logo
#

Latest news with #Rhyne

Today's NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints, Answers for July 30 #310
Today's NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints, Answers for July 30 #310

CNET

time29-07-2025

  • Entertainment
  • CNET

Today's NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints, Answers for July 30 #310

Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here for today's Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle and Strands puzzles. The purple category for Connections: Sports Edition was extra sneaky today. The theme went right over my head, but made sense once it was revealed. Read on for hints and the answers if you run into problems like I did. Connections: Sports Edition is out of beta now, making its debut on Super Bowl Sunday, Feb. 9. That's a sign that the game has earned enough loyal players that The Athletic, the subscription-based sports journalism site owned by the Times, will continue to publish it. It doesn't show up in the NYT Games app but now appears in The Athletic's own app. Or you can continue to play it free online. Read more: NYT Connections: Sports Edition Puzzle Comes Out of Beta Hints for today's Connections: Sports Edition groups Here are four hints for the groupings in today's Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group. Yellow group hint: Your ticket off the field. Green group hint: Links groups. Blue group hint: Georgia on my mind. Purple group hint: Hoops groups. Answers for today's Connections: Sports Edition groups Yellow group: Types of outs in baseball/softball. Green group: Professional golf tours. Blue group: First names of Atlanta sports stars. Purple group: Starts of NBA team names. Read more: Wordle Cheat Sheet: Here Are the Most Popular Letters Used in English Words What are today's Connections: Sports Edition answers? The completed NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle for July 30, 2025. NYT/Screenshot by CNET The yellow words in today's Connections The theme is types of outs in baseball/softball. The four answers are fly, force, strike and tag. The green words in today's Connections The theme is professional golf tours. The four answers are Korn Ferry, LIV, LPGA and PGA. The blue words in today's Connections The theme is first names of Atlanta sports stars. The four answers are Bijan, Rhyne, Ronald and Trae. The purple words in today's Connections The theme is starts of NBA team names. The four answers are Kin, Pac, Tim and Wiz.

Spartanburg County Sheriff's race up to five candidates
Spartanburg County Sheriff's race up to five candidates

Yahoo

time04-06-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Spartanburg County Sheriff's race up to five candidates

A fifth candidate has announced his plan to run for Spartanburg County Sheriff. Bill Rhyne is a former United States Marine who went on to serve as a deputy in the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office. He later worked for the South Carolina Highway Patrol. In an announcement on social media, Rhyne said, 'This campaign isn't about politics: it's about making sure our communities are safe, heard, and respected. It's about being present, well-reasoned in our actions, and building a Sheriff's Office that serves every corner of Spartanburg County.' Filing for the special election to replace former Sheriff Chuck Wright, who resigned in May, will be from June 13 to June 21. Rhyne joins four others who have declared their plans to run: Nick Duncan, who served for almost 10 years in the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office before taking on Wright in the 2024 Republican primary. Randy Hollifield, who served in the Army before going into law enforcement in 1982 as a member of the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office. Andy Clark, a former member of the City of Spartanburg police department who retired from the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office. Joseph Hawes, police chief of Pacolet and a former staff member at the United States Department of Defense. More: 'It's so disappointing:' Spartanburg County residents react to Chuck Wright's resignation There will be a primary election on Aug. 5. A runoff will take place on Aug. 19, if needed, according to John Baucom, director of Spartanburg County Voter Registration and Elections. The special election is set for Nov. 4. This article originally appeared on Herald-Journal: A fifth candidate for Spartanburg County Sheriff emerges

Bill to make homeless shelters 'drug free' receives House approval
Bill to make homeless shelters 'drug free' receives House approval

