Latest news with #QuacquarelliSymonds
Indian Express
25-07-2025
- Politics
- Indian Express
NEP 2020, Five Years On: Curricular flexibility improves, but multiple entry-exit remains rigid
Five years after its approval by the Union Cabinet in July 2020, the National Education Policy (NEP) — envisioned to transform India into a 'global knowledge superpower' — has led to notable systemic reforms. These include greater curriculum flexibility, the integration of Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) into classrooms, and the establishment of new institutions. However, despite this progress, several structural challenges remain. According to the first 'QS I-GAUGE Implementation Report' by Quacquarelli Symonds, only 36% of higher education institutions (HEIs) have implemented multiple entry and exit points. The report, based on data from 165 higher education institutions (HEIs) across 24 states and union territories, assesses the policy's progress across key areas. The most visible impact of the NEP has been the shift away from rigid disciplinary boundaries. Nearly 90% of surveyed institutions now report offering flexible, multidisciplinary curricula, often integrated with vocational components. Environmental education is nearly universal, and ethics-based courses such as Mulya Pravah 2.0 are now offered by 62% of institutions. The multiple entry and exit points — touted as a revolutionary student-centric reform — has failed to take root meaningfully. Just 36% of HEIs surveyed have implemented this provision, and only 64% maintain records in the Academic Bank of Credits (ABC), the mechanism required for credit portability. The NEP placed significant emphasis on improving student well-being. Nearly 86% of institutions report having a dedicated student services centre to address emotional and psychological needs. However, more specialised mental health support, especially in collaboration with national institutes such as NIMHANS or AIIMS, is rare. Only 14% of the surveyed HEIs have formal partnerships with such institutions, the report found. This shortfall is further reflected in faculty preparedness: while the NEP encourages teacher training in counselling and mentoring, only 64% of HEIs reported that their faculty undergo refresher courses on mental health support. A lack of formal training could limit the efficacy of mental wellness services already in place. A major NEP goal was to bring industry closer to academia by appointing 'Professors of Practice' (PoPs) to teach applied, experience-based courses. However, this vision remains far from realised. While many HEIs support the idea in principle, only 14% of institutions have actually appointed such professors. Likewise, only 19% of HEIs involve industry experts in curriculum design, even though this is key to keeping academic content aligned with market demands. Internships have become more widespread, 98% of institutions offer them with academic credit but deeper, sustained industry engagement through curriculum and faculty collaboration remains largely limited. According to the QS report, just 22% of institutions currently enjoy autonomous status. What are the barriers? Nothing out of the blue: 153 institutions cite financial dependence as a key issue, 143 mention bureaucratic delays, and 131 point to limited institutional capacity. But does institutional autonomy really matter? Short answer, yes. It restricts the ability of HEIs to redesign curricula, establish interdisciplinary departments, or forge international partnerships, all crucial to the NEP's vision of 'globally competitive' Indian universities. Global collaboration has not kept pace with NEP's ambitions. Fewer than half the institutions surveyed (41%) have signed MoUs with foreign universities. Just 33% reserve seats for international students, and only 39% report having dedicated infrastructure to host them. Cross-border research collaboration is also underwhelming, with only 45% of faculty reportedly engaging with international peers on joint research or teaching. In effect, while the aspiration for global engagement is widespread, the ecosystem to support it, infrastructure, regulatory ease, and funding, remains weak. The NEP's emphasis on Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) has led to the introduction of electives in areas like Ayurveda, Yoga, Sanskrit, and ancient sciences. But progress here is slow and inconsistent, the report has revealed. Only 38% of institutions offer IKS electives for credit, and just 36% run short-term non-degree courses in these domains. Notably, a mere 8% of HEIs have empanelled 'Kala Gurus', traditional scholars meant to teach and research indigenous knowledge. The report notes that while IKS enjoys rhetorical support, its practical implementation is often limited by a lack of teaching staff, infrastructure, or institutional clarity on integrating traditional and modern epistemologies. NEP envisioned universities pooling resources and forming large knowledge clusters to promote research and innovation. Yet, 61% of