Latest news with #Navi48
Indian Express
21-05-2025
- Indian Express
AMD unveils Radeon RX 9060 XT with 16GB VRAM, likely to cost around Rs 25,000 in India
At Computex 2025, AMD announced the Radeon RX 9060 XT, its newest mid-range graphics card that takes on NVIDIA's RTX 5060. Based on the RDNA4 architecture, the latest from AMD is available in two variants – one with 8GB of VRAM and the other with 16GB of VRAM. Compared to the 9070 series, which uses the Navi 48 chip, the new Radeon RX 9060 XT is powered by the Navi 44 GPU, which makes it a viable card for gamers looking to buy a card that offers value for money. The chip features 32 compute units or 2048 cores and comes with 32 RT accelerators and 64 AI accelerators. Manufactured on TSMC's 4nm process node, the Radeon RX 9060 XT has a boost clock speed of up to 3.13 GHz and a TBP of 150 to 182W. It has a 128-bit bus interface and features a 20 Gbps GDDR6 memory solution. AMD claims that the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB variant is about 6 per cent faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and offers 15 per cent more performance per dollar compared to the competition. The new card also features upgraded display outputs, now coming with DisplayPort 2.1a and HDMI 2.1b support and gets a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is good news for those with older PCIe 4.0 or 3.0 motherboards. As is the case with AMD's new cards, the Radeon RX 9060 XT also supports FidelityFX Super Resolution 4, popularly known as FSR 4. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT does look good on paper, but we will have to wait and see how it performs compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. If we take a look at the hardware, expect to get almost half the performance of the much pricier AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT on the 8GB model. While the 8GB VRAM version of the Radeon RX 9060 XT is priced at $299, the 16GB VRAM variant will be available for $349, which roughly translates to Rs 25,676 and Rs 29,955, respectively.
Yahoo
17-03-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
AMD describes its recent RDNA 4 GPU launch as 'unprecedented' and promises restocking the Radeon RX 9070 XT as 'priority number one'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. AMD has described its RDNA 4 launch as "unprecedented" Demand has outpaced supply significantly The company has promised restocks as "priority number one" AMD has described its RDNA 4 graphics card launch as "unprecedented" in a new interview, promising that restocks of the two current GPUs are "priority number one". In an hour-long video interview with AMD's David McAfee, Corporate VP and General Manager via HotHardware, the company made its mission statement clear: "The biggest thing we are doing quite honestly is ramping supply of Navi 48, very aggressively the demand we saw on day one was really unprecendented and unprecendeted across all the price points in the RDNA 4 product portfolio". Despite promising "wide availability" during the announcement of RDNA 4 hardware at the end of February, RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT stock has been fleeting since the first day they hit the shelves. Current stock is dry in the US, usually reserved to just bundles, and options available in the UK can be well above the aggressive sticker price set by AMD, something claimed to be "limited time" by some retailers. "We want to make sure that users are able to buy cards at the prices they expect to see in the market" McAfee later adds in the interview, "We're doing everything that we can to make that happen" for "retailers as well as our board partners are doing their part to help ensure that there's plenty of supply at those price points". AMD did not produce a reference model for either the RX 9070 nor the RX 9070 XT, meaning that the design, features and price point (to some extent) could be dictated by third-party AIB models. As such, it falls on the company's partners to ramp up production to meet demand in "making sure that they have all the components that they need to build the widest assortment of cards that they can". While the current offerings of RDNA 4 hardware are firmly placed in the midrange market, with respective MSRPs of $549 and $599, respectively (being roughly on par with the RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti), McAfee expressed that AMD may still attempt to compete at the higher-end as well. "We certainly have aspirations to cover the entire gamut of gaming solutions that are out there in the market, and