Latest news with #O'ReillyMedia
Time Business News
22-05-2025
- Business
- Time Business News
Transforming Cloud Operations: The Power of AI-Driven Infrastructure as Code
In the rapidly evolving realm of digital transformation, businesses are racing to adopt smarter solutions for infrastructure provisioning and management. Infrastructure as Code (IaC) has emerged as a foundational DevOps practice that allows IT teams to automate the setup and maintenance of their environments. However, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with IaC introduces a paradigm shift — enabling predictive, self-healing, and optimized infrastructure management. This in-depth article explores how AI Software Development Services are reshaping Infrastructure as Code, with advanced capabilities, real-world applications, and insightful statistics that underscore this transformative journey. IaC is a key component of modern DevOps pipelines, enabling IT infrastructure (servers, databases, networks, etc.) to be provisioned, configured, and managed using declarative code. IaC allows for: Version control of infrastructure Reusability and automation of configurations Rapid environment replication Reduced manual errors and downtime Common IaC tools include Terraform, Pulumi, AWS CloudFormation, and Ansible. However, as digital infrastructure becomes more complex, businesses are turning to AI to elevate IaC to new levels of intelligence and efficiency. AI empowers IaC tools and processes to become more dynamic, adaptive, and predictive. Instead of static configuration templates and reactive monitoring, AI brings: AI models can analyze usage patterns, forecast load spikes, and allocate resources accordingly. This not only prevents outages but ensures optimal cost-performance balance. According to McKinsey (2024), companies leveraging AI for predictive infrastructure scaling reported a 35% improvement in uptime and 28% reduction in cloud spend. AI continuously monitors system logs, metrics, and events to detect misconfigurations or security threats in real time. Once anomalies are detected, auto-remediation scripts or rollbacks are triggered without human intervention. A recent survey by O'Reilly Media indicated that enterprises using AI in IaC pipelines experienced a 47% drop in major outages. AI-driven policy engines can audit and enforce compliance dynamically. Machine learning algorithms detect non-compliant patterns and suggest or implement corrections instantly. Natural Language Processing (NLP) models assist in generating readable documentation and smart Terraform/CloudFormation scripts by interpreting user intent from natural language inputs. AI accelerates root cause detection by correlating logs, traces, and metrics across systems, reducing mean time to repair (MTTR) significantly. AI helps minimize cloud wastage by predicting ideal resource allocation, avoiding overprovisioning. DevOps teams spend less time on troubleshooting and manual configurations, focusing instead on innovation. With AI-powered anomaly detection and policy enforcement, businesses can ensure infrastructure security at all layers. Self-healing and intelligent recovery drastically lower downtime incidents and improve SLAs. AI-accelerated CI/CD pipelines push infrastructure changes faster, enabling quicker feature deployment. AI-driven IaC ensures secure, high-performance, and compliant cloud deployments crucial for financial transactions. Online retail platforms use AI to auto-scale during high-traffic sales events, ensuring no disruption. Hospitals implement AI for high availability of critical applications and data compliance. AI algorithms optimize infrastructure for IoT devices in smart grids and remote installations. IDC forecasts that by 2026, over 60% of digitally mature enterprises will rely on AI-powered IaC for daily infrastructure operations. Despite its potential, AI-integrated IaC presents hurdles: AI requires vast, clean datasets from logs, telemetry, and metrics. Combining AI engines with IaC tools demands architectural planning. Talent with expertise in both AI and infrastructure automation is rare. Over-reliance on automation without checks can lead to unexpected consequences. AI Software Development Services offer businesses the technical expertise and strategic insights needed to integrate AI into IaC workflows: Custom AI model development for predictive infrastructure monitoring Integration of ML models with existing IaC platforms (Terraform, Ansible, Pulumi) Design of self-healing infrastructure with MLOps practices Ongoing model training, versioning, and performance tuning These services allow businesses to scale securely, stay agile, and innovate continuously without worrying about infrastructure pitfalls. As generative AI, LLMs, and edge computing technologies mature, they will further augment IaC capabilities: AI will build optimized configuration files based on past deployments. Engineers will deploy infrastructure using natural language prompts interpreted by LLMs. End-to-end pipelines with zero manual intervention, self-managed through reinforcement learning. Gartner predicts that by 2027, AI will manage 75% of enterprise infrastructure autonomously. AI-Driven IaC leverages machine learning and data analysis to introduce predictive scaling, auto-remediation, and intelligent decision-making, whereas traditional IaC only automates infrastructure with static rules and templates. Yes. AI can be layered on top of most popular IaC tools like Terraform, AWS CloudFormation, and Ansible using APIs, plugins, and data pipelines that feed performance