Latest news with #RTX5090
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
5 RTX 50 series gaming laptops to grab during Amazon Great Freedom Festival Sale
The Amazon Great Freedom Festival sale kicks off July 31, and if you've been holding out for a next-gen gaming laptop, this is the window to strike. Nvidia's RTX 50 series is finally showing up in India, bringing serious performance, AI features, and future-proof specs. From esports and AAA gaming to content creation, these 5 laptops pack serious heat, and they're worth every click. This one's a monster. With the top-end RTX 5090 GPU, 64 GB DDR5 RAM, and Intel's Ultra 9 275HX chip, it's overkill in the best way. Expect buttery 240Hz gameplay on its WQXGA 16-inch panel and enough thermal management to keep things chill. If you're building a gaming/editing beast, this is the alpha pick. Same design, lighter load. The RTX 5080 version offers insane performance for a slightly lower price. You still get a 240Hz display, a generous 32 GB of RAM, and all the perks of HP's Omen software and AI chops. Ideal for creators and gamers who want premium without going all-in on 5090. ASUS brings its signature RGB swagger here, with a 12 GB RTX 5070 Ti GPU, 140W TGP, and a snappy 240Hz QHD+ screen. The metal chassis is sleek, and the 32 GB RAM combo means zero stutter during high-load sessions. Great pick for streamers and competitive gamers. This is the most balanced option of the lot. The RTX 5060 (115W) paired with Intel Ultra 9 still delivers strong 1440p performance. You get 16 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, and the same design and display perks as the pricier version—making it perfect for aspiring pros on a tighter budget. Entry-level RTX 50 performance with a 13th Gen i7? Yes, please. The Victus packs an 8 GB RTX 5050, 144Hz display, and upgradeable RAM up to 24 GB. It's not flashy, but it's a smart pick for students and casual gamers looking for a future-ready setup under ₹ 1 lakh. From full-blown powerhouses to mid-range monsters, the RTX 50 laptop wave has arrived—and Amazon's Freedom Festival is your shot at early deals. Keep your eyes on launch prices, bank offers, and early bird discounts starting July 31.
Digital Trends
2 days ago
- Digital Trends
Asus reveals RTX 50 series GPU power specs for 2025 ROG and TUF gaming laptops
Asus has published the complete GPU power specifications for its 2025 ROG and TUF gaming laptops, offering clarity on the exact TGP (Total Graphics Power) configurations for the latest Nvidia RTX 50 series mobile GPUs. This move provides much-needed transparency for consumers, who often struggle to determine GPU wattages due to inconsistent or hidden specs across the laptop industry. The detailed list, available on Asus' official website, covers all RTX 50-series mobile GPUs across a wide range of gaming laptop models. RTX 5090 Mobile: 100W – 175W RTX 5080 Mobile: 100W – 175W RTX 5070 Ti Mobile: 100W – 175W RTX 5070 Mobile: 75W – 115W RTX 5060 Mobile: 75W – 115W RTX 5050 Mobile: 75W – 115W Recommended Videos According to the company, all 2025 ROG Strix Scar laptops equipped with the RTX 5090, RTX 5080, and RTX 5070 Ti will be capable of running these GPUs at their maximum TGPs. On the other hand, the TUF Gaming models like the TUF A18 and TUF A16 will feature slightly more conservative configurations, with the RTX 5070 and the RTX 5060 at up to 115W. The slimmer Zephyrus G14, known for its ultraportable design, will offer the RTX 5080 and RTX 5070 Ti at 120W, while the rest of the GPUs will be capped at 100W. This reflects the thermal and power constraints of its thin chassis. Asus has shared these power figures model-by-model to give buyers a clearer idea of the performance they can expect. For instance, the ROG Strix Scar 18 with the RTX 5080 runs the chip at 175W, while the Zephyrus G14 caps the RTX 5080 at 120W to maintain thermals. While both laptops offer the same GPU, the difference in power would result in a significant difference in terms of performance. This public disclosure comes in response to growing consumer demand for transparency in GPU power ratings. Since Nvidia's 30- and 40-series mobile GPUs began allowing a wide TGP range with no strict branding distinction, buyers have had to rely on third-party reviews or hidden spec sheets to know what level of performance to expect. By sharing this information upfront, Asus seems to be giving buyers the tools to make informed decisions, especially as GPU power limits can significantly impact gaming performance, cooling, and battery life.
