Latest news with #Redbubble
AU Financial Review
3 days ago
- Business
- AU Financial Review
Star chair Anne Ward's other sharemarket dumpster fire
Star Entertainment chairwoman Anne Ward attended 45 board meetings (of a possible 46) of the distressed casino operator in the 2024 financial year. It's surely one of the busiest director schedules on the ASX. Necessitated by Star Entertainment being a dumpster fire (which might be unfair to dumpsters and/or fires). Less known is that Ward is also chairwoman of the ASX-listed Articore Group, the ecommerce operator of Redbubble. She joined as a director in 2018.
Business Mayor
25-04-2025
- Entertainment
- Business Mayor
Sydney woman who sold a cartoon cat T-shirt told to pay US$100,000 in Grumpy Cat copyright case
Alda Curtis, a 63-year-old counselling student from Sydney, set up a Redbubble store as a hobby, including selling a T-shirt featuring an unhappy cat cartoon. After years of running the store, a single sale of that T-shirt resulted in a US$100,000 default judgment against her for infringing on the trademark of Grumpy Cat late last year. Then Curtis noticed nearly US$600 had been taken from her PayPal account. Grumpy Cat, also known as Tardar Sauce, shot to internet fame in 2012 due to her permanently grumpy facial expressions that were caused by a permanent underbite and feline dwarfism. The American domestic cat became a symbol for everyone on the internet who felt disgruntled about life, with millions of followers on social media, memes, merchandise including clothing and soft toys, and even a fragrance. At the peak of the cat's fame in 2014, the film Grumpy Cat's Worst Christmas Ever was released. It starred the grumpy cat herself, voiced by Aubrey Plaza. Rotten Tomatoes gives the film an aggregate score of 27%. The world of internet stardom moves on quickly, however, and Grumpy Cat's fame has dimmed since Tardar Sauce died in 2019, aged 7. But the ghost of the frowny feline still haunts anyone trying to sell a product that could be confused with the real Grumpy Cat. The owner of the Grumpy Cat trademark is ever vigilant for unauthorised products sold online. Last year, Grumpy Cat Ltd filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against more than 200 online sellers in an Ohio court. They sought damages for products sold on sites such as RedBubble that allegedly infringed on the trademark. Alda Curtis, 63, received a default judgment against her for a T-shirt sold on RedBubble. Photograph: Supplied In September last year, the court ruled a default judgment in favour of Grumpy Cat Ltd. The company was awarded damages of US$100,000 per defendant. If the payments were made in full, the company would win more than US$24m. The sellers have also been restrained from continuing to sell the products identified, forcing the removal from the online stores. Curtis set up a Redbubble store as a hobby while studying counselling in the northern suburbs of Sydney, Australia. She first became aware of the Grumpy Cat Ltd case against her two weeks after the default judgment in Ohio. The problem for Curtis was one item she sold: a T-shirt of a frowning purple and yellow cat. She said the sale had been made just before the US lawsuit was launched against her. The T-shirt had sat unsold for years on her site. The design for the T-shirt had been licensed from a design website, titled 'Grumpy Cat Pattern Graphic T-shirt'. Curtis earned just over US$1 from the sale. In the six years she had been running her store, she had generated about US$200 in revenue. Curtis said she had 'absolutely no intentions' of infringing the trademark. 'I've seen a picture of that cat, but I didn't even cross my mind that was in any copyright infringement or anything like that,' she said. 