Latest news with #Quetelet
WebMD
29-07-2025
- Health
- WebMD
Why BMI Still Won't Die
July 29, 2025 — The body mass index was born in judgment. Its creator, the 19th-century Belgian astronomer and statistician Adolphe Quetelet, believed that greatness arose from averageness. The closer an individual was to the average size and shape of their time and place, the closer they were to perfection. Any sports fan instantly sees the flaw in this logic: How boring would basketball be if the average NBA player was 5-foot-9 instead of 6-foot-7? But it gets worse: Quetelet asserted that the further someone deviated from the population average, the more flawed they were. First, however, he had to figure out what 'average' was. Starting with a database of measurements from Scottish soldiers, Quetelet developed a formula of weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters) squared. More than a century later, in 1972, legendary nutrition scientist Ancel Keys coined a new name for Quetelet's formula: body mass index, or BMI. What was conceived in judgment remains quite judge-y. BMI continues to serve as a demarcation between a 'normal' or 'healthy' body weight (a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9) and the deviance of being 'overweight' (a BMI of 25 to 29.9) or 'obese' (a BMI of 30 or more). Today, there's nothing 'normal' about a sub-25 BMI. Not when the average American adult has a BMI of 30 — just a couple of sandwiches past 'overweight' —and the CDC estimates that 42% of U.S. adults have obesity. That's why, over the past decade, a growing number of doctors and scientists have argued that BMI as a health metric is past its sell-by date. But before we talk about what's wrong with BMI and what health professionals can use instead, we need to look at how it became so ubiquitous and what it tells us — and doesn't. What BMI Can and Can't Tell Us 'The advantage of BMI,' said obesity specialist Yoni Freedhoff, MD, is that 'it's easily calculable.' Just run your height and weight through a BMI calculator. Freedhoff, an associate professor of family medicine at the University of Ottawa and medical director of the Bariatric Medical Institute, also acknowledges that 'BMI has a basis in statistical risk.' We've known for a long time that a person with obesity has a higher risk of developing heart disease, diabetes, and some cancers. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we learned that someone with a BMI over 30 was statistically more likely to develop a severe or even fatal illness. But when we look at overall risk of dying early from any cause, the link to excess body weight doesn't line up with expectations. A 2023 study found that, among U.S. adults, the likelihood of early death was 5%-7% lower among people with a BMI in the 'overweight' range, compared to those with a BMI between 22.5 and 24.9. The results varied significantly for older vs. younger groups. For those 65 and older, the chance of early death was about the same across BMIs from 22.5 to 34.9 — from the high end of 'healthy' to the low end of 'obese.' But for participants younger than 65, the lowest death rates were more constrained: from 22.5 to 27.4. 'BMI alone does not capture metabolic risk well,' said study author Aayush Visaria, MD, an instructor of medicine and clinical researcher at Rutgers University. That's because it can't distinguish between fat mass and lean tissue (muscle, bone, water), much less account for how a person's fat is distributed. That's important, Visaria said, because health professionals may overlook potential health risks in a patient who has a 'normal' BMI but poor body composition — the ratio of fat to muscle. The combination isn't as rare as it sounds. Research shows that many people with a 'healthy' BMI have excess body fat, defined as 25% or more in men and 35% or more in women. So what are the alternatives to using BMI to assess a patient's health risks? A New Paradigm for Diagnosing Obesity 'BMI by itself doesn't do anything for me,' said Fatima Cody Stanford, MD, MPH, an obesity medicine specialist at Massachusetts General Hospital and an associate professor of medicine and pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. 