maybe one day we'll get there". It's unclear whether this comment pertains to a potential higher-end RNDA 4 card or whether RDNA 5 will offer RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 rivals in the future. We've been impressed with the current RDNA 4 lineup since it launched earlier this month, citing the RX 9070 XT's near-RTX 4080 performance for the low price of $599 as a particular highlight. This is to say nothing of FSR 4, the latest version of the upscaling and Frame Generation technology, which is now AI-powered, being a step closer in quality, smoothness, and performance to Nvidia's ever-evolving DLSS, too. Given the sheer price-to-performance afforded by both the current RDNA graphics cards, it's not surprising to see that their availability has been limited (seemingly) far beyond AMD's expectations - hence the shortages. Traditionally, Team Red has played second fiddle behind Team Green, but the aggressive pricing (and powerful performance) of its latest cards have meant that it's occupying a niche in the midrange space that PC gamers can get behind. This is especially true given the lackluster RTX 5070, which we gave a 3-star write-up. It's been just over a week since the RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT went on sale, and they've been hard to find ever since, selling out in minutes from major retailers across regions like the US and the UK. AMD's promise of restocks and backing its partners as they ramp up AIB production is an encouraging move. We're hopeful that AMD keeps to its word and that more PC gamers will be able to see what's possible with a GPU under $600, while its major competitor is more concerned with pushing performance boundaries (and prices) in the other direction. Four ways ChatGPT can help you take control of your life Five ways to get the best art from Google's upcoming Flash 2.0 upgrade We explain all PC cases available and the form factor builds you can make
Yahoo
08-03-2025
- Yahoo
Sapphire Pulse AMD Radeon RX 9070
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. AMD's Radeon RX 9070 falls right in line behind the Radeon RX 9070 XT in its Radeon RX 9000 series of graphics cards. Though a competent card in its own right, the $549 Radeon RX 9070 sits in the shadow of the generally better-value $599 Radeon RX 9070 XT, with the difference in price not big enough to make the Radeon RX 9070 stand out. In testing a Sapphire Pulse AMD Radeon RX 9070 for this review, we found that you can undoubtedly draw an enjoyable gaming experience from the Radeon RX 9070 at high-detail 1440p and lower-detail 4K resolutions. However, spending an extra $50 for the Radeon RX 9070 XT, an Editors' Choice award winner, is much more worthwhile, so long as that card remains in stock and the price gap doesn't grow. The RX 9070 uses the RDNA 4 graphics architecture and the Navi 48 GPU die, just like the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, but AMD partially disabled portions of the RX 9070's GPU in the binning process. The RX 9070 hasn't lost much from a part-by-part analysis. The number of stream processors inside the RX 9070 is 3,584, a 14% reduction from the RX 9070 XT's count of 4,096. This reduction comes with a decrease in the number of texture mapping units (TMUs) from 256 on the RX 9070 XT to 224 on the RX 9070, and the number of ray accelerators similarly dropped from 64 to 56. That's about it in terms of hardware changes. Technically, the number of AI accelerators dropped from 128 to 112, but those don't impact gaming performance under normal conditions. The number of raster operation units (ROPs) was unchanged; same for the memory interface. AMD's 16GB pool of GDDR6 memory operates at 20Gbps on both cards. Arguably, the most notable differences between the RX 9070 XT and the RX 9070 come from their firmware. The RX 9070 XT is configured to operate with a max boost clock of 2,970MHz and is rated to mostly hover around 2,400MHz while gaming. AMD set the RX 9070's turbo clock 15% lower at 2,520MHz, and the expected gaming clock speed dropped by 14% to 2,070MHz. These reductions in hardware resources and clock speed also pushed the expected peak power draw of the RX 9070 down to 220 watts from the RX 9070 XT's peak of 304W. These drops in performance create a sufficiently large performance delta between the Radeon RX 9070 and the RX 9070 XT to keep each card from directly competing on performance, but pricing is another matter. With the RX 9070 XT priced at $599 and the RX 9070 set at $549, that's a price difference of just 9%. Keep this in mind when I get to the benchmarks: If