'So it was totally just a fluke, and they're taking advantage of that. If everyone in the world is going to be not allowed to call [a design] Happy Cat, Grumpy Cat, feathered cat, or whatever it might be … where does it end?' In February, a few months after the ruling, Curtis discovered US$592.75 was missing from her PayPal account, without explanation. After multiple attempts to contact PayPal to try to get the money back, Curtis said PayPal referred her to Grumpy Cat's lawyers. Others across the globe have found themselves in similar situations. There are posts on Reddit asking what to do after finding a default judgment has been made against them. 'I had no idea 'Grumpy Cat' was a thing. 'Grumpy Cat' was not even mentioned on my design neither looked my design like their stupid cat,' one poster said. Prof Graeme Austin, chair in private law at Victoria University in New Zealand, said US trademark law gives courts powers to impose tough damages awards in infringement cases, including statutory damages of up to US$200,000. 'Wholesale default judgment proceedings in trademark and copyright cases are a familiar strategy for intellectual property owners,' he said. skip past newsletter promotion Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025 Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. after newsletter promotion 'They can be a useful tool for trademark owners – but they risk imposing very harsh remedies on individual defendants who might have had good defences if they had acted sooner.' Austin said such cases were not unusual, and it was important for anyone served with a complaint to act quickly. 'The last thing you want is to be swept up in proceedings against a large group of other defendants. You want to be in the position to raise any defences as early as possible.' Curtis said it could be a case of what has been termed 'SAD Scheme'. In a 2023 Columbia Law Review Forum article, Prof Eric Goldman described the 'Schedule A Defendants Scheme' in the northern district of Illinois – where the Grumpy Cat case was filed – targeting online merchants in China, mostly. Goldman said the scheme allowed rights owners 'to extract settlements from online merchants without satisfying basic procedural safeguards like serving the complaint and establishing personal jurisdiction over defendants'. Goldberg argued the scheme 'goes far beyond just curbing online infringement and instead causes substantial harm to innocent merchants'. Australian copyright law expert Fiona Phillips said the US-based PayPal taking the US$592.75 from Curtis's account was the company enforcing its user agreement, which outlines funds may be taken in response to a court order. 'It is an interesting development in the enforcement of IP across national borders and a further reason for people to pay more attention to the terms and conditions,' she said. Curtis is now battling to have the default judgment vacated. In response to her filing in the court, lawyers for Grumpy Cat have argued that service was made to Curtis' Gmail account on 2 May 2024, and have sought to have the motion dismissed on the grounds that Curtis has filed the motion under her name, not in the name of the online seller name she had used. The company also argued that the trademark infringement was due to the name of the product being 'Grumpy Cat Pattern Graphic T-Shirt'. Curtis said a search of her inbox shows no email from the lawyers until the first one she received in September. A ruling has yet to be made. Lawyers for Grumpy Cat offered to settle the case for US$1,000 in an email to Curtis in March, seen by Guardian Australia. Users on Reddit have reported similar offers. In 2018, Grumpy Cat Ltd won $750,000 in damages from a US coffee company for violating the terms of their agreement to use the cat's image on a line of iced coffee drinks called 'Grumppuccinos'. Grumpy Cat's owners said the company had 'blatantly infringed' their copyrights and trademarks when they began selling roasted coffee and Grumppucino T-shirts featuring Tardar Sauce's face. As of 2024, it was reported that Grumpy Cat Ltd had filed more than 50 lawsuits related to the use of Grumpy Cat in unauthorised merchandise. Grumpy Cat's lawyers and PayPal were contacted for comment.
