Latest news with #PacificConservationBiology
Fox News
21-04-2025
- Politics
- Fox News
Liberal Outlets Demonize Man's Best Friend
Liberal outlets dub dogs as 'environmental villains!' Here we go again! I'm Tomi Lahren, more next. Climate change zealots are the worst! They suck the joy and fun out of everything but now they've taken it too far because they're coming after man's best friend. Yes, according to research circulated by The Guardian and Mother Jones, dogs are environmental villains that have 'extensive and multifarious' environmental impacts that disturb other wildlife, pollute waterways, and contribute to carbon emissions. A review published in the journal Pacific Conservation Biology suggests that dogs, the world's 'commonest large carnivores' have an especially dangerous impact on shore birds like penguins. Other studies suggest insecticides from flea and tick medications kill aquatic invertebrates. Look, this may all very well be true but newsflash to these science nuts, humans love dogs and we will never give them up or stop owning them because you claim they are bad. It's not going to happen! So research all you want, we don't care! I'm Tomi Lahren and you watch my show 'Tomi Lahren is Fearless' at Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Fox News
16-04-2025
- General
- Fox News
Liberal outlets say dogs are actually bad for the environment
Woof. Mother Jones republished an article from fellow progressive outlet The Guardian on Saturday that argued that while dogs may be man's best friend, they're Mother Nature's "villains." The left-wing magazine highlighted new research, originally published by The Guardian, that concluded dogs have "extensive and multifarious" environmental impacts, disturbing wildlife, polluting waterways and contributing to carbon emissions. It pinpointed how canines are disturbing native wildlife, particularly shore birds. An Australian review of existing studies published in Pacific Conservation Biology analyzed dog attacks on other animals, finding that it may account for the colony collapse of little penguins in Tasmania, while a study of animals taken to the Australia Zoo wildlife hospital found that mortality was highest after dog attacks. In the U.S., the report continued, studies have found that deer, foxes and bobcats were less active in or avoid wilderness areas where dogs were allowed. Other intel showed that insecticides from flea and tick medications kill aquatic invertebrates when they wash off into waterways. Dog feces, meanwhile, can leave scent traces and affect soil chemistry and plant growth. A canine's carbon footprint is also "significant," according to the study. A 2020 study found the dry pet food industry had an environmental footprint that is around twice the land area of the UK, with greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to the 60th highest-emitting country. The owners of furry friends weren't particularly impressed by the dog doom deep dive. They united in ripping the Mother Jones report on X, with several users responding with photos of their own beloved dogs or wondering if a rival animal wrote it. "Did… a cat write this?" columnist Tim Carney asked. Others wondered why the liberal outlet was trying to unearth the bad in what is considered a universally beloved animal. "Is there any enjoyable part of life these insufferable kill joys won't attack?" The Young Turks host Ana Kasparian wondered. "First environmentalists came for cows and people said nothing. Now they want to sacrifice dogs to save the planet? Not a winning message by the net-zero crowd, whose track record is notoriously bad," Gabriella Hoffman, Energy & Conservation Director for the Independent Women's Forum Center, said. The study suggested that a way to tamp down on dogs' environmental impact is to "keep them leashed in areas where restrictions apply and to maintain a buffer distance from nesting or roosting shorebirds." The review's lead author, Prof Bill Bateman of Curtin University, perhaps anticipating backlash from pet owners, said the research did not intend to be "censorious" but aimed to raise awareness of the environmental impacts of man's best friend, according to Mother Jones. "Although we've pointed out these issues with dogs in natural environments… there is that other balancing side, which is that people will probably go out and really enjoy the environment around them — and perhaps feel more protective about it — because they're out there walking their dog in it," he said. Fox News Digital reached out to Mother Jones for comment.
