Latest news with #ReddingRecordSearchlight
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Land sinking in Red Bluff, Corning: What it means for Tehama and can it happen in Redding?
Parts of Tehama County, including areas around Red Bluff, Corning, and Antelope, are sinking. — a condition that could cause damage to infrastructure and deplete groundwater permanently if the ag-producing county does not reverse it, geologists say. For those who wonder, Redding and the rest of Shasta County aren't having the same problem, in part because Shasta's groundwater is replenished by the ACID Canal, flowing from the Sacramento River. It's also because Shasta doesn't have as much agriculture stressing the groundwater supply, according to groundwater experts in both counties' public works departments. Mid- to southwestern parts of Tehama County are suffering land subsidence, a drop in the Earth's crust when too much groundwater is removed. The soil collapses into the space left by the lack of water, making the ground above it sink. One cause is groundwater partially dried up during years of heavy drought. But the main issue in Tehama County is people are pumping too much water out of the ground in places like the Red Bluff and Corning sub-basins, said Justin Jenson, Tehama's public works deputy director. More than 90% of that pumped-out groundwater goes to the county's agriculture — mostly almond, walnut and pistachios orchards, Jenson said. If Tehama County doesn't take steps to reverse the problem, repercussions could be devastating, geologists say. Most land subsidence in California and other parts of the world is caused by humans pumping too much water out of the ground, according to U.S. Geological Survey. It's a slow process that can take years to become a disaster — and can take as long to fix, when fixes are still possible. Note to readers: If you appreciate the work we do here at the Redding Record Searchlight, please consider subscribing yourself or giving the gift of a subscription to someone you know. Subsidence compacted the ground in parts of the San Joaquin Valley, dropping ground level almost 30 feet in the 50 years between 1925 and 1977, according to USGS geologists. Even slight shifts in ground level can cause damage to buildings and infrastructure like bridges and overpasses, Jenson said. If left unchecked, land subsidence can permanently reduce the amount of groundwater an aquifer can hold by reducing its storage space. In worst cases, that could mean less to no groundwater for people, crops and wildlife living in the area, according to the USGS. Worst case scenarios also include holes and fissures opening up as the dry, brittle ground collapses. This happened in the Mojave Desert near the now-dry Lucerne Lake in San Bernardino County. Geologists reported fissures more than 3 feet deep and 3 feet wide opened up as the ground crumbled and collapsed. Shasta County is spared land subsidence for a few reasons, according to Shasta's Public Works Director Troy Bartolomei. First, Shasta has less agriculture pumping out groundwater. Second, the county's 'very large heavy aquifers' can replenish Shasta's groundwater faster than Tehama's. The third reason Shasta isn't sinking has to do with the way it irrigates valley farms south of Redding, toward the Tehama County line. Water flows from the Sacramento River via the ACID (Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District) canal. 'All that irrigation helps to charge the aquifer' and keep it healthy, Bartolomei said. More: After seeing land sinking in Red Bluff and Corning areas, Tehama County calls meeting ACID Canal serves approximately 800 customers and irrigates approximately 7,000 acres of farmland, according to the district's website. Future long-term drought or increasing demand for groundwater could change that delicate balance, so Shasta County participates in a voluntary groundwater monitoring program with other California counties. 'Because we have a healthy aquifer that recharges itself, we don't need expensive monitoring by the state' like Tehama County does, Bartolomei said. Tehama County's sinking problem could become irreversible if people don't make changes soon, according to Jenson. That's because as empty underground water channels fill with collapsed soil, the space for water sources to refill the underground reservoirs becomes smaller. Even during wet winters like 2024-25, there's less opportunity for those water sources to recharge those aquifers fast enough to save them. One of the areas losing groundwater the fastest is between Red Bluff and Corning, where there's a lot of competition for water, Jenson said. The good news, he said, is the problem is still likely reversible. However, it will take long-term community action to change it. That's because "both the cause of subsidence and the fix … take a really long time. If you don't pre-plan to resolve the issue then you can cause a future problem that you cannot fix." The Tehama County Board of Supervisors is trying to do just that, Jenson said. The board announced it will host a public meeting on Tuesday, June 3 to discuss possible solutions to the county's land subsidence problem. Tehama had "observable land subsidence on a scale that has never been recorded," county officials said in the announcement. Jessica Skropanic is a features reporter for the Record Searchlight/USA Today Network. She covers science, arts, social issues and news stories. Follow her on Twitter @RS_JSkropanic and on Facebook. Join Jessica in the Get Out! Nor Cal recreation Facebook group. To support and sustain this work, please subscribe today. Thank you. This article originally appeared on Redding Record Searchlight: Why Red Bluff, Corning are sinking but Redding in Shasta County is not
Yahoo