Digital Trends
4 days ago
- Digital Trends
My favorite GPU this year is also one you absolutely shouldn't buy right now
When it comes to some of the best graphics cards that have been released in 2025 so far, I have a strong favorite — and it's not one I thought would end up at the top of my list going into this year. I'm talking about the current AMD flagship, the Radeon RX 9070 XT. However, as much as I love the GPU, I still don't think you should buy it right now — and although it pains me to do it, I'm about to show you why not (and what you can buy instead). The RX 9070 XT is a fantastic GPU In a year when both Nvidia and AMD launched new graphics cards, there's always quite a bit to choose from. However, going into this generation, I knew that AMD would be trying to stick to mainstream GPUs. Nvidia's RTX 5090 was bound to remain uncontested, and I thought that the RTX 5080 and the RTX 5070 Ti wouldn't have too much to worry about, either. I was wrong, and for once, I was happy to be. Recommended Videos Upon launch, the RX 9070 XT was said to deliver RTX 5070 Ti-level performance for $150 less, and I was fully on board with that. Benchmarks quickly proved that AMD wasn't throwing around empty promises, either. The GPU can stand its ground, perhaps more so than I expected it to, making it more of an upper-midrange option than a true mainstream card. Sure, AMD wasn't trying to destroy Nvidia — but it tried, and succeeded, in making a GPU that most gamers can want. Depending on the benchmark and the reviewer, you'll see the RX 9070 XT falling behind the last-gen flagship, the RX 7900 XTX, in pure rasterization. But in ray tracing? The RX 9070 XT beats the previous-gen halo card, and that's despite its lower price point. Let's compare to Nvidia. As Nvidia remains ever the GPU behemoth, it's no wonder that many gamers still default to Team Green — but on paper, AMD's option is better here. Most benchmarks pin the RX 9070 XT somewhere within 10% of the RTX 5070 Ti, and up to 15% faster than the RTX 5070. Not a bad score for something that was meant to cater to the mainstream market. I've even seen the RX 9070 XT nearly catch up to the RTX 5080 when overclocked. Back when the RX 9070 XT launched, I told people that if I had to buy a graphics card this year, it'd have been AMD. Unfortunately, I had to change my mind soon after the GPU hit the shelves. There's one major problem It's all about the money, I'm afraid. No single GPU exists in a vacuum. It's important to know that. Even if the card in question is fantastic, it's always going to be compared against other GPUs, and I'm not just talking about the performance. I'm talking about the price, and this is where, months after launch, the AMD RX 9070 XT still leaves a lot to be desired. AMD launched the RX 9070 XT at $599, and the RX 9070 at $549. I've seen people complaining about the price, but personally, it was better than I dared to hope for. AMD managed to undercut Nvidia in a major way with the RX 9070 XT, and while the non-XT version was doomed to a less successful life due to the skewed price-to-performance ratio, the RX 9070 XT had every chance of becoming a fan favorite. Well, what do you know: AMD itself admitted that the RX 9070 XT was selling faster than the manufacturers could keep up with. AMD delivered a good product, and the market was ready for it. Unfortunately, the MSRP didn't last. Demand today for our new @amdradeon cards has been phenomenal. We are working with our AIBs to replenish stock at our partners ASAP in the coming days and weeks. MSRP pricing (excluding region specific tariffs and/or taxes) will continue to be encouraged beyond today so don't… — Frank Azor (@AzorFrank) March 6, 2025 Although AMD's Frank Azor said back in March that MSRP pricing will continue to be encouraged, the current state of the market has won. Scanning Amazon for the RX 9070 XT shows me a few models in the $720 to $820 range. At that price, the advantage AMD has over Nvidia is all but gone, which is why it's hard to recommend the RX 9070 XT right now. If I had to recommend one, it'd be the cheapest option from Asus, which you can check out here. It's still $120 more than the MSRP, but it is cheaper than the RTX 5070 Ti, if only slightly. I can't, and don't, blame AMD here at all. The GPU market is rough, and most graphics cards are selling above their MSRPs. In fact, if a GPU sells at MSRP, chances are that the demand for it might be lower — take from that what you will. AMD doesn't suffer from a lack of demand. If anything, it's the exact opposite. When the GPU flew off the shelves