logo
#

Latest news with #MojaveDesert

Some ICE detainees unable to buy food after payment system goes down
Some ICE detainees unable to buy food after payment system goes down

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Some ICE detainees unable to buy food after payment system goes down

ICE immigrant detention center detainees have been left without access to basic necessities after a third-party service software outage, according to a new report. Access Corrections is one of several private vendors used by ICE. The company provides payment processing systems and communications to ICE's detention facilities, and its software allows detainees to buy commissary items like food, hygiene supplies, and medicine. But things have gone from bad to worse for the individuals ICE has whisked off the street to face an uncertain fate; Access Corrections' services have apparently been a problem for some time, according to SFGATE. One man who was detained at ICE's Desert View Annex in the Mojave Desert told the outlet that he was kept imprisoned for 50 days, and during that time had to rely on the kindness of other detainees for basic items after his his wife's numerous attempts at sending him money were stifled by software problems. In Maine, a nonprofit group called Mainers for Humane Immigration said they tried to deposit money for detainees, but were also thwarted by computer issues. 'We called to ask if we could go to CCJ [Cumberland County Jail] and deposit money through the kiosk, nope, that's down too," the group wrote in a Facebook post. "I asked about money orders, and they said all commissary is tied to Access Corrections, which means no one inside can access any funds at all right now.' The man who had to rely on other detainees' generosity told SFGATE that he lost nearly 30 pounds while he was in captivity, not just because he didn't have access to money, but also because the food, as he put it, was "inedible." 'The food provided by the detention center was inedible,' he told the publication. 'The only thing I could manage to eat was instant noodles, which you can only buy from the commissary.' Since Access Corrections is a company and not a public entity, it exists to make a profit, and it does so in part by charging fees to families and others who want to send money to the detainees. For example, at the Imperial Regional Detention Facility in Calexico, SFGATE learned that to deposit $25 for a detainee, it costs the sender $9.95 — essentially a 40 percent surcharge for a reportedly spotty service. To send the maximum deposit of $300 would cost the sender a $13.95 surcharge. The charges are lower for smaller transactions, like just under $7 for a $20 transfer, but that means that families who can't afford to dump hundreds of dollars at a time into the system are charged at a higher rate than those with the means to do so. Even when the system does work, it doesn't necessarily mean families can effectively navigate ICE's systems. Administrative errors — like misspelled names — can limit how families interact with their detained loved ones. When detainees are released, they are given the remaining balance of the money deposited for them, which is often money they'll need to find transportation home. 'I feel like animals are treated better than how we were treated,' the man detained in the Mojave Desert told SFGATE. The Independent has requested comment from Access Corrections and ICE.

Some ICE detainees unable to buy food after payment system goes down
Some ICE detainees unable to buy food after payment system goes down

