logo
How schools are responding as Ohio's "bathroom bill" becomes law

How schools are responding as Ohio's "bathroom bill" becomes law

Axios25-02-2025

Ohio is entering "complicated and unsettled" legal territory, policy experts say, as a new law takes effect Tuesday banning transgender students from bathrooms matching their gender identity.
Why it matters: The controversial law once again puts schools in the middle of an ongoing culture war impacting transgender students' rights.
The big picture: The law impacts K-12 schools and colleges, both public and private.
K-12 leaders are "torn" and "looking for all kinds of advice," Patrick Corbett, senior adviser with Ohio-based school policy consulting firm Neola, tells Axios.
One visible change: Some schools are replacing "all-gender" restroom signs with signs like "single-occupancy" or "family."
The Ohio Legislative Service Commission estimates replacements will cost $30-100 per sign. If each of Ohio's over 3,500 public school buildings replaced just one apiece, that could total up to $350,000.
Upper Arlington just spent $2,150 updating signs based on legal advice, a district spokesperson told Axios.
But even signage can get complicated — a visiting girls sports team using a locker room labeled for boys would technically be illegal now, if its sign isn't swapped, Corbett notes.
Zoom in: Local school boards, such as Columbus, have also been repealing or changing policies referencing transgender students.
Districts have never been required to enact such policies and the new law doesn't change that. But policies that do exist must follow the law.
Between the lines: The law doesn't specify any enforcement mechanisms or penalties, though Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has threatened"legal action" if districts don't comply.
It appears to contradict "state and federal court decisions in Ohio and beyond that hold transgender students have a right to use the facilities that correspond to their gender identity," notes a Neola advisory. A case near Dayton is still pending.
Friction point: The law says students can use their "official birth record … issued at or near the time of the individual's birth" to "prove biological sex," but doesn't say who would be responsible for questioning it.
The Ohio Department of Education and Workforce directed Axios to a document that encourages school officials to consult with their legal counsel for further guidance.
The document states concerns about potential violations can be reported to the State Board of Education's Office for Professional Conduct.
What we're watching: Neola's advisory says it's "reasonable to assume the law will be challenged in court" and "lawsuits may be filed against school districts by parties on both sides."
The bottom line: "Our clients all have the same questions: 'What happens if we follow the law?' You can get sued. 'What happens if we don't?' Well, you can get sued," Corbett says.
What's happening in higher ed
Central Ohio colleges and universities report few compliance issues with the new law, Axios reporting finds.
By the numbers: There are more than 200,000 transgender college students across the country, according to Williams Institute research.
State of play: We reached out to 13 Central Ohio colleges and universities to learn how they would comply with the law.
Each that responded told us they were either already in compliance or are working toward compliance with signage changes.
What they're saying: An Ohio State spokesperson says the school would follow the law and is "committed to a welcoming environment for all members of our community."
Spokespeople from Central Ohio Technical College, Columbus State Community College, OSU Newark and Otterbein University told us their schools were also already in compliance.
Capital University and Kenyon College are working to update signage to reach compliance.
Students at the two schools will be allowed to explore other housing options if the law makes them uncomfortable in their current housing, spokespeople said.
In addition, schools like COTC, Kenyon and Ohio State are directing students in need to counseling services offered by student life.
Representatives from Columbus College of Art and Design, Franklin University, Hondros College of Nursing, Mount Carmel College of Nursing, Ohio Christian and Ohio Wesleyan did not reply.
Zoom out: Outside of Central Ohio, some universities have experienced pushback.
New "Biological men" and "Biological women" signs at University of Cincinnati bathrooms were torn down or covered with notes.
Students and faculty at Antioch College and Oberlin College have objected to the schools' compliance.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say
Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say

By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The State Department is weighing giving $500 million to the new foundation providing aid to war-shattered Gaza, according to two knowledgeable sources and two former U.S. officials, a move that would involve the U.S. more deeply in a controversial aid effort that has been beset by violence and chaos. The sources and former U.S. officials, all of whom requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that money for Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is being folded into the U.S. State Department. The plan has met resistance from some U.S. officials concerned with the deadly shootings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality, began distributing aid last week amid warnings that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade, which was lifted on May 19 when limited deliveries were allowed to resume. The foundation has seen senior personnel quit and had to pause handouts twice this week after crowds overwhelmed its distribution hubs. The State Department and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters has been unable to establish who is currently funding the GHF operations, which began in Gaza last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to transport aid into Gaza for distribution at so-called secure distribution sites. On Thursday, Reuters reported that a Chicago-based private equity firm, McNally Capital, has an "economic interest" in the for-profit U.S. contractor overseeing the logistics and security of GHF's aid distribution hubs in the enclave. While U.S. President Donald Trump's administration and Israel say they don't finance the GHF operation, both have been pressing the United Nations and international aid groups to work with it. The U.S. and Israel argue that aid distributed by a long-established U.N. aid network was diverted to Hamas. Hamas has denied that. USAID has been all but dismantled. Some 80 percent of its programs have been canceled and its staff face termination as part of President Donald Trump's drive to align U.S. foreign policy with his "America First" agenda. One source with knowledge of the matter and one former senior official said the proposal to give the $500 million to GHF has been championed by acting deputy USAID Administrator Ken Jackson, who has helped oversee the agency's dismemberment. The source said that Israel requested the funds to underwrite GHF's operations for 180 days. The Israeli government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two sources said that some U.S. officials have concerns with the plan because of the overcrowding that has affected the aid distribution hubs run by GHF's contractor, and violence nearby. Those officials also want well-established non-governmental organizations experienced in running aid operations in Gaza and elsewhere to be involved in the operation if the State Department approves the funds for GHF, a position that Israel likely will oppose, the sources said. Gaza hospital officials have said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near GHF's distribution points between June 1-3. Since launching its operation, the GHF has opened three hubs, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. Witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" advancing towards their positions.