on launch day, I hoped that it'd be back in great quantities somewhere down the line. I was partly right — it is back, and readily available, but sadly, hardly any cheaper. You still have to pay a premium if you want to own AMD's best GPU. What can you buy instead? The sad reality of the current GPU market is that many graphics cards sell above their MSRPs. However, there are a few options for gamers who don't want to pay too much of a premium. One GPU I keep recommending this year is the Intel Arc B580. Unfortunately, it's not at all of the same caliber as the RX 9070 XT, but if you're looking for a budget option to add to your build, it'll do the trick nicely. If we're looking at cards that offer similar performance to the RX 9070 XT, we're really considering options like Nvidia's RTX 5070 Ti, RTX 5070, and perhaps the RTX 5060 Ti. From AMD itself, there's the RX 9070 non-XT, but also the RX 7800 XT, RX 7900 XT or GRE, and the RX 7900 XTX. The last-gen options will offer worse ray tracing performance, so that's something to keep in mind. Last-gen availability is spotty, and cards are often overpriced. If you want to try to get one of those, I recommend the second-hand market instead. But let's say you want a new GPU. What do you do? If you want to keep the same level of performance, I would probably bite the bullet and get the RTX 5070 Ti. It's slightly faster than the RX 9070 XT, offers better ray tracing performance, and grants you access to Nvidia's latest DLSS 4 Multi-Frame Generation tech. I found the RTX 5070 Ti for $790 on Amazon, so check it out. That's $40 above the MSRP, which is not too terrible for current pricing trends. Don't mind lowering your performance-related expectations? AMD's more recent RX 9060 XT 16GB is an option — just make sure you buy the 16GB version and not the one with just eight gigs of VRAM. I found this Sapphire RX 9060 XT 16GB at $380. Nvidia's 16GB RTX 5060 Ti is considerably pricier, so if you're buying something cheaper, make sure to choose AMD here.
Hindustan Times
6 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Building the ultimate RTX 5090 gaming PC in 2025: power, speed, and zero compromise
The RTX 5090 is hands down the GPU of 2025. With Nvidia's Blackwell architecture, 32 GB of VRAM, upgraded Tensor cores, and 4th-gen ray tracing, it's built for extreme 4K and 8K gaming, high-end AI workloads, and content creation pipelines that don't flinch. But to unlock its full potential, the rest of your PC better keep up. This guide builds around the RTX 5090 with a ₹4.5L-6L range in mind, balancing brute force with thermal sanity and long-term upgradability. Ultimate overpowered RTX 5090 gaming PC build. Core components: No weak links allowed GPU: The RTX 5090 is a massive 3.5-slot card. It needs serious breathing room and consistent cooling. You'll want a case that doesn't choke airflow and, ideally, a custom loop or top-tier triple-fan air cooler if not going full liquid. CPU: Ryzen 9 9950X3D is the sweet spot for pure gaming and streaming. Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is better suited for AI and multitasking. Both are monsters, pair either with confidence. Motherboard: Go for an X670E or Z990 chipset board with solid VRMs, DDR5 RAM support, PCIe 5.0 lanes, and at least three M.2 slots. Stability matters at this level. RAM: 32 GB DDR5 (6000MHz+) is the baseline. Creators and AI users can push to 64 GB or higher. Storage: Start with a fast 2 TB PCIe Gen 4/5 NVMe for boot and main games. Add a secondary SSD or HDD for bulk files. Personal recommendation would be to go for a Gen 5 SSD for absolute future proofing. Power Supply: 1000W+ 80+ Platinum, modular, and ready for multiple 8-pin or 12VHPWR GPU connectors. Cooling: A 360mm AIO is minimum. Custom loops? Ideal if you're chasing silence or aesthetics. Case: Full tower preferred. Prioritize airflow, cable clearance, and GPU clearance. Building it right Mount the CPU carefully, paste it right, and make sure your RAM clicks fully. The RTX 5090 installation will test your patience, remove extra slot covers and ensure enough clearance. Cable management matters more here. This isn't a casual build. What you get Expect buttery-smooth gameplay at 4K with max settings, real-time AI processing, and machine learning tasks without stutters. Heat? Yes. Noise? Moderate. But this rig handles it all. This isn't a build for casual users. It's for enthusiasts, creators, and professionals who want tomorrow's power today. If you've got the budget and ambition, the RTX 5090 build is everything you need, and ready for whatever comes next.