The Independent

time3 days ago

  • Business
  • The Independent

Some ICE detainees unable to buy food after payment system goes down

ICE immigrant detention center detainees have been left without access to basic necessities after a third-party service software outage, according to a new report. Access Corrections is one of several private vendors used by ICE. The company provides payment processing systems and communications to ICE's detention facilities, and its software allows detainees to buy commissary items like food, hygiene supplies, and medicine. But things have gone from bad to worse for the individuals ICE has whisked off the street to face an uncertain fate; Access Corrections' services have apparently been a problem for some time, according to SFGATE. One man who was detained at ICE's Desert View Annex in the Mojave Desert told the outlet that he was kept imprisoned for 50 days, and during that time had to rely on the kindness of other detainees for basic items after his his wife's numerous attempts at sending him money were stifled by software problems. In Maine, a nonprofit group called Mainers for Humane Immigration said they tried to deposit money for detainees, but were also thwarted by computer issues. 'We called to ask if we could go to CCJ [Cumberland County Jail] and deposit money through the kiosk, nope, that's down too," the group wrote in a Facebook post. "I asked about money orders, and they said all commissary is tied to Access Corrections, which means no one inside can access any funds at all right now.' The man who had to rely on other detainees' generosity told SFGATE that he lost nearly 30 pounds while he was in captivity, not just because he didn't have access to money, but also because the food, as he put it, was "inedible." 'The food provided by the detention center was inedible,' he told the publication. 'The only thing I could manage to eat was instant noodles, which you can only buy from the commissary.' Since Access Corrections is a company and not a public entity, it exists to make a profit, and it does so in part by charging fees to families and others who want to send money to the detainees. For example, at the Imperial Regional Detention Facility in Calexico, SFGATE learned that to deposit $25 for a detainee, it costs the sender $9.95 — essentially a 40 percent surcharge for a reportedly spotty service. To send the maximum deposit of $300 would cost the sender a $13.95 surcharge. The charges are lower for smaller transactions, like just under $7 for a $20 transfer, but that means that families who can't afford to dump hundreds of dollars at a time into the system are charged at a higher rate than those with the means to do so. Even when the system does work, it doesn't necessarily mean families can effectively navigate ICE's systems. Administrative errors — like misspelled names — can limit how families interact with their detained loved ones. When detainees are released, they are given the remaining balance of the money deposited for them, which is often money they'll need to find transportation home. SFGATE.

California utility to pay $82 million settlement in lawsuit stemming from huge 2020 wildfire
California utility to pay $82 million settlement in lawsuit stemming from huge 2020 wildfire

The Independent

time23-05-2025

  • The Independent

California utility to pay $82 million settlement in lawsuit stemming from huge 2020 wildfire

A California utility has agreed to pay the federal government $82.5 million stemming from an enormous 2020 wildfire that churned through mountains northeast of Los Angeles and into the Mojave Desert, officials said Friday. The U.S. Justice Department announced the payment by Southern California Edison on Thursday. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said in a statement that the settlement provides "meaningful compensation to taxpayers for the extensive costs of fighting the ... fire and for the widespread damage to public lands." Edison agreed to pay the settlement within 60 days of its effective date, May 14, without admitting wrongdoing or fault, prosecutors said. Utility spokesperson Diane Castro said, 'Our hearts are with the people who were affected by the Bobcat Fire. We are pleased to have resolved this matter and will continue to advance wildfire mitigation measures." The settlement stemmed from a 2023 lawsuit filed by federal prosecutors on behalf of the U.S. Forest Service against Edison and Utility Tree Service to recover costs from fighting the so-called Bobcat Fire and for the extensive damage that it caused to the Angeles National Forest. The government alleged that the fire ignited when trees that were not properly maintained by the utility and its tree maintenance contractor came into contact with power lines. Damage from the fire closed campgrounds and more than 100 miles (161 kilometers) of trails for years and harmed habitat for the federally endangered wildlife-mountain yellow-legged frog and federally threatened fish and birds, the government said. 'These resources will help us rehabilitate burned areas, restore wildlife habitats and strengthen our forests' resilience to future wildfires,' said Deputy Forest Supervisor Tony Martinez of the Angeles National Forest. The fire charred about 178 square miles (461 square kilometers). Last year, the utility agreed to pay $80 million to settle claims on behalf of the U.S. Forest Service connected to a massive wildfire that destroyed more than a thousand homes and other structures in 2017. Authorities are continuing to investigate the cause of the Eaton Fire, which destroyed at least 7,000 homes and other structures and laid waste to entire neighborhoods earlier this year. Lawsuits against SCE say the utility's equipment sparked the blaze.