the RX 9070 XT can outpace the RX 9070 by more than 9%, which these specs suggest it should easily do, then the RX 9070 XT is the better value. Before moving on to the tests, it's worth mentioning that the Radeon RX 9070 could have ample headroom for overclocking. The RX 9070 and the RX 9070 XT both use the Navi 48 graphics chip, but AMD clocked the RX 9070 XT much higher, suggesting that the RX 9070 could also go higher. However, if you are interested in overclocking, I wouldn't bother buying a better-cooled RX 9070 model if it costs any extra. You won't find enough room between the RX 9070 and the RX 9070 XT in price to support doing that when you could just buy an RX 9070 XT. Sapphire manufactured the test card that AMD sent us for review with a dual-fan thermal solution. The Sapphire Pulse AMD Radeon RX 9070 doesn't have any RGB LEDs but makes up for this with an edgy black exterior covered in diagonal slits and red lines. A metal backplate helps give the card additional structural integrity while keeping the components on the back of the card's PCB cooler. This card requires only two conventional eight-pin PCIe power connectors. Display output options include two HDMI 2.1 ports and two DisplayPort 2.1a jacks. Our 2025 graphics card testbed features a Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master motherboard and an AMD Ryzen 9 9950X processor with a large 360mm water cooler to test the Sapphire Pulse AMD Radeon RX 9070. We installed two 16GB sticks of DDR5 on the motherboard and configured them to operate under a 6,000MHz AMD EXPO memory profile. We also added two Crucial 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSDs to the system, one dedicated to games and the other holding Windows 11 and all other software. To ensure plentiful power delivery headroom, we used a 1,500-watt Corsair power supply. AMD's main Radeon RX 9070 competition is the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070, which is also priced at $549. Due to similar pricing, the RX 9070 will also have to compete with the RX 9070 XT, the last-gen Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Super, and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE. The Radeon RX 9070 started strong in the 3DMark tests we conducted. It essentially tied with the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super while surpassing the RTX 5070 and the RX 7900 GRE in the Port Royal test. The RX 970 also performed this way in the Steel Nomad and Time Spy Extreme benchmarks. In 3DMark's Solar Bay and Speed Way tests, the RTX 5070 pulled into a close tie with the RX 9070. Unigine Superposition showed both scenarios, with the RTX 5070 tying with the RX 9070 in DirectX but falling behind in OpenGL. AI performance could be a key measurement for graphics cards someday, but that remains somewhat questionable for the moment as software that can take advantage of this hardware is still in development. In these particular tests, Nvidia unquestionably has the advantage over AMD. At least the AMD Radeon RX 9070 performed well enough for an AMD card, holding an edge over the RX 7900 GRE. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 also performed reasonably well in content creation tasks. It essentially tied with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 and outpaced the rest of the AMD competition. The Blender benchmark refused to work with the AMD Radeon RX 9070, but this will likely be a temporary issue that will disappear after the drivers or Blender software are updated. We limit our DLSS, FSR, and XeSS testing to Black Myth: Wukong due to the complications surrounding testing these technologies against each other. They all result in differing image quality, which makes comparing them solely on performance imprecise. Black Myth Wukong supports DLSS 3 and FSR 3, which we test on Nvidia and AMD cards, respectively, with the super-resolution sampling set to 100%. We then rerun these tests with frame generation on for all cards to gauge how this alters performance. This test notably does not show DLSS 4 or FSR 4 multi-frame-generation performance. With DLSS 4, Nvidia adopted a new AI model for DLSS work and AMD also made several changes to its fourth version of FSR technology. Of particular note is that these technologies can create more than one intermediary frame between each conventionally generated frame, though this has some trade-offs. To learn more about DLSS 4, check my article that closely examines DLSS 4 performance on the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090. In this test, the RX 9070 performed about the same as