Yahoo

time16-04-2025

  • Health
  • Yahoo

Bill to make homeless shelters 'drug free' receives House approval

Homeless residents pack to leave after being ordered to vacate privately-owned property south of downtown Raleigh. High rents and deposit fee requirements are making it impossible for hundreds of thousands of low-income Americans to gain access to a permanent residence. (Photo: Greg Childress) The House approved a bill Tuesday to make homeless shelters 'drug-free zones.' Under House Bill 437, it would be a felony to manufacture, sell or deliver controlled substances in such areas and service providers would be held responsible if they 'intentionally' allow such activities within 100 feet of their properties. HB 437 was sent to the Senate for its consideration. Rep. Heather Rhyne (R-Lincoln) said the bill is needed because the state's homeless population is under regular threat from dealers seeking to sell them controlled substances. 'By making homeless shelters drug-free zones, we reduce the opportunity for these criminal elements to further victimize the homeless while holding operators of these facilities accountable,' said Rhyne, a bill cosponsor. 'Providing a safe and secure environment where treatment is provided and the people can get the help they need to become self-dependent is the focus of the bill.' Rhyne noted that HB 437 also requires signs designating them as drug-free zones. She said shelters needing anonymity such as those serving victims of domestic violence would be allowed to place signs inside front entrances. The House approved the legislation over the objection of service providers, 140 of which signed a letter opposing the bill. Rep. Julia Greenfield (D-Mecklenburg) shared part of the letter with colleagues. 'As a nurse who was always working in the trenches, I kind of believe it's important to listen to those who are working in the trenches and to take into consideration their concerns,' Greenfield said. She said service providers support the larger intent of HB 437 to keep drug dealers away from facilities serving people experiencing homelessness. They are concerned, however, that the bill would hold service providers criminally responsible for 'intentionally allowing' drug dealing to takes place within 100 feet of their property. Greenfield read this passage from the letter: 'This implication that service providers are the enemy in working to keep those we serve safe instead of a partner in an incredibly challenging effort to provide both welcoming and safe space is incredibly hurtful and disappointing. This work carries enough risk without the threat of a felony conviction and jail time, depending on how someone interprets 'intentionally allows.' Service providers are also concerned about the expenses of possibly having to hire armed security and fencing off property to ensure criminal drug activity doesn't take place. 'If the General Assembly would like to work to protect those we serve, homeless service providers would welcome specialized funding to support the personal and design enhancements to improve safety on our campuses,' the service providers said in the letter to lawmakers. Rep. Allen Chesser (R-Nash) said service providers' words 'fall flat' because the bill speaks to possession with intent to sell and deliver drugs, not simple possession. 'So, we're not sending the users, the end users to jail with this, we're targeting dealers,' Chesser said. He said the burden will be on law enforcement officials to prove a facility is 'intentionally allowing' drug sells to take place. 'There's going to be footage. There's going to be investigations,' Chesser said. 'This isn't something that's going to be fly by night. We're trying to protect a very vulnerable population.' Last week, Dr. Latonya Agard, executive director of the North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness, shared concerns about HB 437 during a rally at the legislature to lobby for affordable housing. 'I think this is unconscionable because it places and unfair burden on those facilities to increase security, to figure out what this means, to reestablish relationships that are trustworthy within the community,' Agard said.

Virginia Lottery set to lower disclosure amount for winners
Virginia Lottery set to lower disclosure amount for winners

Yahoo

time14-03-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Virginia Lottery set to lower disclosure amount for winners

Virginia Lottery offices in Richmond. (Photo by Parker Michels-Boyce for The Virginia Mercury) By Marlin Adams/VCU Capital News Service RICHMOND, Va. – Lawmakers this session voted to lower the Virginia Lottery disclosure amount to provide more privacy to big ticket winners. Del. Scott Wyatt, R-Mechanicsville, introduced House Bill 1799, which protects the personal information of $1 million or more lottery winners. Virginia Lottery winners are currently required to release personal information, including their name and photo, for any amount under $10 million. Forty-five states have lotteries, and 21 allow winners to stay anonymous, according to World Population Review, which tracks global population data and trends. Virginia requires the highest amount needed to stay anonymous. Those opposed to the bill believe the required disclosure adds needed transparency, while those in support cited examples of personal privacy breaches because of the current law. Megan Rhyne, executive director for the Virginia Coalition for Open Government, spoke against lowering the disclosure amount during the ABC-Gaming subcommittee meeting on Jan 14. The current law was established to promote the lottery and its winners; essentially for residents to see real Virginians winning real prizes, according to Rhyne. The current disclosure amount also supports state law that prevents Virginia Lottery board members, officers and employees from participating in the lottery, Rhyne said. This includes the purchase of tickets by any person residing in the same household of such a member. Disclosure can help prevent 'nefarious activities,' such as when a computer programmer working with the Multi-State Lottery Association rigged several lotteries and collected over $2 million in winnings, Rhyne said. Eddie Tipton pleaded guilty to rigging the lottery winnings in Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Oklahoma and Wisconsin, according to the Associated Press. He had help from his brother Tommy Tipton, a former Texas judge. The bill's sponsor told the House panel that a previous $1 million Virginia winner was the target of several scams, including on social media, after her identity was posted on the lottery's website. Virginia Lottery Executive Director Khalid Jones, spoke in support of Wyatt's bill. Any prize under $600 can be paid out at any participating lottery retailer. Anything over that limit, and winners are required to report it to the Virginia Lottery to claim the prize, according to Jones. The Virginia Lottery is responsible for verifying the identity and address of any winner over $600. 'We run those names through our internal system to ensure that they're not the members of the lottery playing themselves,' Jones said. This creates internal accountability, but FOIA gives the public a measure of external accountability, Rhyne said. Any winner whose prize value is $1 million or greater will not be disclosed through the Freedom of Information Act, which allows citizens to request the name, hometown and amount won of a lottery winner, according to the bill. That part of state law was previously set at $10 million or greater. Other U.S. states have varying disclosure amounts and rules. A handful of states do not allow any anonymity. In Michigan, players winning over $10,000 from in-state games are allowed to stay anonymous if they choose. In Florida, collecting any amount over $250,000 gives winners the option to have their personal information temporarily disclosed for 90 days after the winnings are collected. After 90 days their information is no longer private. Wyatt's bill sailed through the House with unanimous votes. Three Democrats and one Republican voted against it in the Senate. The bill currently sits with the governor, awaiting further action. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Virginia Lottery set to lower disclosure amount for winners
Virginia Lottery set to lower disclosure amount for winners

