Latest news with #OHSC
TimesLIVE
5 days ago
- Health
- TimesLIVE
Unsafe and substandard. Is that what public health care in SA looks like?
MEASURED Image: Delwyn Verasamy 'Unsupervised, unstructured, non-standardised, unsafe and altogether substandard.' This is how the health ombud's report at the end of July described the care four patients received at the Robert Mangaliso Sobukwe and Northern Cape Mental Health hospitals in Kimberley last year. Two later died and one was left with permanent brain damage. In the same week as the ombud's report, politicians' comments about the 'alarming number' of patients who pick up infections in Gauteng hospitals and a news headline alleging that duct tape was used to close an Eastern Cape mom's C-section wound raised questions — and hackles — about the standard at which health facilities in South Africa operate. Mention the National Health Insurance scheme — the government's plan for rolling out universal health coverage — in the same conversation and debates become explosive. The basic idea is that inspectors visit clinics and hospitals, run through a long list of requirements that have to be met, award a score for each one, and then later write up a report to say whether quality is up to scratch. If so, a certificate of compliance — valid for four years — is issued; if not, the facility is re-inspected later and if still not in the clear, it gets a written warning. But, says Susan Cleary, a health economist and head of the School of Public Health at the University of Cape Town, the measures defined in these scorecards make it 'almost impossible' for an establishment to pass the test. Scoring a facility's service quality according to measures they have little control over is unfair, she says. 'The last thing you want to do is give people a job that's impossible to do.' Yet given the way the inspection system tests whether a facility complies with each of the 23 standards defined by the National Health Act, it's 'almost as if we set them up for failure', says Cleary. 'Is it then really a question of what the quality of service is,' she asks, 'or is it a question of what is being measured?' In a series of analyses, we're diving into the OHSC's inspection reports to get a sense of what the benchmarks are — and what they say about the state of affairs at clinics, community health centres (CHCs) and hospitals. In this first story, we're looking only at the public health sector — not because we think things are perfect in private establishments, but because with roughly 85% of South Africans using government facilities, it seems like the best place to start. And like with getting universal health coverage in place, we have to start somewhere. Come with us as we look at the numbers. The lay of the land South Africa has 3,741 public health facilities, of which about 90% are clinics and CHCs. Hospitals make up the remaining 10%. Facilities differ in their size and types of service, with clinics and CHCs being smaller and offering primary health care, while hospitals (including district, regional or central hospitals) can handle many patients, have them stay a day or more and deliver more specialised treatment. Because the different facilities offer different services, the detailed list of requirements they have to meet doesn't look the same for each place — though they all have to adhere to the same broad set of 23 standards. For example, four inspection tools (almost like a questionnaire) have to be completed for a clinic, totalling about 90 pages of checklists. For a regional hospital though, we counted 38 tools to be filled in across its different departments — a total of roughly 500 pages of checklists. For this reason, one day is budgeted for doing a standards audit at a clinic, but up to five days for a hospital, depending on its size. Counting and compliance Between 2019 and 2023, the OHSC inspected 3,093 public health facilities — about 83% of the total to be assessed. Scores for the last 17% — 648 facilities — are still outstanding. (The latest inspection results available are for the 2022/23 financial year, and though the OHSC has published its annual performance report for 2023/24, the inspection results for the last two years have not been released yet. The OHSC did not respond to our questions about the reason for the delay.) Getting to each health facility in the country is a mammoth task though. For example, 734 inspections in 2023 work out to two a day — and with only 53 people in the OHSC's auditing unit at the time and the extent of the checklists, it's not surprising that things take way longer than planned. But the task seems even more overwhelming when the compliance rate is added into the mix. In 2022 (the latest year for which results are available), only four out of 10 public facilities passed the test and so have to be re-inspected later, meaning the backlog builds. To be rated as compliant, a facility has to get full marks for a set of so-called non-negotiable measures — things the standards documents say can lead to 'severe harm or death' if not in place, then at least 60% for a set of vital measures — requirements that are critical to keep staff and patients safe — and 50% on essential items, 'necessary for safe, decent and quality care'. It's an unfeasible system, says Cleary. 