Latest news with #PalestinianLiberation
Arab News
6 days ago
- General
- Arab News
Barred for Gaza speech, MIT grad becomes symbol of courage for Indian students
NEW DELHI: When Megha Vemuri denounced the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for ties to Israel's military, she was barred from the university's graduation — an incident that resonated in her ancestral India, where students say she inspires them to stand up for Palestinian liberation. The Indian-American class president of 2025, Vemuri addressed an MIT commencement ceremony last week. 'Right now, while we prepare to graduate and move forward with our lives, there are no universities left in Gaza. We are watching Israel try to wipe Palestine off the face of the earth. And it is a shame that MIT is a part of it,' she said, wearing a keffiyeh over her gown. Without naming Vemuri, the MIT said in a statement right after the event that the 'graduating senior' would not be permitted at the degree ceremony the next day. While the speech got her barred from campus, it soon gained global media attention. In India, Vemuri's ancestry put her in the media spotlight, at the same time drawing attention to Israel's ongoing deadly onslaught on Gaza — where, over the past year and a half, tens of thousands of people have been killed, critically wounded, and starved by Israel's daily attacks and aid blockades. 'A lot more of the Indian media covered it, and people get to know and hear what's happening … more and more people are realizing that this is not something you can be silent about,' Sreeja Dontireddy, a student at the English and Foreign Languages University in Hyderabad, told Arab News. 'I think what Megha Vemuri did was commendable and necessary at the same time … If you are given such a platform … and if you do not speak about Palestine, it would be a grave injustice.' Vemuri said in a statement to the media that she was not disappointed that she did not get to walk the stage with her classmates. 'For two entire graduation seasons, over two years now, thousands of bright Gazan students should have been able to walk across a stage and receive their diplomas. These students did not get to walk because Israel murdered them, displaced them from their homes, and destroyed their schools,' she said. 'I am, however, disappointed that MIT's officials massively overstepped their roles to punish me without merit or due process, with no indication of any specific policy broken. These repressive measures are proof that the university is guilty of aiding and abetting genocide … They want to distract from what is happening in Palestine and their role in it.' For Akriti Chaudhary and Himanshu Thakur, recent history graduates from Delhi University, their MIT peer's protest was something that inspired them to raise their voices more. 'Being a politically aware person, I feel really, really proud and really happy about people speaking up for the Palestinian cause,' Chaudhary said. 'It was difficult to digest the fact that she was barred from her own graduation ceremony … They want to curb all kinds of protest and all kinds of dissent. But it never works that way. It only inspires people to step in and talk about the situation.' It also inspires them to call things what they really are, 'to speak about (the Israeli) occupation, and to call a spade a spade, to call occupation an occupation,' Thakur added. 'We need more such voices to come forward, not only in the US but also in India … We need more Meghas in our campuses.' The opportunity created by Vemuri's MIT speech is also one for renewed momentum in activism in India. Priyambada, a physics student and coordinator of BDS India — a group advancing the global Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions campaign in the country — believes their efforts will be strengthened. 'How can you punish someone for speaking against genocide?' she said. 'This is giving strength to students across the world and giving us the opportunity to stand by Megha and Palestinian liberation … All colleges and universities, students from everywhere and people who believe in justice should come forward.'