Stuff.tv
22-07-2025
- Stuff.tv
After weeks of testing, the new Razer Blade 16 is the gaming laptop I'd happily take anywhere
Stuff Verdict The Razer Blade 16 (2025) is a gaming monster, naturally, but also has fantastic battery life and a stunning screen. If you can afford one, it's a fantastic ultraportable powerhouse. Pros Immense gaming muscle and desktop performance Gorgeous, high refresh rate OLED screen Genuinely impressive battery life for a gaming laptop Cons Screen is very reflective Ruinously expensive with an RTX 5090 Introduction I'm not a fan of having to pick between high frame rates and portability. The most powerful gaming laptops are usually the biggest and heaviest – and rarely last more than a few hours as soon as you unplug their brick-like power adapters. Or at least, that used to be the case. Manufacturers have gotten much better at emphasising slimness and sleekness, without compromising on hardware. The new Razer Blade 16 might've just taken that to the extreme. At a mere 17mm thick, it isn't that far off a modern MacBook Pro's dimensions, yet it finds room inside for top-tier Nvidia RTX 5090 mobile graphics. Razer has also opted for AMD internals for the first time to maximise battery life, and brought OLED display tech into the mix. The laptop equivalent of a supercar never comes cheap, of course. The Blade 16 starts $2400/£2100 with an RTX 5060 GPU, but climbs up to a heady $4500/£3900 for the version tested here – and you can push that figure even further if you want extra RAM or storage. That puts it in the same ballpark as the equally svelte Asus ROG Zephyrus G16. Does the Razer do enough to justify its asking price? How we test laptops Every laptop reviewed on Stuff is tested using industry standard benchmarks and apps to assess performance and battery life. We use our years of experience to judge display, sound and general usability. Manufacturers have no visibility on reviews before they appear online, and we never accept payment to feature products. Find out more about how we test and rate products. Design & build: slender fan Side by side with a 2023-era Blade (the last to use the old chassis), it's seriously impressive how much skinnier this new model is – despite having to make room inside for some particularly toasty components, not least the RTX 5090 GPU. Cleverly, Razer has pulled this thinning off by actually making the new laptop larger. The 5mm of depth that's been shaved off has been added to the length of the laptop instead, but you'd only notice with a direct comparison. The footprint has barely grown, and it won't affect the sort of backpacks or laptop bags the Blade will slide into. That's handy, as given the new model is over 300g lighter than the old one, you're going to want to take it on the move a lot more. I've long seen Razer laptops as the yin to Apple's yang, and that rings true again here. There's a clear family resemblance in the milled aluminium unibody, subtle Ouroboros logo on the lid, and green accented USB ports at the sides. The matte black finish is treated to prevent wear, and does a decent job at minimising fingerprint smudges too. It looks mean, without also being shouty; as gaming laptops go, it's wonderfully subtle unless you know what you're looking at. The Blade also gets a big thumbs up for not skimping on connectivity in the name of slimness. You get two USB-Cs (one USB4, one USB 3.2) and three USB type-As, as well as full-size HDMI, a 3.5mm combination headset port, and a full-size SD card reader. Having them all at the sides makes it impossible to keep cables out of sight when gaming at a desk, but convenient for quickly plugging in peripherals. Keyboard & touchpad: happy taps Older Blades weren't the greatest laptops to type on, but this new one is a treat for your fingers. There's 50% more key travel than the last-gen chassis got, and the actuation force has been adjusted so it feels like you're pressing down with purpose before an input is detected. It's fairly quiet to tap away on unless you type like you're