Latest news with #People'sConvention
Daily Maverick
6 days ago
- Politics
- Daily Maverick
South African political parties' internal democracy problem
Several of South Africa's political parties seem to have little intention of allowing their members to elect their leaders. 'No electoral congress is on the cards for MK.' uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela was perfectly straightforward when asked by Daily Maverick this week whether the party had any plans to allow members to elect party leaders. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads MK has never made any pretence of this: all its leaders have been 'appointed' by former president Jacob Zuma, who leads the party's 'high command' — all of whose members were hand-picked by Zuma. Most recently, MK urged its members to be patient while Zuma decides who MK's next secretary-general will be, with the party's head of presidency, Magasela Mzobe, quoted as telling members: 'The president will soon call the national leadership and announce who will take over the SG position. He is still assessing; he asked that he not be rushed.' The MK party, in other words, is not a democracy. Democratic political parties periodically hold electoral conferences, at which delegates, acting on behalf of broader constituencies, cast votes for their leaders. But MK is not the only South African party being run like a fiefdom. Read more: Former MK party secretaries did many 'wrong things', says Zuma after Shivambu's axing Where is ActionSA's electoral congress? ActionSA, the party founded by former DA Johannesburg mayor Herman Mashaba, adopted its interim constitution in January. That constitution states that the party will hold a 'People's Convention' every five years, at which the party president and other office-bearers will be elected. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads It states that this electoral conference must be held 'within 9 (nine) months after the 2024 national government elections' — yet almost 15 months after the elections, this has not happened. Significantly, the ActionSA constitution also states: 'The People's Convention may not be held 18 (eighteen) months prior to an election of a general nature.' It's unclear whether this description would encompass the 2026 local government elections, which have been pencilled in for between 2 November 2026 and 1 February 2027. If it does, the party could have missed the window in which the conference should have been held. Asked by Daily Maverick on Monday why ActionSA had not yet held an elective conference and when it intends to do so, party spokesperson Matthew George pointed to another clause of the constitution, which reads: 'A membership audit must confirm that branches have been established in 70% of the wards of the country before the People's Convention can be called or upon the presentation of a resolution signed by 60% of the members of the Party.' George said the party was 'working hard to achieve' the branch target. He said, 'Importantly, in giving due effect to both constitutional provisions, we have sought not to elevate one above the other. As such, the matter of the People's Convention currently resides with the Senate, ActionSA's highest decision-making body in the absence of the Convention. The Senate will formally communicate the outcomes in due course, first to our internal structures and then to the media.' advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Even when the People's Convention is eventually held, the party's constitution decrees that not all positions are voted on. Of the top three ActionSA leadership positions — president, deputy president and chairperson — only the president is voted in at the elective conference. The constitution states that the chairperson and deputy president positions are 'appointed for a 5 (five) year term linked to the term of the President, by the elected President'. Patriotic Alliance is the playground of its 'Founders' The Patriotic Alliance (PA) did not respond to Daily Maverick's questions on Monday, but in its 12 years of existence, it is unclear whether anyone has been able to challenge leader Gayton McKenzie in a vote. Its constitution makes it clear that the supreme authorities in the party are the 'Founders' — 'one of the three individuals who originally established the Party': Gayton McKenzie, businessman Kenny Kunene and former journalist Charles Cilliers. The PA constitution says that party leaders are 'selected' — not elected — 'not based on popularity', but on their ability to deliver results. It openly states: 'The Patriotic Alliance rejects the inefficiencies of traditional hierarchies and elective conference-driven systems.' advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The closest the PA gets to participatory democracy is hosting an annual general meeting at which members are supposed to be able to 'nominate candidates for consideration by the Founders to key Party positions'. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads However, 'The AGM does not have the authority to elect or confirm key Party positions unless the Founders neglect to approve or reject the nominations within 30 days of the AGM.' McKenzie suspended Kunene as party deputy president last month after Kunene was found at the house of an accused hitman — but he presumably retains his status as a 'Founder'. Read more: 'Continue Kenny's good work' — McKenzie appoints PA's Liam Jacobs to replace Kunene Other parties do practise democracy In other local parties, there is genuine contestation for leadership positions. Historically, the most significant of these has been the ANC's internal elections, since the winner of that contest has always gone on to be the president of South Africa. That may not be the case for the next victor, due to be elected in December 2027. The DA's Willie Aucamp confirmed to Daily Maverick that the DA's next electoral congress will take place next year, on 11 and 12 April. The Freedom Front Plus, meanwhile, held its congress in February, at which Corné Mulder was voted in to replace Pieter Groenewald as leader. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) pay lip service to robust democratic structures, but its People's Assembly was described by Zimbabwean journalist Hopewell Chin'ono in 2024 as an example of 'guided democracy': a system in which 'democratic processes, such as political party leadership elections, are allowed to exist, but are heavily influenced or controlled by a central authority or dominant political force or individual' — in this case, Julius Malema. As South Africa's political landscape fragments into personality-driven outfits, the barely-there visibility of internal democracy in parties such as MK, EFF, ActionSA and the Patriotic Alliance hollows out the very idea of representative politics. That only a handful of parties still hold genuinely competitive leadership elections underscores how rare true accountability has become. The genuine danger is also that it acclimatises South Africans to autocratic leadership — in a context where, to quote US President Franklin D Roosevelt, 'People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.' DM
