a new scale, we need more strategies, experts say. The Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs (CAFC) has called on Ottawa to establish a national forest fire co-ordination agency to ensure that personnel and equipment can be distributed across the country when different regions are seeing heavy fires, and that fire chiefs are at the table when national policies are made. The government has been studying the possibility of creating a national disaster response agency since 2023, and met with CAFC to discuss it in December. But it's time to move beyond the planning stage, according to Ken McMullen, the organization's president and fire chief in Red Deer, Alta. "All parties are saying that they think it's a good idea. The reality is nobody's helped pick up the ball and get it across the finish line," he said. Flannigan, at Thompson Rivers University, supports the idea, but believes we need to go further and create a robust national emergency management agency that would be able to provide training for fighting wildfires, forecast where fires are likely to occur and whether they're a danger, and then move resources there proactively. "Yes, it's going to cost money, but if it prevents one Jasper, one Fort McMurray, it pays for itself," he said, referring to the Alberta communities ravaged in recent years by fires.
National Observer
21-07-2025
- Climate
- National Observer
The 'why' of wildfires
We burned past a milestone this week, and not the kind any of us want to celebrate. Across Canada, wildfires have already torched more land than was burned in the entirety of last year — which was the second-most destructive fire season this century, eclipsed only by the year before that. Over five and a half million hectares of forest have gone up in flames so far this year. It's a scale that's hard to visualize or wrap your mind around. But you might try this: there are 72 countries whose entire land mass is smaller than that, including the likes of Costa Rica and Croatia. And, of course, it is only mid-July and there are at least two months left in the Canadian fire season. This year has not been tracking to be as destructive as the horrendous fires of 2023, but these recent years have all been staggering in size and ferocity. Canada's forests are truly enormous. But Mike Flannigan, one of Canada's foremost fire experts, estimates that seven per cent of Canada's forests have burned in the last three years. In British Columbia's northeast, the provincial government estimates that nearly a third of forests could burn by year's end. In the last two years, wildfires had already burned 10 per cent of that region's forests — more than the 60 preceding years, combined. The area has been in a multi-year drought lasting six or seven years now, says Lori Daniels, a professor at the University of British Columbia. Saskatchewan and Manitoba have been particularly badly hit this year and both provinces have recorded well over a million hectares burned. For Manitoba, that's more than 10 times the 20-year average. Manitoba had to declare a provincewide state of emergency for the second time this summer and is ordering new evacuations. Almost 13,000 people are out of their homes, and some Indigenous communities evacuating again, just days after returning to their communities. There are 72 countries in the world whose landmass is smaller than the amount of hectares of forest that have burned across Canada this year — and wildfire season isn't over yet. Smoke from forest fires has smothered cities across North America, in many cases choking residents already sweltering through heat waves. Earlier this week, Toronto ranked as the second-most polluted city in the world for air quality. These climate impacts are rarely attributed to climate change in the public conversation. And it's even more rare for the media to delve beneath abstract concepts like 'climate change' and pinpoint its main cause, the burning of fossil fuels. Even as tragedies mount, they remain decontextualized and deracinated, floating across our newsfeeds as problems without any tangible cause that could be tackled. Only 13 per cent of Canadian news stories about wildfires mention climate change, even in passing. That's according to a media analysis I helped produce for the organization last year. And that 13 per cent figure is almost certainly an overcount because we deliberately omitted any emergency notices or breaking news about evacuation orders and alerts. The percentage has actually dropped from 16 per cent in 2023. The causes of climate change are even harder to find. Fossil fuels are mentioned in just 10 per cent of the stories that touch on climate change, even though they cause about 90 per cent of carbon pollution and 75 per cent of all greenhouse gas emissions. Specific products that we interact with in real life — like oil, gasoline or natural gas — are even more rarely linked to climate change. It's a particularly bizarre omission because it violates such a fundamental checklist for storytelling and journalism: the five W's. We usually get the Who? What? Where? and When? but very rarely the Why? That missing 'why' isn't just an oversight — it's a political gift to the status quo. If wildfires, heat waves and floods are just something happening, then no one is responsible. But if they are, in fact, the predictable consequences of continued fossil fuel combustion — then we have to reckon with who profits from that combustion, who enables it and who celebrates it. This evasion allows governments to avoid shifting our domestic economy from fossil fuels to clean electricity, and allows them to greenlight new pipelines and LNG export terminals for export, all while publicly mourning the devastation of fiery disasters — as if the burning forests and burning fuels were unrelated. Politicians can promise support for communities one day, and stand at a ribbon-cutting for carbon-spewing projects the next. As the climate scientist Katherine Hayhoe has long been arguing, making the connection explicit is crucial to public engagement. Hayhoe is talking about research like a new study just published in Nature Climate Change on how extreme events affect support for climate policies around the world. As one of its contributors writes: 'simple exposure to extreme weather events does not affect people's view of climate action – but linking those events to climate change can make a big difference.' Until we name the cause, we can't address it. Until we connect fossil fuels to climate impacts in our everyday conversations, our news coverage and our political discourse, we'll keep fuelling a worsening spiral. The fires tearing through Canada's forests are a kind of haunting mirror — burning trees reflecting the combustion in engines, furnaces, power plants and export terminals. Until we confront that symmetry and connect the burns, we'll keep fueling the flames.