institutions surveyed said they are not part of any such cluster. The barriers cited include infrastructural limitations (138 institutions), financial constraints (140), and cultural or administrative differences (123). Moreover, only 64% of institutions reported collaboration with regional R&D partners, pointing to the early stages of a research ecosystem that NEP aims to build. One of NEP's strongest adoption areas has been digital learning. According to the report, 96% of institutions use platforms like SWAYAM, DIKSHA, or SWAYAM PRABHA. Additionally, 94% report investment in digital infrastructure, and 85% offer faculty training in creating high-quality online content. Yet, equitable access remains a challenge. Only 28% of institutions offer two-year postgraduate diplomas via open and distance learning, an option that could democratise access in underserved regions. And while MOOCs are accepted for credit in 72% of institutions, standardised assessment and integration into degree programs are still evolving. The NEP has succeeded in reshaping perceptions around higher education in India. Over the last five years, several new public institutions including the Indian Institute of Heritage and multiple Central Tribal Universities have been launched. Funding models are being reconsidered, and digital learning is seeing greater traction than before. Yet, as the QS I-GAUGE report shows, India's higher education reform remains a work in progress. The policy vision is in place, but its realisation depends on operational support, targeted funding, and regulatory simplification. Without addressing foundational issues like faculty shortages and financial dependency, even the best policy ideas risk being stuck in an implementation limbo.
The Hindu
21-07-2025
- Politics
- The Hindu
QS rankings and Indian universities: Are they meaningful or just window dressing?
According to the Union Education Ministry, Indian universities have achieved their best-ever performance in the World University Rankings 2026. The rankings are done by a British company, Quacquarelli Symonds, also known as QS. QS rankings and Indian universities: Are they meaningful or just window dressing? The new QS rankings feature a total of 54 Indian universities, which makes India the 4th most represented country, with only the US (192), the UK (90) and China (72) having more universities ranked than India. Among Indian universities, 48% have also improved their rankings compared to the previous year, with six featuring in the top 250. IIT, Delhi is the highest ranked Indian university in the list, coming in at #123. The government has claimed that the numbers indicate a revolutionary transformation of India's educational landscape. How exactly are the QS rankings arrived at? What idea of the university is being evaluated in these rankings? Are the metrics relevant to the Indian context and Indian students? Guest: Professor Anita Rampal, former Dean, Faculty of Education, at Delhi University. Anita, welcome to the pod. Host: G. Sampath, Social Affairs Editor, The Hindu Edited by Sharmada Venkatasubramanian Listen to more In Focus podcasts
Filipino Times
18-07-2025
- Business
- Filipino Times
Manila ranks 88th in QS best student cities 2026
Manila ranked 88th in the 2026 edition of the QS Best Student Cities rankings released by global higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). The ranking evaluates cities based on several indicators, including affordability, student mix, desirability, employer activity, student view, and the presence of top-ranked universities. Manila received an overall score of 63.9. It scored highest in affordability at 85.3, which reflects the cost of tuition and student living expenses. The city also earned a 68.4 in employer activity, measuring how employers view graduates from Manila-based institutions. For student view, which gauges student satisfaction and the city's friendliness and sustainability, Manila received a score of 57. It earned 37.2 in desirability and 31.2 in student mix, which refers to the proportion of students in the city population, including international students. In terms of institutional presence, the Philippines scored 35.2, with six universities included in the QS World University Rankings 2026. These are: • University of the Philippines (362nd) • Ateneo de Manila University (511st) • De La Salle University (654th) • University of Santo Tomas (851st–900th) • Adamson University (1,001st–1,200th) • Mapúa University (1,401st) Seoul topped the 2026 QS rankings, ending London's six-year run as the number one student city. Tokyo placed second, followed by London, Munich, and Melbourne. QS also noted that 10 of the top 20 cities are in the Asia-Pacific region, including Sydney, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Beijing, Taipei, Hong Kong (SAR), and Kyoto. Cities included in the ranking must have a population of at least 250,000, at least two universities featured in the QS World University Rankings, and a low to moderate risk level based on the International SOS index. The indicators were based on various sources, including Numbeo's Quality of Life and Traffic indices, and the Economist Price Index.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17-07-2025