metrics into AI engines. AI predicts resource demands and auto-scales only what's needed, avoiding costly overprovisioning. It also identifies underutilized services and recommends optimization. These services help businesses build and train AI models, integrate them into existing infrastructure systems, ensure data pipelines are optimized, and maintain the AI lifecycle through MLOps practices. AI enhances security by continuously scanning logs and configurations for anomalies, applying patches automatically, and enforcing compliance rules dynamically, reducing vulnerabilities. Yes. Cloud-native SMBs with limited IT resources can especially benefit by outsourcing complex infrastructure decisions to intelligent systems, reducing manpower needs and speeding up operations. Implementation time varies by complexity but typically ranges from 6–12 weeks, including data preparation, model training, integration with IaC tools, and testing. AI is not just enhancing Infrastructure as Code — it is revolutionizing it. With predictive analytics, self-healing mechanisms, and intelligent resource orchestration, AI-Driven IaC ensures faster, safer, and more efficient cloud operations. Organizations that partner with experienced AI Software Development Services providers are better equipped to unlock these benefits while staying competitive in a cloud-first world. AI and infrastructure have officially converged. Those who adopt this technology early will shape the future of digital enterprises, driving smarter, more efficient cloud solutions for years to come. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
01-04-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Researchers suggest OpenAI trained AI models on paywalled O'Reilly books
OpenAI has been accused by many parties of training its AI on copyrighted content sans permission. Now a new paper by an AI watchdog organization makes the serious accusation that the company increasingly relied on nonpublic books it didn't license to train more sophisticated AI models. AI models are essentially complex prediction engines. Trained on a lot of data — books, movies, TV shows, and so on — they learn patterns and novel ways to extrapolate from a simple prompt. When a model "writes" an essay on a Greek tragedy or "draws" Ghibli-style images, it's simply pulling from its vast knowledge to approximate. It isn't arriving at anything new. While a number of AI labs, including OpenAI, have begun embracing AI-generated data to train AI as they exhaust real-world sources (mainly the public web), few have eschewed real-world data entirely. That's likely because training on purely synthetic data comes with risks, like worsening a model's performance. The new paper, out of the AI Disclosures Project, a nonprofit co-founded in 2024 by media mogul Tim O'Reilly and economist Ilan Strauss, draws the conclusion that OpenAI likely trained its GPT-4o model on paywalled books from O'Reilly Media. (O'Reilly is the CEO of O'Reilly Media.) In ChatGPT, GPT-4o is the default model. O'Reilly doesn't have a licensing agreement with OpenAI, the paper says. "GPT-4o, OpenAI's more recent and capable model, demonstrates strong recognition of paywalled O'Reilly book content … compared to OpenAI's earlier model GPT-3.5 Turbo," wrote the co-authors of the paper. "In contrast, GPT-3.5 Turbo shows greater relative recognition of publicly accessible O'Reilly book samples." The paper used a method called DE-COP, first introduced in an academic paper in 2024, designed to detect copyrighted content in language models' training data. Also known as a "membership inference attack," the method tests whether a model can reliably distinguish human-authored texts from paraphrased, AI-generated versions of the same text. If it can, it suggests that the model might have prior knowledge of the text from its training data. The co-authors of the paper — O'Reilly, Strauss, and AI researcher Sruly Rosenblat — say that they probed GPT-4o, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and other OpenAI models' knowledge of O'Reilly Media books published before and after their training cutoff dates. They used 13,962 paragraph excerpts from 34 O'Reilly books to estimate the probability that a particular excerpt had been included in a model's training dataset. According to the results of the paper, GPT-4o "recognized" far more paywalled O'Reilly book content than OpenAI's older models, including GPT-3.5 Turbo. That's even after accounting for potential confounding factors, the authors said, like improvements in newer models' ability to figure out whether text was human-authored. "GPT-4o [likely] recognizes, and so has prior knowledge of, many non-public O'Reilly books published prior to its training cutoff date," wrote the co-authors. It isn't a smoking gun, the co-authors are careful to note. They acknowledge that their experimental method isn't foolproof and that OpenAI might've collected the paywalled book excerpts from users copying and pasting it into ChatGPT. Muddying the waters further, the co-authors didn't evaluate OpenAI's most recent collection of models, which includes GPT-4.5 and "reasoning" models such as o3-mini and o1. It's possible that these models weren't trained on paywalled O'Reilly book data or were trained on a lesser amount than GPT-4o. That being said, it's no secret that OpenAI, which has advocated for looser restrictions around developing models using copyrighted data, has been seeking higher-quality training data for some time. The company has gone so far as to hire journalists to help fine-tune its models' outputs. That's a trend across the broader industry: AI companies recruiting experts in domains like science and physics to effectively have these experts feed their knowledge into AI systems. It should be noted that OpenAI pays for at least some of its training data. The company has licensing deals in place with news publishers, social networks, stock media libraries, and others. OpenAI also offers opt-out mechanisms — albeit imperfect ones — that allow copyright owners to flag content they'd prefer the company not use for training purposes. Still, as OpenAI battles several suits over its training data practices and treatment of copyright law in U.S. courts, the O'Reilly paper isn't the most flattering look. OpenAI didn't respond to a request for comment. This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at