Yahoo

time14-03-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Virginia Lottery set to lower disclosure amount for winners

Virginia Lottery offices in Richmond. (Photo by Parker Michels-Boyce for The Virginia Mercury) By Marlin Adams/VCU Capital News Service RICHMOND, Va. – Lawmakers this session voted to lower the Virginia Lottery disclosure amount to provide more privacy to big ticket winners. Del. Scott Wyatt, R-Mechanicsville, introduced House Bill 1799, which protects the personal information of $1 million or more lottery winners. Virginia Lottery winners are currently required to release personal information, including their name and photo, for any amount under $10 million. Forty-five states have lotteries, and 21 allow winners to stay anonymous, according to World Population Review, which tracks global population data and trends. Virginia requires the highest amount needed to stay anonymous. Those opposed to the bill believe the required disclosure adds needed transparency, while those in support cited examples of personal privacy breaches because of the current law. Megan Rhyne, executive director for the Virginia Coalition for Open Government, spoke against lowering the disclosure amount during the ABC-Gaming subcommittee meeting on Jan 14. The current law was established to promote the lottery and its winners; essentially for residents to see real Virginians winning real prizes, according to Rhyne. The current disclosure amount also supports state law that prevents Virginia Lottery board members, officers and employees from participating in the lottery, Rhyne said. This includes the purchase of tickets by any person residing in the same household of such a member. Disclosure can help prevent 'nefarious activities,' such as when a computer programmer working with the Multi-State Lottery Association rigged several lotteries and collected over $2 million in winnings, Rhyne said. Eddie Tipton pleaded guilty to rigging the lottery winnings in Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Oklahoma and Wisconsin, according to the Associated Press. He had help from his brother Tommy Tipton, a former Texas judge. The bill's sponsor told the House panel that a previous $1 million Virginia winner was the target of several scams, including on social media, after her identity was posted on the lottery's website. Virginia Lottery Executive Director Khalid Jones, spoke in support of Wyatt's bill. Any prize under $600 can be paid out at any participating lottery retailer. Anything over that limit, and winners are required to report it to the Virginia Lottery to claim the prize, according to Jones. The Virginia Lottery is responsible for verifying the identity and address of any winner over $600. 'We run those names through our internal system to ensure that they're not the members of the lottery playing themselves,' Jones said. This creates internal accountability, but FOIA gives the public a measure of external accountability, Rhyne said. Any winner whose prize value is $1 million or greater will not be disclosed through the Freedom of Information Act, which allows citizens to request the name, hometown and amount won of a lottery winner, according to the bill. That part of state law was previously set at $10 million or greater. Other U.S. states have varying disclosure amounts and rules. A handful of states do not allow any anonymity. In Michigan, players winning over $10,000 from in-state games are allowed to stay anonymous if they choose. In Florida, collecting any amount over $250,000 gives winners the option to have their personal information temporarily disclosed for 90 days after the winnings are collected. After 90 days their information is no longer private. Wyatt's bill sailed through the House with unanimous votes. Three Democrats and one Republican voted against it in the Senate. The bill currently sits with the governor, awaiting further action. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store