Latest news with #Perceptive
Time Business News
19-06-2025
- Business
- Time Business News
How Top Companies Are Revolutionizing Clinical Trials
Have you ever thought about how new drugs could be delivered into the hands of people quickly when the trials are not a mess? It is happening courtesy of a bright tool known as Interactive Response Technology, or IRT. This technology is not only rendering trials faster and convenient, but also companies that have applied the technology are on the frontline and referred to as IRT clinical trial companies. Among them, one of the most notable examples is Perceptive, which was created based on the collaboration of Calyx and Invicro. They are building the future of health research with tons of experience under their belt. Let's dive into this exciting change and see why Perceptive is a name to cheer for! Think of a trial in which manual monitoring of patients and drugs brings about confusion or delays. IRT remedies those by automatically making hard work harder. It selects the recipient of a given treatment, monitors drug stocks, and records data with no errors. Consider a sample trial in many locations- IRT ensures that all people have what they need and reduces tests, and does not prolong delays. Other works state that it can save 15% of money and accelerate trial initiations. Is that not something that makes you wonder how IRT can accelerate access to new treatments? The IRT clinical trial companies are achieving it! The IRT is a trial super helper. It operates day and night and nothing is out of track. As an example, when a facility experiences shortage of medicine, IRT identifies it before it does and supplies it. This is time saving and safe to the patients. Also, it cleans and prepares data before work can be performed, making the doctors and researchers go at a quicker pace. No wonder IRT is turning into a 'need to have' in the trial world! Perceptive is an organization that has more than 50 years of experience with experience in 11,000+ trials, 800+ approvals, and 3,000+ early research. They are a result of the close collaboration of Calyx and Invicro, and that experience promotes their success. Their crew is also all about providing the best results, right up to their end. This leaves you with a question to ask: how does such a team accelerate new medicines? The secret in Perceptive is in IRT tools that have real-time updates and smart tracking. They are a bright picture among all IRT clinical trial companies! The other distinguishing factor about Perceptive is the fact that they have a heart of science. They do not simply conduct trials; they are interested in making a change. They have the experience to deal with even the most difficult obstacles, such as locating the right patients or managing supplies. Through each trial, they improve and get better, which is the reason why sponsors adore working with them. It is like having a friend whom you know and trust! Perceptive's experience shines bright. With 50+ years and thousands of trials, they've earned trust from sponsors worldwide. They work across the globe, tackling location challenges with ease. A happy note from Christy Meyer at Protrials even praises their 30 years of solid eClinical work. It's like a friend giving a high-five! This worldwide help makes Perceptive a leader among IRT clinical trial companies, supporting teams everywhere. Their global reach means they can help no matter where a trial happens. Whether it's a busy city or a quiet town, Perceptive's team knows how to make it work. This flexibility is a big plus, especially when trials need to adapt to new ideas or places. It shows how much they care about getting results, no matter the odds. Trials are changing—more are online or flexible now. Perceptive's IRT adapts with ease, handling online checks and tricky plans. Their team is ready to team up, always improving their tools to stay ahead. This flexibility makes them a standout among IRT clinical trial companies, leading the way in new trial styles. Online trials are the future, and Perceptive is ready for it. Their IRT can manage virtual visits and adjust plans on the fly. This keeps trials moving, even when things get complicated. Their team's willingness to grow keeps them at the top, helping sponsors try new ways to find cures. Perceptive's work goes beyond just running trials. They've helped bring 800+ approvals to life, meaning new medicines are out there because of them. Their 3,000+ early studies show they're great at starting things off right. This impact makes them a go-to name when sponsors need help. As an IRT clinical trial company, Perceptive is changing lives one trial at a time. Their focus on quality is what sets them apart. Every trial they touch gets the best care, from planning to finish. This dedication builds trust and keeps them busy with new projects. It's a cycle of success that benefits everyone involved! The world of clinical trials is getting a big boost from companies like Perceptive. Their IRT tools make trials faster, cheaper, and safer, bringing new medicines to people sooner. With their experience and caring team, Perceptive is a partner you can count on. Check them out to see how they can make your next trial a success. New treatments are on the way—let's get there with Perceptive! It's an exciting time for health research. Perceptive's work is opening doors to cures that could change lives. Their team's passion and smart tools are a perfect match for today's challenges. By choosing Perceptive, you're joining a movement to make trials better for everyone. So, why wait? Let's build that future together with Perceptive leading the way! TIME BUSINESS NEWS
NZ Herald
26-05-2025
- Business
- NZ Herald
One NZ survey shows most New Zealanders don't trust AI and fear job losses from it
The majority of New Zealanders fear artificial intelligence will take their jobs, but that hasn't stopped them from using it. A survey of 1,000 people conducted by market research firm Perceptive and commissioned by One NZ shows conflicting attitudes towards AI: 65% fear job losses, 62% worry about the use of AI leading to unfair decision-making, 67% of people were concerned about the misuse of personal data, and 47% did not trust large companies to use AI ethically. None of this has prevented people from adopting AI, with 77% of respondents saying they had knowingly used AI services over the past year. However, there are generational differences with 90% of 18 to 34-year-olds having interacted with AI compared to 60% of people aged 55 years and older.
NZ Herald
26-05-2025
- Business
- NZ Herald
Most NZers distrust AI, fear job losses despite usage
A One NZ survey shows most New Zealanders don't trust AI and fear job losses from it. NZers fear AI job losses and distrust it. The majority of New Zealanders fear artificial intelligence will take their jobs, but that hasn't stopped them from using it. A survey of 1000 people conducted by market research firm Perceptive and commissioned by One NZ shows conflicting attitudes towards AI: 65% fear job losses, 62% worry about the use of AI leading to unfair decision-making, 67% of people were concerned about the misuse of personal data, and 47% did not trust large companies to use AI ethically. None of this has prevented people from adopting AI, with 77% of respondents saying they had knowingly used AI services over the past year. However, there are generational differences with 90% of 18 to 34-year-olds having interacted with AI compared to 60% of people aged 55 years and older.
