Latest news with #RecordingPerformersMalaysia
Free Malaysia Today
2 days ago
- Business
- Free Malaysia Today
Music industry bodies secure leave to challenge new copyright guidelines
Public Performance Malaysia Bhd and Recording Performers Malaysia Bhd are challenging the Guidelines of Copyright (Collective Management Organisations) 2025. KUALA LUMPUR : The High Court has granted two collective management organisations (CMOs) representing the rights of recording performers in Malaysia leave to bring judicial review proceedings to challenge a new regulatory framework slated to come into force next year. Justice Amarjeet Singh allowed Public Performance Malaysia Bhd (PPM) and Recording Performers Malaysia Bhd (RPM) to pursue judicial review proceedings in their bid to quash the Guidelines of Copyright (Collective Management Organisations) 2025. The court also fixed Aug 7 to hear the application by PPM and RPM to stay the enforcement of the guidelines pending the disposal of the lawsuit. PPM and PRM named the controller of copyright, MyIPO, and the domestic trade and cost of living minister as respondents in their application. They claim the guidelines – scheduled to come into force on Jan 16, 2026 – were drawn up and issued by the respondents without proper consultation. They said they were only provided last year with a public consultation paper that outlined general proposals, without the specific details necessary for meaningful feedback. Both bodies claimed they only came to know the full contents of the guidelines when it was published earlier this year. They said the guidelines contained 'sweeping provisions' relating to the internal structure, constitution and governance of a CMO, its agreement with constituent members, and the terms of the licensing scheme to be implemented. They also said the copyright controller, tasked with regulating copyright matters, did not accord them a fair opportunity to be heard and reply. They further alleged that the guidelines contained provisions that exceed the powers vested by law in the controller. The court also fixed July 10 to hear a separate bid by Music Authors Copyright Protection Bhd (MACP) for leave to commence a judicial review over the same guidelines. PPM, RPM and MACP had said that they disagreed with the guidelines as it could negatively impact copyright holders.
New Straits Times
09-05-2025
- Entertainment
- New Straits Times
#SHOWBIZ: RPM: Shima received royalties four times since 2023
KUALA LUMPUR: Recording Performers Malaysia (RPM) Berhad has denied claims by veteran singer Shima that she did not receive full royalty payments since registering as a member four years ago. RPM claimed that it distributed royalty payments four times to the singer who is popular with the song Teringin, since August 2023. However, RPM did not disclose the amount of royalty payments received by Shima. "RPM has distributed royalties four times to Shima with the latest payment in December last year. "All payments were made through the singer's bank account and we have proof of payment to each member. RPM has never discriminated against anyone and all members are treated equally," RPM said in a statement to Berita Harian yesterday. RPM was commenting on Shima's recent statement that she had only received RM2,000 in one instalment since becoming a member of the body. Shima or Ku Nazhatul Shima Ku Kamaruzzaman, 56, claimed that she had tried to contact RPM to seek clarification on the royalty payments but failed. In 2023, Shima was reported to have raised the same issue with RPM. Shima claimed that the RPM management told her that they were collecting information from radio stations and karaoke centres on the use of her works before royalties could be distributed. "RPM calls on members to register their songs. Royalty payments are based on the use of their songs. Members cannot assume that all registered songs will be paid royalties automatically. "If a song is played on radio stations and by karaoke centres, the management of such radio stations and karaoke centres must ensure that reports submitted to RPM contain records or information on the use of the song," said RPM. RPM stated that they had never received a call from Shima.