Yahoo
01-04-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Researchers suggest OpenAI trained AI models on paywalled O'Reilly books
OpenAI has been accused by many parties of training its AI on copyrighted content sans permission. Now a new paper by an AI watchdog organization makes the serious accusation that the company increasingly relied on non-public books it didn't license to train more sophisticated AI models. AI models are essentially complex prediction engines. Trained on a lot of data — books, movies, TV shows, and so on — they learn patterns and novel ways to extrapolate from a simple prompt. When a model "writes" an essay on a Greek tragedy or "draws" Ghibli-style images, it's simply pulling from its vast knowledge to approximate. It isn't arriving at anything new. While a number of AI labs including OpenAI have begun embracing AI-generated data to train AI as they exhaust real-world sources (mainly the public web), few have eschewed real-world data entirely. That's likely because training on purely synthetic data comes with risks, like worsening a model's performance. The new paper, out of the AI Disclosures Project, a nonprofit co-founded in 2024 by media mogul Tim O'Reilly and economist Ilan Strauss, draws the conclusion that OpenAI likely trained its GPT-4o model on paywalled books from O'Reilly Media. (O'Reilly is the CEO of O'Reilly Media.) In ChatGPT, GPT-4o is the default model. O'Reilly doesn't have a licensing agreement with OpenAI, the paper says. "GPT-4o, OpenAI's more recent and capable model, demonstrates strong recognition of paywalled O'Reilly book content [...] compared to OpenAI's earlier model GPT-3.5 Turbo," wrote the co-authors of the paper. "In contrast, GPT-3.5 Turbo shows greater relative recognition of publicly accessible O'Reilly book samples." The paper used a method called DE-COP, first introduced in an academic paper in 2024, designed to detect copyrighted content in language models' training data. Also known as a "membership inference attack," the method tests whether a model can reliably distinguish human-authored texts from paraphrased, AI-generated versions of the same text. If it can, it suggests that the model might have prior knowledge of the text from its training data. The co-authors of the paper — O'Reilly, Strauss, and AI researcher Sruly Rosenblat — say that they probed GPT-4o, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and other OpenAI models' knowledge of O'Reilly Media books published before and after their training cutoff dates. They used 13,962 paragraph excerpts from 34 O'Reilly books to estimate the probability that a particular excerpt had been included in a model's training dataset. According to the results of the paper, GPT-4o "recognized" far more paywalled O'Reilly book content than OpenAI's older models, including GPT-3.5 Turbo. That's even after accounting for potential confounding factors, the authors said, like improvements in newer models' ability to figure out whether text was human-authored. "GPT-4o [likely] recognizes, and so has prior knowledge of, many non-public O'Reilly books published prior to its training cutoff date," wrote the co-authors. It isn't a smoking gun, the co-authors are careful to note. They acknowledge that their experimental method isn't foolproof, and that OpenAI might've collected the paywalled book excerpts from users copying and pasting it into ChatGPT. Muddying the waters further, the co-authors didn't evaluate OpenAI's most recent collection of models, which includes GPT-4.5 and "reasoning" models such as o3-mini and o1. It's possible that these models weren't trained on paywalled O'Reilly book data, or were trained on a lesser amount than GPT-4o. That being said, it's no secret that OpenAI, which has advocated for looser restrictions around developing models using copyrighted data, has been seeking higher-quality training data for some time. The company has gone so far as to hire journalists to help fine-tune its models' outputs. That's a trend across the broader industry: AI companies recruiting experts in domains like science and physics to effectively have these experts feed their knowledge into AI systems. It should be noted that OpenAI pays for at least some of its training data. The company has licensing deals in place with news publishers, social networks, stock media libraries, and others. OpenAI also offers opt-out mechanisms — albeit imperfect ones — that allow copyright owners to flag content they'd prefer the company not use for training purposes. Still, as OpenAI battles several suits over its training data practices and treatment of copyright law in U.S. courts, the O'Reilly paper isn't the most flattering look. OpenAI didn't respond to a request for comment. Sign in to access your portfolio