Scoop
11-05-2025
- General
- Scoop
Local Water Done Not So Well: Public Understanding And Confidence In Framework Severely Lacking
Press Release – Local Water Done Well An additional 19 per cent said they had heard of it but didnt know any details, bringing the total number of respondents with no real knowledge of the framework to 74 per cent, or nearly three out of four people. As many district councils across the country are currently seeking public feedback on proposed models for delivering water services and who pays for it, under the Local Water Done Well (LWDW) legislative framework, new data from Perceptive, New Zealand's leading insights and market research agency, raises an important question: is the public informed enough to be weighing in? While the LWDW framework plays a key role in shaping how waste, storm and drinking water services are planned, built and paid for in New Zealand, more than half of respondents (55 per cent) said they had never heard of it, with one person stating, 'I have absolutely no idea what it is about.' An additional 19 per cent said they had heard of it but didn't know any details, bringing the total number of respondents with no real knowledge of the framework to 74 per cent, or nearly three out of four people. Only a small proportion of those who were surveyed feel informed, with 4 per cent reporting a good understanding of the framework. Mark Vincett, Director of Strategy at Perceptive, says this highlights an opportunity for councils across the country to better inform residents ahead of and during consultation phase, especially as 85 per cent of New Zealanders rely on water provided by councils. 'The lack of public awareness and understanding of LWDW is concerning and shows that more needs to be done to educate the public,' says Vincett. 'There's a big risk that Kiwis won't engage in the consultation phase if they don't know what it's about or how it can affect them.' 'Being better informed helps to nurture trust, so it's not surprising that the data also shows there's mixed public confidence in whether or not councils can decide on the best way to deliver regional water services.' When asked about their councils' ability to deliver under the LWDW framework, one fifth (21 per cent) said they do not trust the council to choose the best option, with 36 per cent being unsure and 43 per cent trusting their council. Some also took the time to mention that LWDW feels like a rebrand of the former Three Waters policy without any improvements, with one respondent saying 'Seems like we are redoing Three Waters… I wish our governments would stop undoing each other's work.' Notes: The survey was conducted by Perceptive with a sample size of 1,325 individuals. The survey was conducted between January – March 2025. All respondents are over 18 years old. Key survey questions and datasets are below. Regional and raw data tables available on request. Have you heard of 'Local Water Done Well'? I have never heard of it 55% I have heard of it, but don't know anything about it 19% I have heard of it and know a bit about it 13% I have good knowledge of this plan 4% Don't know 8% I trust my local council's ability to objectively and impartially assess the options and choose the best delivery method for the current and future water services in my area. Strongly agree 4% Agree 39% Neither 36% Disagree 13% Strongly disagree 8% How is your home's drinking water provided?
Scoop
11-05-2025
- General
- Scoop
Local Water Done Not So Well: Public Understanding And Confidence In Framework Severely Lacking
As many district councils across the country are currently seeking public feedback on proposed models for delivering water services and who pays for it, under the Local Water Done Well (LWDW) legislative framework, new data from Perceptive, New Zealand's leading insights and market research agency, raises an important question: is the public informed enough to be weighing in? While the LWDW framework plays a key role in shaping how waste, storm and drinking water services are planned, built and paid for in New Zealand, more than half of respondents (55 per cent) said they had never heard of it, with one person stating, 'I have absolutely no idea what it is about.' An additional 19 per cent said they had heard of it but didn't know any details, bringing the total number of respondents with no real knowledge of the framework to 74 per cent, or nearly three out of four people. Only a small proportion of those who were surveyed feel informed, with 4 per cent reporting a good understanding of the framework. Mark Vincett, Director of Strategy at Perceptive, says this highlights an opportunity for councils across the country to better inform residents ahead of and during consultation phase, especially as 85 per cent of New Zealanders rely on water provided by councils. 'The lack of public awareness and understanding of LWDW is concerning and shows that more needs to be done to educate the public,' says Vincett. 'There's a big risk that Kiwis won't engage in the consultation phase if they don't know what it's about or how it can affect them.' 'Being better informed helps to nurture trust, so it's not surprising that the data also shows there's mixed public confidence in whether or not councils can decide on the best way to deliver regional water services.' When asked about their councils' ability to deliver under the LWDW framework, one fifth (21 per cent) said they do not trust the council to choose the best option, with 36 per cent being unsure and 43 per cent trusting their council. Some also took the time to mention that LWDW feels like a rebrand of the former Three Waters policy without any improvements, with one respondent saying 'Seems like we are redoing Three Waters… I wish our governments would stop undoing each other's work.' Notes: The survey was conducted by Perceptive with a sample size of 1,325 individuals. The survey was conducted between January - March 2025. All respondents are over 18 years old. Key survey questions and datasets are below. Regional and raw data tables available on request. Have you heard of 'Local Water Done Well'? I have never heard of it 55% I have heard of it, but don't know anything about it 19% I have heard of it and know a bit about it 13% I have good knowledge of this plan 4% Don't know 8% I trust my local council's ability to objectively and impartially assess the options and choose the best delivery method for the current and future water services in my area. Strongly agree 4% Agree 39% Neither 36% Disagree 13% Strongly disagree 8% How is your home's drinking water provided? Council/town supply 85%