hammering nails, and each island-style key is comfortably spaced apart. It did take me a few hours to get used to how flat it all is, with no key recesses to help place your fingers. Sensibly Razer hasn't tried to shoehorn in a numerical keypad, but has found a bit of space at the edge of the board for a few customisable macro keys. Holding down the fn button also switches the per-key RGB backlighting to highlight the top row's multimedia functions, making things like screen brightness and the mute key far easier to find. Doubling up on LEDs for these keys mean each key cap is perfectly lit, with next to no light bleed around the edges. You can customise the lot through Razer's Synapse software, too. While I default to a wireless mouse for pretty much anything outside of the Windows desktop, the Blade's touchpad is a fine substitute when away from a desk. It's huge, with a low-friction surface that makes cursor movement a breeze. It's accurate and has a firm physical click action. Screen & sound: how refreshing Regardless of what spec you choose, every Blade 16 gets the same QHD+ resolution display. I'm not complaining – it's an absolute stunner, and I rarely used the last-gen Blade's dual resolution mode anyway. Here you're getting a 2560×1600 OLED with a rapid 240Hz refresh rate, which is ideal for hectic multiplayer gaming. While some LCD screens claim even faster refresh rates, OLED tech has inherently faster response times, so you're getting a gloriously smooth presentation here. Variable refresh all but prevents tearing when frame rates dip below 60fps, too. OLED also means there's none of the light bloom or halo effect you got on the old Blade's mini-LED panel – just perfect blacks and impeccable contrast, which give dimly lit movie scenes and dark game levels outstanding amounts of depth. Colours are deliciously vibrant, helping Cyberpunk 2077's Phantom Liberty expansion feel even more immersive than usual. There's a decent amount of brightness on tap, which helps give HDR content some welcome extra pop. Pretty much the only downside is how reflective the panel is; even at full whack, sitting by windows or underneath bright lights can be quite distracting. The six-speaker sound system is a great match to the screen, getting impressively loud and with decent amounts of bass for a laptop. The mid-range is clear, and THX Spatial Audio does a convincing impression of surround sound. Treble could use just a little extra bite, but I didn't ever feel the need to plug in a headset unless I was gaming – and that was partly down to fan noise. The internal fans spin up to a noticeable degree as soon as you boot into a game, and are impossible to ignore when run at their maximum. Performance: graphical greatness Razer used to be all-in on Intel, but has made the switch to AMD power for this laptop generation. The Blade 16 kicks off with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, but steps up to a Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 once you add RTX 5090 graphics to your order. I've seen this twelve core, 24-thread chip in larger gaming laptops, but this is the first time I've tried one in such a skinny chassis. In my review unit it's paired with a 2TB NVMe SSD and 32GB of RAM. For desktop duties, AMD's silicon trades back and forth with the last-gen Intel Core chips. The gap is fairly small, and there's ample oomph for all sorts of creative jobs like image editing. Synthetic tests show very little in the way of penalty for going slim, being roughly on par with the 18in MSI Stealth A18 AI+. Certain tasks – like video encoding – are just better suited to Intel's architecture, so keep in mind that newer doesn't always mean better – though AMD comfortably wins out on efficiency. More on that below. Razer Blade 16 (2025) productivity benchmark scores Geekbench 6 single-core 2966 Geekbench 6 multi-core 15488 Geekbench AI 7643 You don't buy a Blade 16 to just work on the Windows desktop, of course. It's gaming where this laptop truly shines, the RTX 5090 GPU and its