- Business
- Business Standard
QS 2026: Not London or Boston, Seoul is top city for foreign education
Seoul, not London, has emerged as the most preferred city for international students, according to the QS Best Student Cities Ranking 2026. The South Korean capital has taken the top spot, pushing London to third place, while Tokyo has climbed to second. This is the first time two Asian cities have led the global student city rankings. Compiled by UK-based Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), the annual index considers a mix of factors including affordability, student mix, desirability, quality of universities, and employment outcomes after graduation. London, United Kingdom Munich, Germany Melbourne, Australia Sydney, Australia Berlin, Germany Paris, France Zurich, Switzerland Vienna, Austria Singapore Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Beijing, China Taipei, Taiwan Boston, United States 'Seoul's rise to the top spot, overtaking long-time favourites like Tokyo and London, is a clear message that the global higher education scene is evolving strongly and shows diversity in the study options for students globally. For Indian students and parents, this means that they now don't have to run behind the Anglosphere and can choose other hot spots,' said Mamta Shekhawat, founder at 'It additionally confirms that Asian cities, especially East Asian cities such as Seoul and Tokyo, provide a very real and exciting blend of academic excellence, lively student experience, and strong post-graduation career options,' she told Business Standard. Indian students still prefer familiar routes 'It's a wake-up call for Indian families to look beyond the traditional US–UK–Canada triangle and consider high-performing, culturally rich destinations like South Korea that are investing heavily in international education,' Ritesh Jain, co-founder of LaunchEd Global told Business Standard. Mary Gogoi, head of admissions at eduVelocity, agreed the trend is slowly shifting. 'Students are becoming more open to exploring countries like South Korea and Japan, especially for courses in STEM, business, and international studies. This is often driven by curiosity, cultural appeal, and the availability of government scholarships,' she told Business Standard. Still, many Indian families continue to lean towards English-speaking destinations. 'For many families, these factors offer a sense of comfort and long-term opportunity, especially in terms of career prospects,' said Gogoi. Korean wave and government support drive interest According to LaunchEd Global and there has been a clear uptick in enquiries over the past 12 to 18 months. 'We've seen a clear uptick in interest, particularly from students in tech, design, and media-related fields. South Korea's pop culture influence—K-dramas, K-pop, etc.—is a huge pull among Gen Z, but it's not just about fandom,' said Jain. 'Students are now recognising the strong academic infrastructure and the generous scholarships Korean and Japanese universities are offering to international students.' 'While difficulties like learning a new language and finding work after graduation are still real, both South Korea and Japan are actively trying to make things easier for international students, including those from India,' said Shekhawat. Language barriers and career planning 'While many top universities in Seoul and Tokyo offer programmes in English, daily life and internships often require some knowledge of the local language. Also, the path to staying and working after graduation isn't as clear-cut as it is in Canada or Australia,' said Jain. 'Knowing the local language becomes essential for internships, part-time jobs, and long-term employment. Post-study work options exist, but navigating them requires good planning and language skills. It's important for students to be prepared for that adjustment,' said Gogoi. She added that Seoul and Tokyo offer high-quality education at comparatively lower costs, excellent public safety, and a modern lifestyle. 'Generous scholarships and a growing focus on internationalisation make them attractive. Career opportunities in tech, design, and research are also a big plus.' 'Seoul has built a strong reputation through universities like KAIST and SNU, especially in tech, engineering, and research. Scholarships and government support help too,' said Mayank Maheshwari, co-founder and COO at University Living. 'Tokyo's been a go-to for innovation for years whether it's AI, robotics, or design. Both cities have universities that are respected around the world, which is why they score well in the employer-related parts of the QS ranking,' he said. 