California utility to pay $82 million settlement in lawsuit stemming from huge 2020 wildfire
California utility to pay $82 million settlement in lawsuit stemming from huge 2020 wildfire

Washington Post

time23-05-2025

  • General
  • Washington Post

California utility to pay $82 million settlement in lawsuit stemming from huge 2020 wildfire

LOS ANGELES — A California utility has agreed to pay the federal government $82.5 million stemming from an enormous 2020 wildfire that churned through mountains northeast of Los Angeles and into the Mojave Desert, officials said Friday. The U.S. Justice Department announced the payment by Southern California Edison on Thursday. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said in a statement that the settlement provides 'meaningful compensation to taxpayers for the extensive costs of fighting the ... fire and for the widespread damage to public lands.' Edison agreed to pay the settlement within 60 days of its effective date, May 14, without admitting wrongdoing or fault, prosecutors said. Utility spokesperson Diane Castro said, 'Our hearts are with the people who were affected by the Bobcat Fire. We are pleased to have resolved this matter and will continue to advance wildfire mitigation measures.' The settlement stemmed from a 2023 lawsuit filed by federal prosecutors on behalf of the U.S. Forest Service against Edison and Utility Tree Service to recover costs from fighting the so-called Bobcat Fire and for the extensive damage that it caused to the Angeles National Forest. The government alleged that the fire ignited when trees that were not properly maintained by the utility and its tree maintenance contractor came into contact with power lines. Damage from the fire closed campgrounds and more than 100 miles (161 kilometers) of trails for years and harmed habitat for the federally endangered wildlife-mountain yellow-legged frog and federally threatened fish and birds, the government said. 'These resources will help us rehabilitate burned areas, restore wildlife habitats and strengthen our forests' resilience to future wildfires,' said Deputy Forest Supervisor Tony Martinez of the Angeles National Forest. The fire charred about 178 square miles (461 square kilometers). Last year, the utility agreed to pay $80 million to settle claims on behalf of the U.S. Forest Service connected to a massive wildfire that destroyed more than a thousand homes and other structures in 2017. Authorities are continuing to investigate the cause of the Eaton Fire, which destroyed at least 7,000 homes and other structures and laid waste to entire neighborhoods earlier this year. Lawsuits against SCE say the utility's equipment sparked the blaze.

California utility to pay $82 million settlement in lawsuit stemming from huge 2020 wildfire
California utility to pay $82 million settlement in lawsuit stemming from huge 2020 wildfire

Associated Press

time23-05-2025

  • General
  • Associated Press

California utility to pay $82 million settlement in lawsuit stemming from huge 2020 wildfire

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A California utility has agreed to pay the federal government $82.5 million stemming from an enormous 2020 wildfire that churned through mountains northeast of Los Angeles and into the Mojave Desert, officials said Friday. The U.S. Justice Department announced the payment by Southern California Edison on Thursday. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said in a statement that the settlement provides 'meaningful compensation to taxpayers for the extensive costs of fighting the ... fire and for the widespread damage to public lands.' Edison agreed to pay the settlement within 60 days of its effective date, May 14, without admitting wrongdoing or fault, prosecutors said. Utility spokesperson Diane Castro said, 'Our hearts are with the people who were affected by the Bobcat Fire. We are pleased to have resolved this matter and will continue to advance wildfire mitigation measures.' The settlement stemmed from a 2023 lawsuit filed by federal prosecutors on behalf of the U.S. Forest Service against Edison and Utility Tree Service to recover costs from fighting the so-called Bobcat Fire and for the extensive damage that it caused to the Angeles National Forest. The government alleged that the fire ignited when trees that were not properly maintained by the utility and its tree maintenance contractor came into contact with power lines. Damage from the fire closed campgrounds and more than 100 miles (161 kilometers) of trails for years and harmed habitat for the federally endangered wildlife-mountain yellow-legged frog and federally threatened fish and birds, the government said. 'These resources will help us rehabilitate burned areas, restore wildlife habitats and strengthen our forests' resilience to future wildfires,' said Deputy Forest Supervisor Tony Martinez of the Angeles National Forest. The fire charred about 178 square miles (461 square kilometers). Last year, the utility agreed to pay $80 million to settle claims on behalf of the U.S. Forest Service connected to a massive wildfire that destroyed more than a thousand homes and other structures in 2017. Authorities are continuing to investigate the cause of the Eaton Fire, which destroyed at least 7,000 homes and other structures and laid waste to entire neighborhoods earlier this year. Lawsuits against SCE say the utility's equipment sparked the blaze.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store