'I think that's a large part of what's happened to our public sectors. [People] get given unfunded mandates all the time. But just because a standard has been set unrealistically high, it doesn't mean that [service] quality is terrible; it may simply mean that hitting the bar is unaffordable given the money or staff available.' Star struck or star stuck? If we convert public health facilities' compliance rates to a star rating — like what you'd give a service provider on an online review — no province got more than three stars in 2022. Looking at these results, it seems that, at best, three out of five facilities would make the cut — and it happens only in Gauteng. In KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape chances are that every second facility may meet the OHSC's list of requirements, with the other provinces struggling to get more than one out of five facilities compliant. In fact, in the Northern Cape and Limpopo so few of the inspected facilities could pass the assessments that their scores won't even translate to a single star. But these are the results on paper — and likely give a warped picture of what is happening in practice because of the way performance is measured. A trimmed list of requirements — 'something that 90—95% of facilities can actually meet' — could give a more realistic view, says Cleary. This doesn't mean compromising on quality, but rather that decisionmakers have to think more carefully about what the priorities really are. 'It's partly a matter of 'cutting your coat according to your cloth',' she says, and then working from there to improve step by step — with the money to make it happen. Says Cleary: 'We have to let go of this idea that we can have everything and that it all has to be perfect otherwise it's not good enough.' Stats that really are shocking Something like the non-negotiable measures in the OHSC's scorecards could give a fairer idea of what healthcare quality really looks like. These are three things a clinic has to have in place to make the grade; the same three things in the emergency, obstetrics and clinical services units of a CHC; and eight things in a hospital. They cover only statements related to handling a medical emergency, having a system in place for supplying lifesaving medical gas (like oxygen) to patients, and getting patients' consent the right way. Viewing the quality of public health care from this angle really does paint a shocking picture — and could give decisionmakers a concrete place to start to get to grips with claims of inadequate service. In 2022, only two provinces — Gauteng and the Western Cape — managed to have these minimum life-saving measures in place in at least seven out of 10 clinics and CHCs and half the district hospitals inspected. (We didn't include regional hospitals in our analysis because at most two of these were assessed in a province. A score of, say, 50% would therefore not have been a fair reflection of reality.) In two other provinces — Mpumalanga and North West — half of either clinics or CHCs met these minimum requirements. The other provinces don't come close. The health ombud's investigation revealed that in the two Northern Cape hospitals under the spotlight, emergency power supply was non-existent and that resuscitation equipment did not work. Looking only at these measures then, the assessment that the care available to patients at these facilities was 'substandard, and [that] patients were not attended to in a manner consistent with the nature and severity of their health condition' would be fair — and something that leadership should be held accountable for.
IOL News
05-07-2025
- Health
- IOL News
Public Servants Association threatens legal action against health minister over OHSC relocation
Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi could face legal action should he fail to intervene in the dispute over the imminent relocation of the Office of Health Standards Compliance to new offices over 20 kilometres away, the Public Servants Association has warned. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi and the Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC) could face legal action over the entity's imminent relocation from the Pretoria central business district (CBD) to Centurion. On August 1, OHSC staff are scheduled to start relocating from their Prinshof, Tshwane, head office to Centurion, more than 20 kilometres away, but the Public Servants Association (PSA) has complained that the process has been done without consultation and adequate explanation. PSA members have been protesting against the relocation since June 17 and on Friday delivered a memorandum of demands to Motsoaledi after accusing OHSC management of failing to be honest and transparent on the matter. Among the demands is for the minister to exercise his executive authority to immediately halt the unlawful and procedurally flawed office relocation. 'The decision to relocate without prior consultation and absent mitigating support measures constitutes a prima facie violation of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, specifically concerning fair working conditions, the preservation of work-life balance and protection against undue financial and emotional hardship,' PSA general manager Reuben Maleka told Motsoaledi. The PSA wants a comprehensive forensic investigation to be commissioned by the Auditor-General of South Africa or the National Treasury into the irregular, opaque, and potentially corrupt procurement process associated with the relocation. 