Latest news with #PeterEtchells
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Health
- Daily Mail
Social media curfews for children WON'T work - and could even create divides in friendships and lead to isolation, experts warn
The government's proposed social media curfew won't make children any safer online, experts have warned. Ministers are considering implementing an 'app cap', to reduce teenagers' exposure to harmful online content. However, scientists have told MailOnline that there is no evidence to suggest these restrictions will have any positive effects. In fact, such restrictions could actually harm children by increasing isolation and facing more social problems during the day, the experts say. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle suggested children's social media time could be cut down by law to two hours per day outside of school time and before 10 pm. Studies have shown that using social media shortly before going to bed can lead to poor sleep patterns, falling academic achievement, and poor mental health. While that might make a curfew appealing, the scientific evidence suggests that curfews don't actually help children reduce their screen time or get more sleep. Professor Peter Etchells, an expert on the effects of digital technology from Bath Spa University, told MailOnline: 'If we're worried that social media is harmful, bans don't fix those problems - they just delay access.' The idea of a social media curfew has been raised as a possible solution to the serious harms that can be caused by excessive social media use. A study of nearly 10,000 teenagers aged between 13 and 16 found that excessive social media use disrupts positive activities like sleep while increasing exposure to harmful content, especially in the form of cyberbullying. This can lead to teenagers experiencing increased anxiety, depression, falling grades and even physical health issues. A recent survey conducted by BSI found that 50 per cent of British young people felt that a social media curfew would improve their lives. Likewise, there is very strong evidence that taking breaks from social media can have pronounced positive impacts. Dr Rachel Kent, a leading digital health expert from King's College London and host of the podcast Digital Health Diagnosed, told MailOnline: 'There is a wealth of evidence that suggests restrictions and boundaries can be incredibly beneficial. 'Short periods of time away from our devices can drastically reduce the stress and anxiety that comes from increased screen time.' Dr Kent says that the curfew would be a 'good thing' because it signals to children that they need to have boundaries in their relationship with technology. However, as Dr Kent acknowledges, a curfew would be extremely difficult and highly impractical to implement at a national level. It isn't clear how the Government intends to enforce any proposed curfew, but it is likely that many 'digitally native' children would find a way around any restriction. In 2011, South Korea implemented the 'shutdown law' which prevented under-16s from playing online video games between midnight and 6am. Years later, research showed that children were only getting 1.5 minutes of extra sleep per night and had simply shifted their online activity to other points in the day, leading to the ban being repealed in 2021. Professor Etchells says: 'It's not clear that it had any positive effect, even though at face value it feels like it should work. 'I think curfews feel like they are a good solution, but we don't have good evidence to suggest that they would work in the way that we want them to.' Recently, a Youth Select Committee report on the effects of social media found that social media bans were 'neither practical nor effective'. Experts have also raised concerns that a ban might create inadvertent consequences that cause more harm than good. WHAT ARE THE GUIDELINES FOR CHILD SCREEN TIME? There are no official guidelines for screen time limits. But there are calls for interventions to be put in place due to growing concern about the impact of screen time, and social media use, on the mental health and well-being of young people. The Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health and American Association of Pediatrics give guidance for parents: For children younger than 18 months, avoid use of screen media. Parents of children 18 to 24 months of age who want to introduce digital media should choose high-quality programming, and watch it with their children. For children ages 2 to 5 years, limit screen use to 1 hour per day of high-quality programs. Parents should view media with children to help them understand what they are seeing. Designate media-free times. Social media expert Rhea Freeman told MailOnline: 'For everything that's bad about social media, there are many good things too- finding like-minded people, chatting to friends, connection to family. 