Indian Express
28-05-2025
- Politics
- Indian Express
‘In 3 months of President's Rule in Manipur, every attempt to restore peace has failed, those against it not held liable': COCOMI
The Coordinating Committee on Manipur Integrity (COCOMI), the umbrella body of the Meitei groups, has supported the move for government formation in the state. A day after the outfit held talks with the Union Home Ministry in Delhi over a row brewing on the covering up of 'Manipur' name on a state transport bus, its convenor Khuraijam Athouba told The Indian Express that the administration under President's Rule has not been able to restore peace nor punish those who disturbed it. In an interview, he also talked about the new row over which it announced a state-wide agitation starting May 25, and has demanded an apology from Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla, and the removal of Chief Secretary Prashant Kumar Singh, DGP Rajiv Singh and Security Advisor Kuldiep Singh. Excerpts: * Why have you hit the streets over the alleged covering up of the word 'Manipur' on a state transport bus by security forces? This May 20 incident is widely seen as an insult to the identity of the state by the state administration… The top administrators in the state right now – as it is under President's Rule – are the Chief Secretary, DGP and the Security Advisor. If that incident happened under some kind of instruction, the three of them must have knowledge of it. So, we hold them responsible and demanded their replacement… The Governor is the head of the state… So, he should take moral responsibility and we sought an apology from him… There was notification of the constitution of an inquiry committee… but it is not an independent inquiry as it (will be supervised by) the Chief Secretary… We could not get any positive response from the government's side. So, we had to intensify the agitation. * How was your meeting with Home Ministry officials on Tuesday? The meeting was earlier to be held ahead of our May 3 'People's Convention'. But because of Operation Sindoor – the entire nation stood with the government against terrorism – we held it back and extended our solidarity, waiting for the right time. By the time we met on Tuesday, the incident of May 20 had happened. So we included it in our agenda. We told Home Ministry officials that there should be some action from the government's side… We are waiting for the government's response. Hopefully we will see some decisions. * Ten Manipur MLAs met the Governor Wednesday claiming the support of 44 legislators to form a government. Are you in touch with these MLAs? We are not as such, but are planning to hold talks with MLAs regarding the resolutions we adopted so that there can be a unanimous voice before the Centre and an early settlement to the crisis… The MLAs are on the side of the people. However, the general feeling is that they are not doing enough, and have left matters to the civil society rather than functioning as people's representatives. * Do you think President's Rule should be lifted in Manipur and a popular government restored? Yes. The recent incident also shows that President's Rule is an alien administration. They don't understand the state's history and its identity; how the people are sensitive about it. The lack of that kind of understanding creates issues. They are unable to relate to the people. So, President's Rule is not a good choice. We have had bitter experiences with President's Rule in the past as well. If you remember 2001, the Assembly was burnt down during President's Rule… The government was not able to cope with the long-drawn crisis (since May 2023) and so thought of handing over things to the Centre… But after three months of President's Rule, there are no visible results. Every attempt to restore peace has failed, and those against peace have not been held liable. They haven't been punished, controlled or contained. * Has any effort been made to initiate talks with the Kuki side? No, not as of now, as the sane voices among Kuki civilians are yet to come forward. They are completely controlled by armed militant groups, who are solely responsible for this crisis. At Tuesday's meeting too, we told the Home Ministry that it is very important that the government control and contain all the elements trying to disrupt or suppress the voice of innocent civilians on the Kuki and Meitei side as well. We should help these voices emerge. If the government is able to control the separatists, we will also extend our support to talks for reconciliation and restoration of peace and normalcy in the state. We are waiting for that. * In case a popular government does take over, who could be the possible CM? It is difficult for us to comment on that… There are many people who want to become Chief Minister. I don't know what their (motivation) is. Are they trying to prove themselves capable of resolving the crisis, or are they just driven by hunger for power? * One concern of the Centre is that a large portion of the looted weapons and ammunition have not been surrendered yet. As per a government report, 5,000-plus arms have been recovered, most of them from the (Meitei-dominated) Valley. The hill volunteers and armed groups have openly defied the call of the government asking for surrender of arms. Despite this defiance by organisations and village volunteers, the government has not taken any counter-measure. This has created an apprehension in the minds of Valley people about whether surrendering of arms is the right thing or not… This is not conducive.
