Latest news with #R-CorpusChristi
Yahoo
26-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Bill to pump up to $500 million into Texas films OK'ed in the House
The Texas House on Sunday passed a bill increasing the amount of money the state spends to attract film and television productions. Senate Bill 22, filed by Houston Republican Sen. Joan Huffman, received preliminary approval from the Texas House, 105-34. The bill allows the comptroller to deposit $500 million into a new Texas Moving Image Industry Incentive Fund every two years until 2035. Eligible expenses include Texas workers' wages, meals purchased from local restaurants, and airfare on Texas-based airlines. The actual dollar amount seems subject to change, as Rep. Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, the bill's sponsor, suggested it might drop to $300 million based on discussions in committee hearings. 'It could go up to $500 million as they haven't finalized the budget, but the $300 million is what they're discussing,' Hunter told lawmakers. Hunter said SB 22 does not guarantee the film incentive fund $500 million, which acts as a ceiling. 'You already voted for the budget. This money was placed in the budget. That's not this bill,' Hunter told lawmakers. 'This bill provides safeguards on how Texas spends money on film.' Chase Musslewhite, co-founder of Media for Texas, a non-profit organization dedicated to boosting the state's film and media industry, said on Tuesday she had heard discussions about decreasing the $500 million amount. Still, as long as it's above $200 million, she said her organization is content. 'This bill makes us competitive with our neighbors so that we wouldn't be losing our stories to New Mexico, Louisiana, and Georgia, but it wouldn't make us competitive enough to open the floodgates,' said Musslewhite. 'About six or seven other states still offer more or have stronger incentives, and I think that works perfectly for Texas. We're not trying to have everybody come here and join the rat race to get more incentives. We just want to be baseline competitive.' This bill has been the subject of commentary and discussion for several weeks now. Critics have been alarmed at the amount of money that would be given to productions and the potential political and local impact Hollywood might have on Texas. 'This bill provides taxpayer-funded incentives to the film and entertainment industry. The same industry that trashed us for supporting President Trump, mocked us for standing up for the unborn, and ridiculed our Christian faith at every opportunity,' said Rep. David Lowe, R-North Richland Hills, who spoke against the bill. 'Now we are expected to trust them to produce family-friendly content and reimburse them $2.5 billion over the next decade. Let's stop the Hollywood handouts.' Others have raised concerns about how the governor's office will determine which productions to fund. The bill gives the governor's office complete discretion over which projects receive grant funding. However, supporters pointed out that many of these things have already been in place, and the bill doesn't stop films from being made; it just provides extra incentives. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, Texas is one of 37 states to offer a film incentive program. However, due to the uncertainty surrounding their incentive program, Texas is far behind states like New York, Georgia, and New Mexico when it comes to Westerns and other film and TV productions. 'There are tons of Texans who live in California and New York, all over the globe, who are pursuing their careers, because those opportunities weren't here in Texas,' said Grant Wood, Co-founder, Media for Texas. 'We have essentially been subsidizing the workforce of these other states. It's all about bringing that workforce home and continuing to create a more robust and diverse economy.' Since 2007, lawmakers have funded the film incentive program at varying levels, with $50 million during one legislative session followed by $45 million the next. A then-historic $200 million came during the most recent session in 2023. The program has boosted economic activity in Texas, producing a 469% return on investment, according to the Texas Film Commission, though economists and some House lawmakers have criticized that metric and denounced film incentives as wasteful spending. SB 22 would make Texas more attractive to producers who have opted to film their projects in other states that have historically offered larger and more stable incentives, according to Musslewhite. The bill has received support from actors like Matthew McConaughey, Woody Harrelson, and Dennis Quaid, and creators like Chad Gunderson, who produces the show 'The Chosen,' and Taylor Sheridan, who wrote the movie Hell or High Water. 'I think with the celebrity power we have behind this, once this bill gets passed, it will spread like wildfire,' Musslewhite said, mentioning 10 productions are already interested in shooting in Texas. In addition to pumping more money into film incentives, SB 22 would make smaller films eligible for larger grants. Currently, projects that spend between $1 million and $3.5 million in Texas are eligible for a 10% rebate, and projects that pay more than $3.5 million can receive a 20% grant. The bill proposes a larger, 25% grant for feature films and television programs that spend at least $1.5 million. Texas' film incentive program offers an additional 2.5% incentive to productions shot in certain 'underutilized' or 'economically distressed areas,' as well as to those with veterans who make up 5% of the total paid crew. One of the biggest fears expressed by Republican lawmakers when it comes to this bill is the amount of influence this gives 'Hollywood' executives over Texans when it comes to booking stadiums or parks, closing down roads or streets, and taking up resources, a fear that Musslewhite says is unfounded. 'I have always found this fear interesting because I think it doesn't give enough credit to how Texans operate, how strong we are in our sensibilities, who we are, and how we do business,' Musselewhite said. 'Instead of fearing what Hollywood will do to Texas, we should be enthusiastic about what Texas will implement on the industry.' Disclosure: National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Yahoo
03-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Bill to give Starbase control over Boca Chica closures revived
May 2—Legislation that would take away Cameron County's authority over SpaceX-related beach and road closures has been revived in the House State Affairs Committee after being narrowly voted down in the same committee a couple of days earlier. Sen. Adam Hinojosa's (R-Corpus Christi) Senate Bill 2188, taken up by the committee in lieu of identical House Bill 4660 from Rep. Janie Lopez (R-San Benito), passed 8-6 on Wednesday— recommended without amendment to a vote by the full House — after failing 7-6 on Monday. The Senate passed SB 2188 on April 5. The legislation would hand over to Starbase — a newly minted municipality likely to be approved in the May 3 election — authority over closures over S.H. 4 and Boca Chica Beach except from Friday at noon to 8 a.m. Monday, during which authority would remain with the county. Although the bills' reference municipalities with spaceports and beach access, without specifically mentioning Starbase, they appear tailor made to accommodate SpaceX's wishes when it comes to its operations at Boca Chica. County officials are staunchly opposed to handing control over closures to Starbase's municipal government, which doesn't exist yet. County Judge Eddie Treviño Jr., who has argued against the legislation from the start, said he knew the matter wasn't settled. Treviño said he doesn't buy the argument from SpaceX and other proponents of the legislation that it's necessary to streamline the process of implementing closures. "There is no good reason to change the current protocol," he said. "I don't think that the process has proven to be inefficient whatsoever — quite the opposite. As I think as we've gotten more and more experience and more accustomed to it, it's become much more efficient. "The whole point I think is to make sure that the public is aware of when potential closures or delays may be taking place. We've done that. On occasion the county has said no (to SpaceX), but we've tried real hard to work with them and we're going to continue to do that." Those behind the legislation would be hard pressed to show how not passing it would negative impact SpaceX's operations, Treviño said. "I think the history shows that the county's been extremely supportive, while at the same time trying to safeguard the public access to the beach," he added. Treviño said the county will continue to argue its position among state and local officials, and encouraged county residents who are against the change to contact as many state representatives as possible to register their opposition. "Until the session's over, then we need to keep trying," he said. Treviño said he can see how SB 2188 and HB 4660 might be viewed by some as further evidence of SpaceX's intent to consolidate control of Boca Chica at the expense of the public — though Treviño emphasized that he hopes that's not the case. "I can certainly understand that sentiment," he said. Featured Local Savings