'Restrictions could potentially create divides in friendships and lead to isolation if people's allocated usage doesn't line up, I could see this being an issue.' Likewise, studies conducted among university students found that interventions designed to limit social media use led to negative effects like fear of missing out (FOMO). However, experts' biggest concern with the potential curfew is that this restriction doesn't solve the underlying problem of harmful content on social media As Professor Etchells points out, bans and curfews only delay access to social media rather than making the internet any safer for children. The Online Safety Act has passed into law, and from this year will require tech platforms to follow new Ofcom-issued codes of practice to keep users safe online, particularly children. However, experts say that adding a curfew won't solve the gaps and weaknesses of this regulation. Dr Kent says: 'I would argue that the curfew misses the point. The point is about making sure that the tech companies are taking accountability for the circulation of harmful content, moderating it, censoring it. What is the Online Safety Act? The Online Safety Act is a set of laws intended to protect children online. The act places a duty of care on online platforms, making them responsible for protecting users from harmful content. Sites must take measures to remove harmful or misleading content and change their algorithms to avoid sharing pornography and material promoting suicide or eating disorders They will also be required to introduce 'highly effective' checks to block under-18s accessing age-restricted sites. Ofcom has the power to fine technology firms up to £18 million or 10 per cent of their global revenue if they breach their duties under the landmark Online Safety Act. However, the act has been criticised for not doing enough to keep children safe from addictively designed apps. 'Tech companies need to be held to account and the government needs to be enforcing this.' Mr Kyle was asked on Sunday morning whether he would look at limiting the time children spend on social media to two hours per app after the Sunday People and Mirror reported the measure was being considered by ministers. 'I'm trying to think how we can break some of the addictive behaviour and incentivise more of the healthy developmental… and also the good communicative side of online life,' Mr Kyle told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg show. This came after the government was criticised by the father of a teen who took her own life after viewing harmful content. Mr Ian Russell, whose 14-year-old daughter Molly died in 2017, said that 'sticking plasters' would not solve the problem of harmful content online. Andrew Burrows, CEO of the Molly Rose Foundation, told MailOnline: 'It's welcome to hear Peter Kyle look to strengthen online safety protections, but these measures would not change the dial on the harmful content that continues to be bombarded at children. 'Unless Ministers fix the structural issues that have hamstrung the Online Safety Act, even if it is effective at reducing time spent on platforms, a code of practice on addictive design will be just another sticking plaster.' What experts would like to see instead is more focus on educating children and carers on how to stay safe online and manage their own social media usage. Children should be taught how to recognise harmful content online and know what to do when they encounter it, the experts argue. Professor Etchells says: 'What we need to be talking more about is how we better prepare children and young people for a world saturated with technology. 'Hard-and-fast bans don't have much weight of evidence behind them to support them. But we do know that talking to kids, developing their digital literacy and resiliency skills, developing their communication skills and support networks - these are things which will lead to more sustainable long-term outcomes.' The Department for Science Innovation and Technology has been contacted for comment. Children as young as two are using social media, research from charity Barnardo's has suggested. Internet companies are being pushed to do more to combat harmful content online but parents can also take steps to alter how their children use the web. Here are some suggestions of how parents can help their children. Both iOS and Google offer features that enable parents to filter content and set time limits on apps. For iOS devices, such as an iPhone or iPad, you can make use of the Screen Time feature to block certain apps, content types or functions. On iOS, this can be done by going to settings and selecting Screen Time. For Android, you can install the Family Link app from the Google Play Store. Talk to your children Many charities, including the NSPCC, say talking to children about their online activity is vital to keep them safe. Its website features a number of tips on how to start a conversation with children about using social media and the wider internet, including having parents visit sites with their children to learn about them together and discussing how to stay safe online and act responsibly. There are tools available for parents to learn more about how social media platforms operate. Net Aware, a website run in partnership by the NSPCC and O2, offers information about social media sites, including age requirement guidance. The World Health Organisation recommends parents should limit young children to 60 minutes of screen time every day. The guidelines, published in April, suggest children aged between two and five are restricted to an hour of daily sedentary screen time.
