logo
#

Latest news with #PVOAct

Amendments to the voluntary organisations Act threatens civic space in Zimbabwe
Amendments to the voluntary organisations Act threatens civic space in Zimbabwe

Mail & Guardian

time27-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Mail & Guardian

Amendments to the voluntary organisations Act threatens civic space in Zimbabwe

Oppression: Zimbabwe's President Emmerson Mnangagwa. Photo: Natalia Fedosenko/Pool/Reuters In a nation where democratic space is already under suffocating pressure, Zimbabwe's new Private Voluntary Organisations (Amendment) Act, 2024 (PVO Act) arrives cloaked in the language of reform yet carries the sharp edges of state control. This is not merely a bureaucratic adjustment but a calculated move in a broader campaign to consolidate power and stifle dissent. Some justify the law as complying with the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) Recommendation 8, which seeks to protect nonprofit organisations from being exploited for terrorist financing. But this justification rings hollow when viewed in context. The FATF explicitly cautions against overregulation and insists that any countermeasures be risk-based and proportionate. Zimbabwe's approach fails on both counts. Rather than identifying high-risk entities through a transparent process, the Act casts suspicion on all civil society organisations indiscriminately. The law requires all organisations engaged in public fundraising or receiving foreign support to register under a new regulatory regime. It grants the registrar of private voluntary organisations and the minister extensive powers to deny, suspend, or cancel registration based on vaguely defined criteria such as 'public interest', 'public morality' or the 'economic interests of the state'. These catch-all phrases have historically been used to suppress activism and silence whistleblowers. This issue extends beyond mere compliance; it is fundamentally about control. The new law also authorises government interference in NGO governance, including the power to remove elected boards and appoint trustees who would likely be loyal to the state. The implications are vast. Imagine an organisation offering legal aid to victims of political violence or a charity advocating for the rights of LGBTQ+ people. Under the new rules, such entities could be shuttered overnight based on nothing more than bureaucratic discretion. We have already glimpsed this future. The recent imprisonment of prominent journalist Blessing Mhlanga for investigative reporting reflects the trajectory Zimbabwe is on. Mhlanga was not promoting instability or inciting violence. He was doing what journalists are meant to do: holding the powerful to account through offering a platform to a political dissident. His arrest signals a government increasingly intolerant of any form of oversight or scrutiny, and the PVO Act places NGOs in the same line of fire. These measures are not only anti-democratic but also anti-development. Civil society organisations play a crucial role in Zimbabwe, particularly in addressing gaps left by an under-resourced state. They operate health clinics, educate vulnerable populations and advocate for the rights of women, children and minority groups. Curtailing their work under the pretext of anti-terrorism is not only legally dubious but morally indefensible. International best practice presents a different model. South Africa's nonprofit law permits voluntary registration and ensures civil society can operate without unwarranted state interference. Although not yet fully implemented, Kenya's Public Benefit Organisations Act was developed through extensive consultation and includes legal safeguards against political misuse. Even Zambia, once notorious for its restrictive NGO laws, has recently reduced many of its excesses. The Private Voluntary Organisations (Amendment) Act contradicts Zimbabwe's constitutional commitments and its obligations under international human rights law. section 58 of Zimbabwe's Constitution guarantees freedom of association, while section 61 protects freedom of expression. These rights are reiterated in Article 10 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, to which Zimbabwe is a signatory. The Southern Africa Litigation Centre, working across the region and with the Global Campaign to Decriminalise Poverty and Status, has witnessed the devastating consequences of overregulation. In countries where civic space is stifled, human rights violations go unchallenged, corruption flourishes, and ordinary people suffer in silence. The government of Zimbabwe still has a choice. It can repeal or significantly revise the PVO Amendment Act and adopt a regulatory framework that genuinely enhances transparency while respecting constitutional freedoms. Alternatively, it can continue along a path that further isolates it from international partners and undermines its development objectives. The international community must not remain silent. Donors, multilateral institutions, and regional bodies must demand reforms that align with democratic norms. The FATF must clarify that its standards are being misused when governments adopt laws that criminalise legitimate civic engagement. Zimbabwe does not need another tool for repression. It requires institutions that foster trust, governance frameworks that enable participation and laws that reflect the values of freedom and accountability. The PVO Amendment Act is not a step forward; it is a leap backwards. Blessing Mhlanga should not be facing charges for doing his job, NGOs should not operate in fear, and Zimbabweans should not have to choose between their rights and their safety. The world is watching. And Zimbabwe must decide whether it wants to be a democracy in practice or just in name. Melusi Simelane is the civic rights cluster lead at the .

Zimbabwe government challenged in court over new PVO law
Zimbabwe government challenged in court over new PVO law

eNCA

time26-05-2025

  • Politics
  • eNCA

Zimbabwe government challenged in court over new PVO law

HARARE - Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights is challenging the government in the High Court in an attempt to repeal a new law. In April, Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa signed the Private Voluntary Organisation Bill into law. The legal body says the PVO law will criminalise legitimate developmental human rights work. The PVO Act allows the government to monitor the operations of all civil society organisations and NGOs and their funding sources. Speaking in parliament recently, Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi said the law aims to curb NGOs involved in political activities.

EU suspends governance funding to Zimbabwe after signing of controversial PVO law
EU suspends governance funding to Zimbabwe after signing of controversial PVO law

Zawya

time15-04-2025

  • Business
  • Zawya

EU suspends governance funding to Zimbabwe after signing of controversial PVO law

The law, gazetted Friday as Act No. 1 of 2025, introduces sweeping changes to Zimbabwe's regulatory framework for civic groups and non-governmental organizations. It amends five major pieces of legislation, including the PVO Act [Chapter 17:05], the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act, and the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act. Under the new law, authorities are granted broad powers to monitor and control the operations of private voluntary organizations. It allows the government to scrutinize ownership structures, funding sources and affiliations, and introduces stricter definitions of 'beneficial owner' and 'controller.' Individuals found guilty of offenses related to illicit financing or misrepresentation could face lengthy prison sentences. The legislation also empowers the government to deregister organizations, seize assets or dissolve entities that breach the new provisions. A newly established PVO Board — comprising representatives from civil society and various ministries — will oversee enforcement. Human rights groups and international observers, including the United Nations, have condemned the law, warning that it could be used to suppress dissent and target organizations that challenge government policy or expose corruption. Government officials say the changes are necessary to combat terrorism financing and money laundering. In a post Saturday on X, formerly Twitter, EU Ambassador to Zimbabwe Jobst von Kirchmann said the enactment of the law, without concluding consultations with civil society, undermines Zimbabwe's commitments under an ongoing debt resolution and reform process. 'Zimbabwe has over USD 21 billion in debt and arrears with bilateral and multilateral creditors,' von Kirchmann said. 'Several years ago, the Government of Zimbabwe initiated a commendable arrears clearance and debt resolution process. It is disappointing to see that Zimbabwe has not upheld its own commitments under this process, particularly regarding the expansion of civic space.' 'The enactment of the PVO Amendment Bill, without concluding consultations to address the concerns of civil society organizations, has further reinforced negative trends in governance. As a consequence, the European Union has decided to discontinue its planned targeted 2025 funding in support of the government's good governance initiatives under the structured dialogue framework.' he added. The EU said it remains open to reconsidering its position if the Zimbabwean government shows genuine commitment to meeting its governance obligations. © Copyright The Zimbabwean. All rights reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store