28-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
After seeing land sinking in Red Bluff and Corning areas, Tehama County calls meeting
Parts of Tehama County, including around Red Bluff, Corning and Antelope, are sinking, officials have discovered, prompting an emergency meeting to decide next steps to intervene. In a statement announcing the June 3 meeting, county officials said they found the mid- to southwestern part of Tehama had "observable land subsidence on a scale that has never been recorded." Land subsidence is a drop in the Earth's crust — sudden or gradual — into empty underground space, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. In Tehama County, some of the area's groundwater dried up during years of heavy drought, according to the announcement. The soil is now collapsing into the cavity left by the absent water, making the ground above it sink. Note to readers: If you appreciate the work we do here at the Redding Record Searchlight, please consider subscribing yourself or giving the gift of a subscription to someone you know. Other factors are further stressing what's left of the underground water supply, according to the county. These include changes in agricultural practices and less surface water available from lakes, creeks and other water bodies. As empty underground water channels fill with collapsed soil from above, the space available for water sources to fill them becomes smaller. That means even during wet years, when there's more water, there's less opportunity for those water sources to refill or 'recharge' those underground reservoirs fast enough to save them. All this doesn't bode well for county plans to expand agriculture wells in areas where the ground is sinking, the county reported in the announcement. The Tehama County Groundwater Sustainability Agency gave county supervisors the results of their findings after monitoring groundwater levels and rate of sinking. Supervisors plan to look at the agency's latest data, figure out how serious the situation is, look for possible solutions and intervene as needed, according to the county. The meeting — scheduled for 9 a.m. on Tuesday, June 3 in board chambers (727 Oak St., Red Bluff) — is a chance for residents to hear the results and participate in the discussion, the announcement said. People can get more information and submit comments to Tehama County Deputy Director of Public Works Justin Jenson at 530-690-0700, extension 201. They can also email Jenson at jjenson@ Jenson didn't return a phone call from the Record Searchlight late Tuesday afternoon. Land subsidence in other parts of California is most often caused by people pumping out the groundwater for a variety of uses. These include directing water to urban centers and using it for agriculture and industrial projects, according to the USGS. For more information about land subsidence in the state, go to Jessica Skropanic is a features reporter for the Record Searchlight/USA Today Network. She covers science, arts, social issues and news stories. Follow her on Twitter @RS_JSkropanic and on Facebook. Join Jessica in the Get Out! Nor Cal recreation Facebook group. To support and sustain this work, please subscribe today. Thank you. This article originally appeared on Redding Record Searchlight: Tehama finds land is sinking in Red Bluff, Corning areas after drought
Yahoo
27-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
22 California cities north of Sacramento with slight population losses
Redding and 21 other far Northern California cities lost residents over the past year, even as the state's overall population grew. Redding got a slight population boost during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown and when state sanctions were in place; but those population gains were gone as of Jan. 1, 2025, according to state Department of Finance population estimates, released in May. While Redding lost the same number of residents or more than all but one North State city on the list, that loss made a smaller dent in the city's overall population. The Shasta County seat is home to 93,534 people, more than than any other city on the list. Anderson and Shasta Lake in Shasta County, too, were among 240 California cities where the population went down. More: 12 California cities in North Coast, North State that are growing Note to readers: If you appreciate the work we do here at the Redding Record Searchlight, please consider subscribing yourself or giving the gift of a subscription to someone you know. Montague, Mount Shasta, Fort Jones, Etna, Tulelake, Dorris and Dunsmuir: These Siskiyou County cities saw small declines in their population ranging from five people each in Etna, Fort Jones and Montague to 15 in Dunsmuir and 23 in Mount Shasta. Anderson, Redding and Shasta Lake: These Shasta County cities each saw population declines that ranged from 76 people in Shasta Lake and 81 each in Anderson and Redding. Gridley and Biggs: These Butte County cities each saw population declines that ranged from 25 people in Biggs and 81 in Gridley. Grass Valley and Nevada City: These Nevada County cities each saw population declines that ranged from 29 in Nevada City to 97 in Grass Valley. Eureka, Fortuna, Ferndale, Trinidad, Blue Lake and Rio Dell: These Humboldt County cities each saw population declines that ranged from 50 people in Eureka and 47 in Fortuna to 6 in Ferndale and 2 in Trinidad. Alturas: This Modoc County city saw a population decline of 5 people. Williams: This Colusa County city saw a population decline of 27 people. More: Shasta County sees more people leave while California population rebounds post-COVID Jessica Skropanic is a features reporter for the Record Searchlight/USA Today Network. She covers science, arts, social issues and news stories. Follow her on Twitter @RS_JSkropanic and on Facebook. Join Jessica in the Get Out! Nor Cal recreation Facebook group. To support and sustain this work, please subscribe today. Thank you. This article originally appeared on Redding Record Searchlight: Redding, other far Northern California cities losing population