'Evidence suggests a breach of the Public Finance Management Act and procurement protocols, warranting criminal and disciplinary proceedings where applicable,' the union alleged. In addition, the PSA demanded that Motsoaledi publicly and formally reprimand the OHSC executive management for their continued disregard of statutory consultation obligations and repeated violations of good faith bargaining as required under the Labour Relations Act and the constitutional right to fair labour practices. Maleka added: 'Their conduct has directly undermined the integrity of collective labour relations.' According to the union, the current office lease procurement should be immediately nullified and a new, transparent and compliant procurement process initiated, under independent oversight, with the explicit condition that office accommodation be identified within a five kilometre radius of the current Pretoria CBD premises, in line with accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and operational continuity. Earlier this year, the PSA presented two relocation scenario planning demands to the OHSC, including employees being paid R3,500 monthly or allowed to work from home for two weeks a month. However, the OHSC rejected the two scenarios due to budget constraints and because working from home was not compatible with the effectiveness of its service delivery requirements. Instead, the entity offered to provide transportation from the CBD to ferry staff members from a defined location to Eco-Glades Office Park in Centurion free of charge for a fixed period of six months, after which every employee will be expected to make their way to the new offices. The OHSC also promised to consider the process to deal with the plight of employees' school-going children. Employees complained that Eco-Glades Office Park was isolated and far from basic amenities and that they had children in schools in the CBD registered based on the proximity of their workplace. Additionally, access to the new office was also constrained due to peak hour transport, and would create difficulties for them in cases of emergencies during normal working hours. Some children commute with their parents, and there is no provision of relief assistance. Maleka told Motsoaledi to address their concerns as a matter of urgency. 'The relocation decision, in its current form, is risky, undermines staff morale, reduces operational effectiveness, and places undue strain on already limited resources. Failure to act in accordance with these demands will result in the institution of legal proceedings, and national exposure of the ministry's failure to uphold statutory obligations,' he warned.
The Star
20-06-2025
- Health
- The Star
UMS camp stirs rural students' interest in AI healthcare applications
KOTA KINABALU: A recent Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) event brought science and technology education to rural students in a fun, inspiring way. Over 120 students from 12 secondary schools in the Kudat district took part in the two-day Science and Art Camp: Future Doctor in Tech, a hackathon-style event designed to spark interest in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) and artificial intelligence (AI), especially in healthcare. Organised by UMS' One Health Student Club (OHSC) in collaboration with the U-Science Centre, the National Science Centre, and the Kudat district Education Office, the camp received support from Unesco and the Science, Technology and Innovation Ministry. 'We used a hackathon concept to introduce students to AI in healthcare through hands-on activities and group mentoring. 'The goal is not just to give them knowledge, but the confidence and curiosity to explore STEM careers, especially medicine,' said OHSC adviser Dr Zulkhairul Naim Sidek Ahmad. Hackathons are collaborative events where participants work intensely on projects over a short period. For this camp, the students engaged in team-based projects mentored by professionals, culminating in interactive presentations. They also learned how technology is shaping the future of healthcare. At the closing ceremony, UMS Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty deputy dean Dr Mohammad Firdaus Bolong said the programme aimed to ensure that 'no child, no matter where they are, is left behind in the science and technology wave.' 'STEM education is not just about knowledge, but about building critical, creative and innovative thinking. We must reach out to rural communities and equip them to be part of our nation's future,' he said. "We learned so many new things, especially how technology can help in healthcare," said camp participant Vivilleahlyn Majiman, from SMK Pinawantai. "It's opened my eyes to a whole new world – being a doctor sounds so futuristic now." The programme is seen as an example of how inclusive, creative learning can help bridge the education gap between urban and rural students, while igniting their dreams and potential. Also present were Kudat deputy Education officer Amiluddin Majuki and guest speaker Dr Aimi Shazwani Ghazali from the International Islamic University Malaysia.