The Guardian
24-05-2025
- Politics
- The Guardian
The Israeli embassy shooting was a stupid and horrific attack
The killing of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington DC on Wednesday night is unconscionable. The victims, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, should be alive, and justice must be meted out to their assailant. This brazen act of political violence in the heart of the nation's capital only underscores the obvious: all this violence – whether it's in Washington DC, Gaza, Jenin or Israel, and whether it's by bullet, bomb or forced starvation – all of it must end, and it must end immediately. What we know so far is that shortly after 9pm on Wednesday evening, a gunman approached a group of four people who were departing an event at the Capital Jewish Museum that had been hosted by the American Jewish Committee. (It's been reported that the event 'focused on bringing humanitarian aid to Gaza through Israeli-Palestinian and regional collaboration'.) The suspected gunman, identified in media accounts as 31-year-old Elias Rodriguez from Chicago, had been seen pacing outside the museum when he spotted the group of four leaving the building. He opened fire on the group, fatally wounding two at close range. He then entered the building, where he was detained by event security. He can be seen on video in handcuffs and chanting 'free, free Palestine'. Needless to say, criminal actions such as this reprehensible murder do not advance the cause of Palestinian liberation or anyone's freedom. This stupid and horrific act must be opposed not only for its immorality but also because the world needs to focus on pressuring Israel to end its blockade of Gaza and allow the flow of humanitarian aid into the besieged territory before tens of thousands of Palestinians – including 14,000 babies, according to the United Nations – die from forced starvation in the coming days. Already, the Israeli government is using the murder to wag its finger at Israel's critics and deflect from its own actions. In a press conference in Jerusalem, Gideon Sa'ar, the Israeli foreign minister, blamed 'leaders and officials of many countries and international organizations, especially from Europe' for inciting violence against Israel, incitement which he said led 'in a direct line … to this murder'. The idea that European leaders are directly responsible for this heinous murder is nothing short of ridiculous, of course. But it does show how nervous the Israeli government is about a new wave of criticism being directed against its assault on Gaza. Earlier, on 21 May, the UK development minister, Jenny Chapman, told the BBC that Israel is 'using hunger as a weapon of war' in Gaza. The foreign secretary, David Lammy, also called Israel's planned military escalation in Gaza 'morally unjustifiable, wholly disproportionate and utterly counterproductive', and Keir Starmer, the UK prime minister, recently stated that Britain 'cannot allow the people of Gaza to starve' and that levels of suffering in Gaza were 'utterly intolerable'. In addition, the UK has suspended free trade talks with Israel, and EU foreign ministers are reviewing the European Union's trade agreement with Israel over its blockading of food, water, medicine and other needed supplies for Gazans' survival. While these actions are welcome, they're also a case of too little, too late. And despite a partial UK arms embargo on Israel, the UK government still approved licenses for £127.6m of military equipment to Israel, more than the combined total for 2020-23, according to the group Campaign Against the Arms Trade. In other words, the violence is intensifying, enabled in part because those who arm Israel continue to do so. It's also expanding, and not just on to the streets of Washington DC. Consider what happened on the same day as the tragic killing of the Israeli embassy staffers. A delegation of diplomats representing 31 different countries were on an official mission to observe the humanitarian situation in the West Bank city of Jenin, which has also been under sustained assault by Israel for the last 120 days. The Israeli military shot towards the delegation of diplomats, and later claimed the group had 'deviated from the approved route'. Once upon a time, to be a diplomat meant you were afforded a certain amount of security, but those were times when we, perhaps naively, believed there were rules governing warfare. What do we have now? Shots fired as diplomats carry out their jobs. Food used as a weapon of war. Young embassy staffers assassinated in public. This killing must end. We all know it, just as we know that it must start with an immediate and permanent ceasefire, the return of all captives taken on 7 October and after, and the full resumption of aid into Gaza. The details of what happens in the medium and long term, for both Israelis and Palestinians, can and must be forged through honest dialogue and not by the mass displacement and extermination of the Palestinian people. But rather than heeding this lesson, we will likely witness in the days ahead an all-out push to discredit those who oppose Israel's military campaign, which has been labeled a genocide by multiple international human rights organizations, among many others. Israel's foreign minister has already started. In his press conference, Sa'ar claimed that it was the talk that Israel is committing 'genocide, crimes against humanity and murdering babies' that 'pave[s] the way exactly for such murders' as happened in Washington DC. But genocide, crimes against humanity and babies being killed are all happening, and millions are stating their loud opposition to Israeli actions without resorting to murderous political violence. In fact, that's exactly what we must do, and we must do that now, louder and stronger than ever, before this violence grows and spreads further, consuming even more innocent lives in its monstrous path. Moustafa Bayoumi is a Guardian US columnist