'I call it street-corner medicine. You're looking at the person like you're sitting on the street corner and you're like, 'That person has this issue.'' That's the message of a recent report that Stanford developed along with dozens of obesity experts from across the globe. The report puts obesity on a continuum. Where a person lands depends on how much body fat they have and how it affects their health and abilities. Toward the healthier end, you'd have someone whose BMI puts them in the overweight or obesity range but who has no weight-related health problems. They also wouldn't have excess fat mass, which you can indirectly measure with a tape measure. If their waist circumference, measured at the belly button, is less than 35 inches (for a woman) or 40 inches (for a man), you can assume they have a healthy body composition. A lot of athletes and other highly active people would fit into this category. At the other end of the continuum is clinical obesity: a chronic illness caused by excess body fat. Clinical obesity affects the person's health and/or quality of life at a functional level. They might have sleep apnea or joint pain; high blood pressure or heart problems; or high blood sugar or low HDL cholesterol. Or it might be some combination. Whatever the symptoms are, clinical obesity has a significant effect on the patient's present and future health status. Somewhere in between is preclinical obesity. In this category, a person has objectively high body fat (whether measured directly with DEXA or indirectly via waist circumference) but doesn't yet have obesity-related complications. Those complications are by no means exclusive to people with obesity. In a recent study, Stanford and her co-authors found that 61% of participants with a BMI of 30 or higher had at least one obesity-related complication — typically muscle or joint pain, high cholesterol, and high blood pressure. But so did 50% of participants with a 'normal' BMI. 'I don't know anything about [a patient] until I do a full assessment,' Stanford said. In fact, she won't see a new patient until she has access to a full metabolic workup, including fasting blood lipids and glucose, as well as their height and weight measurements. 'I don't even go over BMI with patients until it gets very severe, which is that 40-plus group.' What No Measurement Can Tell Us Someone with such a high BMI is unlikely to be surprised by hearing it. 'People who have excess weight know they have excess weight,' Freedhoff said. 'The doctors know. Everybody knows.' That's why Freedhoff doesn't think it matters if we replace or combine BMI with any other metrics. 'None of those numbers tell you if the individual in front of you has health consequences of their excess adiposity,' he said. Even more important, he added, is whether they themselves have any concerns about their weight. 'And if the answer to all those questions is no' — they have no medical conditions that require treatment, and they don't think their weight affects their quality of life — 'they're good to go. Just monitor, like we would with any other medical condition.' Why BMI Won't Go Away So if BMI doesn't offer uniquely valuable information, why is it still so ubiquitous? Why is it still used to assess who is or isn't at risk for diabetes or heart disease? Why is BMI the basis for prescribing in-demand weight loss medicines or for approving a range of procedures from joint replacements to organ transplants? 'It all comes down to what's the easiest, best number to use?' Freedhoff said. 'I'm not saying it's BMI, but I'm not saying it isn't.' If excess body fat is what medical providers should be monitoring, he added, 'BMI is pretty darned good' at detecting it. That's supported by a new study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. It showed that an overwhelming majority of participants with a BMI above the obesity threshold do, in fact, have excess body fat, as measured by DEXA. Still, Freedhoff said, no number has perfect prognostic value. That applies to any tool doctors use for any chronic condition. The difference with BMI is that it comes with the onus of personal responsibility. Whereas a doctor would never suggest that a patient's cardiac arrhythmia is a choice, that implication is almost always part of the conversation when it comes to obesity. 'I marvel at how challenging it seems to be for society as a whole, including health care, to consider obesity to be just another chronic medical condition that the person did not choose, that does not always guarantee problems, that does respond to treatment, and that should be free from blame,' Freedhoff said.