Yahoo
27-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
12 California cities in North Coast, North State that are growing
California's population grew for a second year. It's now home to approximately 39,529,101 people, according to state population data released in May. That means the Golden State recouped almost all of the population it lost in 2020 and 2021 — an estimated 358,543 people. It started 2025 with just 9,122 fewer residents than it had in 2020, state Department of Finance population estimates show. Pockets of growth were spread across far Northern California or the North State and North Coast. Among cities that saw significant growth was Paradise in the Sierra foothills of Butte County, in a sign of ongoing rebuilding since the Camp Fire in 2018 leveled the town. Overall, 241 California cities had population gains, while 240 other cities saw declines and one — Morro Bay in San Luis Obispo County — saw no change, the report found. Note to readers: If you appreciate the work we do here at the Redding Record Searchlight, please consider subscribing yourself or giving the gift of a subscription to someone you know. More: Shasta County sees more people leave while California population rebounds post-COVID Crescent City: This Del Norte County community picked up 468 new residents and saw its population increase to 6,056, an 8.38% growth since 2024. Paradise: This Butte County city gained 805 new residents and saw its population increase to 11,088, a 7.83% growth since 2024. Susanville: This Lassen County city picked up 766 new residents and saw its population increase to 12,270, a 6.66% growth since 2024. Chico: This Butte County city, and Redding's larger neighbor to the south, gained 2,876 new residents and saw its population increase to 113,847, a 2.59% growth since 2024. Oroville: This Butte County city gained 432 new residents and saw its population increase to 19,653, a 2.25% growth since 2024. Arcata: This Humboldt County city gained 310 new residents and saw its population increase to 19,001, a 1.66% growth since 2024. Willows: This Glenn County city gained 103 new residents and saw its population increase to 6,475, a 1.62% growth since 2024. Corning: This Tehama County city gained 106 new residents and saw its population increase to 8,268, a 1.30% growth since 2024. Yuba: This Sutter County city gained 672 new residents and saw its population increase to 70,453, a 0.96% growth since 2024. Yreka: This Siskiyou County city gained 50 new residents and saw its population increase to 7,879, a 0.64% growth since 2024. Live Oak: This Sutter County city gained 56 new residents and saw its population increase to 9,658, a 0.58% growth since 2024. Woodland: This Yolo County city gained 217 new residents and saw its population increase to 61,623, a 0.35% growth since 2024. More: 22 California cities north of Sacramento with slight population losses Jessica Skropanic is a features reporter for the Record Searchlight/USA Today Network. She covers science, arts, social issues and news stories. Follow her on Twitter @RS_JSkropanic and on Facebook. Join Jessica in the Get Out! Nor Cal recreation Facebook group. To support and sustain this work, please subscribe today. Thank you. This article originally appeared on Redding Record Searchlight: Which California cities are growing north of Sacramento?
Yahoo
17-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Shasta County home listings asked for more money in April; see current median price here
The median home in Shasta County listed for $444,475 in April, up 3.6% from the previous month's $429,000, an analysis of data from shows. Compared to April 2024, the median home list price slightly increased from $441,000. The statistics in this article only pertain to houses listed for sale in Shasta County, not houses that were sold. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at Shasta County's median home was 271 square feet, listed at $0.16 per square foot. The price per square foot of homes for sale is mostly unchanged from April 2024. Listings in Shasta County moved steadily, at a median 44 days listed compared to the April national median of 50 days on the market. In the previous month, homes had a median of 57 days on the market. Around 292 homes were newly listed on the market in April, a 5.2% decrease from 308 new listings in April 2024. The median home prices issued by may exclude many, or even most, of a market's homes. The price and volume represent only single-family homes, condominiums or townhomes. They include existing homes, but exclude most new construction as well as pending and contingent sales. In California, median home prices were $767,000, a slight increase from March. The median California home listed for sale had 28,552 square feet, with a price of $0.16 per square foot. Throughout the United States, the median home price was $431,250, a slight increase from the month prior. The median American home for sale was listed at 467,514 square feet, with a price of $0.18 per square foot. The median home list price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. Experts say the median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average list price, which would mean taking the sum of all listing prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high price. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on Redding Record Searchlight: Shasta County home listing prices up in April; see current median price