National Observer
17-06-2025
- Politics
- National Observer
In 'serious omission,' G7 leaders release wildfire charter with no mention of climate change
G7 leaders released a joint statement on Tuesday about wildfires that did not include any reference to climate change. Climate change — fuelled primarily by burning fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas — is driving warmer and drier conditions and increasing the likelihood of more frequent and severe wildfires. The Kananaskis Wildfire Charter is 536 words long. None of them are "climate change." 'They're missing the whole point in that we're seeing more fires, a longer fire season, more intense fires, more severe fires, because the climate is changing due to human activities,' said fire and climate professor Mike Flannigan of Thompson Rivers University. 'It's a serious omission, and that's being very polite.' The charter published talks about everything related to wildfire but climate change: firefighting equipment, data collection, information sharing, restoring ecosystems, building resilient infrastructure, to name a few. 'It's saying many of the right things,' Flannigan says — aside from the glaring omission — but he notes that even the actions laid out in the agreement are light on detail. 'How are they going to do it? Easier said than done. It's going to cost money.' 'We're seeing more fires, a longer fire season, more intense fires, more severe fires, because the climate is changing due to human activities ... that's a serious omission, and that's being very polite," said fire expert Mike Flannigan. The discussions that led to the statement's specific wording were not public. But governments of most G7 nations recognize the role of human activity in climate change, as well as the role of climate change in wildfire, with one notable exception. Since the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, climate change has been scrubbed from government websites; grants for research on climate have been cut; the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Energy and many others have had their climate capacity slashed, among other devastating anti-climate moves. 'For [G7 leaders] to avoid it — probably for political reasons; I don't know that for sure, but that's a guess — it's a serious shortfall,' Flannigan said. 'This was a wasted opportunity as Canada ducked away from a confrontation with Trump,' said Keith Stewart, senior energy strategist with Greenpeace Canada. 'Canada is literally a country on fire.' The Canadian environmental group the Climate Action Network lambasted the charter in a statement within hours of its release. 'What's the point of a coalition of like-minded countries if it isn't even capable of mentioning the existential crisis facing humanity?" wrote Caroline Brouillette, the Climate Action Network's executive director. Canada is experiencing what may be its second-worst fire season on record, and the frequency of bad years has been increasing due to climate change. 'You can talk all you want about fire guards and resilient communities. But at the end of the day, if you're in a flammable landscape and things are extreme enough, fuel is fuel is fuel — it will burn,' Flannigan said. Trump received record donations from the oil industry during his election campaign. In his current bill working its way through congress is a billion-dollar tax break for the oil and gas industry. Last year, with Joe Biden as US president, the G7 summit ended with a communiqué that specifically mentioned climate change among the priorities countries agreed to focus efforts on. Not so this year. 'It's sad but not surprising,' Bloc Québécois MP Patrick Bonin said in an interview with Canada's National Observer. Another Bloc MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval echoed Bonin, saying the joint statement is consistent with the federal government acting 'as if climate change did not exist anymore' and is very worrying. NDP MP Leah Gazan agreed the failure to reference climate change is 'highly problematic' and given the global impact of extreme weather events this issue should be front and centre. 'We were expecting that the quick departure of Mr. Trump will bring the other countries, including Canada, to show more leadership and to talk about climate change and to come up with some statement and commitment in order to recognize that they need to do more and that they commit to do more,' Bonin said. Conservative MP Shannon Stubbs declined to comment because she had not read the statement, saying, 'I couldn't speak for the thought process of the people who put the document together.' Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada Julie Dabrusin was not immediately available to comment; this story will be updated with comment if it becomes available. Talking about wildfires without talking about how climate change is making wildfires more frequent and intense is 'just like putting their head in the sand,' Bonin said. 'We need to have a real discussion about the root cause of what we're seeing,' he said. While Canada burns, the prime minister is 'just ignoring the smoke,' he added.
