logo
ENع
#

Latest news with #NirKaissar

Why the S&P 500 is cruising through policy upheaval
Why the S&P 500 is cruising through policy upheaval

Business Times

time12 hours ago

  • Business
  • Business Times

Why the S&P 500 is cruising through policy upheaval

IF YOU are wondering why the S&P 500 index has held up so well in the past two months, look no further than the technology and communications sectors, which collectively account for nearly half of the index by weighting. For all the wild and headline-grabbing swings in trade policy since early April, analysts have continued to project more than 14 per cent earnings growth in those combined sectors this year – an outlook that really has not budged. Wall Street is not ignoring the potential risks from tariffs and a consumer slowdown; analysts just think that America's innovation superstars will partially offset any damage. And reasonably so. Artificial intelligence (AI) poster child Nvidia Corp said last week that it had US$44.1 billion in revenue in the latest quarter, up an extraordinary 69 per cent from a year earlier. Microsoft Corp, the index's biggest company by weighting, posted a 20 per cent increase in cloud revenue last quarter, showing why its software-heavy model leaves it relatively insulated from tariffs. And Netflix, which successfully hiked subscription prices recently, said revenue jumped 12.5 per cent, reaffirming the resilience of its business model. None of this is to say that all is fine and dandy in the economy, but there is clearly a compositional element to the perceived strength of the main equity index. In addition to the sector-weightings issue, my Bloomberg Opinion colleague Nir Kaissar has pointed out that the companies with the heaviest weights also tend to enjoy extraordinary pricing power that will serve them well in the face of a trade war. That partially explains why the S&P 500 is back within spitting distance of its all-time highs, even as small-caps and mid-caps are still down about 17 per cent and 11 per cent, respectively. But even for large-cap stocks, the index outlook can be somewhat deceiving. Consumer discretionary earnings forecasts have not held up quite so well since President Donald Trump left markets in a tizzy with his Apr 2 'Liberation Day' tariffs on countries around the world. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up According to data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence, Wall Street analysts now expect the S&P 500's consumer discretionary sector to post a 1.2 per cent earnings drop this year. Prior to Apr 2, analysts expected discretionary growth of 4.5 per cent. The outlook for the consumer staples sector has also been revised sharply lower. The revisions reflect a weaker revenue environment and – for discretionary in particular – narrower profit margins. The question now is what comes next. On the positive side, the US Court of International Trade ruled last week that many of Trump's tariffs are illegal. But as Goldman Sachs Group wrote, the ruling 'might not change the final outcome for most major US trading partners'. A federal appeals court on May 29 paused the Court of International Trade's ruling, and the White House plans to appeal to the Supreme Court. Even if it fails in its appeal, Goldman Sach's Alec Phillips said the White House could still reinstate many of the other tariffs through other legal means. A number of market participants think that Trump has experienced buyers' remorse over some of the tariffs (or 'chickens out' whenever market volatility rears its head). But if Trump were really looking for a chance to walk away from the policy entirely while still saving face politically, this ruling would be precisely that off-ramp. All indications suggest that he is not going to take it. On the macroeconomic front, the outlook is equally foggy. Revisions to first-quarter gross domestic product published on May 29 showed that consumer spending advanced at its weakest pace in two years, and higher-frequency data from the Bank of America Institute suggest that the consumer slowdown extended into April and the first part of May. The traditional labour market indicators have been decent, yet hiring remains extremely sluggish and continuing jobless claims are now at their highest since 2021. At the corporate level, even some of the superstar stocks are flashing warning signs, with tariff-exposed Apple expected to post just 'low to mid-single digit' revenue growth in its next quarterly report (though that depends on the outcome of tariff policy). Investors are also rightfully on alert for further headwinds to ad-driven businesses including Alphabet and Meta Platforms. As for the quintessential AI stocks including Nvidia and Microsoft, investors may one day find themselves on the wrong side of extraordinarily high expectations. But evidently that day is not today. There is a common bearish take that the market is ignoring the macroeconomic headwinds, and I do not think that is quite right. Yes, the S&P 500 is probably at the richer end of its fair value band, but it is not untethered from it. Mr Market seems to have the story generally right: a handful of innovation superstars continue to deliver other-worldly results. Another handful of consumer-based sectors are starting to struggle, due to the softening consumer and nonsensical trade policy that is apparently on the ropes. And beyond that, nobody has the faintest idea of what is going to happen next. BLOOMBERG

Best of BS Opinion: How the calm today may be masking deeper risks
Best of BS Opinion: How the calm today may be masking deeper risks

Business Standard

time4 days ago

  • Business
  • Business Standard

Best of BS Opinion: How the calm today may be masking deeper risks

You know that moment when your car hums along just fine, but one weird little light on the dashboard keeps flickering? That quiet, pulsing reminder that even though everything feels normal, something might still be off under the hood? That's how the world also feels right now, technologies are advancing, markets are steadying, systems are stabilising, but those little blinking lights? They're everywhere. Let's dive in. Take the bond market. Nir Kaissar walks us through a reality-check: people are panicking over interest rates, but zoom out and the current 4.5 per cent on 10-year Treasuries is historically normal. The bigger issue? We're just not used to it anymore after years of easy money. The machine is working but fiscal red flags like $5 trillion in potential deficits or unsustainable tax cuts are blinking. Ignore them, and we might end up stalling on the highway. Meanwhile, Mihir S Sharma cautions that with artificial intelligence, the system isn't just running, it's accelerating like a Tesla in Ludicrous Mode. But no one agrees on where it's heading. Some say AI will democratise creativity and generate jobs. Others predict mass layoffs and existential threats. Will it empower developing countries or further divide them from AI-rich superpowers? The engine is sleek, but no one can read the road signs ahead. And for Pakistan, Shekhar Gupta points out a particularly worrisome light on the regional dashboard: Field Marshal Munir. A military chief with unprecedented power, a hollowed-out civilian government, and a jailed popular rival (Imran Khan) — this isn't a hybrid regime anymore, it's a duckbilled platypus of power. Past performance, as they say in mutual fund ads, is no guarantee of future returns. But in Pakistan, past power-hungry generals have ended up disgraced, exiled, or dead. Munir, however, seems poised to act while he still can. India, beware: the system next door may look stable, but it's humming toward a potentially explosive 12 months. Then there's Devangshu Datta, who shows how GPS and drones, marvels of civilian tech, are now shaping military arsenals. From V-1 flying bombs to AI-guided kamikaze drones, our tools for convenience are doubling as tools for conflict. Precision strikes and geolocation warfare are here, whether we're ready or not. The system works brilliantly, for both Swiggy and the battlefield. Even climate scientists are leaning into geoengineering, as Kumar Abishek writes. Solar Radiation Modification might temporarily cool the Earth by bouncing sunlight back into space. It's technically feasible, increasingly funded, and yet deeply risky. The cooling may come with unintended consequences and no global playbook to manage them. The science is on, but the ethics light is blinking furiously.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store