Latest news with #PremierFord


CTV News
24-06-2025
- Business
- CTV News
Ontario Place final designs revealed
Ont. Premier Ford during an update on the redevelopment of the Ontario Place, saying it will provide over 5,000 jobs and welcome millions every year.


CTV News
19-06-2025
- Politics
- CTV News
Doug Ford apologizes for ‘hat in hand' comment on First Nations
First Nations leaders called Ont. Premier Ford's apology 'sincere' after comments he made surrounding Bill 5 were referred to as racist.


National Post
18-06-2025
- Politics
- National Post
Opinion: Chief Justice Richard Wagner forgets that criticizing judges is part of democracy
Article content If legal commentators are permitted to scrutinize the reasoning of judges, then it is entirely legitimate for elected officials to do so, as well. After all, the rule of law mandates that each branch of the state remains within its allocated bounds. Where a court exceeds its proper constitutional role, or is in danger of doing so, then elected officials have a right, and a constitutional duty, to contest these uses of official power. Article content Consider the case that provoked Premier Ford's comments, which involved a court challenge to his government's decision to remove bike lanes in some Toronto neighbourhoods. Whether or not their removal was appropriate, it is hard to conceive of bike lanes as a 'fundamental right' contemplated by the framers of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. At best, the question is one of urban planning: a dispute over transit infrastructure, about which reasonable people can disagree. It is entirely consistent with Canada's constitutional order that these questions of policy should be left to the politically accountable government of Ontario. In discharging its unique constitutional role in our democracy, Queen's Park is entitled to assert its priorities over those of cycling advocates. Article content Unfortunately, none of these considerations prevented Justice Paul Schabas of the Superior Court of Ontario from issuing a preliminary injunction, effectively stopping the government from implementing its priorities. In so doing, Justice Schabas summarily dismissed the elected branches' constitutional function, asserting that 'the government does not have a monopoly on the public interest.' Instead, the learned judge contended, it was for the court to exercise its own judgment as to which public interests the government could and could not pursue. Article content Next, consider the numerous cases in which Canadian courts have struck down mandatory minimum sentences as unconstitutional, or departed significantly from public sentiment in sentencing criminal offenders. In one emblematic case, the Supreme Court of Canada declared a six-month mandatory minimum for child luring to be 'cruel and unusual punishment' contrary to the Charter, claiming that it would 'shock the conscience of an informed public.' More recently, the Provincial Court of British Columbia has been criticized for a decision to impose no jail time upon an offender who possessed what the court characterized as a 'relatively modest' collection of child pornography. In these circumstances, it is entirely unsurprising that officials and informed citizens should raise questions about the intelligent exercise of judicial power. Article content Article content A constitutional democracy that prizes our courts as forums of reason cannot have it both ways. It cannot profess public confidence in the judiciary, while insisting that judicial decisions be shielded from public criticism. Central to judicial responsibility is the task of offering reasoned justifications for one's decisions. Those reasons are an invitation to the public to examine and critically appraise the cogency of a judge's decision-making. Article content There is little reason to think, then, that elected officials are acting inappropriately, much less unconstitutionally, in expressing reasoned disagreement with judicial rulings, or in proposing solutions to perceived problems with those decisions. To the contrary, such criticism is precisely what the rule of law requires, and bearing it with composure is a constitutional duty of the judicial role. Article content


CTV News
17-06-2025
- Politics
- CTV News
‘I'm sick and tired of the weak justice system': Ford's heated rant on Canada's criminal code
Watch Ontario Premier Doug Ford calls for changes to the criminal code and bail reform in a heated rant after suspects in historic drug seizure have been released.


CTV News
17-06-2025
- CTV News
Ford says ‘four thugs' who tried to steal his car will ‘be back out' due to ‘weak justice system'
While slamming the 'weak justice system', Ont. Premier Ford revealed that 'four thugs' recently tried to steal his car. Siobhan Morris reports.