Trump Is Bleeding Hundreds of Millions Thanks to Musk's War
Trump Is Bleeding Hundreds of Millions Thanks to Musk's War

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Is Bleeding Hundreds of Millions Thanks to Musk's War

The explosion of Donald Trump's once-cozy friendship with Elon Musk is hitting them hard where it hurts most—in the pocketbook. As reported Thursday, Musk's personal fortune was cut by $26.6 billion after Tesla shares slumped by more than 14 percent, wiping a mind-boggling $150 billion off the EV giant's market value. But Trump isn't escaping unscathed. According to Axios, Trump Media & Technology Group stock declined 8 percent, while his MAGA-fueled $TRUMP cryptocurrency tumbled 12 percent—bleeding him of more than a billion dollars. The website reported that the 8 percent dip in Trump Media & Technology Group cost the president around $202 million. But he may be more concerned by the roughly 10 percent decline in the value of of his Official Trump meme coin, potentially costing him nearly $900 million. As Axios noted: 'Both men got to vent their frustrations publicly, and it only cost them about $21 billion.' The dramatic split was triggered when Musk, having departed his DOGE post on May 30, torched Trump's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill'—a sprawling tax-and-spending package—as a 'disgusting abomination.' Musk, who had personally poured nearly $300 million into Republican campaigns in 2024, tweeted: 'Without me, Trump would have lost.' After an uncharacteristic delay, Trump hit back—threatening to strip federal contracts from Musk's companies, which would kill electric vehicle tax credits and cost Tesla $1.2 billion this year, according to JPMorgan analysts. Musk then pressed the nuclear button by alleging Trump's name appears in sealed legal files on the late pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. He also called for Trump's impeachment, responding 'yes' to a user on X who wrote: 'Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.' However, a truce may be on the horizon, as Trump and Musk are expected to speak in person on Friday, according to Politico's White House Bureau Chief Dasha Burns. Perhaps, as the old adage goes, money really does talk.

White House Aides Blame Trump Loyalist for Fueling Musk Feud
White House Aides Blame Trump Loyalist for Fueling Musk Feud

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

White House Aides Blame Trump Loyalist for Fueling Musk Feud

President Donald Trump's feud with Elon Musk shows no sign of abating, and inside the MAGA machine the knives are out for one of the president's closest aides. Axios reported that furious Trump advisers are pointing the finger at Sergio Gor, the president's personnel chief and longtime family loyalist, for pushing Trump to torpedo Musk's top choice to lead NASA, billionaire entrepreneur and astronaut Jared Isaacman. According to the advisers, Isaacman's rejection for the role had to do with his previous donations to Democratic organizations, as was previously reported. Yet the advisers said it was Gor in particular who repeatedly opposed the nomination to Trump behind the scenes—sealing the decision to pull Isaacman's nomination. Gor—who co-founded a publishing venture with Donald Trump Jr.—reportedly oversees key loyalty tests for the Trump administration's hires and is known for ruthlessly protecting Trump's interests. He reportedly 'spun up the president' against Isaacman 'by just constantly mentioning the donations,' a Trump adviser told Axios. In a Wednesday interview with the 'All-In Podcast‚' Isaacman appeared to mention Gor as the 'influential adviser' who had Trump's ear while reviewing his associations. He also suggested that his relationship with Musk didn't do him any favors as changes were being made in the White House. 'I'm not going to play dumb on this—I don't think timing was much of a coincidence… there were other changes going on the same day,' said Isaacman. He added, 'The President's got to make a call and move on.' Trump announced in a May 31 Truth Social post that he was withdrawing Isaacman's nomination days before he was set to be confirmed by the Senate, the Associated Press (AP) reported. He added that the withdrawal came after a 'thorough review' of Isaacman's 'prior associations' and he will soon 'announce a new Nominee who will be Mission aligned, and put America First in Space.' On Thursday, taking press questions in the Oval Office, Trump suggested pulling Isaacman's nomination was one of many reasons Musk was 'upset' and torching him online. Musk even threatened to pull SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft from NASA missions before awkwardly backpedaling, AP reported. Meanwhile, both men have seen their stock portfolios take major hits amid the escalating drama. Axios quoted White House communications director Steven Cheung saying in a written statement that Gor 'is a vital member of the team and he has helped President Trump put together an administration that is second to none.' The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House for a response.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store