The Guardian
25-04-2025
- Entertainment
- The Guardian
Sydney woman who sold a cartoon cat T-shirt told to pay US$100,000 in Grumpy Cat copyright case
Alda Curtis, a 63-year-old counselling student from Sydney, set up a Redbubble store as a hobby, including selling a T-shirt featuring an unhappy cat cartoon. After years of running the store, a single sale of that T-shirt resulted in a US$100,000 default judgment against her for infringing on the trademark of Grumpy Cat late last year. Then Curtis noticed nearly US$600 had been taken from her PayPal account. Grumpy Cat, also known as Tardar Sauce, shot to internet fame in 2012 due to her permanently grumpy facial expressions that were caused by a permanent underbite and feline dwarfism. The American domestic cat became a symbol for everyone on the internet who felt disgruntled about life, with millions of followers on social media, memes, merchandise including clothing and soft toys, and even a fragrance. At the peak of the cat's fame in 2014, the film Grumpy Cat's Worst Christmas Ever was released. It starred the grumpy cat herself, voiced by Aubrey Plaza. Rotten Tomatoes gives the film an aggregate score of 27%. The world of internet stardom moves on quickly, however, and Grumpy Cat's fame has dimmed since Tardar Sauce died in 2019, aged 7. But the ghost of the frowny feline still haunts anyone trying to sell a product that could be confused with the real Grumpy Cat. The owner of the Grumpy Cat trademark is ever vigilant for unauthorised products sold online. Last year, Grumpy Cat Ltd filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against more than 200 online sellers in an Ohio court. They sought damages for products sold on sites such as RedBubble that allegedly infringed on the trademark. Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter In September last year, the court ruled a default judgment in favour of Grumpy Cat Ltd. The company was awarded damages of US$100,000 per defendant. If the payments were made in full, the company would win more than US$24m. The sellers have also been restrained from continuing to sell the products identified, forcing the removal from the online stores. Curtis set up a Redbubble store as a hobby while studying counselling in the northern suburbs of Sydney, Australia. She first became aware of the Grumpy Cat Ltd case against her two weeks after the default judgment in Ohio. The problem for Curtis was one item she sold: a T-shirt of a frowning purple and yellow cat. She said the sale had been made just before the US lawsuit was launched against her. The T-shirt had sat unsold for years on her site. The design for the T-shirt had been licensed from a design website, titled 'Grumpy Cat Pattern Graphic T-shirt'. Curtis earned just over US$1 from the sale. In the six years she had been running her store, she had generated about US$200 in revenue. Curtis said she had 'absolutely no intentions' of infringing the trademark. 'I've seen a picture of that cat, but I didn't even cross my mind that was in any copyright infringement or anything like that,' she said. 'So it was totally just a fluke, and they're taking advantage of that. If everyone in the world is going to be not allowed to call [a design] Happy Cat, Grumpy Cat, feathered cat, or whatever it might be … where does it end?' In February, a few months after the ruling, Curtis discovered US$592.75 was missing from her PayPal account, without explanation. After multiple attempts to contact PayPal to try to get the money back, Curtis said PayPal referred her to Grumpy Cat's lawyers. Others across the globe have found themselves in similar situations. There are posts on Reddit asking what to do after finding a default judgment has been made against them. 'I had no idea 'Grumpy Cat' was a thing. 'Grumpy Cat' was not even mentioned on my design neither looked my design like their stupid cat,' one poster said. Prof Graeme Austin, chair in private law at Victoria University in New Zealand, said US trademark law gives courts powers to impose tough damages awards in infringement cases, including statutory damages of up to US$200,000. 'Wholesale default judgment proceedings in trademark and copyright cases are a familiar strategy for intellectual property owners,' he said. Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025 Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'They can be a useful tool for trademark owners – but they risk imposing very harsh remedies on individual defendants who might have had good defences if they had acted sooner.' Austin said such cases were not unusual, and it was important for anyone served with a complaint to act quickly. 