whopping 24GB of video memory absolutely churning through modern titles. At the 2560×1600 native resolution, none of the titles I tried ever dipped below 60fps as long as ray tracing stayed disabled. Counter Strike 2 comfortably saw frame rates in the 100-200fps range, which should be ideal for serious esports gamers. Ray Tracing can still make the hardware sweat, Nvidia's upscaling tech is on hand to assist. DLSS 4.0 and multi-frame generation are scarily good, creating entirely new frames without the tearing, blurriness or input delay seen on previous iterations. Cyberpunk 2077 saw huge gains, from a barely playable 24.4fps with maximum path tracing but no upscaling, to a far smoother 53.9fps with DLSS. Doom: the Dark Ages was equally impressive, running smoothly even when the screen was filled with demons. This is the fastest mobile GPU money can buy, hands down – but native rendering performance isn't a huge leap from the previous generation, and the RTX 5080 isn't that far behind. It's only with DLSS and multi-frame generation enabled that the 5000 series shows a truly generational leap from the 4000 series, and even then 4K gaming at maximum settings with ray tracing still looks out of reach in some titles. The Blade 16's more restrictive thermals also limit the 5090's potential a little, but not to the extent that games aren't playable. Frame rates never dipped at any point, even during a marathon play session. Razer Blade 16 (2025) gaming benchmark scores Native rendering (2560×1600) DLSS upscaling 3DMark Steel Nomad 5821 N/A Cyberpunk 2077 (RT Overdrive) 24.43fps 53.9fps Cyberpunk 2077 (Ultra, RT off) 91.42fps 111.05fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider (RT on) 119fps 148fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider (RT off) 156fps 161fps Gears Tactics 130.6fps N/A Arguably what impressed me most when benchmarking the Blade 16 was how long it lasted while away from the mains. When looping a local video at 50% brightness, I was getting close to ten hours. That's way more than I managed from the old Intel-powered Blade. Desktop working should see you closer to six or seven, which might be enough to see you through an entire working day – if you aren't tempted to game during your lunch break. Depending on the title it can last between one and three hours here. That's still not a bad showing for a laptop with a green this big and a GPU this power-hungry. Razer Blade 16 (2025) verdict Razer laptops have always carried a certain gravitas, but I think the latest Blade 16 might be one of the first to truly deserve it. This is a gloriously potent gaming laptop, with the sort of screen you could happily stare at all day and enough ports at the sides to become a very effective desktop replacement. Yet it also has a long-lasting battery and is light enough that you can happily take it on the move. OK, it's expensive, especially in 5090 guise – but name a laptop with that GPU that isn't. The 'Razer tax' does mean you pay a premium over the likes of Asus, MSI or Lenovo, but you're getting a design that's almost on par with Apple for your money. If you have the funds, it'll demolish any game you can throw at it for years to come. Stuff Says… Score: 5/5 The Razer Blade 16 (2025) is a gaming monster, naturally, but also has fantastic battery life and a stunning screen. If you can afford one, it's a fantastic ultraportable powerhouse. Pros Immense gaming muscle and desktop performance Gorgeous, high refresh rate OLED screen Genuinely impressive battery life for a gaming laptop Cons Screen is very reflective Ruinously expensive with an RTX 5090 Razer Blade 16 (2025) technical specifications Screen 16in, 2560×1600, 240Hz OLED Processor AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Memory 32GB RAM Graphics Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop w/ 24GB RAM Storage 2TB Operating system Windows 11 Connectivity HDMI, 1x USB4 Type-C, 1x USB 3.2 Type-C, 3x USB, 3.5mm headphone port, SD card reader Battery 90Whr Dimensions 355x251x17.4mm, 2.14kg