the RTX 5070 with frame generation off but pulled ahead of the RTX 5070 with frame generation on. The RX 9070 was faster than the RX 7900 GRE in both tests, though. The Radeon RX 9070's performance in modern games that support ray tracing produced ups and downs. In Cyberpunk 2077, the RX 9070 was slightly slower than the GeForce RTX 5070 and lagged behind the RTX 5070 in Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora and Returnal. However, the RTX 5070 never beat the RX 9070 by more than 10% in these titles, with its advantage typically in the single digits. That contrasts with the RX 9070's wins against the RTX 5070. The RX 9070 may not have beaten the RTX 5070 in every game, but when the RX 9070 was faster, it was typically ahead by double-digit percentages. The RX 9070's advantage varied from as low as 6% in F1 2024 to as high as 27% in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. It was also faster in Far Cry 6. As for competing with other AMD cards, the last-generation Radeon RX 7900 XT and RX 7900 GRE were typically behind the RX 9070. And the RX 9070 XT was typically faster than the RX 9070, which makes sense. I didn't calculate the percentage differences between the RX 9070 and the RX 9070 XT across the board, but the RX 9070 XT was ahead by at least 18% in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III at 4K and by 16% in the same game at 1080p. The RX 9070 XT's lead over the RX 9070 in other games looks roughly around these figures across the board. As those leads are greater than the 9% difference in price between these two GPUs, there's no question: The Radeon RX 9070 XT presents a better value and more frames per dollar than the RX 9070, assuming the pricing holds. Last generation, AMD's greatest strength was in games that didn't support ray tracing as its ray-tracing hardware was less potent than Nvidia's. Instead, the average AMD GPU seemed to have a bit more muscle when it came to more traditional gaming workloads like those that don't support ray tracing. This generation's situation appears to have been reversed, with the GeForce RTX 5070 performing better in Total War: Three Kingdoms than the Radeon RX 9070. The Radeon RX 9070 pulled ahead in Shadow of the Tomb Raider at the 4K resolution, which shows that it can still be faster in older games. The RTX 5070 appeared slightly faster in this game at 1440p and 1080p, but the scores were realistically close enough to be a tie at those resolutions. Using a Kill-A-Watt power meter, we measured the power consumption of our graphics card test bed as a whole while running some key benchmarks on each of the graphics cards shown in the table. The Radeon RX 9070 consumed a bit more power in the Adobe Premiere Pro test than the RTX 5070, but this is made up for by the RX 9070's higher performance in that test. Gaming power consumption was also notably lower on the RX 9070 than the RTX 5070. Given the RX 9070 typically tied with or performed better than the RTX 5070, this suggests the RX 9070 is the more energy efficient of the two. The RX 9070's power consumption was also considerably better than the RX 9070 XT's, which is likely due in large part to its reduced clock speeds and slightly reduced shader count. The RX 9070 also stayed much cooler than the RTX 5070 during the testing process; the Sapphire's thermal solution performed better than Nvidia's Founders Edition cooler. For its $549 asking price, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 gives you lots of performance and realistically little to complain about. Sure, its AI performance lags behind Nvidia, but seriously, is that why you are buying a midrange graphics card? When it comes to gaming, the RX 9070 is usually just as fast as the RTX 5070 or a fair bit faster. It is slightly slower in a few games, but not by a meaningful amount, whereas the RX 9070's performance lead is more meaningful and noticeable when present. The Radeon RX 9070 goes a long way to replace AMD's aging Radeon RX 7900 GRE and Radeon RX 7900 XT, as it generally outpaces these cards. AMD only has one real issue as far as the RX 9070 goes: You can buy a Radeon RX 9070 XT for just $50 more. AMD's Radeon RX 9070 XT is generally better and well worth the added cost if the two cards remain $50 apart or less. The RX 9070 is a solid buy, but it would be easier to recommend if it were priced a touch lower, like $499. At $549, the Radeon RX 9070 is a fine graphics card that is worth its asking price, but think long and hard and make sure you can't scrape together that extra $50 for the Editors' Choice-award-winning Radeon RX 9070 XT.