Yahoo
05-02-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
Why You Should Ignore Your BMI and Focus on This Instead
If you've had your weight and height recorded at the doctor's office, chances are you have heard of body mass index, or BMI. BMI is widely used as a marker of health, but it turns out that it's not all that accurate -- especially for people of color. Instead, it's better to learn yourbody fat percentage and body fat distribution. These figures can give you a far better picture of your overall health. We break down the history behind BMI and how body fat percentage relates to your health. Read more to get a better understanding on why BMI is out and better ways to determine your health status. To figure out the history behind BMI, we have to look at Flemish statistician Lambert Adolph Jacque Quetelet, who gave us the concept of "social averages." He was searching for the definition of the "average man" and wanted to find a distribution of body fat that would give him a bell-shaped curve. Quetelet discovered in 1835 that a fairly accurate equation for the relationship of body mass to height was given by squaring the ratio of weight to height. And thus, body mass index was born (though it wasn't called this quite yet). That's a lot of math lingo, but the important part is that Quetelet was not a physician, nor was he studying obesity or health -- he was looking for a way to analyze populations. Quetelet's Index also didn't differentiate between fat and muscle, only taking into account total body mass. So how did BMI start being used as an indicator of an individual's health? In the 1970s, researcher Ancel Keys conducted a study with more than 7,500 participants, trying to find the most effective way to measure body fat. After testing body mass index, water displacement and skin calipers, the first of the three was determined to be the best and most cost-effective way to do so. The problem with Keys' study? The participants were all men, and predominantly white. Nevertheless, in 1985 the National Institute of Health changed its definition of obesity to include BMI, saying that it is "a simple measurement highly correlated with other estimates of fatness." And thus, BMI became an easy way to measure one's risk of obesity-related illnesses. But just because BMI is simple and cost-effective to measure, this doesn't mean that it's accurate for everyone. This is partially because muscle weighs more than fat, so if your body fat percentage is low, but you weigh more than what's average for your height, your BMI could say that you are obese when you aren't. In one study with thousands of participants, African American women with the same BMIs as white women were found to have better health markers in areas like blood pressure and cholesterol, suggesting that BMI can define black people as "unhealthy" when in reality they aren't. Other studies echo similar ideas -- a researcher at the University of Tennessee concluded that, "Compared to Caucasians, African Americans of the same age, gender, waist circumference, weight and height may have lower total and abdominal fat mass." Thus, BMI will overestimate their body fat, and isn't accurate. BMI also fails to accurately assess health in Asian people, but in the opposite direction of African Americans. One study that tracked the health of more than 78,000 women in the US found that Asian Americans were at a higher risk of developing obesity-related illnesses at lower BMIs than their white counterparts. Now that we've determined that BMI isn't a super accurate way to measure a person's health and risk of disease, we can turn to one measurement that is far more effective: body fat percentage. Body fat percentage has been shown to be an accurate indicator of the risk of osteoporosis with aging, high blood pressure and other cardiometabolic risks, diabetes and increased mortality in general -- all when people's BMIs or weight would indicate they are otherwise healthy. Researchers don't know the full story behind BMI, body fat percentage and obesity, but the reason why body fat percentage is more accurate is probably because it actually takes into account a person's adipose tissue, instead of lumping body fat and lean muscle together. There's a bunch of different ways you can measure your body fat percentage, and for the best readings you'll want to get it done at a doctor's or dietician's office. They'll have machines like an underwater weighing station or the ability to do a DEXA scan, which are far more accurate than anything you can do at home. If you don't have the resources to make the trip to a health care provider, however, you can get a fairly good estimate at home. The American Council of Exercise has a calculator where you can plug in some skinfold measurements for a rough idea of what your body fat percentage is. Body fat percentage still doesn't tell the whole story -- where the fat is stored on your body is important, too. Some people carry fat around their midsection, while others have an "hourglass" shape, where you carry fat in your chest and hips. Body fat distribution is determined in part by environmental factors, like alcohol intake and cigarette use, but it also has a strong genetic component. To get an idea of your body fat distribution, measure the ratio between the circumference of your waist and the circumference of your hips. The more fat you carry around your waist (being apple-shaped as opposed to pear-shaped), the higher your risk is for heart disease. Ratios over 0.85 for women and 0.9 for men put people at substantially increased risk for obesity-related illnesses. If your ratio or body fat percentage is higher than you'd like, the good news is that it's not permanent. A 2011 study suggested that a diet low in processed foods may lower your waist-to-hip ratio. If you're concerned about your body fat percentage, talk to your health care provider -- they'll have ideas on how you can manage your weight better in the long run.
