Zimbabwe government challenged in court over new PVO law
HARARE - Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights is challenging the government in the High Court in an attempt to repeal a new law.
In April, Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa signed the Private Voluntary Organisation Bill into law.
The legal body says the PVO law will criminalise legitimate developmental human rights work.
The PVO Act allows the government to monitor the operations of all civil society organisations and NGOs and their funding sources.
Speaking in parliament recently, Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi said the law aims to curb NGOs involved in political activities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
14 South Africans held in Zimbabwean jails
HARARE - At least 14 South Africans are being held in Zimbabwean jails. They are among over 70 foreign nationals behind bars in the country, the majority for crossing the border illegally. The Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission says these people should be deported and not held. During a visit to the Harare Remand and Chikurubi Maximum Security prisons recently, the commission exposed inhumane conditions. It's calling for an urgent intervention. The commission inspected the Harare Remand and Chikurubi Maximum Security prisons. It found inhumane conditions, lack of access to education, healthcare and delays in legal proceedings. But, the commission also found dozens of undocumented migrants. The ZHRC says these people should be deported and not held in these jails. Human rights lawyers are calling for the swift implementation of all the commission's findings.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Comrades demands grit but so does the courtroom
Advocate Charles Mnisi's request to miss court after the Comrades Marathon sparked debate on balancing personal ambition with professional and ethical obligations. Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng put his foot squarely in it yesterday in the High Court in Pretoria when he went on a tirade about a request from a defence lawyer in the Senzo Meyiwa trial to be excused from court on Monday because he is running the Comrades Marathon on Sunday. After angrily speaking about 'justice delayed is justice denied' in a case in which family members have been waiting for closure for a decade, Mokgoatlheng fumed: 'This is what happens in a South Africa run by blacks. A white advocate will never have the gall to ask me that.' While many took offence at what one of them, Good party's Brett Heron, called 'racially divisive language', which is 'entirely unacceptable', I was more intrigued about the fact that a senior advocate, Charles Mnisi, would have thought that taking part in the annual KZN athletic spectacle was more important that defending an accused in a murder case. I wondered, initially, whether advocates have to swear an oath, similar to the Hippocratic one taken by doctors, to act at all times in the best interests of their clients and the legal system. Then I thought about it a little more. Mnisi was, after all, asking to be excused from attending court on Monday, which would be a recovery day and not race day itself. ALSO READ: 'This is what happens in a SA run by blacks': Senzo Meyiwa trial judge fires off explosive rant He said he was planning to drive back to Johannesburg after the race and, obviously, would not make it in time. Now, as an advocate who presumably gets paid a decent whack for his time, I ask; could he not have afforded to fly back to Gauteng, either late on Sunday night or early on Monday morning? As someone who has five Comrades marathons under my belt (although many years ago now), I do remember the post-race agony. That post-race agony for me, I remember, was made worse by hobbling down the aircraft steps at the then Jan Smuts airport on one occasion. That hobbling – everybody knew what it was caused by – was worn as a badge of honour, though. What an entrance to court it would have made had Mnisi got back in time and hobbled in on Monday morning and asked for the court's indulgence for his gait, by explaining to the judge that he had just travelled 90km on foot from Pietermaritzburg to Durban but that, while his legs may be hurting, his mind was ready for the fight… ALSO READ: Meyiwa trial becomes a courtroom spectacle without justice Completing the Comrades is, for all entrants, a triumph of mind over matter because human bodies are simply not made for that sort of effort. Will power and not muscle power gets you over the finish line. I do realise that many runners put their lives on hold for the first half of any given year in getting ready for the race. I know I did. Job, family, friends all took a back seat to joining the '100 Club' (100 miles, or 160km, in one training week). But I never missed a commitment – or ducked work – because I was a runner. If you can commit yourself to finishing the Annual Pilgrimage to the Shrine of Pain, surely you can suffer a little more discomfort on a recovery day to honour a professional appointment? The Comrades Marathon – the gruelling training, the arduous competition itself and the agony of recovery – is not for sissies. It's a quest you can't walk, or hobble, away from. Pretty much the same as life in general. NOW READ: 'No proper investigation was done': Defence frustrated over missing evidence in Senzo Meyiwa murder trial
The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
Creecy intervenes in Acsa baggage screening services dispute
The dispute has resulted in multiple review applications, interdictory proceedings, and related appeal proceedings in the High Court. ACS provides baggage services on behalf of airlines operating at Acsa-managed airports. Picture: iStock Transport Minister Barbara Creecy has directed the Airports Company South Africa (Acsa) board to enter mediation with the firm responsible for baggage handling services at its airports. This comes after Acsa and the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) suffered a legal blow last month in their battle with Aviation Co-ordination Services (ACS) to take control of hold baggage control screening (HBS). Legal battles The Gauteng High Court dismissed the urgent appeal by Acsa and SACAA, which barred it from bidding for or purchasing baggage screening equipment. The court judgment upholds the High Court's order of 5 November 2024, requiring Acsa and SACAA to allow ACS to replace the relevant equipment at OR Tambo and King Shaka International Airports while a main review case is still before the courts. It confirmed that the critical replacement of old hold baggage screening (HBS) equipment may proceed at the international airports, which is needed to ensure public safety and airport efficiency. The dispute has resulted in multiple review applications, interdictory proceedings, and related appeal proceedings in the High Court. Creecy's ministerial orders issued on Thursday empower the minister to take necessary steps to safeguard national security where a risk to critical infrastructure, public safety, or the national interest has been identified. ALSO READ: Acsa loses appeal for control of baggage screening services at major airports 'Negative impact' The minister said she is concerned about the 'negative impact' the protracted litigation could have on the integrity and reliability of HBS as the first line of defence against threats in the aviation system at Acsa's airports. 'In this regard, I am satisfied that intervention is necessary to prevent potential disruption, compromise of national security, and reputational harm. 'As such, my engagements with the Acsa board have, in the main, related to finding a solution to resolve the dispute amicably and timeously to obviate any destabilisation of an essential national security function,' said Creecy. ALSO READ: Acsa interdicted from adjudicating and awarding R3bn tender Terms of reference Creecy ordered the board to finalise and execute a mediation agreement which contains the following terms of reference: The implementation of interim measures relating to the maintenance regime and whether ACS / ACSA can or should install any HBS maintenance-related equipment, including the back-up HBS units. The dispute pertaining to ACS, which is responsible for the provision of the HBS and interrelated services, will be addressed at the mediation. The provision of service of HBS and its maintenance, compliance with the applicable regulatory frameworks, budgetary and fiscal constraints, the safety of passengers who use ACSA's airports, potential revision of agreements, and the commercial relations between the parties. Negotiate, during the mediation proceedings, must be in good faith as the legal prescripts require that parties to the mediation act in the best interests of national security. Prepare and submit a comprehensive report within two weeks, setting out the total costs incurred in relation to the dispute to date. This report must include a detailed breakdown of all the legal fees, disbursements, and any other associated expenses borne by the State. Mediation ACS CEO Duke Phahla welcomed the ministerial order announced by Creecy 'We strongly believe that the current challenges can be resolved without further delay or public expenditure through the courts. Our priority is, and always has been, the safe, secure, and compliant screening of baggage on behalf of our airline clients and their passengers. 'We enter this process in the spirit of collaboration and transparency. We look forward to engaging with Acsa and the Department of Transport to find an outcome that protects the integrity of South Africa's aviation security systems,' said Phahla. ACS was established by the airline industry to provide HBS services on behalf of airlines operating at ACSA-managed airports. NOW READ: Acsa wants a look over in fight over baggage screening services
