Latest news with #OhioLegislativeServiceCommission
Axios
25-02-2025
- Politics
- Axios
How schools are responding as Ohio's "bathroom bill" becomes law
Ohio is entering "complicated and unsettled" legal territory, policy experts say, as a new law takes effect Tuesday banning transgender students from bathrooms matching their gender identity. Why it matters: The controversial law once again puts schools in the middle of an ongoing culture war impacting transgender students' rights. The big picture: The law impacts K-12 schools and colleges, both public and private. K-12 leaders are "torn" and "looking for all kinds of advice," Patrick Corbett, senior adviser with Ohio-based school policy consulting firm Neola, tells Axios. One visible change: Some schools are replacing "all-gender" restroom signs with signs like "single-occupancy" or "family." The Ohio Legislative Service Commission estimates replacements will cost $30-100 per sign. If each of Ohio's over 3,500 public school buildings replaced just one apiece, that could total up to $350,000. Upper Arlington just spent $2,150 updating signs based on legal advice, a district spokesperson told Axios. But even signage can get complicated — a visiting girls sports team using a locker room labeled for boys would technically be illegal now, if its sign isn't swapped, Corbett notes. Zoom in: Local school boards, such as Columbus, have also been repealing or changing policies referencing transgender students. Districts have never been required to enact such policies and the new law doesn't change that. But policies that do exist must follow the law. Between the lines: The law doesn't specify any enforcement mechanisms or penalties, though Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has threatened"legal action" if districts don't comply. It appears to contradict "state and federal court decisions in Ohio and beyond that hold transgender students have a right to use the facilities that correspond to their gender identity," notes a Neola advisory. A case near Dayton is still pending. Friction point: The law says students can use their "official birth record … issued at or near the time of the individual's birth" to "prove biological sex," but doesn't say who would be responsible for questioning it. The Ohio Department of Education and Workforce directed Axios to a document that encourages school officials to consult with their legal counsel for further guidance. The document states concerns about potential violations can be reported to the State Board of Education's Office for Professional Conduct. What we're watching: Neola's advisory says it's "reasonable to assume the law will be challenged in court" and "lawsuits may be filed against school districts by parties on both sides." The bottom line: "Our clients all have the same questions: 'What happens if we follow the law?' You can get sued. 'What happens if we don't?' Well, you can get sued," Corbett says. What's happening in higher ed Central Ohio colleges and universities report few compliance issues with the new law, Axios reporting finds. By the numbers: There are more than 200,000 transgender college students across the country, according to Williams Institute research. State of play: We reached out to 13 Central Ohio colleges and universities to learn how they would comply with the law. Each that responded told us they were either already in compliance or are working toward compliance with signage changes. What they're saying: An Ohio State spokesperson says the school would follow the law and is "committed to a welcoming environment for all members of our community." Spokespeople from Central Ohio Technical College, Columbus State Community College, OSU Newark and Otterbein University told us their schools were also already in compliance. Capital University and Kenyon College are working to update signage to reach compliance. Students at the two schools will be allowed to explore other housing options if the law makes them uncomfortable in their current housing, spokespeople said. In addition, schools like COTC, Kenyon and Ohio State are directing students in need to counseling services offered by student life. Representatives from Columbus College of Art and Design, Franklin University, Hondros College of Nursing, Mount Carmel College of Nursing, Ohio Christian and Ohio Wesleyan did not reply. Zoom out: Outside of Central Ohio, some universities have experienced pushback. New "Biological men" and "Biological women" signs at University of Cincinnati bathrooms were torn down or covered with notes. Students and faculty at Antioch College and Oberlin College have objected to the schools' compliance.