Yahoo
18-04-2025
- General
- Yahoo
I Kicked My Screen Addiction And Fell Back In Love With Reading – Here's How
It's a refrain I hear so often, both among friends and on social media. 'I loved reading as a child,' former voracious bookworms wail, 'and now I can't finish a novella.' I can't judge them – I am them. I used to tear through titles as a kid, ravenously reading through entire series of books in a week. It did not feel good to realise that, like lapsed bibliophiles before me, my childhood habit had been replaced by short-form video and 'doom scrolling.' A particularly damning Saturday this month saw me spend seven hours and twenty-seven actual minutes on TikTok (I am as mortified as you'd be). I was sick at the time, but that doesn't justify a 12+-hour screen day, does it? Seeing that stat made me realise something needed to change. Namely, I needed to 1) touch grass and 2) turn page. Speaking to BBC Science Focus, Dr Peter Etchells, an expert on the psychological effects of digital technology, had some good news for my beleaguered brain. 'To the best of my knowledge, there isn't any good science to support the idea that short videos are specifically or uniquely bad in terms of effects on the brain,' he said. But that's only one half of the equation. There's not much proof it's good for me, either; while reading books has been linked to higher dementia defences, boosting confidence and self-esteem, and even living longer. Personally, I've felt my ability to follow through with a chapter fade over the years while my capacity for hypnotically 'okay' clips became enormous. In short, I'd had enough, and knew I had to rekindle my love for reading. I am not joking when I say that last year's attempt to reconnect with reading started with George Eliot's notoriously lengthy Middlemarch. This was, as instinct should have told me, a terrible idea. I thought my love for the author would help, but – as with running, or eating more fibre, or any good habit – starting small is key. This time around, I started off with George Orwell's short stories, and I made a conscious effort to set myself time limits, too. Twenty minutes before bed, I'd open the pages and settle into the story; over time, that became half an hour, and I began reading on my lunch break too. It's crucial to pick a book you really enjoy, not just one you feel you 'should' read. Your child self wasn't looking to impress an imaginary audience of literary peers, after all – you probably just really liked Jacqueline Wilson. Once I'd finished the shorter books, I got going on another, longer novel (Adam Bede, which is by George Eliot but is shorter than Middlemarch, as most books are). The reading minutes shrank again at first; I went back to 20-minute, pre-bed slots as the denser writing took its toll. But removing the pressure of having read at a certain pace – though I had marked myself as reading the novel on Goodreads, I felt alright finishing it ten pages at a time if I had to – was key. Paradoxically, that easygoing approach brought me back to the lights-under-the-blanket keenness I remember feeling as a kid. By the end of last Saturday, I was breathlessly tearing through the pages, ranting about the plot to my bemused boyfriend like I was sharing family gossip. And for what it's worth, I'm now dawdling through Middlemarch. My TikTok time last weekend was a measly(ish) hour and a half. Go slow. Too much, too fast, will put you off restarting; enforce time limits if you have to. Choose authors you like. We don't stick to things we hate; no need to suffer through that tome about economic theory if you don't want to. Mix accountability with permissiveness. Telling a friend, a book club, or your Goodreads account you're working through a novel can be helpful; accepting that you might not finish it at the speed you expected, or even at all, is key. Build reading into your routine. I now can't sleep without reading (incidentally, my sleep has gotten better since I quit late-night TikTok binges). Embrace the smug. I am a lover of deeply smug hobbies, like running, pointlessly baking food I can buy better versions of for less money, and now, reading. From my experience, The Smug is fuelling, sustaining. If bragging about reading more gets you through it, post those 'aesthetic' storiesof you reading all you like; or, as I did, force people to read a whole article about it. I Just Learned Why Hardbacks Always Come Out Before Paperback Books, And It Makes Sense I Haven't Given My 12-Year-Old A Smartphone. After Reading This I Hope You Won't Either The New Gender Divide? Reading, Apparently