Indian Express
03-05-2025
- Politics
- Indian Express
2 years of ethnic conflict later, where does the future hold for Manipur?
Increased security presence and intensified checks at key locations, 'Separation Day' programmes in Churachandpur and Kangpokpi, a 'People's Convention' in Imphal — as Manipur prepares to mark two years of the ongoing ethnic conflict on Saturday, May 3, the state remains divided and bruised. The 'Separation Day' programmes lined up by Kuki-Zomi groups reflect their demand for a separate administration, state or Union Territory. These programmes are set to be held not just in different parts of the state, but also in major cities like New Delhi and Bengaluru. Also on Saturday, Meitei organisation COCOMI, which has alleged inaction by the Centre in addressing the situation in the state, has called for a public meeting in Imphal to 'voice collective concerns' to the Union government. As the state completes two years in the throes of conflict, in which over 250 have been killed and thousands displaced, there is a restlessness in the air, and questions about the roadmap for the future remain unanswered. The last major cycle of violence between the two communities took place in November last year, and a major political development took place earlier this year with the resignation of chief minister N Biren Singh in February, followed by the imposition of President's Rule. However, 'normalcy' remains a far cry for the state's residents. Kimvah (55), one of the residents of a relief camp in Kangpokpi district where more than 850 people live in rows of small pre-fabricated houses, had to flee with her daughter two years ago from their home in Kangchup, located along the troubled inter-district border of Kuki-Zomi-majority Kangpokpi and Meitei-majority Imphal West districts. 'We receive our ration of rice, dal and aloo twice a month from the district administration, and we have received Rs 1,000 per person thrice since the conflict started. Apart from that, we have no basic source of livelihood, no homes of our own and no idea about our future. It has been too long,' she said. Thousands like her, living in relief camps on both sides of the ethnic divide, are among the worst affected by the geographic and demographic divide in the state, unable to return to their homes. Another resident of the same relief camp, Hekhol (60), says their indeterminate situation should be resolved one way or another. 'My home was among Meiteis, and since it is not possible to go back, why not a colony where we can settle? At least we can live in our independent houses and not in these cramped conditions,' she said. The administration says there have been 'incremental changes' over the last three months. An official of the civil administration said that identifying some areas where it is possible to facilitate resettlement with security cover 'is in the pipeline'. 'The effort is to resettle at least some people in their original homes, at least in fringe areas,' said the official. A security official said a small number of people, mostly Meiteis, have been resettled in some fringe areas. 'These are villages which have not been destroyed, but from which people fled because of firing. This has been done quietly and without drawing attention for the safety of the people,' he said. However, the key breakthrough that many in the state are waiting for is political dialogue between the leaders of the two communities. A step towards that took place last month when civil society leaders representing both sides met in Delhi. The meeting, led by the Ministry of Home Affairs' Adviser on North East Affairs A K Mishra, ended without a resolution. The needle is yet to move on any of the core issues surrounding the conflict. 'Security measures are one part of it and there has been a lack of violence between both sides for a while now. But everything is still very volatile underneath the surface. The only solution is dialogue,' a security official posted in the state said.
