logo
#

Latest news with #PartnersinEducation

ATMOS Energy partners with Jones Elementary through Partners in Education
ATMOS Energy partners with Jones Elementary through Partners in Education

Yahoo

time12-02-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

ATMOS Energy partners with Jones Elementary through Partners in Education

Feb. 11—MIDLAND — The Midland Education Foundation announces its first partnership with the new Partners in Education program, as ATMOS Energy became the official partner for Jones Elementary School. Partners in Education was an initiative created by the Midland Chamber of Commerce and is now operated by the Midland Education Foundation. The Midland Education Foundation aims to expand its reach and impact, ensuring that MISD students and staff across 39 campuses are supported and connected to the greater Midland community, including this partnership with ATMOS. ATMOS Energy's willingness to connect and support Jones Elementary School allows the campus to fulfill needs outside campus budgets and support its literacy initiative through a book vending machine donation. "Our partnership with ATMOS Energy has tremendously impacted our campus' use of innovative tools to encourage student literacy. Many of the students that Jones serves have limited access to books," Tanya Duewall, Principal of Jones Elementary, said in a news release. "The book vending machine will help bridge the gap by providing books directly to students to ensure they have individual reading materials at home. This interactive and engaging book vending machine makes book selection exciting, increases student motivation to read, improves literacy skills, and ultimately fosters a life-long love of reading." Jones Elementary, home of the Tornadoes, serves nearly 500 students from Pre-K through 6th grade. The partnership with ATMOS Energy will assist the school in showcasing its achievements while working together to provide enrichment opportunities for all of their students and support the staff. "Community service is a fundamental element of our culture," said Andrea Goodson, Public Affairs Manager for ATMOS Energy. "Because our employees live, work, and play in the communities we serve, they take great pride in being good neighbors." In total, six campuses currently have a designated Partner in Education. Through PIE, businesses are invited to adopt a campus by supporting campus needs, teacher appreciation, and student initiatives that fall outside of campus budgets. Campuses without a community partner or PTA to help fill these gaps often have high teacher turnover and low campus culture. PIE also allows organizations to connect to special projects across the district through the gift of volunteering, gifts in kind, or designated monetary gifts which in turn provide campuses with the essential programs and activities that are vital to a well-rounded education. Businesses and individuals interested in becoming a Partner in Education are encouraged to contact Lauren Hopkins, Community Connections Coordinator at Midland ISD. ([email protected])

Rival SD school choice bills both fail in Education Committee
Rival SD school choice bills both fail in Education Committee

Yahoo

time29-01-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Rival SD school choice bills both fail in Education Committee

Lobbyists, members of the public and lawmakers crowd the South Dakota House Education Committee room ahead of a Jan. 29, 2025, hearing on a bill to create an education savings account program in the state. (Josh Haiar/South Dakota Searchlight) Lawmakers in the House Education Committee shot down former South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem's proposed $4 million education savings account program and a similar, competing proposal Wednesday morning at the Capitol in Pierre. Procedural maneuvers could still be used to bring the bills to the House floor, but the committee votes were an early setback for an idea proposed by Noem and supported by her successor, Gov. Larry Rhoden, after she departed to become secretary of the federal Department of Homeland Security. The committee voted 9-6 against the governor-supported House Bill 1020, despite the bill having the majority leaders of both legislative chambers as prime sponsors. The bill would provide up to $3,000 per student to help cover private school tuition, homeschooling or other alternative-instruction costs. Lawmakers and people who testified against the bill included public education stalwarts, who argued that the program would lack oversight and divert funds from public schools, and school choice advocates, who said the program would be too limited. A competing school choice bill that would create a similar program with a higher price tag and less oversight was also shot down with an 8-7 vote. The bill, HB 1009, was introduced by Rep. Dylan Jordan, R-Clear Lake, and is estimated to cost up to $142 million by the Legislative Research Council. Reps. Jordan and Phil Jensen, R-Rapid City, both supported Jordan's bill but opposed the governor's bill. Rep. Travis Ismay, R-Newell, was the only other committee member to switch his vote — supporting the governor's bill but opposing Jordan's bill — while all other committee members either supported both bills or opposed both bills. Anthony Mirzayants, representing the Texas-based student activist group Young Americans for Liberty, told lawmakers the bill supported by the governor isn't 'a real school choice bill.' He compared it to South Dakota's Partners in Education scholarship program. That program gives insurance companies up to $5 million in tax credits annually in exchange for their contributions to scholarships for private-school students. Other opponents of HB 1020 included representatives of public education organizations, teachers, school board members and superintendents, disability advocates, the South Dakota Chamber of Commerce, the South Dakota Retailers Association and the Great Plains Tribal Education Directors. Opponents were concerned with the impact the programs would have on public school funding and a lack of accountability, standards and transparency. They brought up similar concerns in HB 1009's committee hearing last week. 'Public education funding should reflect a shared responsibility. Instead, public funds would be drained from public and tribal schools, leaving fewer resources and opportunities for all students,' said Roquel Gorneau, representing the Great Plains Tribal Education Directors. 'This bill does not strengthen education. It weakens it, forcing public schools to do more with less.' Several supporters of HB 1020 (the governor's bill) included private school administrators who said the program would make alternatives to public education more accessible to students and could lead to better teacher pay within their schools. Supporters also included alternative instruction advocates and alternative school founders. The bill, introduced by House Majority Leader Scott Odenbach, R-Spearfish, was amended during the hearing to clarify that students who use education savings accounts would not be classified as alternative instruction students. Odenbach proposed the amendment to appease the homeschool advocacy group Families for Alternative Instruction Rights in South Dakota, which feared that not separating education savings account students from alternative instruction students would open the door to regulation of alternative instruction. The organization switched its stance on the bill from opposed to neutral because of the amendment, based on a memo sent to lawmakers last week. The amendment means that if the bill is revived and becomes law, families opting for homeschooling, microschools or other alternative settings would have to choose whether they want to be ESA families eligible for the state financial assistance or alternative instruction students ineligible for the money. Both South Dakota Department of Education Secretary Joseph Graves and Governor's Office Policy Adviser Sarah Hitchcock told lawmakers the program would improve education in the state by increasing competition among schools. 'We can't force our students to wait until we have perfect funding,' Hitchcock told the committee. Supporters of the legislation could seek approval from one-third of the House of Representatives to force the committee to send the bills to the floor. Support from a majority of the chamber's 70 members would then be needed to add the bills to the House calendar for debate and a vote. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store