Yahoo
29-01-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Bipartisan group of Ohio lawmakers offer new approach to repealing death penalty
State Rep. Jean Schmidt, R-Loveland speaking alongside state Reps. Adam Mathews, R-Lebanon, and state Sens. Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, Hearcel Craig, D-Columbus and Steve Huffman, R-Tipp City. (Photo by Nick Evans, Ohio Capital Journal.) Ohio lawmakers from both chambers and both sides of the aisle announced a measure Tuesday that would abolish the death penalty and prohibit any state funding from supporting abortion services or physician-assisted suicide. Ohio law already bars state funding from subsidizing abortion, and physician-assisted suicide isn't legal in Ohio. But the sponsors described their three-part approach as a statement of values bridging the gap between two very different political outlooks. The proposal's big tent approach to 'pro-life' mirrors the Catholic church's positioning on the idea, and representatives from the church were on hand to lend their support. Sponsors placed their greatest emphasis on ending the death penalty, but outside groups are criticizing lawmakers for connecting three different policy questions and warning the bill could undermine access to abortion care. State Rep. Jean Schmidt, R-Loveland, described how she previously supported the death penalty when she served in the Ohio legislature 20 years ago. What changed her mind was a book written by former Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro. A few years ago, he co-wrote an op-ed with former Governor Bob Taft and former Attorney General Lee Fisher urging lawmakers to repeal the death penalty, explaining the punishment is expensive, ineffective, and unjust. Schmidt framed her current stance as a question of human dignity. 'Abortion, the death penalty, and assisted suicide all undermine the commitment to human dignity,' she argued. 'To be consistent with our pro-life principles, we must oppose all three. Schmidt argued that all three proposals support the affirmation of life. 'Our legislation will make sure that the state of Ohio does not fund death and preserves tax dollars for alternatives which promote life,' she argued. 'Our commitment to protecting human life must be unwavering; prohibiting state funding for abortion, assisted suicide, and the death penalty creates a consistent, life-affirming ethic that upholds the dignity of life.' Across the aisle, meanwhile, state Sen. Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, focused on practical resources. 'Abolishing the death penalty is pragmatic,' she argued. 'According to the Ohio Legislative Service Commission, abolishing the practice could save the state between $128 and $384 million. Can you imagine what kinds of proactive policies we could do with that?' Even as she insisted 'the time to abolish Ohio's death penalty is now — it has been for a long time,' she didn't point to a particular ideal, but rather shifting political winds. The new Trump administration wants to re-start capital punishment at the federal level and just last year lawmakers in Ohio proposed alternative methods to jumpstart executions. 'We stand here today, progressive Democrats and conservative Republican colleagues,' Antonio said. 'We may use different language to explain where we stand on the spectrum of our beliefs, but we agree that there is a moral imperative to end the use of the death penalty in the state of Ohio.' Schmidt and Antonio were joined by state Rep. Adam Mathews, R-Lebanon, and state Sens. Hearcel Craig, D-Columbus and Steve Huffman, R-Tipp City. They're still hammering out the final text of the legislation, although Mathews, in particular, noted they would draft it to ensure the proposal is not 'severable' — i.e. a court can't remove one aspect of the legislation after the fact and leave the other provisions in effect. Although the measure's sponsors indicated they've lined up several more lawmakers ready to sign on to their bill, they'll face an uphill climb. Antonio backed a death penalty repeal with Huffman last session, and Schmidt sponsored companion legislation in the House. Neither bill cleared its committee. Ohio House holds first hearing for new nitrogen gas death penalty method Meanwhile, state Reps. Brian Stewart, R-Ashville, and Phil Plummer, R-Dayton, sponsored a bill last year allowing executions to go forward using a process known as nitrogen hypoxia. 'Well look, I mean, I fundamentally disagree with the premise,' Stewart said of the proposal eliminating the death penalty and blocking funding for abortion or physician-assisted suicide. 'I don't think there's support in the state,' he continued, 'or certainly in the Republican caucus, for eliminating the death penalty.' Stewart plans to reintroduce the nitrogen hypoxia bill, and like Antonio, he brought up the new presidential administration. 'This week, President Trump introduced an executive order that I think puts the federal government squarely in favor of the death penalty,' he argued, 'not only at the federal level, but it actually directs the entire federal apparatus to support states in obtaining lethal injection drugs and in preserving laws that enable capital punishment in all the states.' The proposal also got pushback from the Ohio chapters of the ACLU and Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood Executive Director Lauren Blauvelt called the measure 'anti-democratic' and argued it shows 'how low out of touch politicians will go to taint popular legislation with abortion stigma.' 'The sad reality is that what should have been a focused effort to end the death penalty in Ohio devolved into yet another anti-abortion spectacle,' Blauvelt said. 'We can end the death penalty without sacrificing the gains we made for reproductive freedom. While ending the death penalty in Ohio has been long overdue, conservative politicians have added unconstitutional abortion restrictions as a Trojan horse allowing our government to dictate our personal health care decisions.' In a joint statement, ACLU of Ohio Legal Director Freda Levenson and Policy Director Jocelyn Rosnick blasted the bill for 'manipulatively interweav(ing)' unrelated issues and expressed disappointment given what they see as progress building a coalition in opposition to the death penalty. 'Our organization has maintained an anti-death penalty stance since our founding,' they said, 'but this 'bait and switch' bill is a wolf in sheep's clothing, slyly designed to limit how public funds can be used for abortion care and coverage. Furthermore, supporting death with dignity is a longstanding ACLU principle.' The sponsors insisted that nothing in their bill would violate the reproductive rights amendment approved by voters in 2023, but the ACLU isn't so sure. In particular, they worry the blanket prohibition on state funding could wind up denying access to abortion medications. 'This proposed legislation violates the Ohio Constitution by deliberately undercutting the Reproductive Freedom Amendment,' they warned. 'Should this bill pass, litigation is not off the table.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