'The last thing you want is to be swept up in proceedings against a large group of other defendants. You want to be in the position to raise any defences as early as possible.' Curtis said it could be a case of what has been termed 'SAD Scheme'. In a 2023 Columbia Law Review Forum article, Prof Eric Goldman described the 'Schedule A Defendants Scheme' in the northern district of Illinois – where the Grumpy Cat case was filed – targeting online merchants in China, mostly. Goldman said the scheme allowed rights owners 'to extract settlements from online merchants without satisfying basic procedural safeguards like serving the complaint and establishing personal jurisdiction over defendants'. Goldberg argued the scheme 'goes far beyond just curbing online infringement and instead causes substantial harm to innocent merchants'. Australian copyright law expert Fiona Phillips said the US-based PayPal taking the US$592.75 from Curtis's account was the company enforcing its user agreement, which outlines funds may be taken in response to a court order. 'It is an interesting development in the enforcement of IP across national borders and a further reason for people to pay more attention to the terms and conditions,' she said. Curtis is now battling to have the default judgment vacated. In response to her filing in the court, lawyers for Grumpy Cat have argued that service was made to Curtis' Gmail account on 2 May 2024, and have sought to have the motion dismissed on the grounds that Curtis has filed the motion under her name, not in the name of the online seller name she had used. The company also argued that the trademark infringement was due to the name of the product being 'Grumpy Cat Pattern Graphic T-Shirt'. Curtis said a search of her inbox shows no email from the lawyers until the first one she received in September. A ruling has yet to be made. Lawyers for Grumpy Cat offered to settle the case for US$1,000 in an email to Curtis in March, seen by Guardian Australia. Users on Reddit have reported similar offers. In 2018, Grumpy Cat Ltd won $750,000 in damages from a US coffee company for violating the terms of their agreement to use the cat's image on a line of iced coffee drinks called 'Grumppuccinos'. Grumpy Cat's owners said the company had 'blatantly infringed' their copyrights and trademarks when they began selling roasted coffee and Grumppucino T-shirts featuring Tardar Sauce's face. As of 2024, it was reported that Grumpy Cat Ltd had filed more than 50 lawsuits related to the use of Grumpy Cat in unauthorised merchandise. Grumpy Cat's lawyers and PayPal were contacted for comment.
Yahoo
10-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
February 2025's ASX Penny Stocks With Growth Potential
The Australian stock market has faced a slight downturn, with the ASX200 down 0.36% amid concerns over new tariffs on aluminium and steel imposed by the Trump administration. Despite these challenges, certain sectors like Utilities and Health Care have shown resilience, highlighting opportunities for investors to explore undervalued segments of the market. Penny stocks, often representing smaller or newer companies, remain a relevant investment area; when backed by strong financials and fundamentals, they can offer growth potential at lower price points. Name Share Price Market Cap Financial Health Rating Embark Early Education (ASX:EVO) A$0.77 A$141.28M ★★★★☆☆ LaserBond (ASX:LBL) A$0.57 A$66.88M ★★★★★★ EZZ Life Science Holdings (ASX:EZZ) A$1.90 A$89.63M ★★★★★★ Austin Engineering (ASX:ANG) A$0.495 A$306.97M ★★★★★☆ MaxiPARTS (ASX:MXI) A$1.92 A$106.21M ★★★★★★ Dusk Group (ASX:DSK) A$1.065 A$66.32M ★★★★★★ Helloworld Travel (ASX:HLO) A$2.04 A$332.15M ★★★★★★ SHAPE Australia (ASX:SHA) A$3.00 A$248.73M ★★★★★★ IVE Group (ASX:IGL) A$2.19 A$339.21M ★★★★☆☆ Vita Life Sciences (ASX:VLS) A$1.90 A$105.71M ★★★★★★ Click here to see the full list of 1,031 stocks from our ASX Penny Stocks screener. Here we highlight a subset of our preferred stocks from the screener. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★☆ Overview: Articore Group Limited operates as an online marketplace for art and design products across Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and internationally, with a market cap of A$68.15 million. Operations: The company generates revenue of A$492.99 million from its Redbubble and Teepublic marketplaces. Market Cap: A$68.15M Articore Group Limited, with a market cap of A$68.15 million, operates as an online marketplace generating A$492.99 million in revenue from its Redbubble and Teepublic platforms. Despite being debt-free and having a sufficient cash runway for over three years, the company remains unprofitable with increasing losses over the past five years at 20.5% annually. Its short-term assets do not cover short-term liabilities, reflecting potential liquidity challenges. The management team is experienced but the board is relatively new, which may impact strategic stability amid recent executive changes like Ben Heap's temporary leave from the board. Click to explore a detailed breakdown of our findings in Articore Group's financial health report. Examine Articore Group's earnings growth report to understand how analysts expect it to perform. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: Imugene Limited is a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company based in Australia that focuses on developing immunotherapies to activate the immune system for treating and eradicating tumors, with a market cap of approximately A$275.93 million. Operations: The company's revenue segment is focused on the research, development, and commercialisation of health technologies, generating A$4.97 million. Market Cap: A$275.93M Imugene Limited, with a market cap of A$275.93 million, remains pre-revenue and unprofitable, with losses increasing at 54.1% annually over the past five years. Despite this, the company is debt-free and has short-term assets of A$113 million exceeding both short-term liabilities (A$29.3 million) and long-term liabilities (A$3.8 million), indicating financial stability in covering obligations. Recent capital raises through private placements and convertible notes have bolstered its cash runway to approximately 11 months based on free cash flow estimates, providing a buffer to continue its research activities while navigating profitability challenges amid management turnover. Get an in-depth perspective on Imugene's performance by reading our balance sheet health report here. Gain insights into Imugene's outlook and expected performance with our report on the company's earnings estimates. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★☆ Overview: OM Holdings Limited is an investment holding company involved in the mining, smelting, trading, and marketing of manganese ores and ferroalloys globally, with a market cap of A$267.51 million. Operations: The company's revenue primarily comes from its Smelting segment, which generated $441.70 million, and its Marketing and Trading segment, contributing $631.02 million. Market Cap: A$267.51M OM Holdings Limited, with a market cap of A$267.51 million, is trading significantly below its estimated fair value and maintains a satisfactory net debt to equity ratio of 34.5%. The company's short-term assets exceed both long-term liabilities and short-term liabilities, indicating strong liquidity. However, interest payments are not well covered by EBIT, suggesting potential financial strain if earnings do not improve. Recent reports show stable production and sales figures for ferrosilicon and manganese alloys in 2024, with production guidance for 2025 set between 170,000-190,000 tonnes for ferrosilicon and 270,000-300,000 tonnes for manganese alloys. Click here to discover the nuances of OM Holdings with our detailed analytical financial health report. Review our growth performance report to gain insights into OM Holdings' future. Take a closer look at our ASX Penny Stocks list of 1,031 companies by clicking here. Are you invested in these stocks already? Keep abreast of every twist and turn by setting up a portfolio with Simply Wall St, where we make it simple for investors like you to stay informed and proactive. Take control of your financial future using Simply Wall St, offering free, in-depth knowledge of international markets to every investor. Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention. Jump on the AI train with fast growing tech companies forging a new era of innovation. Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include ASX:ATG ASX:IMU and ASX:OMH. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
10-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
February 2025's ASX Penny Stocks With Growth Potential
The Australian stock market has faced a slight downturn, with the ASX200 down 0.36% amid concerns over new tariffs on aluminium and steel imposed by the Trump administration. Despite these challenges, certain sectors like Utilities and Health Care have shown resilience, highlighting opportunities for investors to explore undervalued segments of the market. Penny stocks, often representing smaller or newer companies, remain a relevant investment area; when backed by strong financials and fundamentals, they can offer growth potential at lower price points. Name Share Price Market Cap Financial Health Rating Embark Early Education (ASX:EVO) A$0.77 A$141.28M ★★★★☆☆ LaserBond (ASX:LBL) A$0.57 A$66.88M ★★★★★★ EZZ Life Science Holdings (ASX:EZZ) A$1.90 A$89.63M ★★★★★★ Austin Engineering (ASX:ANG) A$0.495 A$306.97M ★★★★★☆ MaxiPARTS (ASX:MXI) A$1.92 A$106.21M ★★★★★★ Dusk Group (ASX:DSK) A$1.065 A$66.32M ★★★★★★ Helloworld Travel (ASX:HLO) A$2.04 A$332.15M ★★★★★★ SHAPE Australia (ASX:SHA) A$3.00 A$248.73M ★★★★★★ IVE Group (ASX:IGL) A$2.19 A$339.21M ★★★★☆☆ Vita Life Sciences (ASX:VLS) A$1.90 A$105.71M ★★★★★★ Click here to see the full list of 1,031 stocks from our ASX Penny Stocks screener. Here we highlight a subset of our preferred stocks from the screener. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★☆ Overview: Articore Group Limited operates as an online marketplace for art and design products across Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and internationally, with a market cap of A$68.15 million. Operations: The company generates revenue of A$492.99 million from its Redbubble and Teepublic marketplaces. Market Cap: A$68.15M Articore Group Limited, with a market cap of A$68.15 million, operates as an online marketplace generating A$492.99 million in revenue from its Redbubble and Teepublic platforms. Despite being debt-free and having a sufficient cash runway for over three years, the company remains unprofitable with increasing losses over the past five years at 20.5% annually. Its short-term assets do not cover short-term liabilities, reflecting potential liquidity challenges. The management team is experienced but the board is relatively new, which may impact strategic stability amid recent executive changes like Ben Heap's temporary leave from the board. Click to explore a detailed breakdown of our findings in Articore Group's financial health report. Examine Articore Group's earnings growth report to understand how analysts expect it to perform. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: Imugene Limited is a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company based in Australia that focuses on developing immunotherapies to activate the immune system for treating and eradicating tumors, with a market cap of approximately A$275.93 million. Operations: The company's revenue segment is focused on the research, development, and commercialisation of health technologies, generating A$4.97 million. Market Cap: A$275.93M Imugene Limited, with a market cap of A$275.93 million, remains pre-revenue and unprofitable, with losses increasing at 54.1% annually over the past five years. Despite this, the company is debt-free and has short-term assets of A$113 million exceeding both short-term liabilities (A$29.3 million) and long-term liabilities (A$3.8 million), indicating financial stability in covering obligations. Recent capital raises through private placements and convertible notes have bolstered its cash runway to approximately 11 months based on free cash flow estimates, providing a buffer to continue its research activities while navigating profitability challenges amid management turnover. Get an in-depth perspective on Imugene's performance by reading our balance sheet health report here. Gain insights into Imugene's outlook and expected performance with our report on the company's earnings estimates. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★☆ Overview: OM Holdings Limited is an investment holding company involved in the mining, smelting, trading, and marketing of manganese ores and ferroalloys globally, with a market cap of A$267.51 million. Operations: The company's revenue primarily comes from its Smelting segment, which generated $441.70 million, and its Marketing and Trading segment, contributing $631.02 million. Market Cap: A$267.51M OM Holdings Limited, with a market cap of A$267.51 million, is trading significantly below its estimated fair value and maintains a satisfactory net debt to equity ratio of 34.5%. The company's short-term assets exceed both long-term liabilities and short-term liabilities, indicating strong liquidity. However, interest payments are not well covered by EBIT, suggesting potential financial strain if earnings do not improve. Recent reports show stable production and sales figures for ferrosilicon and manganese alloys in 2024, with production guidance for 2025 set between 170,000-190,000 tonnes for ferrosilicon and 270,000-300,000 tonnes for manganese alloys. Click here to discover the nuances of OM Holdings with our detailed analytical financial health report. Review our growth performance report to gain insights into OM Holdings' future. Take a closer look at our ASX Penny Stocks list of 1,031 companies by clicking here. Are you invested in these stocks already? Keep abreast of every twist and turn by setting up a portfolio with Simply Wall St, where we make it simple for investors like you to stay informed and proactive. Take control of your financial future using Simply Wall St, offering free, in-depth knowledge of international markets to every investor. Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention. Jump on the AI train with fast growing tech companies forging a new era of innovation. Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include ASX:ATG ASX:IMU and ASX:OMH. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Sign in to access your portfolio