'But students also care about what happens after—can they stay back, work, and build a life there? And even during their studies, they think about the everyday stuff: food, language, part-time work, and whether they'll feel at home in a completely new culture. That's why, for many Indian students, countries like the UK, Canada, the US, and Australia still feel easier. The language, the work rights after graduation, and even access to familiar food and communities—all of that helps when you're going abroad for the first time.' Cost of living: Seoul vs Tokyo vs Europe 'When it comes to cost of living, Seoul is generally more affordable than both Tokyo and many major cities in Western Europe. International students in Seoul usually spend around $550 to $750 per month, depending on lifestyle and housing,' said Maheshwari. 'Dorms are reasonably priced, public transport is student-friendly, and food, especially on campus, is affordable.' According to him: Tokyo tends to be slightly more expensive, with monthly student expenses between $700 and $900 (around ₹58,800 to ₹75,600). Rent and commuting costs are higher, but quality of life is strong. In European cities like Paris, Amsterdam, Berlin, or Dublin, student budgets can range between $1,200 and $1,800 per month (around ₹1 lakh to ₹1.5 lakh). Housing in Europe generally ranges from €500 to €900 (around ₹45,500 to ₹81,900), with total monthly costs often crossing €1,000 (around ₹91,000). 'However, many students manage these costs through part-time work opportunities, which are more accessible and flexible in Europe compared to some Asian destinations,' he said. 'In the end, Seoul offers a strong mix of affordability, safety, and quality education. Tokyo appeals to students keen on tech, design, and innovation. And Europe remains one of the top choices, not just for academic excellence and cultural diversity, but also for its student-friendly work policies and career pathways,' Maheshwari said.
GMA Network
17-07-2025
- Business
- GMA Network
Manila ranks 88th in QS 2026 'world's best student cities'
The Philippine capital has earned a place on the global academic map as Manila ranked 88th in the 2026 QS Best Student Cities Ranking, released by international education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). The annual index evaluates cities worldwide based on factors that matter most to students: academic reputation, student diversity, affordability, and employability. With an overall score of 63.9, Manila stood out for its affordability (85.3) and employer activity (68.4) — two crucial metrics for local and international students alike. The city also scored a respectable 57 in student view, reflecting generally positive perceptions of the student experience in the metro. Though it placed lower in categories like student mix (31.2) and desirability (37.2) — which reflect internationalization and quality of life — Manila's inclusion highlights the country's growing relevance in the global higher education landscape. To qualify for the rankings, cities must have over 250,000 residents and at least two universities featured in the latest QS World University Rankings. In Manila's case, top-performing universities such as the University of the Philippines (UP) and Ateneo de Manila University help anchor its presence in the index. Asia's momentum Manila's inclusion coincides with a broader trend across Asia: the continent is on the rise in international higher education. For the first time, Seoul has been crowned the world's best student city, dethroning London after six consecutive years. South Korea's capital was praised for academic excellence, safety, and cultural vibrancy — a model that many Asian cities, including Manila, may look to emulate. 'Asia's continued ascent signals a broader shift in the global education landscape, as emerging hubs challenge long-standing Western dominance,' said Ben Sowter, QS Senior Vice President. Other Asian cities also climbed the ranks: Kuala Lumpur (12th) broke into the top 15 for the first time. Beijing (13th) and Taipei (14th) achieved record-high placements. Hong Kong (17th) re-entered the top 20. Global overview The 2026 edition of the QS Best Student Cities Ranking evaluated 150 cities across 58 countries and territories, using six indicators: University Rankings Student Mix Desirability Employer Activity Affordability Student Voice Meanwhile, the Top 10 cities are: Seoul Tokyo London Munich Melbourne Sydney Berlin and Paris (tie) Zurich Vienna In contrast to Asia's momentum, many Western cities saw stagnation or decline, particularly due to high living costs. London, despite strong performance in employer activity and student mix, dropped to third place due to affordability issues. US cities also struggled with metrics on desirability and diversity, while Canadian cities dropped slightly in rank. Now in its 11th edition, the QS Best Student Cities Ranking is produced annually by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), a global authority on higher education insights. The index is widely consulted by students, educators, and policymakers worldwide as a trusted guide to the world's top study destinations. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