Yahoo
12-04-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
New Research Finds That Dogs Are Incredibly Horrible
Bad news for people who love good puppers: pet dogs seem, per an unsettling new study, to be astonishingly bad for the environment. In an interview with The Guardian, the lead author of a wide-ranging review of canine environmental effects suggested that pet dogs may be as harmful to their surroundings as their much-maligned brethren, housecats. "To a certain extent, we give a free pass to dogs because they are so important to us," Bill Bateman of Australia's Curtin University told the newspaper, "not just as working dogs but also as companions." Though there has been far less research about pet dogs as environmental threats compared to similar research about cats, the studies that do exist paint a pretty stark picture. As Bateman and his colleagues found when compiling their literature review, which was published in the journal Pacific Conservation Biology, dogs are not only one of the world's most ubiquitous predators, but also one of the deadliest. "As the commonest large carnivore in the world, the environmental impacts of owned dogs are extensive and multifarious," Curtin University's press release reads. "They are implicated in direct killing and disturbance of multiple species, particularly shore birds." Beyond problematic hunting behaviors, the mere scent of dogs changes the behavior of animals that come into contact with their essence long after the canines depart — and that's not even counting their fetid waste that many owners just leave smeared all over public spaces. "Studies have found that animals like deer, foxes, and bobcats in the US are less active or completely avoid areas where dogs are regularly walked, even in the absence of the dogs," Bateman said in Curtin's press release about the new research. "Dog waste also contributes to pollution in waterways and inhibits plant growth," he continued, "while wash-off from chemical treatments used to clean and guard dogs from parasites can add toxic compounds to aquatic environments." It sucks to discover that man's best friend is also a big-time polluter — but as Bateman told The Guardian, he and his colleagues didn't undertake their research to be "censorious." "Although we've pointed out these issues with dogs in natural environments," he said, "there is that other balancing side, which is that people will probably go out and really enjoy the environment around them — and perhaps feel more protective about it — because they're out there walking their dog in it." Training one's dogs not to hunt and using less toxic cleaning products, Bateman had a simple trick that can help dog owners feel better about their polluting pets. "If nothing else," he noted, "pick up your own dog shit." More on pet projects: We Talked to the Inventors of the "Tamagotchi" Vape That Dies If You Stop Puffing
The Guardian
09-04-2025
- Science
- The Guardian
Pet dogs have ‘extensive and multifarious' impact on environment, new research finds
Dogs have 'extensive and multifarious' environmental impacts, disturbing wildlife, polluting waterways and contributing to carbon emissions, new research has found. An Australian review of existing studies has argued that 'the environmental impact of owned dogs is far greater, more insidious, and more concerning than is generally recognised'. While the environmental impact of cats is well known, the comparative effect of pet dogs has been poorly acknowledged, the researchers said. The review, published in the journal Pacific Conservation Biology, highlighted the impacts of the world's 'commonest large carnivore' in killing and disturbing native wildlife, particularly shore birds. In Australia, attacks by unrestrained dogs on little penguins in Tasmania may contribute to colony collapse, modelling suggests, while a study of animals taken to the Australia Zoo wildlife hospital found that mortality was highest after dog attacks, which was the second most common reason for admission after car strikes. In the US, studies have found that deer, foxes and bobcats were less active in or avoid wilderness areas where dogs were allowed, while other research shows that insecticides from flea and tick medications kill aquatic invertebrates when they wash off into waterways. Dog faeces can also leave scent traces and affect soil chemistry and plant growth. The carbon footprint of pets is also significant. A 2020 study found the dry pet food industry had an environmental footprint of around twice the land area of the UK, with greenhouse gas emissions – 56 to 151 Mt CO2 – equivalent to the 60th highest-emitting country. The review's lead author, Prof Bill Bateman of Curtin University, said the research did not intend to be 'censorious' but aimed to raise awareness of the environmental impacts of man's best friend, with whom humans' domestic relationship dates back several millennia. 'To a certain extent we give a free pass to dogs because they are so important to us … not just as working dogs but also as companions,' he said, pointing to the 'huge benefits' dogs had on their owners' mental and physical health. He also noted that dogs played vital roles in conservation work, such as in wildlife detection. 'Although we've pointed out these issues with dogs in natural environments … there is that other balancing side, which is that people will probably go out and really enjoy the environment around them – and perhaps feel more protective about it – because they're out there walking their dog in it.' Angelika von Sanden, a trauma therapist and the author of Sit Stay Grow: How Dogs Can Help You Worry Less and Walk into a Better Future, said she had observed that for many clients the companionship of a dog was often 'literally the only reason to survive, to get up, to still keep going'. 'It gives them a reason to get up, a reason to get out, a reason to move around and be in contact a little bit with the world outside,' she said. 'Dog owners can get a bad name if they are not aware of the surroundings they are in and of other people around them,' she noted. In the review, the researchers attributed the extent of the environmental impacts to the sheer number of dogs globally, as well as 'the lax or uninformed behaviour of dog owners'. A simple way to mitigate against the worst impacts was to keep dogs leashed in areas where restrictions apply and to maintain a buffer distance from nesting or roosting shorebirds, the paper suggested. 'A lot of what we're talking about can be ameliorated by owners' behaviour,' Bateman said, pointing out that low compliance with leash laws was a problem. 'Maybe, in some parts of the world, we actually need to consider some slightly more robust laws,' Bateman said, suggesting that dog exclusion zones may be more suitable in some areas. Bateman also raised sustainable dog food as an option to reduce a pet's environmental paw print, noting however that 'more sustainable dog food tends to cost more than the cheap dog food that we buy which has a higher carbon footprint'. 'If nothing else, pick up your own dog shit,' he said.
